Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
util: use [Array] for deeply nested arrays - #12046
Closed
addaleax wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Contributor
addaleax
commented
Mar 26, 2017
MemberAuthor
@vsemozhetbyt Yes, thank you. :) |
Prefer `[Array]` over `[Object]` because the latter is confusing. Ref: nodejs#11651 PR-URL: nodejs#12046
evanlucas
approved these changes
Mar 26, 2017
evanlucas
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM. I've been wanting this for a while :]
targos
approved these changes
Mar 26, 2017
cjihrig
approved these changes
Mar 26, 2017
cjihrig
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM. Do you know if there are any tests that still cover the else logic?
jasnell
approved these changes
Mar 26, 2017
addaleax
commented
Mar 26, 2017
| @@ -72,6 +72,8 @@ assert.strictEqual(util.inspect({'a': {'b': { 'c': 2}}}, false, 0), | |||
| '{ a: [Object] }'); | |||
| assert.strictEqual(util.inspect({'a': {'b': { 'c': 2}}}, false, 1), | |||
| '{ a: { b: [Object] } }'); | |||
MemberAuthor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@cjihrig This should keep covering the else branch
Fishrock123
approved these changes
Mar 27, 2017
MemberAuthor
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit/8722/ (oops, didn’t see Jeremiah’s CI run … ¯\_(ツ)_/¯) |
jasnell
commented
Mar 28, 2017
Member
CI failures are unrelated. |
jasnell pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 28, 2017
Prefer `[Array]` over `[Object]` because the latter is confusing. PR-URL: #12046 Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com>
jasnell
commented
Mar 28, 2017
Member
Landed in 4a5a944 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
7 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prefer
[Array]over[Object]because the latter is confusing.I may be mistaken but I think this was brought up somewhere a few weeks ago (?) – I couldn’t find anything, but if somebody has aFixes:tag I’ll happily ad it, and if this is a duplicate, I’ll happily close the PR. :)Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
util