--check silently passes a .js file with a syntax error when the file contains ESM syntax #65202

Description

@MerlijnW70

Version

v22.22.1

Platform

Microsoft Windows NT 10.0.26200.0 x64

Subsystem

module / cli (lib/internal/main/check_syntax.js)

What steps will reproduce the bug?

Create broken.js in a directory with no package.json:

importfsfrom"node:fs";var=;

Then:

$ node --check broken.js ;echo"exit: $?"exit: 0
$ node broken.jsvar = ; ^SyntaxError: Unexpected token '='

--check reports nothing and exits 0 for a file that is not valid JavaScript under either goal
symbol.

How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

Always, given the condition: the file's format must be ambiguous — a .js extension with no
"type" in the nearest package.json — and the source must contain import or export.
Everything that states its format is handled correctly:

the filenode --check
.mjs, or "type": "module"correct — reports the error
"type": "commonjs"correct — Cannot use import statement outside a module
.js, no "type", containing import/exportexit 0, nothing reported
.js whose only ESM signal is top-level awaitcorrect — reports the error

What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

A non-zero exit and the SyntaxError, as with every other invalid file. The documentation for
-c, --check is "Syntax check the script without executing", with no caveat about module
detection — and the same source reports the error correctly the moment its format is stated.

This matters in practice because node --check is a common cheap gate in CI, and a plain .js
file containing import is the shape most projects have — so the sources most likely to be
checked are the ones that silently pass.

What do you see instead?

Exit code 0 and no output.

Additional information

lib/internal/main/check_syntax.js parses under the Module goal only when defaultGetFormat
answers 'module', which an ambiguous .js does not:

if(format==='module'){const{ ModuleWrap }=internalBinding('module_wrap');newModuleWrap(filename,undefined,source,0,0);return;}wrapSafe(filename,source,undefined,format);

So the CommonJS branch runs. Inside wrapSafe, cjsModuleInstance is undefined here, so
shouldDetectModule falls through to --require-module — on by default — and
compileFunctionForCJSLoaderdetects ESM instead of throwing. Its result is then discarded, and
the source is never parsed under either goal.

Module.prototype._compile handles exactly this case correctly a little further down the same
file, by reading the flag the detection returns:

if(format!=='module'){constresult=wrapSafe(filename,content,this,format);compiledWrapper=result.function;if(result.canParseAsESM){format='module';}}if(format==='module'){loadESMFromCJS(this,filename,format,content);return;}

checkSyntax looks like it wants the same canParseAsESM branch, falling back to the ModuleWrap
parse it already has above rather than returning.

The relevant part of check_syntax.js is unchanged on main; the file was last touched
2024-12-02. The behaviour most likely dates from module: unflag detect-module (2024-07-20), which
made detection the default for this path.

Test coverage.test/sequential/test-cli-syntax-bad.js checks bad_syntax.js, bad_syntax,
bad_syntax_shebang.js and bad_syntax_shebang — all CommonJS.
test/fixtures/syntax/bad_syntax.mjs exists but is used only by test-esm-error-cache.js and
test-compile-cache-bad-syntax.js, not by either --check test. So neither a .mjs file nor a
detected-ESM .js file is currently asserted to fail --check.

I am happy to open a PR with the fix and a fixture plus test if that shape is welcome.

Found while differential-testing Node against
ViperJS, an embeddable JavaScript engine in safe Rust.
Sweeping eight repositories, the two disagreed about 18 files; every one of them turned out to be
genuinely invalid JavaScript, and node --check had reported nine as fine. V8 itself is right
about all eighteen — it is only --check that never asks it.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
       blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
      }
      } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
      })();
      (function(){
      try {
      var __m = "github.com";
      var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
      
      Skip to content

      --check silently passes a .js file with a syntax error when the file contains ESM syntax #65202

      Description

      @MerlijnW70

      Version

      v22.22.1

      Platform

      Microsoft Windows NT 10.0.26200.0 x64
      

      Subsystem

      module / cli (lib/internal/main/check_syntax.js)

      What steps will reproduce the bug?

      Create broken.js in a directory with no package.json:

      importfsfrom"node:fs";var=;

      Then:

      $ node --check broken.js ;echo"exit: $?"exit: 0
      $ node broken.jsvar = ; ^SyntaxError: Unexpected token '='

      --check reports nothing and exits 0 for a file that is not valid JavaScript under either goal
      symbol.

      How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

      Always, given the condition: the file's format must be ambiguous — a .js extension with no
      "type" in the nearest package.json — and the source must contain import or export.
      Everything that states its format is handled correctly:

      the filenode --check
      .mjs, or "type": "module"correct — reports the error
      "type": "commonjs"correct — Cannot use import statement outside a module
      .js, no "type", containing import/exportexit 0, nothing reported
      .js whose only ESM signal is top-level awaitcorrect — reports the error

      What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

      A non-zero exit and the SyntaxError, as with every other invalid file. The documentation for
      -c, --check is "Syntax check the script without executing", with no caveat about module
      detection — and the same source reports the error correctly the moment its format is stated.

      This matters in practice because node --check is a common cheap gate in CI, and a plain .js
      file containing import is the shape most projects have — so the sources most likely to be
      checked are the ones that silently pass.

      What do you see instead?

      Exit code 0 and no output.

      Additional information

      lib/internal/main/check_syntax.js parses under the Module goal only when defaultGetFormat
      answers 'module', which an ambiguous .js does not:

      if(format==='module'){const{ ModuleWrap }=internalBinding('module_wrap');newModuleWrap(filename,undefined,source,0,0);return;}wrapSafe(filename,source,undefined,format);

      So the CommonJS branch runs. Inside wrapSafe, cjsModuleInstance is undefined here, so
      shouldDetectModule falls through to --require-module — on by default — and
      compileFunctionForCJSLoaderdetects ESM instead of throwing. Its result is then discarded, and
      the source is never parsed under either goal.

      Module.prototype._compile handles exactly this case correctly a little further down the same
      file, by reading the flag the detection returns:

      if(format!=='module'){constresult=wrapSafe(filename,content,this,format);compiledWrapper=result.function;if(result.canParseAsESM){format='module';}}if(format==='module'){loadESMFromCJS(this,filename,format,content);return;}

      checkSyntax looks like it wants the same canParseAsESM branch, falling back to the ModuleWrap
      parse it already has above rather than returning.

      The relevant part of check_syntax.js is unchanged on main; the file was last touched
      2024-12-02. The behaviour most likely dates from module: unflag detect-module (2024-07-20), which
      made detection the default for this path.

      Test coverage.test/sequential/test-cli-syntax-bad.js checks bad_syntax.js, bad_syntax,
      bad_syntax_shebang.js and bad_syntax_shebang — all CommonJS.
      test/fixtures/syntax/bad_syntax.mjs exists but is used only by test-esm-error-cache.js and
      test-compile-cache-bad-syntax.js, not by either --check test. So neither a .mjs file nor a
      detected-ESM .js file is currently asserted to fail --check.

      I am happy to open a PR with the fix and a fixture plus test if that shape is welcome.

      Found while differential-testing Node against
      ViperJS, an embeddable JavaScript engine in safe Rust.
      Sweeping eight repositories, the two disagreed about 18 files; every one of them turned out to be
      genuinely invalid JavaScript, and node --check had reported nine as fine. V8 itself is right
      about all eighteen — it is only --check that never asks it.

      Activity

      Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Labels

        No labels
        No labels

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
          Skip to content

          --check silently passes a .js file with a syntax error when the file contains ESM syntax #65202

          Description

          @MerlijnW70

          Version

          v22.22.1

          Platform

          Microsoft Windows NT 10.0.26200.0 x64
          

          Subsystem

          module / cli (lib/internal/main/check_syntax.js)

          What steps will reproduce the bug?

          Create broken.js in a directory with no package.json:

          importfsfrom"node:fs";var=;

          Then:

          $ node --check broken.js ;echo"exit: $?"exit: 0
          $ node broken.jsvar = ; ^SyntaxError: Unexpected token '='

          --check reports nothing and exits 0 for a file that is not valid JavaScript under either goal
          symbol.

          How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

          Always, given the condition: the file's format must be ambiguous — a .js extension with no
          "type" in the nearest package.json — and the source must contain import or export.
          Everything that states its format is handled correctly:

          the filenode --check
          .mjs, or "type": "module"correct — reports the error
          "type": "commonjs"correct — Cannot use import statement outside a module
          .js, no "type", containing import/exportexit 0, nothing reported
          .js whose only ESM signal is top-level awaitcorrect — reports the error

          What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

          A non-zero exit and the SyntaxError, as with every other invalid file. The documentation for
          -c, --check is "Syntax check the script without executing", with no caveat about module
          detection — and the same source reports the error correctly the moment its format is stated.

          This matters in practice because node --check is a common cheap gate in CI, and a plain .js
          file containing import is the shape most projects have — so the sources most likely to be
          checked are the ones that silently pass.

          What do you see instead?

          Exit code 0 and no output.

          Additional information

          lib/internal/main/check_syntax.js parses under the Module goal only when defaultGetFormat
          answers 'module', which an ambiguous .js does not:

          if(format==='module'){const{ ModuleWrap }=internalBinding('module_wrap');newModuleWrap(filename,undefined,source,0,0);return;}wrapSafe(filename,source,undefined,format);

          So the CommonJS branch runs. Inside wrapSafe, cjsModuleInstance is undefined here, so
          shouldDetectModule falls through to --require-module — on by default — and
          compileFunctionForCJSLoaderdetects ESM instead of throwing. Its result is then discarded, and
          the source is never parsed under either goal.

          Module.prototype._compile handles exactly this case correctly a little further down the same
          file, by reading the flag the detection returns:

          if(format!=='module'){constresult=wrapSafe(filename,content,this,format);compiledWrapper=result.function;if(result.canParseAsESM){format='module';}}if(format==='module'){loadESMFromCJS(this,filename,format,content);return;}

          checkSyntax looks like it wants the same canParseAsESM branch, falling back to the ModuleWrap
          parse it already has above rather than returning.

          The relevant part of check_syntax.js is unchanged on main; the file was last touched
          2024-12-02. The behaviour most likely dates from module: unflag detect-module (2024-07-20), which
          made detection the default for this path.

          Test coverage.test/sequential/test-cli-syntax-bad.js checks bad_syntax.js, bad_syntax,
          bad_syntax_shebang.js and bad_syntax_shebang — all CommonJS.
          test/fixtures/syntax/bad_syntax.mjs exists but is used only by test-esm-error-cache.js and
          test-compile-cache-bad-syntax.js, not by either --check test. So neither a .mjs file nor a
          detected-ESM .js file is currently asserted to fail --check.

          I am happy to open a PR with the fix and a fixture plus test if that shape is welcome.

          Found while differential-testing Node against
          ViperJS, an embeddable JavaScript engine in safe Rust.
          Sweeping eight repositories, the two disagreed about 18 files; every one of them turned out to be
          genuinely invalid JavaScript, and node --check had reported nine as fine. V8 itself is right
          about all eighteen — it is only --check that never asks it.

          Activity

          Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Labels

            No labels
            No labels

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              --check silently passes a .js file with a syntax error when the file contains ESM syntax #65202

              Description

              @MerlijnW70

              Version

              v22.22.1

              Platform

              Microsoft Windows NT 10.0.26200.0 x64
              

              Subsystem

              module / cli (lib/internal/main/check_syntax.js)

              What steps will reproduce the bug?

              Create broken.js in a directory with no package.json:

              importfsfrom"node:fs";var=;

              Then:

              $ node --check broken.js ;echo"exit: $?"exit: 0
              $ node broken.jsvar = ; ^SyntaxError: Unexpected token '='

              --check reports nothing and exits 0 for a file that is not valid JavaScript under either goal
              symbol.

              How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

              Always, given the condition: the file's format must be ambiguous — a .js extension with no
              "type" in the nearest package.json — and the source must contain import or export.
              Everything that states its format is handled correctly:

              the filenode --check
              .mjs, or "type": "module"correct — reports the error
              "type": "commonjs"correct — Cannot use import statement outside a module
              .js, no "type", containing import/exportexit 0, nothing reported
              .js whose only ESM signal is top-level awaitcorrect — reports the error

              What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

              A non-zero exit and the SyntaxError, as with every other invalid file. The documentation for
              -c, --check is "Syntax check the script without executing", with no caveat about module
              detection — and the same source reports the error correctly the moment its format is stated.

              This matters in practice because node --check is a common cheap gate in CI, and a plain .js
              file containing import is the shape most projects have — so the sources most likely to be
              checked are the ones that silently pass.

              What do you see instead?

              Exit code 0 and no output.

              Additional information

              lib/internal/main/check_syntax.js parses under the Module goal only when defaultGetFormat
              answers 'module', which an ambiguous .js does not:

              if(format==='module'){const{ ModuleWrap }=internalBinding('module_wrap');newModuleWrap(filename,undefined,source,0,0);return;}wrapSafe(filename,source,undefined,format);

              So the CommonJS branch runs. Inside wrapSafe, cjsModuleInstance is undefined here, so
              shouldDetectModule falls through to --require-module — on by default — and
              compileFunctionForCJSLoaderdetects ESM instead of throwing. Its result is then discarded, and
              the source is never parsed under either goal.

              Module.prototype._compile handles exactly this case correctly a little further down the same
              file, by reading the flag the detection returns:

              if(format!=='module'){constresult=wrapSafe(filename,content,this,format);compiledWrapper=result.function;if(result.canParseAsESM){format='module';}}if(format==='module'){loadESMFromCJS(this,filename,format,content);return;}

              checkSyntax looks like it wants the same canParseAsESM branch, falling back to the ModuleWrap
              parse it already has above rather than returning.

              The relevant part of check_syntax.js is unchanged on main; the file was last touched
              2024-12-02. The behaviour most likely dates from module: unflag detect-module (2024-07-20), which
              made detection the default for this path.

              Test coverage.test/sequential/test-cli-syntax-bad.js checks bad_syntax.js, bad_syntax,
              bad_syntax_shebang.js and bad_syntax_shebang — all CommonJS.
              test/fixtures/syntax/bad_syntax.mjs exists but is used only by test-esm-error-cache.js and
              test-compile-cache-bad-syntax.js, not by either --check test. So neither a .mjs file nor a
              detected-ESM .js file is currently asserted to fail --check.

              I am happy to open a PR with the fix and a fixture plus test if that shape is welcome.

              Found while differential-testing Node against
              ViperJS, an embeddable JavaScript engine in safe Rust.
              Sweeping eight repositories, the two disagreed about 18 files; every one of them turned out to be
              genuinely invalid JavaScript, and node --check had reported nine as fine. V8 itself is right
              about all eighteen — it is only --check that never asks it.

              Activity

              Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Labels

                No labels
                No labels

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions

                  , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
                  Skip to content

                  --check silently passes a .js file with a syntax error when the file contains ESM syntax #65202

                  Description

                  @MerlijnW70

                  Version

                  v22.22.1

                  Platform

                  Microsoft Windows NT 10.0.26200.0 x64
                  

                  Subsystem

                  module / cli (lib/internal/main/check_syntax.js)

                  What steps will reproduce the bug?

                  Create broken.js in a directory with no package.json:

                  importfsfrom"node:fs";var=;

                  Then:

                  $ node --check broken.js ;echo"exit: $?"exit: 0
                  $ node broken.jsvar = ; ^SyntaxError: Unexpected token '='

                  --check reports nothing and exits 0 for a file that is not valid JavaScript under either goal
                  symbol.

                  How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

                  Always, given the condition: the file's format must be ambiguous — a .js extension with no
                  "type" in the nearest package.json — and the source must contain import or export.
                  Everything that states its format is handled correctly:

                  the filenode --check
                  .mjs, or "type": "module"correct — reports the error
                  "type": "commonjs"correct — Cannot use import statement outside a module
                  .js, no "type", containing import/exportexit 0, nothing reported
                  .js whose only ESM signal is top-level awaitcorrect — reports the error

                  What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

                  A non-zero exit and the SyntaxError, as with every other invalid file. The documentation for
                  -c, --check is "Syntax check the script without executing", with no caveat about module
                  detection — and the same source reports the error correctly the moment its format is stated.

                  This matters in practice because node --check is a common cheap gate in CI, and a plain .js
                  file containing import is the shape most projects have — so the sources most likely to be
                  checked are the ones that silently pass.

                  What do you see instead?

                  Exit code 0 and no output.

                  Additional information

                  lib/internal/main/check_syntax.js parses under the Module goal only when defaultGetFormat
                  answers 'module', which an ambiguous .js does not:

                  if(format==='module'){const{ ModuleWrap }=internalBinding('module_wrap');newModuleWrap(filename,undefined,source,0,0);return;}wrapSafe(filename,source,undefined,format);

                  So the CommonJS branch runs. Inside wrapSafe, cjsModuleInstance is undefined here, so
                  shouldDetectModule falls through to --require-module — on by default — and
                  compileFunctionForCJSLoaderdetects ESM instead of throwing. Its result is then discarded, and
                  the source is never parsed under either goal.

                  Module.prototype._compile handles exactly this case correctly a little further down the same
                  file, by reading the flag the detection returns:

                  if(format!=='module'){constresult=wrapSafe(filename,content,this,format);compiledWrapper=result.function;if(result.canParseAsESM){format='module';}}if(format==='module'){loadESMFromCJS(this,filename,format,content);return;}

                  checkSyntax looks like it wants the same canParseAsESM branch, falling back to the ModuleWrap
                  parse it already has above rather than returning.

                  The relevant part of check_syntax.js is unchanged on main; the file was last touched
                  2024-12-02. The behaviour most likely dates from module: unflag detect-module (2024-07-20), which
                  made detection the default for this path.

                  Test coverage.test/sequential/test-cli-syntax-bad.js checks bad_syntax.js, bad_syntax,
                  bad_syntax_shebang.js and bad_syntax_shebang — all CommonJS.
                  test/fixtures/syntax/bad_syntax.mjs exists but is used only by test-esm-error-cache.js and
                  test-compile-cache-bad-syntax.js, not by either --check test. So neither a .mjs file nor a
                  detected-ESM .js file is currently asserted to fail --check.

                  I am happy to open a PR with the fix and a fixture plus test if that shape is welcome.

                  Found while differential-testing Node against
                  ViperJS, an embeddable JavaScript engine in safe Rust.
                  Sweeping eight repositories, the two disagreed about 18 files; every one of them turned out to be
                  genuinely invalid JavaScript, and node --check had reported nine as fine. V8 itself is right
                  about all eighteen — it is only --check that never asks it.

                  Activity

                  Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                  Metadata

                  Metadata

                  Assignees

                  No one assigned

                    Labels

                    No labels
                    No labels

                    Type

                    No type

                    Projects

                    No projects

                      Milestone

                      No milestone

                      Relationships

                      None yet

                      Development

                      No branches or pull requests

                      Issue actions

                      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                      Skip to content

                      --check silently passes a .js file with a syntax error when the file contains ESM syntax #65202

                      Description

                      @MerlijnW70

                      Version

                      v22.22.1

                      Platform

                      Microsoft Windows NT 10.0.26200.0 x64
                      

                      Subsystem

                      module / cli (lib/internal/main/check_syntax.js)

                      What steps will reproduce the bug?

                      Create broken.js in a directory with no package.json:

                      importfsfrom"node:fs";var=;

                      Then:

                      $ node --check broken.js ;echo"exit: $?"exit: 0
                      $ node broken.jsvar = ; ^SyntaxError: Unexpected token '='

                      --check reports nothing and exits 0 for a file that is not valid JavaScript under either goal
                      symbol.

                      How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

                      Always, given the condition: the file's format must be ambiguous — a .js extension with no
                      "type" in the nearest package.json — and the source must contain import or export.
                      Everything that states its format is handled correctly:

                      the filenode --check
                      .mjs, or "type": "module"correct — reports the error
                      "type": "commonjs"correct — Cannot use import statement outside a module
                      .js, no "type", containing import/exportexit 0, nothing reported
                      .js whose only ESM signal is top-level awaitcorrect — reports the error

                      What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

                      A non-zero exit and the SyntaxError, as with every other invalid file. The documentation for
                      -c, --check is "Syntax check the script without executing", with no caveat about module
                      detection — and the same source reports the error correctly the moment its format is stated.

                      This matters in practice because node --check is a common cheap gate in CI, and a plain .js
                      file containing import is the shape most projects have — so the sources most likely to be
                      checked are the ones that silently pass.

                      What do you see instead?

                      Exit code 0 and no output.

                      Additional information

                      lib/internal/main/check_syntax.js parses under the Module goal only when defaultGetFormat
                      answers 'module', which an ambiguous .js does not:

                      if(format==='module'){const{ ModuleWrap }=internalBinding('module_wrap');newModuleWrap(filename,undefined,source,0,0);return;}wrapSafe(filename,source,undefined,format);

                      So the CommonJS branch runs. Inside wrapSafe, cjsModuleInstance is undefined here, so
                      shouldDetectModule falls through to --require-module — on by default — and
                      compileFunctionForCJSLoaderdetects ESM instead of throwing. Its result is then discarded, and
                      the source is never parsed under either goal.

                      Module.prototype._compile handles exactly this case correctly a little further down the same
                      file, by reading the flag the detection returns:

                      if(format!=='module'){constresult=wrapSafe(filename,content,this,format);compiledWrapper=result.function;if(result.canParseAsESM){format='module';}}if(format==='module'){loadESMFromCJS(this,filename,format,content);return;}

                      checkSyntax looks like it wants the same canParseAsESM branch, falling back to the ModuleWrap
                      parse it already has above rather than returning.

                      The relevant part of check_syntax.js is unchanged on main; the file was last touched
                      2024-12-02. The behaviour most likely dates from module: unflag detect-module (2024-07-20), which
                      made detection the default for this path.

                      Test coverage.test/sequential/test-cli-syntax-bad.js checks bad_syntax.js, bad_syntax,
                      bad_syntax_shebang.js and bad_syntax_shebang — all CommonJS.
                      test/fixtures/syntax/bad_syntax.mjs exists but is used only by test-esm-error-cache.js and
                      test-compile-cache-bad-syntax.js, not by either --check test. So neither a .mjs file nor a
                      detected-ESM .js file is currently asserted to fail --check.

                      I am happy to open a PR with the fix and a fixture plus test if that shape is welcome.

                      Found while differential-testing Node against
                      ViperJS, an embeddable JavaScript engine in safe Rust.
                      Sweeping eight repositories, the two disagreed about 18 files; every one of them turned out to be
                      genuinely invalid JavaScript, and node --check had reported nine as fine. V8 itself is right
                      about all eighteen — it is only --check that never asks it.

                      Activity

                      Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                      Metadata

                      Metadata

                      Assignees

                      No one assigned

                        Labels

                        No labels
                        No labels

                        Type

                        No type

                        Projects

                        No projects

                          Milestone

                          No milestone

                          Relationships

                          None yet

                          Development

                          No branches or pull requests

                          Issue actions

                          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                          Skip to content

                          --check silently passes a .js file with a syntax error when the file contains ESM syntax #65202

                          Description

                          @MerlijnW70

                          Version

                          v22.22.1

                          Platform

                          Microsoft Windows NT 10.0.26200.0 x64
                          

                          Subsystem

                          module / cli (lib/internal/main/check_syntax.js)

                          What steps will reproduce the bug?

                          Create broken.js in a directory with no package.json:

                          importfsfrom"node:fs";var=;

                          Then:

                          $ node --check broken.js ;echo"exit: $?"exit: 0
                          $ node broken.jsvar = ; ^SyntaxError: Unexpected token '='

                          --check reports nothing and exits 0 for a file that is not valid JavaScript under either goal
                          symbol.

                          How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

                          Always, given the condition: the file's format must be ambiguous — a .js extension with no
                          "type" in the nearest package.json — and the source must contain import or export.
                          Everything that states its format is handled correctly:

                          the filenode --check
                          .mjs, or "type": "module"correct — reports the error
                          "type": "commonjs"correct — Cannot use import statement outside a module
                          .js, no "type", containing import/exportexit 0, nothing reported
                          .js whose only ESM signal is top-level awaitcorrect — reports the error

                          What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

                          A non-zero exit and the SyntaxError, as with every other invalid file. The documentation for
                          -c, --check is "Syntax check the script without executing", with no caveat about module
                          detection — and the same source reports the error correctly the moment its format is stated.

                          This matters in practice because node --check is a common cheap gate in CI, and a plain .js
                          file containing import is the shape most projects have — so the sources most likely to be
                          checked are the ones that silently pass.

                          What do you see instead?

                          Exit code 0 and no output.

                          Additional information

                          lib/internal/main/check_syntax.js parses under the Module goal only when defaultGetFormat
                          answers 'module', which an ambiguous .js does not:

                          if(format==='module'){const{ ModuleWrap }=internalBinding('module_wrap');newModuleWrap(filename,undefined,source,0,0);return;}wrapSafe(filename,source,undefined,format);

                          So the CommonJS branch runs. Inside wrapSafe, cjsModuleInstance is undefined here, so
                          shouldDetectModule falls through to --require-module — on by default — and
                          compileFunctionForCJSLoaderdetects ESM instead of throwing. Its result is then discarded, and
                          the source is never parsed under either goal.

                          Module.prototype._compile handles exactly this case correctly a little further down the same
                          file, by reading the flag the detection returns:

                          if(format!=='module'){constresult=wrapSafe(filename,content,this,format);compiledWrapper=result.function;if(result.canParseAsESM){format='module';}}if(format==='module'){loadESMFromCJS(this,filename,format,content);return;}

                          checkSyntax looks like it wants the same canParseAsESM branch, falling back to the ModuleWrap
                          parse it already has above rather than returning.

                          The relevant part of check_syntax.js is unchanged on main; the file was last touched
                          2024-12-02. The behaviour most likely dates from module: unflag detect-module (2024-07-20), which
                          made detection the default for this path.

                          Test coverage.test/sequential/test-cli-syntax-bad.js checks bad_syntax.js, bad_syntax,
                          bad_syntax_shebang.js and bad_syntax_shebang — all CommonJS.
                          test/fixtures/syntax/bad_syntax.mjs exists but is used only by test-esm-error-cache.js and
                          test-compile-cache-bad-syntax.js, not by either --check test. So neither a .mjs file nor a
                          detected-ESM .js file is currently asserted to fail --check.

                          I am happy to open a PR with the fix and a fixture plus test if that shape is welcome.

                          Found while differential-testing Node against
                          ViperJS, an embeddable JavaScript engine in safe Rust.
                          Sweeping eight repositories, the two disagreed about 18 files; every one of them turned out to be
                          genuinely invalid JavaScript, and node --check had reported nine as fine. V8 itself is right
                          about all eighteen — it is only --check that never asks it.

                          Activity

                          Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                          Metadata

                          Metadata

                          Assignees

                          No one assigned

                            Labels

                            No labels
                            No labels

                            Type

                            No type

                            Projects

                            No projects

                              Milestone

                              No milestone

                              Relationships

                              None yet

                              Development

                              No branches or pull requests

                              Issue actions

                              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                              Skip to content

                              --check silently passes a .js file with a syntax error when the file contains ESM syntax #65202

                              Description

                              @MerlijnW70

                              Version

                              v22.22.1

                              Platform

                              Microsoft Windows NT 10.0.26200.0 x64
                              

                              Subsystem

                              module / cli (lib/internal/main/check_syntax.js)

                              What steps will reproduce the bug?

                              Create broken.js in a directory with no package.json:

                              importfsfrom"node:fs";var=;

                              Then:

                              $ node --check broken.js ;echo"exit: $?"exit: 0
                              $ node broken.jsvar = ; ^SyntaxError: Unexpected token '='

                              --check reports nothing and exits 0 for a file that is not valid JavaScript under either goal
                              symbol.

                              How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

                              Always, given the condition: the file's format must be ambiguous — a .js extension with no
                              "type" in the nearest package.json — and the source must contain import or export.
                              Everything that states its format is handled correctly:

                              the filenode --check
                              .mjs, or "type": "module"correct — reports the error
                              "type": "commonjs"correct — Cannot use import statement outside a module
                              .js, no "type", containing import/exportexit 0, nothing reported
                              .js whose only ESM signal is top-level awaitcorrect — reports the error

                              What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?

                              A non-zero exit and the SyntaxError, as with every other invalid file. The documentation for
                              -c, --check is "Syntax check the script without executing", with no caveat about module
                              detection — and the same source reports the error correctly the moment its format is stated.

                              This matters in practice because node --check is a common cheap gate in CI, and a plain .js
                              file containing import is the shape most projects have — so the sources most likely to be
                              checked are the ones that silently pass.

                              What do you see instead?

                              Exit code 0 and no output.

                              Additional information

                              lib/internal/main/check_syntax.js parses under the Module goal only when defaultGetFormat
                              answers 'module', which an ambiguous .js does not:

                              if(format==='module'){const{ ModuleWrap }=internalBinding('module_wrap');newModuleWrap(filename,undefined,source,0,0);return;}wrapSafe(filename,source,undefined,format);

                              So the CommonJS branch runs. Inside wrapSafe, cjsModuleInstance is undefined here, so
                              shouldDetectModule falls through to --require-module — on by default — and
                              compileFunctionForCJSLoaderdetects ESM instead of throwing. Its result is then discarded, and
                              the source is never parsed under either goal.

                              Module.prototype._compile handles exactly this case correctly a little further down the same
                              file, by reading the flag the detection returns:

                              if(format!=='module'){constresult=wrapSafe(filename,content,this,format);compiledWrapper=result.function;if(result.canParseAsESM){format='module';}}if(format==='module'){loadESMFromCJS(this,filename,format,content);return;}

                              checkSyntax looks like it wants the same canParseAsESM branch, falling back to the ModuleWrap
                              parse it already has above rather than returning.

                              The relevant part of check_syntax.js is unchanged on main; the file was last touched
                              2024-12-02. The behaviour most likely dates from module: unflag detect-module (2024-07-20), which
                              made detection the default for this path.

                              Test coverage.test/sequential/test-cli-syntax-bad.js checks bad_syntax.js, bad_syntax,
                              bad_syntax_shebang.js and bad_syntax_shebang — all CommonJS.
                              test/fixtures/syntax/bad_syntax.mjs exists but is used only by test-esm-error-cache.js and
                              test-compile-cache-bad-syntax.js, not by either --check test. So neither a .mjs file nor a
                              detected-ESM .js file is currently asserted to fail --check.

                              I am happy to open a PR with the fix and a fixture plus test if that shape is welcome.

                              Found while differential-testing Node against
                              ViperJS, an embeddable JavaScript engine in safe Rust.
                              Sweeping eight repositories, the two disagreed about 18 files; every one of them turned out to be
                              genuinely invalid JavaScript, and node --check had reported nine as fine. V8 itself is right
                              about all eighteen — it is only --check that never asks it.

                              Activity

                              Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                              Metadata

                              Metadata

                              Assignees

                              No one assigned

                                Labels

                                No labels
                                No labels

                                Type

                                No type

                                Projects

                                No projects

                                  Milestone

                                  No milestone

                                  Relationships

                                  None yet

                                  Development

                                  No branches or pull requests

                                  Issue actions