Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36.4k
test: increase coverage of async_hooks#13336
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Jump to
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ | ||
| 'use strict'; | ||
| const common = require('../common'); | ||
| const assert = require('assert'); | ||
| const spawnSync = require('child_process').spawnSync; | ||
| const async_hooks = require('async_hooks'); | ||
| const initHooks = require('./init-hooks'); | ||
| switch (process.argv[2]) { | ||
| case 'test_init_callback': | ||
| initHooks({ | ||
| oninit: common.mustCall(() => { throw new Error('test_init_callback'); }) | ||
| }).enable(); | ||
| async_hooks.emitInit(async_hooks.currentId(), 'test_init_callback_type', | ||
| async_hooks.triggerId()); | ||
| break; | ||
| case 'test_callback': | ||
| initHooks({ | ||
| onbefore: common.mustCall(() => { throw new Error('test_callback'); }) | ||
| }).enable(); | ||
| async_hooks.emitInit(async_hooks.currentId(), 'test_callback_type', | ||
| async_hooks.triggerId()); | ||
| async_hooks.emitBefore(async_hooks.currentId()); | ||
| break; | ||
| } | ||
| if (process.execArgv.includes('--abort-on-uncaught-exception')) { | ||
| initHooks({ | ||
| oninit: common.mustCall(() => { throw new Error('test_callback_abort'); }) | ||
| }).enable(); | ||
| async_hooks.emitInit(async_hooks.currentId(), 'test_callback_abort', | ||
| async_hooks.triggerId()); | ||
| } | ||
| const c1 = spawnSync(`${process.execPath}`, [__filename, 'test_init_callback']); | ||
| assert.strictEqual(c1.stderr.toString().split('\n')[0], | ||
| 'Error: test_init_callback'); | ||
| assert.strictEqual(c1.status, 1); | ||
| const c2 = spawnSync(`${process.execPath}`, [__filename, 'test_callback']); | ||
| assert.strictEqual(c2.stderr.toString().split('\n')[0], 'Error: test_callback'); | ||
| assert.strictEqual(c2.status, 1); | ||
| const c3 = spawnSync(`${process.execPath}`, ['--abort-on-uncaught-exception', | ||
| __filename, | ||
| 'test_callback_abort']); | ||
| assert.strictEqual(c3.stdout.toString(), ''); | ||
| const stderrOutput = c3.stderr.toString() | ||
| .trim() | ||
| .split('\n') | ||
| .map((s) => s.trim()); | ||
| assert.strictEqual(stderrOutput[0], 'Error: test_callback_abort'); | ||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ | ||
| 'use strict'; | ||
| const common = require('../common'); | ||
| const assert = require('assert'); | ||
| const spawnSync = require('child_process').spawnSync; | ||
| const async_hooks = require('async_hooks'); | ||
| const initHooks = require('./init-hooks'); | ||
| switch (process.argv[2]) { | ||
| case 'test_invalid_async_id': | ||
| async_hooks.emitBefore(-1); | ||
Contributor There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. To make sure these run I' possibly do this: constemitBeforeMustCall=common.mustCall(()=>async_hooks.emitBefore(-1));switch(process.argv[2]){case'test_invalid_async_id':
emitBeforeMustCall(); | ||
| break; | ||
| case 'test_invalid_trigger_id': | ||
| async_hooks.emitBefore(1, -1); | ||
| break; | ||
| } | ||
| const c1 = spawnSync(process.execPath, [__filename, 'test_invalid_async_id']); | ||
| assert.strictEqual(c1.stderr.toString().split('\n')[0], | ||
| 'Error: before(): asyncId or triggerId is less than zero ' + | ||
| '(asyncId: -1, triggerId: -1)'); | ||
| assert.strictEqual(c1.status, 1); | ||
| const c2 = spawnSync(process.execPath, [__filename, 'test_invalid_trigger_id']); | ||
| assert.strictEqual(c2.stderr.toString().split('\n')[0], | ||
| 'Error: before(): asyncId or triggerId is less than zero ' + | ||
| '(asyncId: 1, triggerId: -1)'); | ||
| assert.strictEqual(c2.status, 1); | ||
| const expectedId = async_hooks.newUid(); | ||
| const expectedTriggerId = async_hooks.newUid(); | ||
| const expectedType = 'test_emit_before_after_type'; | ||
| // Verify that if there is no registered hook, then nothing will happen. | ||
| async_hooks.emitBefore(expectedId); | ||
| async_hooks.emitAfter(expectedId); | ||
| initHooks({ | ||
| onbefore: common.mustCall((id) => assert.strictEqual(id, expectedId)), | ||
| onafter: common.mustCall((id) => assert.strictEqual(id, expectedId)), | ||
| allowNoInit: true | ||
| }).enable(); | ||
| async_hooks.emitInit(expectedId, expectedType, expectedTriggerId); | ||
| async_hooks.emitBefore(expectedId); | ||
| async_hooks.emitAfter(expectedId); | ||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ | ||
| 'use strict'; | ||
| const common = require('../common'); | ||
| const assert = require('assert'); | ||
| const async_hooks = require('async_hooks'); | ||
| const initHooks = require('./init-hooks'); | ||
| // Verify that if there is no registered hook, then those invalid parameters | ||
| // won't be checked. | ||
| assert.doesNotThrow(() => async_hooks.emitInit()); | ||
| const expectedId = async_hooks.newUid(); | ||
| const expectedTriggerId = async_hooks.newUid(); | ||
| const expectedType = 'test_emit_init_type'; | ||
| const expectedResource = { key: 'test_emit_init_resource' }; | ||
| const hooks1 = initHooks({ | ||
| oninit: common.mustCall((id, type, triggerId, resource) => { | ||
| assert.strictEqual(id, expectedId); | ||
| assert.strictEqual(type, expectedType); | ||
| assert.strictEqual(triggerId, expectedTriggerId); | ||
| assert.strictEqual(resource.key, expectedResource.key); | ||
| }) | ||
| }); | ||
| hooks1.enable(); | ||
| assert.throws(() => async_hooks.emitInit(), | ||
| /^RangeError: asyncId must be an unsigned integer$/); | ||
| assert.throws(() => async_hooks.emitInit(expectedId), | ||
| /^TypeError: type must be a string with length > 0$/); | ||
| assert.throws(() => async_hooks.emitInit(expectedId, expectedType, -1), | ||
| /^RangeError: triggerId must be an unsigned integer$/); | ||
| async_hooks.emitInit(expectedId, expectedType, expectedTriggerId, | ||
| expectedResource); | ||
| hooks1.disable(); | ||
| initHooks({ | ||
| oninit: common.mustCall((id, type, triggerId, resource) => { | ||
| assert.strictEqual(id, expectedId); | ||
| assert.strictEqual(type, expectedType); | ||
| assert.notStrictEqual(triggerId, expectedTriggerId); | ||
| assert.strictEqual(resource.key, expectedResource.key); | ||
| }) | ||
| }).enable(); | ||
| async_hooks.emitInit(expectedId, expectedType, expectedResource); |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ | ||
| 'use strict'; | ||
| const common = require('../common'); | ||
| const assert = require('assert'); | ||
| const async_hooks = require('async_hooks'); | ||
| const asyncId = async_hooks.newUid(); | ||
| assert.notStrictEqual(async_hooks.currentId(), asyncId); | ||
| async_hooks.runInAsyncIdScope(asyncId, common.mustCall(() => { | ||
| assert.strictEqual(async_hooks.currentId(), asyncId); | ||
| })); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There's the problem where if
test_init_callbackis never hit then thecommon.mustCall()will never run. Instead you'll need to do it like this:There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
😕 But IMO the actual intention here is just to ensure that the
common.mustCall()will run only when thetest_init_callbackcase is hit? Every switch case will be hit in different process because ofspawnSync()s below.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Whoops. Missed that. You're correct.