Single Executable Application tests often fail on RISC-V #61110

Open
Open
Single Executable Application tests often fail on RISC-V#61110
Labels
riscv64Issues and PRs related to the 64-bit RISC-V architecture.single-executableIssues and PRs related to single-executable applications.

Description

@sxa
sxa
opened on Dec 18, 2025

The SEA tests are failing in many cases. The symptoms are different depending on the hardware. Using a build of Node v25.2.2 I'm currently getting:

  • SIGILL on a TH1520 system with Xuantie C910 cores (RVV0.7 specification) (Built with gcc 14.2.0-ubuntu) (Potentiaily a highway issue)
  • SIGSEGV on a SpacemiT-K1 (RVV1.0 but with a 6.1 kernel. Built with gcc 14.2.0-debian)

I have had a build pass SEA tests under qemu on an x64 host, but nowhere near consistently enough to justify not excluding it.

Noting that the The SIGILL/SIGSEGV also occurs in v22.x which doesn't use highway.

I'll add to those results as I get more details.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    riscv64Issues and PRs related to the 64-bit RISC-V architecture.single-executableIssues and PRs related to single-executable applications.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
       blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

      Skip to content
      Single Executable Application tests often fail on RISC-V #61110
      Open
      Open
      Single Executable Application tests often fail on RISC-V#61110
      Labels
      riscv64Issues and PRs related to the 64-bit RISC-V architecture.single-executableIssues and PRs related to single-executable applications.
      Description
      @sxa
      sxa
      opened on Dec 18, 2025
      The SEA tests are failing in many cases. The symptoms are different depending on the hardware. Using a build of Node v25.2.2 I'm currently getting:
      • SIGILL on a TH1520 system with Xuantie C910 cores (RVV0.7 specification) (Built with gcc 14.2.0-ubuntu) (Potentiaily a highway issue)
      • SIGSEGV on a SpacemiT-K1 (RVV1.0 but with a 6.1 kernel. Built with gcc 14.2.0-debian)
      I have had a build pass SEA tests under qemu on an x64 host, but nowhere near consistently enough to justify not excluding it.
      Noting that the The SIGILL/SIGSEGV also occurs in v22.x which doesn't use highway.
      I'll add to those results as I get more details.
      Activity
      Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
      Metadata
      Metadata
      Assignees
      No one assigned
        Labels
        riscv64Issues and PRs related to the 64-bit RISC-V architecture.single-executableIssues and PRs related to single-executable applications.
        Type
        No type
        Projects
        No projects
          Milestone
          No milestone
          Relationships
          None yet
          Development
          No branches or pull requests
          Issue actions
          
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

          Skip to content
          Single Executable Application tests often fail on RISC-V #61110
          Open
          Open
          Single Executable Application tests often fail on RISC-V#61110
          Labels
          riscv64Issues and PRs related to the 64-bit RISC-V architecture.single-executableIssues and PRs related to single-executable applications.
          Description
          @sxa
          sxa
          opened on Dec 18, 2025
          The SEA tests are failing in many cases. The symptoms are different depending on the hardware. Using a build of Node v25.2.2 I'm currently getting:
          • SIGILL on a TH1520 system with Xuantie C910 cores (RVV0.7 specification) (Built with gcc 14.2.0-ubuntu) (Potentiaily a highway issue)
          • SIGSEGV on a SpacemiT-K1 (RVV1.0 but with a 6.1 kernel. Built with gcc 14.2.0-debian)
          I have had a build pass SEA tests under qemu on an x64 host, but nowhere near consistently enough to justify not excluding it.
          Noting that the The SIGILL/SIGSEGV also occurs in v22.x which doesn't use highway.
          I'll add to those results as I get more details.
          Activity
          Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
          Metadata
          Metadata
          Assignees
          No one assigned
            Labels
            riscv64Issues and PRs related to the 64-bit RISC-V architecture.single-executableIssues and PRs related to single-executable applications.
            Type
            No type
            Projects
            No projects
              Milestone
              No milestone
              Relationships
              None yet
              Development
              No branches or pull requests
              Issue actions
              
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

              Skip to content
              Single Executable Application tests often fail on RISC-V #61110
              Open
              Open
              Single Executable Application tests often fail on RISC-V#61110
              Labels
              riscv64Issues and PRs related to the 64-bit RISC-V architecture.single-executableIssues and PRs related to single-executable applications.
              Description
              @sxa
              sxa
              opened on Dec 18, 2025
              The SEA tests are failing in many cases. The symptoms are different depending on the hardware. Using a build of Node v25.2.2 I'm currently getting:
              • SIGILL on a TH1520 system with Xuantie C910 cores (RVV0.7 specification) (Built with gcc 14.2.0-ubuntu) (Potentiaily a highway issue)
              • SIGSEGV on a SpacemiT-K1 (RVV1.0 but with a 6.1 kernel. Built with gcc 14.2.0-debian)
              I have had a build pass SEA tests under qemu on an x64 host, but nowhere near consistently enough to justify not excluding it.
              Noting that the The SIGILL/SIGSEGV also occurs in v22.x which doesn't use highway.
              I'll add to those results as I get more details.
              Activity
              Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
              Metadata
              Metadata
              Assignees
              No one assigned
                Labels
                riscv64Issues and PRs related to the 64-bit RISC-V architecture.single-executableIssues and PRs related to single-executable applications.
                Type
                No type
                Projects
                No projects
                  Milestone
                  No milestone
                  Relationships
                  None yet
                  Development
                  No branches or pull requests
                  Issue actions
                  
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

                  Skip to content
                  Single Executable Application tests often fail on RISC-V #61110
                  Open
                  Open
                  Single Executable Application tests often fail on RISC-V#61110
                  Labels
                  riscv64Issues and PRs related to the 64-bit RISC-V architecture.single-executableIssues and PRs related to single-executable applications.
                  Description
                  @sxa
                  sxa
                  opened on Dec 18, 2025
                  The SEA tests are failing in many cases. The symptoms are different depending on the hardware. Using a build of Node v25.2.2 I'm currently getting:
                  • SIGILL on a TH1520 system with Xuantie C910 cores (RVV0.7 specification) (Built with gcc 14.2.0-ubuntu) (Potentiaily a highway issue)
                  • SIGSEGV on a SpacemiT-K1 (RVV1.0 but with a 6.1 kernel. Built with gcc 14.2.0-debian)
                  I have had a build pass SEA tests under qemu on an x64 host, but nowhere near consistently enough to justify not excluding it.
                  Noting that the The SIGILL/SIGSEGV also occurs in v22.x which doesn't use highway.
                  I'll add to those results as I get more details.
                  Activity
                  Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
                  Metadata
                  Metadata
                  Assignees
                  No one assigned
                    Labels
                    riscv64Issues and PRs related to the 64-bit RISC-V architecture.single-executableIssues and PRs related to single-executable applications.
                    Type
                    No type
                    Projects
                    No projects
                      Milestone
                      No milestone
                      Relationships
                      None yet
                      Development
                      No branches or pull requests
                      Issue actions
                      
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

                      Skip to content
                      Single Executable Application tests often fail on RISC-V #61110
                      Open
                      Open
                      Single Executable Application tests often fail on RISC-V#61110
                      Labels
                      riscv64Issues and PRs related to the 64-bit RISC-V architecture.single-executableIssues and PRs related to single-executable applications.
                      Description
                      @sxa
                      sxa
                      opened on Dec 18, 2025
                      The SEA tests are failing in many cases. The symptoms are different depending on the hardware. Using a build of Node v25.2.2 I'm currently getting:
                      • SIGILL on a TH1520 system with Xuantie C910 cores (RVV0.7 specification) (Built with gcc 14.2.0-ubuntu) (Potentiaily a highway issue)
                      • SIGSEGV on a SpacemiT-K1 (RVV1.0 but with a 6.1 kernel. Built with gcc 14.2.0-debian)
                      I have had a build pass SEA tests under qemu on an x64 host, but nowhere near consistently enough to justify not excluding it.
                      Noting that the The SIGILL/SIGSEGV also occurs in v22.x which doesn't use highway.
                      I'll add to those results as I get more details.
                      Activity
                      Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
                      Metadata
                      Metadata
                      Assignees
                      No one assigned
                        Labels
                        riscv64Issues and PRs related to the 64-bit RISC-V architecture.single-executableIssues and PRs related to single-executable applications.
                        Type
                        No type
                        Projects
                        No projects
                          Milestone
                          No milestone
                          Relationships
                          None yet
                          Development
                          No branches or pull requests
                          Issue actions
                          
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

                          Skip to content
                          Single Executable Application tests often fail on RISC-V #61110
                          Open
                          Open
                          Single Executable Application tests often fail on RISC-V#61110
                          Labels
                          riscv64Issues and PRs related to the 64-bit RISC-V architecture.single-executableIssues and PRs related to single-executable applications.
                          Description
                          @sxa
                          sxa
                          opened on Dec 18, 2025
                          The SEA tests are failing in many cases. The symptoms are different depending on the hardware. Using a build of Node v25.2.2 I'm currently getting:
                          • SIGILL on a TH1520 system with Xuantie C910 cores (RVV0.7 specification) (Built with gcc 14.2.0-ubuntu) (Potentiaily a highway issue)
                          • SIGSEGV on a SpacemiT-K1 (RVV1.0 but with a 6.1 kernel. Built with gcc 14.2.0-debian)
                          I have had a build pass SEA tests under qemu on an x64 host, but nowhere near consistently enough to justify not excluding it.
                          Noting that the The SIGILL/SIGSEGV also occurs in v22.x which doesn't use highway.
                          I'll add to those results as I get more details.
                          Activity
                          Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
                          Metadata
                          Metadata
                          Assignees
                          No one assigned
                            Labels
                            riscv64Issues and PRs related to the 64-bit RISC-V architecture.single-executableIssues and PRs related to single-executable applications.
                            Type
                            No type
                            Projects
                            No projects
                              Milestone
                              No milestone
                              Relationships
                              None yet
                              Development
                              No branches or pull requests
                              Issue actions
                              
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

                              Skip to content
                              Single Executable Application tests often fail on RISC-V #61110
                              Open
                              Open
                              Single Executable Application tests often fail on RISC-V#61110
                              Labels
                              riscv64Issues and PRs related to the 64-bit RISC-V architecture.single-executableIssues and PRs related to single-executable applications.
                              Description
                              @sxa
                              sxa
                              opened on Dec 18, 2025
                              The SEA tests are failing in many cases. The symptoms are different depending on the hardware. Using a build of Node v25.2.2 I'm currently getting:
                              • SIGILL on a TH1520 system with Xuantie C910 cores (RVV0.7 specification) (Built with gcc 14.2.0-ubuntu) (Potentiaily a highway issue)
                              • SIGSEGV on a SpacemiT-K1 (RVV1.0 but with a 6.1 kernel. Built with gcc 14.2.0-debian)
                              I have had a build pass SEA tests under qemu on an x64 host, but nowhere near consistently enough to justify not excluding it.
                              Noting that the The SIGILL/SIGSEGV also occurs in v22.x which doesn't use highway.
                              I'll add to those results as I get more details.
                              Activity
                              Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
                              Metadata
                              Metadata
                              Assignees
                              No one assigned
                                Labels
                                riscv64Issues and PRs related to the 64-bit RISC-V architecture.single-executableIssues and PRs related to single-executable applications.
                                Type
                                No type
                                Projects
                                No projects
                                  Milestone
                                  No milestone
                                  Relationships
                                  None yet
                                  Development
                                  No branches or pull requests
                                  Issue actions