Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
test: refactor the code in test-dns-ipv4 - #10200
Closed
edsadr wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Contributor
Can't we also get rid of the |
cjihrig
reviewed
Dec 9, 2016
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Would you mind replacing all of these lines in the file with assert.ifError(err);
ContributorAuthor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
will perform these changes later tonight
edsadr
commented
Dec 10, 2016
ContributorAuthor
mscdex
reviewed
Dec 10, 2016
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'd rather either see this indented or use an arrow function to keep it on the previous line. If you go the arrow function route, we should be more consistent though and use it for the other callbacks too.
Same goes for the other instances below.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
common should be required before anything else.
ContributorAuthor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
will do this change too after get the #10219 approved, I am learning the right format for the code
3 tasks
* remove the manual control for functions execution * use common.mustCall to control the functions execution automatically * use let and const instead of var * use assert.strictEqual instead assert.equal
edsadr
commented
Dec 20, 2016
ContributorAuthor
changed the style to match the one agreed in #10219 |
edsadr
commented
Dec 23, 2016
ContributorAuthor
any update on this one? |
julianduque
commented
Dec 23, 2016
Contributor
italoacasas
approved these changes
Dec 23, 2016
|
thefourtheye
approved these changes
Dec 27, 2016
gibfahn
commented
Dec 28, 2016
Member
@italoacasas I think you meant @nodejs/collaborators |
italoacasas pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 28, 2016
* remove the manual control for functions execution * use common.mustCall to control the functions execution automatically * use let and const instead of var * use assert.strictEqual instead assert.equal PR-URL: #10200 Reviewed-By: Italo A. Casas <me@italoacasas.com> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
italoacasas
commented
Dec 28, 2016
Landed 4d3b487 |
evanlucas pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2017
* remove the manual control for functions execution * use common.mustCall to control the functions execution automatically * use let and const instead of var * use assert.strictEqual instead assert.equal PR-URL: #10200 Reviewed-By: Italo A. Casas <me@italoacasas.com> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
evanlucas pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 4, 2017
* remove the manual control for functions execution * use common.mustCall to control the functions execution automatically * use let and const instead of var * use assert.strictEqual instead assert.equal PR-URL: #10200 Reviewed-By: Italo A. Casas <me@italoacasas.com> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2017
* remove the manual control for functions execution * use common.mustCall to control the functions execution automatically * use let and const instead of var * use assert.strictEqual instead assert.equal PR-URL: #10200 Reviewed-By: Italo A. Casas <me@italoacasas.com> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2017
* remove the manual control for functions execution * use common.mustCall to control the functions execution automatically * use let and const instead of var * use assert.strictEqual instead assert.equal PR-URL: #10200 Reviewed-By: Italo A. Casas <me@italoacasas.com> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Merged
MylesBorins pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2017
* remove the manual control for functions execution * use common.mustCall to control the functions execution automatically * use let and const instead of var * use assert.strictEqual instead assert.equal PR-URL: #10200 Reviewed-By: Italo A. Casas <me@italoacasas.com> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
10 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checklist
make -j8 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test nosign(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
test
Description of change
use let and const instead of var
add missing common.mustCall for anonymous functions