Potential regression with libuv in Node 24.16.0 #63638

Description

@OrKoN

Version

24.16.0

Platform

Windows

Subsystem

Microsoft Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100 (GitHub Actions runner)

What steps will reproduce the bug?

Run Puppeteer test suites with Node 24.16.0 https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/actions/runs/26626414041/job/78464147790#step:11:505

How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

It is flaky but happens noticeably in our test CI

https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/actions/runs/26626414041/job/78464147790#step:11:505
https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/actions/runs/26626414041/job/78464147790#step:11:505
https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/actions/runs/26626414041/job/78464147915#step:11:487

3 failures in a single run.

What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

No crahes.

What do you see instead?

Node exists with Assertion failed: !_wcsnicmp(filename, dir, dirlen), file src\win\fs-event.c, line 72

Additional information

Downgrading to Node 24.15.0 seems to have helped. Possibly related to libuv/libuv#5010

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    confirmed-bugIssues and PRs for confirmed bugs.libuvIssues and PRs related to the libuv dependency or the uv binding.windowsIssues and PRs related to the Windows platform.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
       blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
      }
      } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
      })();
      (function(){
      try {
      var __m = "github.com";
      var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
      
      Skip to content

      Potential regression with libuv in Node 24.16.0 #63638

      Description

      @OrKoN

      Version

      24.16.0

      Platform

      Windows
      

      Subsystem

      Microsoft Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100 (GitHub Actions runner)

      What steps will reproduce the bug?

      Run Puppeteer test suites with Node 24.16.0 https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/actions/runs/26626414041/job/78464147790#step:11:505

      How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

      It is flaky but happens noticeably in our test CI

      https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/actions/runs/26626414041/job/78464147790#step:11:505
      https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/actions/runs/26626414041/job/78464147790#step:11:505
      https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/actions/runs/26626414041/job/78464147915#step:11:487

      3 failures in a single run.

      What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

      No crahes.

      What do you see instead?

      Node exists with Assertion failed: !_wcsnicmp(filename, dir, dirlen), file src\win\fs-event.c, line 72

      Additional information

      Downgrading to Node 24.15.0 seems to have helped. Possibly related to libuv/libuv#5010

      Activity

      Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Labels

        confirmed-bugIssues and PRs for confirmed bugs.libuvIssues and PRs related to the libuv dependency or the uv binding.windowsIssues and PRs related to the Windows platform.

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
          Skip to content

          Potential regression with libuv in Node 24.16.0 #63638

          Description

          @OrKoN

          Version

          24.16.0

          Platform

          Windows
          

          Subsystem

          Microsoft Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100 (GitHub Actions runner)

          What steps will reproduce the bug?

          Run Puppeteer test suites with Node 24.16.0 https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/actions/runs/26626414041/job/78464147790#step:11:505

          How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

          It is flaky but happens noticeably in our test CI

          https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/actions/runs/26626414041/job/78464147790#step:11:505
          https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/actions/runs/26626414041/job/78464147790#step:11:505
          https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/actions/runs/26626414041/job/78464147915#step:11:487

          3 failures in a single run.

          What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

          No crahes.

          What do you see instead?

          Node exists with Assertion failed: !_wcsnicmp(filename, dir, dirlen), file src\win\fs-event.c, line 72

          Additional information

          Downgrading to Node 24.15.0 seems to have helped. Possibly related to libuv/libuv#5010

          Activity

          Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Labels

            confirmed-bugIssues and PRs for confirmed bugs.libuvIssues and PRs related to the libuv dependency or the uv binding.windowsIssues and PRs related to the Windows platform.

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              Potential regression with libuv in Node 24.16.0 #63638

              Description

              @OrKoN

              Version

              24.16.0

              Platform

              Windows
              

              Subsystem

              Microsoft Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100 (GitHub Actions runner)

              What steps will reproduce the bug?

              Run Puppeteer test suites with Node 24.16.0 https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/actions/runs/26626414041/job/78464147790#step:11:505

              How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

              It is flaky but happens noticeably in our test CI

              https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/actions/runs/26626414041/job/78464147790#step:11:505
              https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/actions/runs/26626414041/job/78464147790#step:11:505
              https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/actions/runs/26626414041/job/78464147915#step:11:487

              3 failures in a single run.

              What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

              No crahes.

              What do you see instead?

              Node exists with Assertion failed: !_wcsnicmp(filename, dir, dirlen), file src\win\fs-event.c, line 72

              Additional information

              Downgrading to Node 24.15.0 seems to have helped. Possibly related to libuv/libuv#5010

              Activity

              Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Labels

                confirmed-bugIssues and PRs for confirmed bugs.libuvIssues and PRs related to the libuv dependency or the uv binding.windowsIssues and PRs related to the Windows platform.

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions

                  , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
                  Skip to content

                  Potential regression with libuv in Node 24.16.0 #63638

                  Description

                  @OrKoN

                  Version

                  24.16.0

                  Platform

                  Windows
                  

                  Subsystem

                  Microsoft Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100 (GitHub Actions runner)

                  What steps will reproduce the bug?

                  Run Puppeteer test suites with Node 24.16.0 https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/actions/runs/26626414041/job/78464147790#step:11:505

                  How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

                  It is flaky but happens noticeably in our test CI

                  https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/actions/runs/26626414041/job/78464147790#step:11:505
                  https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/actions/runs/26626414041/job/78464147790#step:11:505
                  https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/actions/runs/26626414041/job/78464147915#step:11:487

                  3 failures in a single run.

                  What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

                  No crahes.

                  What do you see instead?

                  Node exists with Assertion failed: !_wcsnicmp(filename, dir, dirlen), file src\win\fs-event.c, line 72

                  Additional information

                  Downgrading to Node 24.15.0 seems to have helped. Possibly related to libuv/libuv#5010

                  Activity

                  Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                  Metadata

                  Metadata

                  Assignees

                  No one assigned

                    Labels

                    confirmed-bugIssues and PRs for confirmed bugs.libuvIssues and PRs related to the libuv dependency or the uv binding.windowsIssues and PRs related to the Windows platform.

                    Type

                    No type

                    Projects

                    No projects

                      Milestone

                      No milestone

                      Relationships

                      None yet

                      Development

                      No branches or pull requests

                      Issue actions

                      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                      Skip to content

                      Potential regression with libuv in Node 24.16.0 #63638

                      Description

                      @OrKoN

                      Version

                      24.16.0

                      Platform

                      Windows
                      

                      Subsystem

                      Microsoft Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100 (GitHub Actions runner)

                      What steps will reproduce the bug?

                      Run Puppeteer test suites with Node 24.16.0 https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/actions/runs/26626414041/job/78464147790#step:11:505

                      How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

                      It is flaky but happens noticeably in our test CI

                      https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/actions/runs/26626414041/job/78464147790#step:11:505
                      https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/actions/runs/26626414041/job/78464147790#step:11:505
                      https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/actions/runs/26626414041/job/78464147915#step:11:487

                      3 failures in a single run.

                      What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

                      No crahes.

                      What do you see instead?

                      Node exists with Assertion failed: !_wcsnicmp(filename, dir, dirlen), file src\win\fs-event.c, line 72

                      Additional information

                      Downgrading to Node 24.15.0 seems to have helped. Possibly related to libuv/libuv#5010

                      Activity

                      Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                      Metadata

                      Metadata

                      Assignees

                      No one assigned

                        Labels

                        confirmed-bugIssues and PRs for confirmed bugs.libuvIssues and PRs related to the libuv dependency or the uv binding.windowsIssues and PRs related to the Windows platform.

                        Type

                        No type

                        Projects

                        No projects

                          Milestone

                          No milestone

                          Relationships

                          None yet

                          Development

                          No branches or pull requests

                          Issue actions

                          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                          Skip to content

                          Potential regression with libuv in Node 24.16.0 #63638

                          Description

                          @OrKoN

                          Version

                          24.16.0

                          Platform

                          Windows
                          

                          Subsystem

                          Microsoft Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100 (GitHub Actions runner)

                          What steps will reproduce the bug?

                          Run Puppeteer test suites with Node 24.16.0 https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/actions/runs/26626414041/job/78464147790#step:11:505

                          How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

                          It is flaky but happens noticeably in our test CI

                          https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/actions/runs/26626414041/job/78464147790#step:11:505
                          https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/actions/runs/26626414041/job/78464147790#step:11:505
                          https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/actions/runs/26626414041/job/78464147915#step:11:487

                          3 failures in a single run.

                          What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

                          No crahes.

                          What do you see instead?

                          Node exists with Assertion failed: !_wcsnicmp(filename, dir, dirlen), file src\win\fs-event.c, line 72

                          Additional information

                          Downgrading to Node 24.15.0 seems to have helped. Possibly related to libuv/libuv#5010

                          Activity

                          Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                          Metadata

                          Metadata

                          Assignees

                          No one assigned

                            Labels

                            confirmed-bugIssues and PRs for confirmed bugs.libuvIssues and PRs related to the libuv dependency or the uv binding.windowsIssues and PRs related to the Windows platform.

                            Type

                            No type

                            Projects

                            No projects

                              Milestone

                              No milestone

                              Relationships

                              None yet

                              Development

                              No branches or pull requests

                              Issue actions

                              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                              Skip to content

                              Potential regression with libuv in Node 24.16.0 #63638

                              Description

                              @OrKoN

                              Version

                              24.16.0

                              Platform

                              Windows
                              

                              Subsystem

                              Microsoft Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100 (GitHub Actions runner)

                              What steps will reproduce the bug?

                              Run Puppeteer test suites with Node 24.16.0 https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/actions/runs/26626414041/job/78464147790#step:11:505

                              How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

                              It is flaky but happens noticeably in our test CI

                              https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/actions/runs/26626414041/job/78464147790#step:11:505
                              https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/actions/runs/26626414041/job/78464147790#step:11:505
                              https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/actions/runs/26626414041/job/78464147915#step:11:487

                              3 failures in a single run.

                              What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

                              No crahes.

                              What do you see instead?

                              Node exists with Assertion failed: !_wcsnicmp(filename, dir, dirlen), file src\win\fs-event.c, line 72

                              Additional information

                              Downgrading to Node 24.15.0 seems to have helped. Possibly related to libuv/libuv#5010

                              Activity

                              Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                              Metadata

                              Metadata

                              Assignees

                              No one assigned

                                Labels

                                confirmed-bugIssues and PRs for confirmed bugs.libuvIssues and PRs related to the libuv dependency or the uv binding.windowsIssues and PRs related to the Windows platform.

                                Type

                                No type

                                Projects

                                No projects

                                  Milestone

                                  No milestone

                                  Relationships

                                  None yet

                                  Development

                                  No branches or pull requests

                                  Issue actions