vm.compileFunction throws an RangeError when invoked with options.lineOffset < 0

[CathyKMeow]

Version

v18.2.0

Platform

Linux localhost 5.17.0-rc7-asahi-next-20220310-5-2-ARCH #4 SMP PREEMPT Fri, 20 May 2022 00:28:08 +0000 aarch64 GNU/Linux

Subsystem

node:vm

What steps will reproduce the bug?

node -p 'vm.compileFunction("", [], { lineOffset: -1 })'

How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

Always, without conditions.

What is the expected behavior?

user@localhost:~$ node -p 'vm.compileFunction("", [], { lineOffset: -1 })'
[Function (anonymous)]

What do you see instead?

user@localhost:~$ node -p 'vm.compileFunction("", [], { lineOffset: -1 })'
node:internal/validators:110
 throw new ERR_OUT_OF_RANGE(name, `>= ${min} && < 4294967296`, value);
 ^

RangeError [ERR_OUT_OF_RANGE]: The value of "options.lineOffset" is out of range. It must be >= 0 && < 4294967296. Received -1
 at Object.compileFunction (node:vm:329:3)
 at [eval]:1:4
 at Script.runInThisContext (node:vm:129:12)
 at Object.runInThisContext (node:vm:305:38)
 at node:internal/process/execution:76:19
 at [eval]-wrapper:6:22
 at evalScript (node:internal/process/execution:75:60)
 at node:internal/main/eval_string:27:3 {
 code: 'ERR_OUT_OF_RANGE'
}

Node.js v18.2.0

Additional information

script.runInContext, runInContext, etc. accept options.lineOffset < 0.

user@localhost:~$ cat /etc/os-release 
NAME="Arch Linux ARM"
PRETTY_NAME="Arch Linux ARM"
ID=archarm
ID_LIKE=arch
BUILD_ID=rolling
ANSI_COLOR="38;2;23;147;209"
HOME_URL="https://archlinuxarm.org/"
DOCUMENTATION_URL="https://archlinuxarm.org/wiki"
SUPPORT_URL="https://archlinuxarm.org/forum"
BUG_REPORT_URL="https://github.com/archlinuxarm/PKGBUILDs/issues"
LOGO=archlinux-logo
user@localhost:~$ date
Wed May 25 10:54:30 PDT 2022
user@localhost:~$ sudo pacman -Syu
:: Synchronizing package databases...
 asahi is up to date
 core is up to date
 extra is up to date
 community is up to date
 alarm is up to date
 aur is up to date
:: Starting full system upgrade...
warning: rust: local (1:1.61.0-1.1) is newer than extra (1:1.61.0-1)
warning: rust-src: local (1:1.61.0-1.1) is newer than extra (1:1.61.0-1)
 there is nothing to do

[devsnek]

i think technically the bug here is that we allow negative numbers elsewhere.

[CathyKMeow]

But IMO negative number should be allowed, actually.

Here's my use case:

await vm.compileFunction(
 "return (async () => {\n" +
 (await fsp.readFile("something")).toString() +
 "\n})();",
 [], {
 lineOffset: -1,
 contextExtensions: [{ something: something }]
}) ();

[devsnek]

It seems like a better approach might be to support async function bodies in compileFunction instead?

[bnoordhuis]

Orthogonal issues? V8 deliberately supports negative line and column offsets, ergo, it seems reasonable to support them in node as well.

[CathyKMeow]

It seems like a better approach might be to support async function bodies in compileFunction instead?

Yes, but anyway we should support negative lineOffset. In most circumstances we add wrappers around the code, not remove parts of the code.
You can't expect

hing")).toString() +
 "\n})();",
 [], {
 lineOffset: -1,
 contextExtensions: [{ somethi

to work.
And, in the native part of vm,

node/src/node_contextify.cc

Line 1044 in a346572

int line_offset = args[2].As<Int32>()->Value();

node/src/node_contextify.cc

Line 1112 in a346572

line_offset, // line offset

node/deps/v8/include/v8-message.h

Line 65 in a346572

int resource_line_offset = 0,

lineOffset is a signed int32.

[sinkhaha]

@bnoordhuis @devsnek So this question should support negative numbers? I'm happy to submit a pull request - internalCompileFunction method in the verification lineOffset parameter, validateUint32 to validateInt32 on the line, right?

[bnoordhuis]

@sinkhaha yes, I believe so.

[sinkhaha]

@bnoordhuis After testing that 'lineOffset' supports negative numbers, stack failed to print the correct line number. For example, the following example passed the test

assert.throws(() => {
​ vm.compileFunction(
​ 'throw new Error("Sample Error")',
​ [],
​ { lineOffset: -1 }
​ )();
 }, {
​ message: 'Sample Error',
​ stack: 'Error: Sample Error\n at <anonymous>'
 });

I'm not sure if this behavior meets expectations. If stack is changed to "Error: Sample Error\n at :0:7", the test will not pass. I'm not sure it makes sense to support negative numbers.

[fhinkel]

Closed via #49855