Skip to content

test: defer abort with setTimeout - #15520

Closed
mcollina wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
mcollina:fix-flaky-http-test
Closed

test: defer abort with setTimeout#15520
mcollina wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
mcollina:fix-flaky-http-test

Conversation

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Ref: #15404
Fixes: #15505

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

test, http

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure. label Sep 21, 2017
@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mscdexmscdex added the http Issues and PRs related to the http subsystem. label Sep 21, 2017
@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it safe to call external.abort() and internalRes.end('Hello World\n'); here or does this invalidate the test?
This would remove the setTimeout dependency.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@lpinca the problem is that this test keeps failing only on Centos and I do not know why :(

@lpinca

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Yes that's weird, it looks like res.on('close', ...) is not emitted but I don't know why.

@cjihrig

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

While you're here, could you move the stuff from // Proxy server until the end of the file into the internal server's listen() callback?

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@BridgeAR

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@mcollina we could also mark the test as being flaky on centos?

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will test less than before, since the mustCall is not in place anymore. It might be worth to check that either finish or close will be called at least once? And I am somewhat surprised that our events are platform dependent. Would you be so kind and add a comment why that is the case?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have no idea on why it's the case, that's the major problem of this PR.

I'll see if I can get another solution as well.

I'll add another check that verifies that at least one of them is called.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/10273/

This should be green, and it can land as it finshes.

@jasnell@lpinca@cjihrig can you review it again so we can land?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing '

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd point out that this only happens on CentOS 5.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess these are only for debugging. Do we want to keep them?

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing semicolon.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ditto.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess this isn't needed after all.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this called more than once on any platforms? Removing the listeners kind of defeats the purpose of wrapping it in common.mustCall().

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess the point is to ensure that the listener is actually called.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, but common.mustCall() also enforces the number of times the function is called. Removing the listeners means we lose that checking.

@lpincalpincaSep 26, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think either 'close' or 'finish' should be emitted so it doesn't matter as long as at least one is emitted.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's why I asked:

Is this called more than once on any platforms?

We shouldn't remove the listeners unless we really need to.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@lpinca

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Still LGTM.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Landed as 1fe9b53

@mcollina
mcollina deleted the fix-flaky-http-test branch September 27, 2017 13:09
mcollina added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2017
Ref: #15404Fixes: #15505
PR-URL: #15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit to MylesBorins/node that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2017
Ref: nodejs#15404Fixes: nodejs#15505
PR-URL: nodejs#15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2017
Ref: #15404Fixes: #15505
PR-URL: #15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@TrottTrott mentioned this pull request Sep 30, 2017
addaleax pushed a commit to addaleax/ayo that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2017
Ref: nodejs/node#15404Fixes: nodejs/node#15505
PR-URL: nodejs/node#15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@MylesBorinsMylesBorins mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2017
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2017
Ref: #15404Fixes: #15505
PR-URL: #15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

httpIssues and PRs related to the http subsystem.testIssues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@mcollina@lpinca@cjihrig@BridgeAR@jasnell@mscdex@MylesBorins@nodejs-github-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
test: defer abort with setTimeout by mcollina · Pull Request #15520 · nodejs/node · GitHub
Skip to content

test: defer abort with setTimeout - #15520

Closed
mcollina wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
mcollina:fix-flaky-http-test
Closed

test: defer abort with setTimeout#15520
mcollina wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
mcollina:fix-flaky-http-test

Conversation

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Ref: #15404
Fixes: #15505

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

test, http

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure. label Sep 21, 2017
@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mscdexmscdex added the http Issues and PRs related to the http subsystem. label Sep 21, 2017
@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it safe to call external.abort() and internalRes.end('Hello World\n'); here or does this invalidate the test?
This would remove the setTimeout dependency.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@lpinca the problem is that this test keeps failing only on Centos and I do not know why :(

@lpinca

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Yes that's weird, it looks like res.on('close', ...) is not emitted but I don't know why.

@cjihrig

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

While you're here, could you move the stuff from // Proxy server until the end of the file into the internal server's listen() callback?

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@BridgeAR

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@mcollina we could also mark the test as being flaky on centos?

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will test less than before, since the mustCall is not in place anymore. It might be worth to check that either finish or close will be called at least once? And I am somewhat surprised that our events are platform dependent. Would you be so kind and add a comment why that is the case?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have no idea on why it's the case, that's the major problem of this PR.

I'll see if I can get another solution as well.

I'll add another check that verifies that at least one of them is called.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/10273/

This should be green, and it can land as it finshes.

@jasnell@lpinca@cjihrig can you review it again so we can land?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing '

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd point out that this only happens on CentOS 5.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess these are only for debugging. Do we want to keep them?

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing semicolon.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ditto.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess this isn't needed after all.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this called more than once on any platforms? Removing the listeners kind of defeats the purpose of wrapping it in common.mustCall().

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess the point is to ensure that the listener is actually called.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, but common.mustCall() also enforces the number of times the function is called. Removing the listeners means we lose that checking.

@lpincalpincaSep 26, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think either 'close' or 'finish' should be emitted so it doesn't matter as long as at least one is emitted.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's why I asked:

Is this called more than once on any platforms?

We shouldn't remove the listeners unless we really need to.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@lpinca

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Still LGTM.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Landed as 1fe9b53

@mcollina
mcollina deleted the fix-flaky-http-test branch September 27, 2017 13:09
mcollina added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2017
Ref: #15404Fixes: #15505
PR-URL: #15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit to MylesBorins/node that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2017
Ref: nodejs#15404Fixes: nodejs#15505
PR-URL: nodejs#15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2017
Ref: #15404Fixes: #15505
PR-URL: #15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@TrottTrott mentioned this pull request Sep 30, 2017
addaleax pushed a commit to addaleax/ayo that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2017
Ref: nodejs/node#15404Fixes: nodejs/node#15505
PR-URL: nodejs/node#15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@MylesBorinsMylesBorins mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2017
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2017
Ref: #15404Fixes: #15505
PR-URL: #15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

httpIssues and PRs related to the http subsystem.testIssues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@mcollina@lpinca@cjihrig@BridgeAR@jasnell@mscdex@MylesBorins@nodejs-github-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' test: defer abort with setTimeout by mcollina · Pull Request #15520 · nodejs/node · GitHub
Skip to content

test: defer abort with setTimeout - #15520

Closed
mcollina wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
mcollina:fix-flaky-http-test
Closed

test: defer abort with setTimeout#15520
mcollina wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
mcollina:fix-flaky-http-test

Conversation

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Ref: #15404
Fixes: #15505

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

test, http

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure. label Sep 21, 2017
@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mscdexmscdex added the http Issues and PRs related to the http subsystem. label Sep 21, 2017
@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it safe to call external.abort() and internalRes.end('Hello World\n'); here or does this invalidate the test?
This would remove the setTimeout dependency.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@lpinca the problem is that this test keeps failing only on Centos and I do not know why :(

@lpinca

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Yes that's weird, it looks like res.on('close', ...) is not emitted but I don't know why.

@cjihrig

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

While you're here, could you move the stuff from // Proxy server until the end of the file into the internal server's listen() callback?

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@BridgeAR

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@mcollina we could also mark the test as being flaky on centos?

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will test less than before, since the mustCall is not in place anymore. It might be worth to check that either finish or close will be called at least once? And I am somewhat surprised that our events are platform dependent. Would you be so kind and add a comment why that is the case?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have no idea on why it's the case, that's the major problem of this PR.

I'll see if I can get another solution as well.

I'll add another check that verifies that at least one of them is called.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/10273/

This should be green, and it can land as it finshes.

@jasnell@lpinca@cjihrig can you review it again so we can land?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing '

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd point out that this only happens on CentOS 5.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess these are only for debugging. Do we want to keep them?

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing semicolon.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ditto.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess this isn't needed after all.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this called more than once on any platforms? Removing the listeners kind of defeats the purpose of wrapping it in common.mustCall().

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess the point is to ensure that the listener is actually called.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, but common.mustCall() also enforces the number of times the function is called. Removing the listeners means we lose that checking.

@lpincalpincaSep 26, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think either 'close' or 'finish' should be emitted so it doesn't matter as long as at least one is emitted.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's why I asked:

Is this called more than once on any platforms?

We shouldn't remove the listeners unless we really need to.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@lpinca

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Still LGTM.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Landed as 1fe9b53

@mcollina
mcollina deleted the fix-flaky-http-test branch September 27, 2017 13:09
mcollina added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2017
Ref: #15404Fixes: #15505
PR-URL: #15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit to MylesBorins/node that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2017
Ref: nodejs#15404Fixes: nodejs#15505
PR-URL: nodejs#15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2017
Ref: #15404Fixes: #15505
PR-URL: #15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@TrottTrott mentioned this pull request Sep 30, 2017
addaleax pushed a commit to addaleax/ayo that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2017
Ref: nodejs/node#15404Fixes: nodejs/node#15505
PR-URL: nodejs/node#15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@MylesBorinsMylesBorins mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2017
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2017
Ref: #15404Fixes: #15505
PR-URL: #15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

httpIssues and PRs related to the http subsystem.testIssues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@mcollina@lpinca@cjihrig@BridgeAR@jasnell@mscdex@MylesBorins@nodejs-github-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' test: defer abort with setTimeout by mcollina · Pull Request #15520 · nodejs/node · GitHub
Skip to content

test: defer abort with setTimeout - #15520

Closed
mcollina wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
mcollina:fix-flaky-http-test
Closed

test: defer abort with setTimeout#15520
mcollina wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
mcollina:fix-flaky-http-test

Conversation

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Ref: #15404
Fixes: #15505

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

test, http

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure. label Sep 21, 2017
@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mscdexmscdex added the http Issues and PRs related to the http subsystem. label Sep 21, 2017
@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it safe to call external.abort() and internalRes.end('Hello World\n'); here or does this invalidate the test?
This would remove the setTimeout dependency.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@lpinca the problem is that this test keeps failing only on Centos and I do not know why :(

@lpinca

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Yes that's weird, it looks like res.on('close', ...) is not emitted but I don't know why.

@cjihrig

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

While you're here, could you move the stuff from // Proxy server until the end of the file into the internal server's listen() callback?

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@BridgeAR

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@mcollina we could also mark the test as being flaky on centos?

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will test less than before, since the mustCall is not in place anymore. It might be worth to check that either finish or close will be called at least once? And I am somewhat surprised that our events are platform dependent. Would you be so kind and add a comment why that is the case?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have no idea on why it's the case, that's the major problem of this PR.

I'll see if I can get another solution as well.

I'll add another check that verifies that at least one of them is called.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/10273/

This should be green, and it can land as it finshes.

@jasnell@lpinca@cjihrig can you review it again so we can land?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing '

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd point out that this only happens on CentOS 5.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess these are only for debugging. Do we want to keep them?

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing semicolon.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ditto.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess this isn't needed after all.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this called more than once on any platforms? Removing the listeners kind of defeats the purpose of wrapping it in common.mustCall().

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess the point is to ensure that the listener is actually called.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, but common.mustCall() also enforces the number of times the function is called. Removing the listeners means we lose that checking.

@lpincalpincaSep 26, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think either 'close' or 'finish' should be emitted so it doesn't matter as long as at least one is emitted.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's why I asked:

Is this called more than once on any platforms?

We shouldn't remove the listeners unless we really need to.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@lpinca

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Still LGTM.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Landed as 1fe9b53

@mcollina
mcollina deleted the fix-flaky-http-test branch September 27, 2017 13:09
mcollina added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2017
Ref: #15404Fixes: #15505
PR-URL: #15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit to MylesBorins/node that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2017
Ref: nodejs#15404Fixes: nodejs#15505
PR-URL: nodejs#15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2017
Ref: #15404Fixes: #15505
PR-URL: #15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@TrottTrott mentioned this pull request Sep 30, 2017
addaleax pushed a commit to addaleax/ayo that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2017
Ref: nodejs/node#15404Fixes: nodejs/node#15505
PR-URL: nodejs/node#15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@MylesBorinsMylesBorins mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2017
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2017
Ref: #15404Fixes: #15505
PR-URL: #15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

httpIssues and PRs related to the http subsystem.testIssues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@mcollina@lpinca@cjihrig@BridgeAR@jasnell@mscdex@MylesBorins@nodejs-github-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' test: defer abort with setTimeout by mcollina · Pull Request #15520 · nodejs/node · GitHub
Skip to content

test: defer abort with setTimeout - #15520

Closed
mcollina wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
mcollina:fix-flaky-http-test
Closed

test: defer abort with setTimeout#15520
mcollina wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
mcollina:fix-flaky-http-test

Conversation

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Ref: #15404
Fixes: #15505

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

test, http

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure. label Sep 21, 2017
@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mscdexmscdex added the http Issues and PRs related to the http subsystem. label Sep 21, 2017
@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it safe to call external.abort() and internalRes.end('Hello World\n'); here or does this invalidate the test?
This would remove the setTimeout dependency.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@lpinca the problem is that this test keeps failing only on Centos and I do not know why :(

@lpinca

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Yes that's weird, it looks like res.on('close', ...) is not emitted but I don't know why.

@cjihrig

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

While you're here, could you move the stuff from // Proxy server until the end of the file into the internal server's listen() callback?

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@BridgeAR

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@mcollina we could also mark the test as being flaky on centos?

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will test less than before, since the mustCall is not in place anymore. It might be worth to check that either finish or close will be called at least once? And I am somewhat surprised that our events are platform dependent. Would you be so kind and add a comment why that is the case?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have no idea on why it's the case, that's the major problem of this PR.

I'll see if I can get another solution as well.

I'll add another check that verifies that at least one of them is called.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/10273/

This should be green, and it can land as it finshes.

@jasnell@lpinca@cjihrig can you review it again so we can land?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing '

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd point out that this only happens on CentOS 5.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess these are only for debugging. Do we want to keep them?

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing semicolon.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ditto.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess this isn't needed after all.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this called more than once on any platforms? Removing the listeners kind of defeats the purpose of wrapping it in common.mustCall().

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess the point is to ensure that the listener is actually called.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, but common.mustCall() also enforces the number of times the function is called. Removing the listeners means we lose that checking.

@lpincalpincaSep 26, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think either 'close' or 'finish' should be emitted so it doesn't matter as long as at least one is emitted.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's why I asked:

Is this called more than once on any platforms?

We shouldn't remove the listeners unless we really need to.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@lpinca

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Still LGTM.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Landed as 1fe9b53

@mcollina
mcollina deleted the fix-flaky-http-test branch September 27, 2017 13:09
mcollina added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2017
Ref: #15404Fixes: #15505
PR-URL: #15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit to MylesBorins/node that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2017
Ref: nodejs#15404Fixes: nodejs#15505
PR-URL: nodejs#15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2017
Ref: #15404Fixes: #15505
PR-URL: #15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@TrottTrott mentioned this pull request Sep 30, 2017
addaleax pushed a commit to addaleax/ayo that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2017
Ref: nodejs/node#15404Fixes: nodejs/node#15505
PR-URL: nodejs/node#15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@MylesBorinsMylesBorins mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2017
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2017
Ref: #15404Fixes: #15505
PR-URL: #15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

httpIssues and PRs related to the http subsystem.testIssues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@mcollina@lpinca@cjihrig@BridgeAR@jasnell@mscdex@MylesBorins@nodejs-github-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' test: defer abort with setTimeout by mcollina · Pull Request #15520 · nodejs/node · GitHub
Skip to content

test: defer abort with setTimeout - #15520

Closed
mcollina wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
mcollina:fix-flaky-http-test
Closed

test: defer abort with setTimeout#15520
mcollina wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
mcollina:fix-flaky-http-test

Conversation

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Ref: #15404
Fixes: #15505

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

test, http

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure. label Sep 21, 2017
@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mscdexmscdex added the http Issues and PRs related to the http subsystem. label Sep 21, 2017
@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it safe to call external.abort() and internalRes.end('Hello World\n'); here or does this invalidate the test?
This would remove the setTimeout dependency.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@lpinca the problem is that this test keeps failing only on Centos and I do not know why :(

@lpinca

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Yes that's weird, it looks like res.on('close', ...) is not emitted but I don't know why.

@cjihrig

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

While you're here, could you move the stuff from // Proxy server until the end of the file into the internal server's listen() callback?

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@BridgeAR

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@mcollina we could also mark the test as being flaky on centos?

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will test less than before, since the mustCall is not in place anymore. It might be worth to check that either finish or close will be called at least once? And I am somewhat surprised that our events are platform dependent. Would you be so kind and add a comment why that is the case?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have no idea on why it's the case, that's the major problem of this PR.

I'll see if I can get another solution as well.

I'll add another check that verifies that at least one of them is called.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/10273/

This should be green, and it can land as it finshes.

@jasnell@lpinca@cjihrig can you review it again so we can land?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing '

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd point out that this only happens on CentOS 5.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess these are only for debugging. Do we want to keep them?

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing semicolon.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ditto.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess this isn't needed after all.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this called more than once on any platforms? Removing the listeners kind of defeats the purpose of wrapping it in common.mustCall().

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess the point is to ensure that the listener is actually called.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, but common.mustCall() also enforces the number of times the function is called. Removing the listeners means we lose that checking.

@lpincalpincaSep 26, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think either 'close' or 'finish' should be emitted so it doesn't matter as long as at least one is emitted.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's why I asked:

Is this called more than once on any platforms?

We shouldn't remove the listeners unless we really need to.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@lpinca

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Still LGTM.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Landed as 1fe9b53

@mcollina
mcollina deleted the fix-flaky-http-test branch September 27, 2017 13:09
mcollina added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2017
Ref: #15404Fixes: #15505
PR-URL: #15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit to MylesBorins/node that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2017
Ref: nodejs#15404Fixes: nodejs#15505
PR-URL: nodejs#15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2017
Ref: #15404Fixes: #15505
PR-URL: #15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@TrottTrott mentioned this pull request Sep 30, 2017
addaleax pushed a commit to addaleax/ayo that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2017
Ref: nodejs/node#15404Fixes: nodejs/node#15505
PR-URL: nodejs/node#15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@MylesBorinsMylesBorins mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2017
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2017
Ref: #15404Fixes: #15505
PR-URL: #15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

httpIssues and PRs related to the http subsystem.testIssues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@mcollina@lpinca@cjihrig@BridgeAR@jasnell@mscdex@MylesBorins@nodejs-github-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' test: defer abort with setTimeout by mcollina · Pull Request #15520 · nodejs/node · GitHub
Skip to content

test: defer abort with setTimeout - #15520

Closed
mcollina wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
mcollina:fix-flaky-http-test
Closed

test: defer abort with setTimeout#15520
mcollina wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
mcollina:fix-flaky-http-test

Conversation

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Ref: #15404
Fixes: #15505

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

test, http

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure. label Sep 21, 2017
@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mscdexmscdex added the http Issues and PRs related to the http subsystem. label Sep 21, 2017
@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it safe to call external.abort() and internalRes.end('Hello World\n'); here or does this invalidate the test?
This would remove the setTimeout dependency.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@lpinca the problem is that this test keeps failing only on Centos and I do not know why :(

@lpinca

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Yes that's weird, it looks like res.on('close', ...) is not emitted but I don't know why.

@cjihrig

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

While you're here, could you move the stuff from // Proxy server until the end of the file into the internal server's listen() callback?

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@BridgeAR

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@mcollina we could also mark the test as being flaky on centos?

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will test less than before, since the mustCall is not in place anymore. It might be worth to check that either finish or close will be called at least once? And I am somewhat surprised that our events are platform dependent. Would you be so kind and add a comment why that is the case?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have no idea on why it's the case, that's the major problem of this PR.

I'll see if I can get another solution as well.

I'll add another check that verifies that at least one of them is called.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/10273/

This should be green, and it can land as it finshes.

@jasnell@lpinca@cjihrig can you review it again so we can land?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing '

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd point out that this only happens on CentOS 5.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess these are only for debugging. Do we want to keep them?

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing semicolon.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ditto.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess this isn't needed after all.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this called more than once on any platforms? Removing the listeners kind of defeats the purpose of wrapping it in common.mustCall().

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess the point is to ensure that the listener is actually called.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, but common.mustCall() also enforces the number of times the function is called. Removing the listeners means we lose that checking.

@lpincalpincaSep 26, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think either 'close' or 'finish' should be emitted so it doesn't matter as long as at least one is emitted.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's why I asked:

Is this called more than once on any platforms?

We shouldn't remove the listeners unless we really need to.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@lpinca

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Still LGTM.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Landed as 1fe9b53

@mcollina
mcollina deleted the fix-flaky-http-test branch September 27, 2017 13:09
mcollina added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2017
Ref: #15404Fixes: #15505
PR-URL: #15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit to MylesBorins/node that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2017
Ref: nodejs#15404Fixes: nodejs#15505
PR-URL: nodejs#15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2017
Ref: #15404Fixes: #15505
PR-URL: #15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@TrottTrott mentioned this pull request Sep 30, 2017
addaleax pushed a commit to addaleax/ayo that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2017
Ref: nodejs/node#15404Fixes: nodejs/node#15505
PR-URL: nodejs/node#15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@MylesBorinsMylesBorins mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2017
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2017
Ref: #15404Fixes: #15505
PR-URL: #15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

httpIssues and PRs related to the http subsystem.testIssues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@mcollina@lpinca@cjihrig@BridgeAR@jasnell@mscdex@MylesBorins@nodejs-github-bot
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); test: defer abort with setTimeout by mcollina · Pull Request #15520 · nodejs/node · GitHub
Skip to content

test: defer abort with setTimeout - #15520

Closed
mcollina wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
mcollina:fix-flaky-http-test
Closed

test: defer abort with setTimeout#15520
mcollina wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
mcollina:fix-flaky-http-test

Conversation

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Ref: #15404
Fixes: #15505

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

test, http

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure. label Sep 21, 2017
@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mscdexmscdex added the http Issues and PRs related to the http subsystem. label Sep 21, 2017
@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it safe to call external.abort() and internalRes.end('Hello World\n'); here or does this invalidate the test?
This would remove the setTimeout dependency.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@lpinca the problem is that this test keeps failing only on Centos and I do not know why :(

@lpinca

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Yes that's weird, it looks like res.on('close', ...) is not emitted but I don't know why.

@cjihrig

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

While you're here, could you move the stuff from // Proxy server until the end of the file into the internal server's listen() callback?

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@BridgeAR

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@mcollina we could also mark the test as being flaky on centos?

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will test less than before, since the mustCall is not in place anymore. It might be worth to check that either finish or close will be called at least once? And I am somewhat surprised that our events are platform dependent. Would you be so kind and add a comment why that is the case?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have no idea on why it's the case, that's the major problem of this PR.

I'll see if I can get another solution as well.

I'll add another check that verifies that at least one of them is called.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/10273/

This should be green, and it can land as it finshes.

@jasnell@lpinca@cjihrig can you review it again so we can land?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing '

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd point out that this only happens on CentOS 5.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess these are only for debugging. Do we want to keep them?

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing semicolon.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ditto.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess this isn't needed after all.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this called more than once on any platforms? Removing the listeners kind of defeats the purpose of wrapping it in common.mustCall().

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess the point is to ensure that the listener is actually called.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, but common.mustCall() also enforces the number of times the function is called. Removing the listeners means we lose that checking.

@lpincalpincaSep 26, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think either 'close' or 'finish' should be emitted so it doesn't matter as long as at least one is emitted.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's why I asked:

Is this called more than once on any platforms?

We shouldn't remove the listeners unless we really need to.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@lpinca

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Still LGTM.

@mcollina

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Landed as 1fe9b53

@mcollina
mcollina deleted the fix-flaky-http-test branch September 27, 2017 13:09
mcollina added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2017
Ref: #15404Fixes: #15505
PR-URL: #15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit to MylesBorins/node that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2017
Ref: nodejs#15404Fixes: nodejs#15505
PR-URL: nodejs#15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2017
Ref: #15404Fixes: #15505
PR-URL: #15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@TrottTrott mentioned this pull request Sep 30, 2017
addaleax pushed a commit to addaleax/ayo that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2017
Ref: nodejs/node#15404Fixes: nodejs/node#15505
PR-URL: nodejs/node#15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@MylesBorinsMylesBorins mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2017
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2017
Ref: #15404Fixes: #15505
PR-URL: #15520
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

httpIssues and PRs related to the http subsystem.testIssues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@mcollina@lpinca@cjihrig@BridgeAR@jasnell@mscdex@MylesBorins@nodejs-github-bot