crypto: mk-ca-bundle.pl drops Izenpe.com and loses NSS SERVER_DISTRUST_AFTER semantics #64752

Description

@Archkon

Version

latest main branch

Platform

Subsystem

crypto

What steps will reproduce the bug?

const{ X509Certificate }=require('node:crypto');consttls=require('node:tls');constizenpeFingerprint='25:30:CC:8E:98:32:15:02:BA:D9:6F:9B:1F:BA:1B:09:'+'9E:2D:29:9E:0F:45:48:BB:91:4F:36:3B:C0:D4:53:1F';constfound=tls.rootCertificates.some((pem)=>{returnnewX509Certificate(pem).fingerprint256===izenpeFingerprint;});console.log(tls.rootCertificates.length);// 120console.log(found);// false

How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

Every

What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

Izenpe.com should remain in the bundled CA store.

Its NSS policy specifies:

CKA_NSS_SERVER_DISTRUST_AFTER = 260415235959Z

Therefore, assuming all other certificate validation succeeds:

  • A server certificate with NotBefore <= 2026-04-15 23:59:59Z should remain trusted.
  • A server certificate with NotBefore > 2026-04-15 23:59:59Z should be rejected.

The cutoff applies to the end-entity certificate’s issuance time. It does not mean that the entire root must be removed after that date.

Retained roots with a server distrust-after constraint continue to trust post-cutoff certificates because the metadata is discarded during PEM generation.

What do you see instead?

The generated src/node_root_certs.h contains 120 valid PEM certificates, but Izenpe.com is missing.

As a result, TLS server chains anchored to Izenpe fail when Node uses its bundled CA store, including chains whose end-entity certificate was issued before the NSS distrust after cutoff.

The missing root can be detected with:

All existing PEM entries still parse successfully, so a test that only validates PEM syntax does not detect the missing trust anchor.

Additional information

No response

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    cryptoIssues and PRs related to the crypto subsystem.toolsIssues and PRs related to the tools directory.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
       blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
      }
      } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
      })();
      (function(){
      try {
      var __m = "github.com";
      var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
      
      Skip to content

      crypto: mk-ca-bundle.pl drops Izenpe.com and loses NSS SERVER_DISTRUST_AFTER semantics #64752

      Description

      @Archkon

      Version

      latest main branch

      Platform

      Subsystem

      crypto

      What steps will reproduce the bug?

      const{ X509Certificate }=require('node:crypto');consttls=require('node:tls');constizenpeFingerprint='25:30:CC:8E:98:32:15:02:BA:D9:6F:9B:1F:BA:1B:09:'+'9E:2D:29:9E:0F:45:48:BB:91:4F:36:3B:C0:D4:53:1F';constfound=tls.rootCertificates.some((pem)=>{returnnewX509Certificate(pem).fingerprint256===izenpeFingerprint;});console.log(tls.rootCertificates.length);// 120console.log(found);// false

      How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

      Every

      What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

      Izenpe.com should remain in the bundled CA store.

      Its NSS policy specifies:

      CKA_NSS_SERVER_DISTRUST_AFTER = 260415235959Z

      Therefore, assuming all other certificate validation succeeds:

      • A server certificate with NotBefore <= 2026-04-15 23:59:59Z should remain trusted.
      • A server certificate with NotBefore > 2026-04-15 23:59:59Z should be rejected.

      The cutoff applies to the end-entity certificate’s issuance time. It does not mean that the entire root must be removed after that date.

      Retained roots with a server distrust-after constraint continue to trust post-cutoff certificates because the metadata is discarded during PEM generation.

      What do you see instead?

      The generated src/node_root_certs.h contains 120 valid PEM certificates, but Izenpe.com is missing.

      As a result, TLS server chains anchored to Izenpe fail when Node uses its bundled CA store, including chains whose end-entity certificate was issued before the NSS distrust after cutoff.

      The missing root can be detected with:

      All existing PEM entries still parse successfully, so a test that only validates PEM syntax does not detect the missing trust anchor.

      Additional information

      No response

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Labels

        cryptoIssues and PRs related to the crypto subsystem.toolsIssues and PRs related to the tools directory.

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
          Skip to content

          crypto: mk-ca-bundle.pl drops Izenpe.com and loses NSS SERVER_DISTRUST_AFTER semantics #64752

          Description

          @Archkon

          Version

          latest main branch

          Platform

          Subsystem

          crypto

          What steps will reproduce the bug?

          const{ X509Certificate }=require('node:crypto');consttls=require('node:tls');constizenpeFingerprint='25:30:CC:8E:98:32:15:02:BA:D9:6F:9B:1F:BA:1B:09:'+'9E:2D:29:9E:0F:45:48:BB:91:4F:36:3B:C0:D4:53:1F';constfound=tls.rootCertificates.some((pem)=>{returnnewX509Certificate(pem).fingerprint256===izenpeFingerprint;});console.log(tls.rootCertificates.length);// 120console.log(found);// false

          How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

          Every

          What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

          Izenpe.com should remain in the bundled CA store.

          Its NSS policy specifies:

          CKA_NSS_SERVER_DISTRUST_AFTER = 260415235959Z

          Therefore, assuming all other certificate validation succeeds:

          • A server certificate with NotBefore <= 2026-04-15 23:59:59Z should remain trusted.
          • A server certificate with NotBefore > 2026-04-15 23:59:59Z should be rejected.

          The cutoff applies to the end-entity certificate’s issuance time. It does not mean that the entire root must be removed after that date.

          Retained roots with a server distrust-after constraint continue to trust post-cutoff certificates because the metadata is discarded during PEM generation.

          What do you see instead?

          The generated src/node_root_certs.h contains 120 valid PEM certificates, but Izenpe.com is missing.

          As a result, TLS server chains anchored to Izenpe fail when Node uses its bundled CA store, including chains whose end-entity certificate was issued before the NSS distrust after cutoff.

          The missing root can be detected with:

          All existing PEM entries still parse successfully, so a test that only validates PEM syntax does not detect the missing trust anchor.

          Additional information

          No response

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Labels

            cryptoIssues and PRs related to the crypto subsystem.toolsIssues and PRs related to the tools directory.

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              crypto: mk-ca-bundle.pl drops Izenpe.com and loses NSS SERVER_DISTRUST_AFTER semantics #64752

              Description

              @Archkon

              Version

              latest main branch

              Platform

              Subsystem

              crypto

              What steps will reproduce the bug?

              const{ X509Certificate }=require('node:crypto');consttls=require('node:tls');constizenpeFingerprint='25:30:CC:8E:98:32:15:02:BA:D9:6F:9B:1F:BA:1B:09:'+'9E:2D:29:9E:0F:45:48:BB:91:4F:36:3B:C0:D4:53:1F';constfound=tls.rootCertificates.some((pem)=>{returnnewX509Certificate(pem).fingerprint256===izenpeFingerprint;});console.log(tls.rootCertificates.length);// 120console.log(found);// false

              How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

              Every

              What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

              Izenpe.com should remain in the bundled CA store.

              Its NSS policy specifies:

              CKA_NSS_SERVER_DISTRUST_AFTER = 260415235959Z

              Therefore, assuming all other certificate validation succeeds:

              • A server certificate with NotBefore <= 2026-04-15 23:59:59Z should remain trusted.
              • A server certificate with NotBefore > 2026-04-15 23:59:59Z should be rejected.

              The cutoff applies to the end-entity certificate’s issuance time. It does not mean that the entire root must be removed after that date.

              Retained roots with a server distrust-after constraint continue to trust post-cutoff certificates because the metadata is discarded during PEM generation.

              What do you see instead?

              The generated src/node_root_certs.h contains 120 valid PEM certificates, but Izenpe.com is missing.

              As a result, TLS server chains anchored to Izenpe fail when Node uses its bundled CA store, including chains whose end-entity certificate was issued before the NSS distrust after cutoff.

              The missing root can be detected with:

              All existing PEM entries still parse successfully, so a test that only validates PEM syntax does not detect the missing trust anchor.

              Additional information

              No response

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Labels

                cryptoIssues and PRs related to the crypto subsystem.toolsIssues and PRs related to the tools directory.

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions

                  , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
                  Skip to content

                  crypto: mk-ca-bundle.pl drops Izenpe.com and loses NSS SERVER_DISTRUST_AFTER semantics #64752

                  Description

                  @Archkon

                  Version

                  latest main branch

                  Platform

                  Subsystem

                  crypto

                  What steps will reproduce the bug?

                  const{ X509Certificate }=require('node:crypto');consttls=require('node:tls');constizenpeFingerprint='25:30:CC:8E:98:32:15:02:BA:D9:6F:9B:1F:BA:1B:09:'+'9E:2D:29:9E:0F:45:48:BB:91:4F:36:3B:C0:D4:53:1F';constfound=tls.rootCertificates.some((pem)=>{returnnewX509Certificate(pem).fingerprint256===izenpeFingerprint;});console.log(tls.rootCertificates.length);// 120console.log(found);// false

                  How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

                  Every

                  What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

                  Izenpe.com should remain in the bundled CA store.

                  Its NSS policy specifies:

                  CKA_NSS_SERVER_DISTRUST_AFTER = 260415235959Z

                  Therefore, assuming all other certificate validation succeeds:

                  • A server certificate with NotBefore <= 2026-04-15 23:59:59Z should remain trusted.
                  • A server certificate with NotBefore > 2026-04-15 23:59:59Z should be rejected.

                  The cutoff applies to the end-entity certificate’s issuance time. It does not mean that the entire root must be removed after that date.

                  Retained roots with a server distrust-after constraint continue to trust post-cutoff certificates because the metadata is discarded during PEM generation.

                  What do you see instead?

                  The generated src/node_root_certs.h contains 120 valid PEM certificates, but Izenpe.com is missing.

                  As a result, TLS server chains anchored to Izenpe fail when Node uses its bundled CA store, including chains whose end-entity certificate was issued before the NSS distrust after cutoff.

                  The missing root can be detected with:

                  All existing PEM entries still parse successfully, so a test that only validates PEM syntax does not detect the missing trust anchor.

                  Additional information

                  No response

                  Metadata

                  Metadata

                  Assignees

                  No one assigned

                    Labels

                    cryptoIssues and PRs related to the crypto subsystem.toolsIssues and PRs related to the tools directory.

                    Type

                    No type

                    Projects

                    No projects

                      Milestone

                      No milestone

                      Relationships

                      None yet

                      Development

                      No branches or pull requests

                      Issue actions

                      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                      Skip to content

                      crypto: mk-ca-bundle.pl drops Izenpe.com and loses NSS SERVER_DISTRUST_AFTER semantics #64752

                      Description

                      @Archkon

                      Version

                      latest main branch

                      Platform

                      Subsystem

                      crypto

                      What steps will reproduce the bug?

                      const{ X509Certificate }=require('node:crypto');consttls=require('node:tls');constizenpeFingerprint='25:30:CC:8E:98:32:15:02:BA:D9:6F:9B:1F:BA:1B:09:'+'9E:2D:29:9E:0F:45:48:BB:91:4F:36:3B:C0:D4:53:1F';constfound=tls.rootCertificates.some((pem)=>{returnnewX509Certificate(pem).fingerprint256===izenpeFingerprint;});console.log(tls.rootCertificates.length);// 120console.log(found);// false

                      How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

                      Every

                      What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

                      Izenpe.com should remain in the bundled CA store.

                      Its NSS policy specifies:

                      CKA_NSS_SERVER_DISTRUST_AFTER = 260415235959Z

                      Therefore, assuming all other certificate validation succeeds:

                      • A server certificate with NotBefore <= 2026-04-15 23:59:59Z should remain trusted.
                      • A server certificate with NotBefore > 2026-04-15 23:59:59Z should be rejected.

                      The cutoff applies to the end-entity certificate’s issuance time. It does not mean that the entire root must be removed after that date.

                      Retained roots with a server distrust-after constraint continue to trust post-cutoff certificates because the metadata is discarded during PEM generation.

                      What do you see instead?

                      The generated src/node_root_certs.h contains 120 valid PEM certificates, but Izenpe.com is missing.

                      As a result, TLS server chains anchored to Izenpe fail when Node uses its bundled CA store, including chains whose end-entity certificate was issued before the NSS distrust after cutoff.

                      The missing root can be detected with:

                      All existing PEM entries still parse successfully, so a test that only validates PEM syntax does not detect the missing trust anchor.

                      Additional information

                      No response

                      Metadata

                      Metadata

                      Assignees

                      No one assigned

                        Labels

                        cryptoIssues and PRs related to the crypto subsystem.toolsIssues and PRs related to the tools directory.

                        Type

                        No type

                        Projects

                        No projects

                          Milestone

                          No milestone

                          Relationships

                          None yet

                          Development

                          No branches or pull requests

                          Issue actions

                          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                          Skip to content

                          crypto: mk-ca-bundle.pl drops Izenpe.com and loses NSS SERVER_DISTRUST_AFTER semantics #64752

                          Description

                          @Archkon

                          Version

                          latest main branch

                          Platform

                          Subsystem

                          crypto

                          What steps will reproduce the bug?

                          const{ X509Certificate }=require('node:crypto');consttls=require('node:tls');constizenpeFingerprint='25:30:CC:8E:98:32:15:02:BA:D9:6F:9B:1F:BA:1B:09:'+'9E:2D:29:9E:0F:45:48:BB:91:4F:36:3B:C0:D4:53:1F';constfound=tls.rootCertificates.some((pem)=>{returnnewX509Certificate(pem).fingerprint256===izenpeFingerprint;});console.log(tls.rootCertificates.length);// 120console.log(found);// false

                          How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

                          Every

                          What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

                          Izenpe.com should remain in the bundled CA store.

                          Its NSS policy specifies:

                          CKA_NSS_SERVER_DISTRUST_AFTER = 260415235959Z

                          Therefore, assuming all other certificate validation succeeds:

                          • A server certificate with NotBefore <= 2026-04-15 23:59:59Z should remain trusted.
                          • A server certificate with NotBefore > 2026-04-15 23:59:59Z should be rejected.

                          The cutoff applies to the end-entity certificate’s issuance time. It does not mean that the entire root must be removed after that date.

                          Retained roots with a server distrust-after constraint continue to trust post-cutoff certificates because the metadata is discarded during PEM generation.

                          What do you see instead?

                          The generated src/node_root_certs.h contains 120 valid PEM certificates, but Izenpe.com is missing.

                          As a result, TLS server chains anchored to Izenpe fail when Node uses its bundled CA store, including chains whose end-entity certificate was issued before the NSS distrust after cutoff.

                          The missing root can be detected with:

                          All existing PEM entries still parse successfully, so a test that only validates PEM syntax does not detect the missing trust anchor.

                          Additional information

                          No response

                          Metadata

                          Metadata

                          Assignees

                          No one assigned

                            Labels

                            cryptoIssues and PRs related to the crypto subsystem.toolsIssues and PRs related to the tools directory.

                            Type

                            No type

                            Projects

                            No projects

                              Milestone

                              No milestone

                              Relationships

                              None yet

                              Development

                              No branches or pull requests

                              Issue actions

                              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                              Skip to content

                              crypto: mk-ca-bundle.pl drops Izenpe.com and loses NSS SERVER_DISTRUST_AFTER semantics #64752

                              Description

                              @Archkon

                              Version

                              latest main branch

                              Platform

                              Subsystem

                              crypto

                              What steps will reproduce the bug?

                              const{ X509Certificate }=require('node:crypto');consttls=require('node:tls');constizenpeFingerprint='25:30:CC:8E:98:32:15:02:BA:D9:6F:9B:1F:BA:1B:09:'+'9E:2D:29:9E:0F:45:48:BB:91:4F:36:3B:C0:D4:53:1F';constfound=tls.rootCertificates.some((pem)=>{returnnewX509Certificate(pem).fingerprint256===izenpeFingerprint;});console.log(tls.rootCertificates.length);// 120console.log(found);// false

                              How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

                              Every

                              What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

                              Izenpe.com should remain in the bundled CA store.

                              Its NSS policy specifies:

                              CKA_NSS_SERVER_DISTRUST_AFTER = 260415235959Z

                              Therefore, assuming all other certificate validation succeeds:

                              • A server certificate with NotBefore <= 2026-04-15 23:59:59Z should remain trusted.
                              • A server certificate with NotBefore > 2026-04-15 23:59:59Z should be rejected.

                              The cutoff applies to the end-entity certificate’s issuance time. It does not mean that the entire root must be removed after that date.

                              Retained roots with a server distrust-after constraint continue to trust post-cutoff certificates because the metadata is discarded during PEM generation.

                              What do you see instead?

                              The generated src/node_root_certs.h contains 120 valid PEM certificates, but Izenpe.com is missing.

                              As a result, TLS server chains anchored to Izenpe fail when Node uses its bundled CA store, including chains whose end-entity certificate was issued before the NSS distrust after cutoff.

                              The missing root can be detected with:

                              All existing PEM entries still parse successfully, so a test that only validates PEM syntax does not detect the missing trust anchor.

                              Additional information

                              No response

                              Metadata

                              Metadata

                              Assignees

                              No one assigned

                                Labels

                                cryptoIssues and PRs related to the crypto subsystem.toolsIssues and PRs related to the tools directory.

                                Type

                                No type

                                Projects

                                No projects

                                  Milestone

                                  No milestone

                                  Relationships

                                  None yet

                                  Development

                                  No branches or pull requests

                                  Issue actions