Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
test: refactor code in test-cluster-http-pipe - #10297
Closed
edsadr wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Calling process.exit(); is not necessary
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would wrap the callback with common.mustCall()
* use common.mustCall to control the functions execution automatically * use const instead of var * use assert.strictEqual instead assert.equal * use assert.ifError instead of throw error
edsadrforce-pushed
the
test-cluster-http
branch
from
December 16, 2016 15:42
80301a5 to
91782d7Compareedsadr
commented
Dec 16, 2016
ContributorAuthor
@santigimeno implemented your suggestions here, @italoacasas please set another CI task I guess? |
JungMinu
commented
Dec 17, 2016
Member
santigimeno
approved these changes
Dec 17, 2016
lpinca
approved these changes
Dec 17, 2016
jasnell
approved these changes
Dec 23, 2016
jasnell pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 23, 2016
* use common.mustCall to control the functions execution automatically * use const instead of var * use assert.strictEqual instead assert.equal * use assert.ifError instead of throw error PR-URL: #10297 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <jmwsoft@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
jasnell
commented
Dec 23, 2016
Member
Landed in 9073fda |
evanlucas pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2017
* use common.mustCall to control the functions execution automatically * use const instead of var * use assert.strictEqual instead assert.equal * use assert.ifError instead of throw error PR-URL: #10297 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <jmwsoft@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
evanlucas pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 4, 2017
* use common.mustCall to control the functions execution automatically * use const instead of var * use assert.strictEqual instead assert.equal * use assert.ifError instead of throw error PR-URL: #10297 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <jmwsoft@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2017
* use common.mustCall to control the functions execution automatically * use const instead of var * use assert.strictEqual instead assert.equal * use assert.ifError instead of throw error PR-URL: #10297 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <jmwsoft@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2017
* use common.mustCall to control the functions execution automatically * use const instead of var * use assert.strictEqual instead assert.equal * use assert.ifError instead of throw error PR-URL: #10297 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <jmwsoft@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Merged
MylesBorins pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2017
* use common.mustCall to control the functions execution automatically * use const instead of var * use assert.strictEqual instead assert.equal * use assert.ifError instead of throw error PR-URL: #10297 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <jmwsoft@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
10 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test nosign(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
test
Description of change