v22.x: main thread self-deadlocks when creating a CpuProfiler under GC pressure — backport request for V8 a6eaf75741 (RecursiveMutex for Logger, crbug 41497149) #65140

Description

@vincentventalon

v22.x backport request: V8 a6eaf75741 ("[logging] Use RecursiveMutex for Logger") — main-thread self-deadlock when a CpuProfiler is created

Version

v22.20.0 (still present in v22.23.1 — see below)

Platform

Linux 7.0.0-22-generic #22-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC x86_64 (Docker node:22.20-bookworm-slim)

Subsystem

deps/v8

What steps will reproduce the bug?

Create a v8::CpuProfiler (e.g. any native addon or embedder calling v8::CpuProfiler::New, or in-process profiling agents — we hit it through @sentry/profiling-node, whose N-API Init creates a profiler at require() time) in a process that already has a significant amount of compiled script code, at a moment when the heap is close to the incremental-marking trigger.

CpuProfiler::NewProfilingScopeV8FileLogger::LogCompiledFunctions() dispatches CodeCreateEvents through the Logger dispatcher, which holds a non-recursivebase::Mutex while calling listeners (deps/v8/src/logging/code-events.h). ProfilerListener::CodeCreateEvent initializes script line-ends, which allocates; if that allocation crosses the incremental-marking limit, V8 starts a major GC cycle on the same thread: Heap::StartIncrementalMarkingMarkCompactCollector::StartCompactionIsolate::AllowsCodeCompaction()logger()->allows_code_compaction() → attempts to re-acquire the same mutex → the main thread deadlocks against itself, forever.

This is Chromium bug 41497149, fixed upstream in May 2024 by V8 commit a6eaf75741 ("[logging] Use RecursiveMutex for Logger", https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/5572952) — the commit message describes exactly this scenario. The fix landed in V8 ≥ 12.7, so Node 23/24 have it; Node 22's V8 12.4 does not, and the file is unchanged in v22.23.1 (deps/v8/src/logging/code-events.h still uses plain base::MutexGuard). Node 20/21 are equally affected but EOL.

The patch is minimal (one file, MutexRecursiveMutex in the Logger dispatcher) and V8 12.4 already ships base::RecursiveMutex, so it should float trivially onto deps/v8 in v22.x.

How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

Non-deterministic by nature: the incremental-marking start has to land inside the LogCompiledFunctions walk. In production (NestJS monolith on a 2-vCPU host, addon loaded early in a large module graph, container cold-boot contention) we measured roughly 1 process start in 3-4 freezing forever. Calm restarts of the same build essentially never hit it, which makes it very painful to diagnose in the field.

What is the expected behavior?

Creating a CPU profiler never deadlocks the process.

What do you see instead?

The process freezes before binding any port, with zero output and ~0 CPU, and never crashes (so process managers keep it "online"). gdb backtrace of the frozen main thread (all other threads idle — same-thread self-deadlock):

#1 pthread_mutex_lock
#2 v8::internal::Isolate::AllowsCodeCompaction()
#3 v8::internal::MarkCompactCollector::StartCompaction(...)
#4 v8::internal::IncrementalMarking::StartMarkingMajor()
#6 v8::internal::Heap::StartIncrementalMarking(...)
#7 v8::internal::PagedSpaceAllocatorPolicy::EnsureAllocation(...)
#8 v8::internal::MainAllocator::AllocateRawSlow(...)
#11 v8::internal::FactoryBase<v8::internal::Factory>::NewFixedArray(...)
#12 v8::internal::String::CalculateLineEnds(...)
#13 v8::internal::Script::InitLineEndsInternal(...)
#14 v8::internal::Script::GetPositionInfo(...)
#16 v8::internal::SourcePosition::InliningStack(...)
#17 v8::internal::ProfilerListener::CodeCreateEvent(...)
#18 v8::internal::ExistingCodeLogger::LogExistingFunction(...)
#19 v8::internal::ExistingCodeLogger::LogCompiledFunctions(...)
#20 v8::internal::ProfilingScope::ProfilingScope(...)
#21 v8::internal::CpuProfiler::EnableLogging()
#22 v8::internal::CpuProfiler::CpuProfiler(...)
#23 v8::CpuProfiler::New(...)
#24 Init(napi_env__*, napi_value__*) (native addon, at require() time)
#25 napi_module_register_by_symbol(...)
#28 node::binding::DLOpen(...)

strace shows the main thread parked in FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE on a contended mutex; every other thread is in its normal idle wait.

Additional information

Workarounds we validated/identified while root-causing this:

Node 22 is in maintenance LTS until 2027-04 and this is a silent, unrecoverable hang, which is why a backport seems worth it despite maintenance mode.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
       blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
      }
      } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
      })();
      (function(){
      try {
      var __m = "github.com";
      var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
      
      Skip to content

      v22.x: main thread self-deadlocks when creating a CpuProfiler under GC pressure — backport request for V8 a6eaf75741 (RecursiveMutex for Logger, crbug 41497149) #65140

      Description

      @vincentventalon

      v22.x backport request: V8 a6eaf75741 ("[logging] Use RecursiveMutex for Logger") — main-thread self-deadlock when a CpuProfiler is created

      Version

      v22.20.0 (still present in v22.23.1 — see below)

      Platform

      Linux 7.0.0-22-generic #22-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC x86_64 (Docker node:22.20-bookworm-slim)
      

      Subsystem

      deps/v8

      What steps will reproduce the bug?

      Create a v8::CpuProfiler (e.g. any native addon or embedder calling v8::CpuProfiler::New, or in-process profiling agents — we hit it through @sentry/profiling-node, whose N-API Init creates a profiler at require() time) in a process that already has a significant amount of compiled script code, at a moment when the heap is close to the incremental-marking trigger.

      CpuProfiler::NewProfilingScopeV8FileLogger::LogCompiledFunctions() dispatches CodeCreateEvents through the Logger dispatcher, which holds a non-recursivebase::Mutex while calling listeners (deps/v8/src/logging/code-events.h). ProfilerListener::CodeCreateEvent initializes script line-ends, which allocates; if that allocation crosses the incremental-marking limit, V8 starts a major GC cycle on the same thread: Heap::StartIncrementalMarkingMarkCompactCollector::StartCompactionIsolate::AllowsCodeCompaction()logger()->allows_code_compaction() → attempts to re-acquire the same mutex → the main thread deadlocks against itself, forever.

      This is Chromium bug 41497149, fixed upstream in May 2024 by V8 commit a6eaf75741 ("[logging] Use RecursiveMutex for Logger", https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/5572952) — the commit message describes exactly this scenario. The fix landed in V8 ≥ 12.7, so Node 23/24 have it; Node 22's V8 12.4 does not, and the file is unchanged in v22.23.1 (deps/v8/src/logging/code-events.h still uses plain base::MutexGuard). Node 20/21 are equally affected but EOL.

      The patch is minimal (one file, MutexRecursiveMutex in the Logger dispatcher) and V8 12.4 already ships base::RecursiveMutex, so it should float trivially onto deps/v8 in v22.x.

      How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

      Non-deterministic by nature: the incremental-marking start has to land inside the LogCompiledFunctions walk. In production (NestJS monolith on a 2-vCPU host, addon loaded early in a large module graph, container cold-boot contention) we measured roughly 1 process start in 3-4 freezing forever. Calm restarts of the same build essentially never hit it, which makes it very painful to diagnose in the field.

      What is the expected behavior?

      Creating a CPU profiler never deadlocks the process.

      What do you see instead?

      The process freezes before binding any port, with zero output and ~0 CPU, and never crashes (so process managers keep it "online"). gdb backtrace of the frozen main thread (all other threads idle — same-thread self-deadlock):

      #1 pthread_mutex_lock
      #2 v8::internal::Isolate::AllowsCodeCompaction()
      #3 v8::internal::MarkCompactCollector::StartCompaction(...)
      #4 v8::internal::IncrementalMarking::StartMarkingMajor()
      #6 v8::internal::Heap::StartIncrementalMarking(...)
      #7 v8::internal::PagedSpaceAllocatorPolicy::EnsureAllocation(...)
      #8 v8::internal::MainAllocator::AllocateRawSlow(...)
      #11 v8::internal::FactoryBase<v8::internal::Factory>::NewFixedArray(...)
      #12 v8::internal::String::CalculateLineEnds(...)
      #13 v8::internal::Script::InitLineEndsInternal(...)
      #14 v8::internal::Script::GetPositionInfo(...)
      #16 v8::internal::SourcePosition::InliningStack(...)
      #17 v8::internal::ProfilerListener::CodeCreateEvent(...)
      #18 v8::internal::ExistingCodeLogger::LogExistingFunction(...)
      #19 v8::internal::ExistingCodeLogger::LogCompiledFunctions(...)
      #20 v8::internal::ProfilingScope::ProfilingScope(...)
      #21 v8::internal::CpuProfiler::EnableLogging()
      #22 v8::internal::CpuProfiler::CpuProfiler(...)
      #23 v8::CpuProfiler::New(...)
      #24 Init(napi_env__*, napi_value__*) (native addon, at require() time)
      #25 napi_module_register_by_symbol(...)
      #28 node::binding::DLOpen(...)
      

      strace shows the main thread parked in FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE on a contended mutex; every other thread is in its normal idle wait.

      Additional information

      Workarounds we validated/identified while root-causing this:

      Node 22 is in maintenance LTS until 2027-04 and this is a silent, unrecoverable hang, which is why a backport seems worth it despite maintenance mode.

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Labels

        No labels
        No labels

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
          Skip to content

          v22.x: main thread self-deadlocks when creating a CpuProfiler under GC pressure — backport request for V8 a6eaf75741 (RecursiveMutex for Logger, crbug 41497149) #65140

          Description

          @vincentventalon

          v22.x backport request: V8 a6eaf75741 ("[logging] Use RecursiveMutex for Logger") — main-thread self-deadlock when a CpuProfiler is created

          Version

          v22.20.0 (still present in v22.23.1 — see below)

          Platform

          Linux 7.0.0-22-generic #22-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC x86_64 (Docker node:22.20-bookworm-slim)
          

          Subsystem

          deps/v8

          What steps will reproduce the bug?

          Create a v8::CpuProfiler (e.g. any native addon or embedder calling v8::CpuProfiler::New, or in-process profiling agents — we hit it through @sentry/profiling-node, whose N-API Init creates a profiler at require() time) in a process that already has a significant amount of compiled script code, at a moment when the heap is close to the incremental-marking trigger.

          CpuProfiler::NewProfilingScopeV8FileLogger::LogCompiledFunctions() dispatches CodeCreateEvents through the Logger dispatcher, which holds a non-recursivebase::Mutex while calling listeners (deps/v8/src/logging/code-events.h). ProfilerListener::CodeCreateEvent initializes script line-ends, which allocates; if that allocation crosses the incremental-marking limit, V8 starts a major GC cycle on the same thread: Heap::StartIncrementalMarkingMarkCompactCollector::StartCompactionIsolate::AllowsCodeCompaction()logger()->allows_code_compaction() → attempts to re-acquire the same mutex → the main thread deadlocks against itself, forever.

          This is Chromium bug 41497149, fixed upstream in May 2024 by V8 commit a6eaf75741 ("[logging] Use RecursiveMutex for Logger", https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/5572952) — the commit message describes exactly this scenario. The fix landed in V8 ≥ 12.7, so Node 23/24 have it; Node 22's V8 12.4 does not, and the file is unchanged in v22.23.1 (deps/v8/src/logging/code-events.h still uses plain base::MutexGuard). Node 20/21 are equally affected but EOL.

          The patch is minimal (one file, MutexRecursiveMutex in the Logger dispatcher) and V8 12.4 already ships base::RecursiveMutex, so it should float trivially onto deps/v8 in v22.x.

          How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

          Non-deterministic by nature: the incremental-marking start has to land inside the LogCompiledFunctions walk. In production (NestJS monolith on a 2-vCPU host, addon loaded early in a large module graph, container cold-boot contention) we measured roughly 1 process start in 3-4 freezing forever. Calm restarts of the same build essentially never hit it, which makes it very painful to diagnose in the field.

          What is the expected behavior?

          Creating a CPU profiler never deadlocks the process.

          What do you see instead?

          The process freezes before binding any port, with zero output and ~0 CPU, and never crashes (so process managers keep it "online"). gdb backtrace of the frozen main thread (all other threads idle — same-thread self-deadlock):

          #1 pthread_mutex_lock
          #2 v8::internal::Isolate::AllowsCodeCompaction()
          #3 v8::internal::MarkCompactCollector::StartCompaction(...)
          #4 v8::internal::IncrementalMarking::StartMarkingMajor()
          #6 v8::internal::Heap::StartIncrementalMarking(...)
          #7 v8::internal::PagedSpaceAllocatorPolicy::EnsureAllocation(...)
          #8 v8::internal::MainAllocator::AllocateRawSlow(...)
          #11 v8::internal::FactoryBase<v8::internal::Factory>::NewFixedArray(...)
          #12 v8::internal::String::CalculateLineEnds(...)
          #13 v8::internal::Script::InitLineEndsInternal(...)
          #14 v8::internal::Script::GetPositionInfo(...)
          #16 v8::internal::SourcePosition::InliningStack(...)
          #17 v8::internal::ProfilerListener::CodeCreateEvent(...)
          #18 v8::internal::ExistingCodeLogger::LogExistingFunction(...)
          #19 v8::internal::ExistingCodeLogger::LogCompiledFunctions(...)
          #20 v8::internal::ProfilingScope::ProfilingScope(...)
          #21 v8::internal::CpuProfiler::EnableLogging()
          #22 v8::internal::CpuProfiler::CpuProfiler(...)
          #23 v8::CpuProfiler::New(...)
          #24 Init(napi_env__*, napi_value__*) (native addon, at require() time)
          #25 napi_module_register_by_symbol(...)
          #28 node::binding::DLOpen(...)
          

          strace shows the main thread parked in FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE on a contended mutex; every other thread is in its normal idle wait.

          Additional information

          Workarounds we validated/identified while root-causing this:

          Node 22 is in maintenance LTS until 2027-04 and this is a silent, unrecoverable hang, which is why a backport seems worth it despite maintenance mode.

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Labels

            No labels
            No labels

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              v22.x: main thread self-deadlocks when creating a CpuProfiler under GC pressure — backport request for V8 a6eaf75741 (RecursiveMutex for Logger, crbug 41497149) #65140

              Description

              @vincentventalon

              v22.x backport request: V8 a6eaf75741 ("[logging] Use RecursiveMutex for Logger") — main-thread self-deadlock when a CpuProfiler is created

              Version

              v22.20.0 (still present in v22.23.1 — see below)

              Platform

              Linux 7.0.0-22-generic #22-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC x86_64 (Docker node:22.20-bookworm-slim)
              

              Subsystem

              deps/v8

              What steps will reproduce the bug?

              Create a v8::CpuProfiler (e.g. any native addon or embedder calling v8::CpuProfiler::New, or in-process profiling agents — we hit it through @sentry/profiling-node, whose N-API Init creates a profiler at require() time) in a process that already has a significant amount of compiled script code, at a moment when the heap is close to the incremental-marking trigger.

              CpuProfiler::NewProfilingScopeV8FileLogger::LogCompiledFunctions() dispatches CodeCreateEvents through the Logger dispatcher, which holds a non-recursivebase::Mutex while calling listeners (deps/v8/src/logging/code-events.h). ProfilerListener::CodeCreateEvent initializes script line-ends, which allocates; if that allocation crosses the incremental-marking limit, V8 starts a major GC cycle on the same thread: Heap::StartIncrementalMarkingMarkCompactCollector::StartCompactionIsolate::AllowsCodeCompaction()logger()->allows_code_compaction() → attempts to re-acquire the same mutex → the main thread deadlocks against itself, forever.

              This is Chromium bug 41497149, fixed upstream in May 2024 by V8 commit a6eaf75741 ("[logging] Use RecursiveMutex for Logger", https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/5572952) — the commit message describes exactly this scenario. The fix landed in V8 ≥ 12.7, so Node 23/24 have it; Node 22's V8 12.4 does not, and the file is unchanged in v22.23.1 (deps/v8/src/logging/code-events.h still uses plain base::MutexGuard). Node 20/21 are equally affected but EOL.

              The patch is minimal (one file, MutexRecursiveMutex in the Logger dispatcher) and V8 12.4 already ships base::RecursiveMutex, so it should float trivially onto deps/v8 in v22.x.

              How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

              Non-deterministic by nature: the incremental-marking start has to land inside the LogCompiledFunctions walk. In production (NestJS monolith on a 2-vCPU host, addon loaded early in a large module graph, container cold-boot contention) we measured roughly 1 process start in 3-4 freezing forever. Calm restarts of the same build essentially never hit it, which makes it very painful to diagnose in the field.

              What is the expected behavior?

              Creating a CPU profiler never deadlocks the process.

              What do you see instead?

              The process freezes before binding any port, with zero output and ~0 CPU, and never crashes (so process managers keep it "online"). gdb backtrace of the frozen main thread (all other threads idle — same-thread self-deadlock):

              #1 pthread_mutex_lock
              #2 v8::internal::Isolate::AllowsCodeCompaction()
              #3 v8::internal::MarkCompactCollector::StartCompaction(...)
              #4 v8::internal::IncrementalMarking::StartMarkingMajor()
              #6 v8::internal::Heap::StartIncrementalMarking(...)
              #7 v8::internal::PagedSpaceAllocatorPolicy::EnsureAllocation(...)
              #8 v8::internal::MainAllocator::AllocateRawSlow(...)
              #11 v8::internal::FactoryBase<v8::internal::Factory>::NewFixedArray(...)
              #12 v8::internal::String::CalculateLineEnds(...)
              #13 v8::internal::Script::InitLineEndsInternal(...)
              #14 v8::internal::Script::GetPositionInfo(...)
              #16 v8::internal::SourcePosition::InliningStack(...)
              #17 v8::internal::ProfilerListener::CodeCreateEvent(...)
              #18 v8::internal::ExistingCodeLogger::LogExistingFunction(...)
              #19 v8::internal::ExistingCodeLogger::LogCompiledFunctions(...)
              #20 v8::internal::ProfilingScope::ProfilingScope(...)
              #21 v8::internal::CpuProfiler::EnableLogging()
              #22 v8::internal::CpuProfiler::CpuProfiler(...)
              #23 v8::CpuProfiler::New(...)
              #24 Init(napi_env__*, napi_value__*) (native addon, at require() time)
              #25 napi_module_register_by_symbol(...)
              #28 node::binding::DLOpen(...)
              

              strace shows the main thread parked in FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE on a contended mutex; every other thread is in its normal idle wait.

              Additional information

              Workarounds we validated/identified while root-causing this:

              Node 22 is in maintenance LTS until 2027-04 and this is a silent, unrecoverable hang, which is why a backport seems worth it despite maintenance mode.

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Labels

                No labels
                No labels

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions

                  , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
                  Skip to content

                  v22.x: main thread self-deadlocks when creating a CpuProfiler under GC pressure — backport request for V8 a6eaf75741 (RecursiveMutex for Logger, crbug 41497149) #65140

                  Description

                  @vincentventalon

                  v22.x backport request: V8 a6eaf75741 ("[logging] Use RecursiveMutex for Logger") — main-thread self-deadlock when a CpuProfiler is created

                  Version

                  v22.20.0 (still present in v22.23.1 — see below)

                  Platform

                  Linux 7.0.0-22-generic #22-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC x86_64 (Docker node:22.20-bookworm-slim)
                  

                  Subsystem

                  deps/v8

                  What steps will reproduce the bug?

                  Create a v8::CpuProfiler (e.g. any native addon or embedder calling v8::CpuProfiler::New, or in-process profiling agents — we hit it through @sentry/profiling-node, whose N-API Init creates a profiler at require() time) in a process that already has a significant amount of compiled script code, at a moment when the heap is close to the incremental-marking trigger.

                  CpuProfiler::NewProfilingScopeV8FileLogger::LogCompiledFunctions() dispatches CodeCreateEvents through the Logger dispatcher, which holds a non-recursivebase::Mutex while calling listeners (deps/v8/src/logging/code-events.h). ProfilerListener::CodeCreateEvent initializes script line-ends, which allocates; if that allocation crosses the incremental-marking limit, V8 starts a major GC cycle on the same thread: Heap::StartIncrementalMarkingMarkCompactCollector::StartCompactionIsolate::AllowsCodeCompaction()logger()->allows_code_compaction() → attempts to re-acquire the same mutex → the main thread deadlocks against itself, forever.

                  This is Chromium bug 41497149, fixed upstream in May 2024 by V8 commit a6eaf75741 ("[logging] Use RecursiveMutex for Logger", https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/5572952) — the commit message describes exactly this scenario. The fix landed in V8 ≥ 12.7, so Node 23/24 have it; Node 22's V8 12.4 does not, and the file is unchanged in v22.23.1 (deps/v8/src/logging/code-events.h still uses plain base::MutexGuard). Node 20/21 are equally affected but EOL.

                  The patch is minimal (one file, MutexRecursiveMutex in the Logger dispatcher) and V8 12.4 already ships base::RecursiveMutex, so it should float trivially onto deps/v8 in v22.x.

                  How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

                  Non-deterministic by nature: the incremental-marking start has to land inside the LogCompiledFunctions walk. In production (NestJS monolith on a 2-vCPU host, addon loaded early in a large module graph, container cold-boot contention) we measured roughly 1 process start in 3-4 freezing forever. Calm restarts of the same build essentially never hit it, which makes it very painful to diagnose in the field.

                  What is the expected behavior?

                  Creating a CPU profiler never deadlocks the process.

                  What do you see instead?

                  The process freezes before binding any port, with zero output and ~0 CPU, and never crashes (so process managers keep it "online"). gdb backtrace of the frozen main thread (all other threads idle — same-thread self-deadlock):

                  #1 pthread_mutex_lock
                  #2 v8::internal::Isolate::AllowsCodeCompaction()
                  #3 v8::internal::MarkCompactCollector::StartCompaction(...)
                  #4 v8::internal::IncrementalMarking::StartMarkingMajor()
                  #6 v8::internal::Heap::StartIncrementalMarking(...)
                  #7 v8::internal::PagedSpaceAllocatorPolicy::EnsureAllocation(...)
                  #8 v8::internal::MainAllocator::AllocateRawSlow(...)
                  #11 v8::internal::FactoryBase<v8::internal::Factory>::NewFixedArray(...)
                  #12 v8::internal::String::CalculateLineEnds(...)
                  #13 v8::internal::Script::InitLineEndsInternal(...)
                  #14 v8::internal::Script::GetPositionInfo(...)
                  #16 v8::internal::SourcePosition::InliningStack(...)
                  #17 v8::internal::ProfilerListener::CodeCreateEvent(...)
                  #18 v8::internal::ExistingCodeLogger::LogExistingFunction(...)
                  #19 v8::internal::ExistingCodeLogger::LogCompiledFunctions(...)
                  #20 v8::internal::ProfilingScope::ProfilingScope(...)
                  #21 v8::internal::CpuProfiler::EnableLogging()
                  #22 v8::internal::CpuProfiler::CpuProfiler(...)
                  #23 v8::CpuProfiler::New(...)
                  #24 Init(napi_env__*, napi_value__*) (native addon, at require() time)
                  #25 napi_module_register_by_symbol(...)
                  #28 node::binding::DLOpen(...)
                  

                  strace shows the main thread parked in FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE on a contended mutex; every other thread is in its normal idle wait.

                  Additional information

                  Workarounds we validated/identified while root-causing this:

                  Node 22 is in maintenance LTS until 2027-04 and this is a silent, unrecoverable hang, which is why a backport seems worth it despite maintenance mode.

                  Metadata

                  Metadata

                  Assignees

                  No one assigned

                    Labels

                    No labels
                    No labels

                    Type

                    No type

                    Projects

                    No projects

                      Milestone

                      No milestone

                      Relationships

                      None yet

                      Development

                      No branches or pull requests

                      Issue actions

                      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                      Skip to content

                      v22.x: main thread self-deadlocks when creating a CpuProfiler under GC pressure — backport request for V8 a6eaf75741 (RecursiveMutex for Logger, crbug 41497149) #65140

                      Description

                      @vincentventalon

                      v22.x backport request: V8 a6eaf75741 ("[logging] Use RecursiveMutex for Logger") — main-thread self-deadlock when a CpuProfiler is created

                      Version

                      v22.20.0 (still present in v22.23.1 — see below)

                      Platform

                      Linux 7.0.0-22-generic #22-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC x86_64 (Docker node:22.20-bookworm-slim)
                      

                      Subsystem

                      deps/v8

                      What steps will reproduce the bug?

                      Create a v8::CpuProfiler (e.g. any native addon or embedder calling v8::CpuProfiler::New, or in-process profiling agents — we hit it through @sentry/profiling-node, whose N-API Init creates a profiler at require() time) in a process that already has a significant amount of compiled script code, at a moment when the heap is close to the incremental-marking trigger.

                      CpuProfiler::NewProfilingScopeV8FileLogger::LogCompiledFunctions() dispatches CodeCreateEvents through the Logger dispatcher, which holds a non-recursivebase::Mutex while calling listeners (deps/v8/src/logging/code-events.h). ProfilerListener::CodeCreateEvent initializes script line-ends, which allocates; if that allocation crosses the incremental-marking limit, V8 starts a major GC cycle on the same thread: Heap::StartIncrementalMarkingMarkCompactCollector::StartCompactionIsolate::AllowsCodeCompaction()logger()->allows_code_compaction() → attempts to re-acquire the same mutex → the main thread deadlocks against itself, forever.

                      This is Chromium bug 41497149, fixed upstream in May 2024 by V8 commit a6eaf75741 ("[logging] Use RecursiveMutex for Logger", https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/5572952) — the commit message describes exactly this scenario. The fix landed in V8 ≥ 12.7, so Node 23/24 have it; Node 22's V8 12.4 does not, and the file is unchanged in v22.23.1 (deps/v8/src/logging/code-events.h still uses plain base::MutexGuard). Node 20/21 are equally affected but EOL.

                      The patch is minimal (one file, MutexRecursiveMutex in the Logger dispatcher) and V8 12.4 already ships base::RecursiveMutex, so it should float trivially onto deps/v8 in v22.x.

                      How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

                      Non-deterministic by nature: the incremental-marking start has to land inside the LogCompiledFunctions walk. In production (NestJS monolith on a 2-vCPU host, addon loaded early in a large module graph, container cold-boot contention) we measured roughly 1 process start in 3-4 freezing forever. Calm restarts of the same build essentially never hit it, which makes it very painful to diagnose in the field.

                      What is the expected behavior?

                      Creating a CPU profiler never deadlocks the process.

                      What do you see instead?

                      The process freezes before binding any port, with zero output and ~0 CPU, and never crashes (so process managers keep it "online"). gdb backtrace of the frozen main thread (all other threads idle — same-thread self-deadlock):

                      #1 pthread_mutex_lock
                      #2 v8::internal::Isolate::AllowsCodeCompaction()
                      #3 v8::internal::MarkCompactCollector::StartCompaction(...)
                      #4 v8::internal::IncrementalMarking::StartMarkingMajor()
                      #6 v8::internal::Heap::StartIncrementalMarking(...)
                      #7 v8::internal::PagedSpaceAllocatorPolicy::EnsureAllocation(...)
                      #8 v8::internal::MainAllocator::AllocateRawSlow(...)
                      #11 v8::internal::FactoryBase<v8::internal::Factory>::NewFixedArray(...)
                      #12 v8::internal::String::CalculateLineEnds(...)
                      #13 v8::internal::Script::InitLineEndsInternal(...)
                      #14 v8::internal::Script::GetPositionInfo(...)
                      #16 v8::internal::SourcePosition::InliningStack(...)
                      #17 v8::internal::ProfilerListener::CodeCreateEvent(...)
                      #18 v8::internal::ExistingCodeLogger::LogExistingFunction(...)
                      #19 v8::internal::ExistingCodeLogger::LogCompiledFunctions(...)
                      #20 v8::internal::ProfilingScope::ProfilingScope(...)
                      #21 v8::internal::CpuProfiler::EnableLogging()
                      #22 v8::internal::CpuProfiler::CpuProfiler(...)
                      #23 v8::CpuProfiler::New(...)
                      #24 Init(napi_env__*, napi_value__*) (native addon, at require() time)
                      #25 napi_module_register_by_symbol(...)
                      #28 node::binding::DLOpen(...)
                      

                      strace shows the main thread parked in FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE on a contended mutex; every other thread is in its normal idle wait.

                      Additional information

                      Workarounds we validated/identified while root-causing this:

                      Node 22 is in maintenance LTS until 2027-04 and this is a silent, unrecoverable hang, which is why a backport seems worth it despite maintenance mode.

                      Metadata

                      Metadata

                      Assignees

                      No one assigned

                        Labels

                        No labels
                        No labels

                        Type

                        No type

                        Projects

                        No projects

                          Milestone

                          No milestone

                          Relationships

                          None yet

                          Development

                          No branches or pull requests

                          Issue actions

                          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                          Skip to content

                          v22.x: main thread self-deadlocks when creating a CpuProfiler under GC pressure — backport request for V8 a6eaf75741 (RecursiveMutex for Logger, crbug 41497149) #65140

                          Description

                          @vincentventalon

                          v22.x backport request: V8 a6eaf75741 ("[logging] Use RecursiveMutex for Logger") — main-thread self-deadlock when a CpuProfiler is created

                          Version

                          v22.20.0 (still present in v22.23.1 — see below)

                          Platform

                          Linux 7.0.0-22-generic #22-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC x86_64 (Docker node:22.20-bookworm-slim)
                          

                          Subsystem

                          deps/v8

                          What steps will reproduce the bug?

                          Create a v8::CpuProfiler (e.g. any native addon or embedder calling v8::CpuProfiler::New, or in-process profiling agents — we hit it through @sentry/profiling-node, whose N-API Init creates a profiler at require() time) in a process that already has a significant amount of compiled script code, at a moment when the heap is close to the incremental-marking trigger.

                          CpuProfiler::NewProfilingScopeV8FileLogger::LogCompiledFunctions() dispatches CodeCreateEvents through the Logger dispatcher, which holds a non-recursivebase::Mutex while calling listeners (deps/v8/src/logging/code-events.h). ProfilerListener::CodeCreateEvent initializes script line-ends, which allocates; if that allocation crosses the incremental-marking limit, V8 starts a major GC cycle on the same thread: Heap::StartIncrementalMarkingMarkCompactCollector::StartCompactionIsolate::AllowsCodeCompaction()logger()->allows_code_compaction() → attempts to re-acquire the same mutex → the main thread deadlocks against itself, forever.

                          This is Chromium bug 41497149, fixed upstream in May 2024 by V8 commit a6eaf75741 ("[logging] Use RecursiveMutex for Logger", https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/5572952) — the commit message describes exactly this scenario. The fix landed in V8 ≥ 12.7, so Node 23/24 have it; Node 22's V8 12.4 does not, and the file is unchanged in v22.23.1 (deps/v8/src/logging/code-events.h still uses plain base::MutexGuard). Node 20/21 are equally affected but EOL.

                          The patch is minimal (one file, MutexRecursiveMutex in the Logger dispatcher) and V8 12.4 already ships base::RecursiveMutex, so it should float trivially onto deps/v8 in v22.x.

                          How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

                          Non-deterministic by nature: the incremental-marking start has to land inside the LogCompiledFunctions walk. In production (NestJS monolith on a 2-vCPU host, addon loaded early in a large module graph, container cold-boot contention) we measured roughly 1 process start in 3-4 freezing forever. Calm restarts of the same build essentially never hit it, which makes it very painful to diagnose in the field.

                          What is the expected behavior?

                          Creating a CPU profiler never deadlocks the process.

                          What do you see instead?

                          The process freezes before binding any port, with zero output and ~0 CPU, and never crashes (so process managers keep it "online"). gdb backtrace of the frozen main thread (all other threads idle — same-thread self-deadlock):

                          #1 pthread_mutex_lock
                          #2 v8::internal::Isolate::AllowsCodeCompaction()
                          #3 v8::internal::MarkCompactCollector::StartCompaction(...)
                          #4 v8::internal::IncrementalMarking::StartMarkingMajor()
                          #6 v8::internal::Heap::StartIncrementalMarking(...)
                          #7 v8::internal::PagedSpaceAllocatorPolicy::EnsureAllocation(...)
                          #8 v8::internal::MainAllocator::AllocateRawSlow(...)
                          #11 v8::internal::FactoryBase<v8::internal::Factory>::NewFixedArray(...)
                          #12 v8::internal::String::CalculateLineEnds(...)
                          #13 v8::internal::Script::InitLineEndsInternal(...)
                          #14 v8::internal::Script::GetPositionInfo(...)
                          #16 v8::internal::SourcePosition::InliningStack(...)
                          #17 v8::internal::ProfilerListener::CodeCreateEvent(...)
                          #18 v8::internal::ExistingCodeLogger::LogExistingFunction(...)
                          #19 v8::internal::ExistingCodeLogger::LogCompiledFunctions(...)
                          #20 v8::internal::ProfilingScope::ProfilingScope(...)
                          #21 v8::internal::CpuProfiler::EnableLogging()
                          #22 v8::internal::CpuProfiler::CpuProfiler(...)
                          #23 v8::CpuProfiler::New(...)
                          #24 Init(napi_env__*, napi_value__*) (native addon, at require() time)
                          #25 napi_module_register_by_symbol(...)
                          #28 node::binding::DLOpen(...)
                          

                          strace shows the main thread parked in FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE on a contended mutex; every other thread is in its normal idle wait.

                          Additional information

                          Workarounds we validated/identified while root-causing this:

                          Node 22 is in maintenance LTS until 2027-04 and this is a silent, unrecoverable hang, which is why a backport seems worth it despite maintenance mode.

                          Metadata

                          Metadata

                          Assignees

                          No one assigned

                            Labels

                            No labels
                            No labels

                            Type

                            No type

                            Projects

                            No projects

                              Milestone

                              No milestone

                              Relationships

                              None yet

                              Development

                              No branches or pull requests

                              Issue actions

                              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                              Skip to content

                              v22.x: main thread self-deadlocks when creating a CpuProfiler under GC pressure — backport request for V8 a6eaf75741 (RecursiveMutex for Logger, crbug 41497149) #65140

                              Description

                              @vincentventalon

                              v22.x backport request: V8 a6eaf75741 ("[logging] Use RecursiveMutex for Logger") — main-thread self-deadlock when a CpuProfiler is created

                              Version

                              v22.20.0 (still present in v22.23.1 — see below)

                              Platform

                              Linux 7.0.0-22-generic #22-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC x86_64 (Docker node:22.20-bookworm-slim)
                              

                              Subsystem

                              deps/v8

                              What steps will reproduce the bug?

                              Create a v8::CpuProfiler (e.g. any native addon or embedder calling v8::CpuProfiler::New, or in-process profiling agents — we hit it through @sentry/profiling-node, whose N-API Init creates a profiler at require() time) in a process that already has a significant amount of compiled script code, at a moment when the heap is close to the incremental-marking trigger.

                              CpuProfiler::NewProfilingScopeV8FileLogger::LogCompiledFunctions() dispatches CodeCreateEvents through the Logger dispatcher, which holds a non-recursivebase::Mutex while calling listeners (deps/v8/src/logging/code-events.h). ProfilerListener::CodeCreateEvent initializes script line-ends, which allocates; if that allocation crosses the incremental-marking limit, V8 starts a major GC cycle on the same thread: Heap::StartIncrementalMarkingMarkCompactCollector::StartCompactionIsolate::AllowsCodeCompaction()logger()->allows_code_compaction() → attempts to re-acquire the same mutex → the main thread deadlocks against itself, forever.

                              This is Chromium bug 41497149, fixed upstream in May 2024 by V8 commit a6eaf75741 ("[logging] Use RecursiveMutex for Logger", https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/5572952) — the commit message describes exactly this scenario. The fix landed in V8 ≥ 12.7, so Node 23/24 have it; Node 22's V8 12.4 does not, and the file is unchanged in v22.23.1 (deps/v8/src/logging/code-events.h still uses plain base::MutexGuard). Node 20/21 are equally affected but EOL.

                              The patch is minimal (one file, MutexRecursiveMutex in the Logger dispatcher) and V8 12.4 already ships base::RecursiveMutex, so it should float trivially onto deps/v8 in v22.x.

                              How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

                              Non-deterministic by nature: the incremental-marking start has to land inside the LogCompiledFunctions walk. In production (NestJS monolith on a 2-vCPU host, addon loaded early in a large module graph, container cold-boot contention) we measured roughly 1 process start in 3-4 freezing forever. Calm restarts of the same build essentially never hit it, which makes it very painful to diagnose in the field.

                              What is the expected behavior?

                              Creating a CPU profiler never deadlocks the process.

                              What do you see instead?

                              The process freezes before binding any port, with zero output and ~0 CPU, and never crashes (so process managers keep it "online"). gdb backtrace of the frozen main thread (all other threads idle — same-thread self-deadlock):

                              #1 pthread_mutex_lock
                              #2 v8::internal::Isolate::AllowsCodeCompaction()
                              #3 v8::internal::MarkCompactCollector::StartCompaction(...)
                              #4 v8::internal::IncrementalMarking::StartMarkingMajor()
                              #6 v8::internal::Heap::StartIncrementalMarking(...)
                              #7 v8::internal::PagedSpaceAllocatorPolicy::EnsureAllocation(...)
                              #8 v8::internal::MainAllocator::AllocateRawSlow(...)
                              #11 v8::internal::FactoryBase<v8::internal::Factory>::NewFixedArray(...)
                              #12 v8::internal::String::CalculateLineEnds(...)
                              #13 v8::internal::Script::InitLineEndsInternal(...)
                              #14 v8::internal::Script::GetPositionInfo(...)
                              #16 v8::internal::SourcePosition::InliningStack(...)
                              #17 v8::internal::ProfilerListener::CodeCreateEvent(...)
                              #18 v8::internal::ExistingCodeLogger::LogExistingFunction(...)
                              #19 v8::internal::ExistingCodeLogger::LogCompiledFunctions(...)
                              #20 v8::internal::ProfilingScope::ProfilingScope(...)
                              #21 v8::internal::CpuProfiler::EnableLogging()
                              #22 v8::internal::CpuProfiler::CpuProfiler(...)
                              #23 v8::CpuProfiler::New(...)
                              #24 Init(napi_env__*, napi_value__*) (native addon, at require() time)
                              #25 napi_module_register_by_symbol(...)
                              #28 node::binding::DLOpen(...)
                              

                              strace shows the main thread parked in FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE on a contended mutex; every other thread is in its normal idle wait.

                              Additional information

                              Workarounds we validated/identified while root-causing this:

                              Node 22 is in maintenance LTS until 2027-04 and this is a silent, unrecoverable hang, which is why a backport seems worth it despite maintenance mode.

                              Metadata

                              Metadata

                              Assignees

                              No one assigned

                                Labels

                                No labels
                                No labels

                                Type

                                No type

                                Projects

                                No projects

                                  Milestone

                                  No milestone

                                  Relationships

                                  None yet

                                  Development

                                  No branches or pull requests

                                  Issue actions