Skip to content

test: properly tag anonymous namespaces - #18583

Closed
mhdawson wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
mhdawson:anonymous-scope
Closed

test: properly tag anonymous namespaces#18583
mhdawson wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
mhdawson:anonymous-scope

Conversation

@mhdawson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

For tests that use anonymous namespaces, some tagged the close
of the namespace with 'namespace' while others used
'anonymous namespace'. It was suggested I should use
'anonymous namespace' in a recent PR review so make all of the
tests consistent with this.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

test

For tests that use anonymous namespaces, some tagged the close
of the namespace with 'namespace' while others used
'anonymous namespace'. It was suggested I should use
'anonymous namespace' in a recent PR review so make all of the
tests consistent with this.
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added addons Issues and PRs related to native addons. dont-land-on-v4.x inspector Issues and PRs related to the V8 inspector protocol node-api Issues and PRs related to the Node-API. test Issues and PRs related to the tests. labels Feb 5, 2018
@mhdawson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

FYI @bnoordhuis

@BridgeARBridgeAR added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Feb 6, 2018

@bnoordhuisbnoordhuis left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. FWIW, I mentioned it because the linter complained about it at one time. Maybe we lost that when we upgraded cpplint.

@mhdawson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@mhdawson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Opened #18663 for issue seen on ubuntu 1204

The failure on 1604 looks like a problem writing out the output, but here is another test run for the linux platforms to see if it recreates: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-linux/16248/

@mhdawson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

No recreate on ubuntu1604. Full green CI on linux so landing.

@mhdawson

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Landed as fe442f6

@mhdawsonmhdawson closed this Feb 8, 2018
mhdawson added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2018
For tests that use anonymous namespaces, some tagged the close
of the namespace with 'namespace' while others used
'anonymous namespace'. It was suggested I should use
'anonymous namespace' in a recent PR review so make all of the
tests consistent with this.
PR-URL: #18583
Reviewed-By: Eugene Ostroukhov <eostroukhov@google.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2018
For tests that use anonymous namespaces, some tagged the close
of the namespace with 'namespace' while others used
'anonymous namespace'. It was suggested I should use
'anonymous namespace' in a recent PR review so make all of the
tests consistent with this.
PR-URL: #18583
Reviewed-By: Eugene Ostroukhov <eostroukhov@google.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2018
For tests that use anonymous namespaces, some tagged the close
of the namespace with 'namespace' while others used
'anonymous namespace'. It was suggested I should use
'anonymous namespace' in a recent PR review so make all of the
tests consistent with this.
PR-URL: #18583
Reviewed-By: Eugene Ostroukhov <eostroukhov@google.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2018
For tests that use anonymous namespaces, some tagged the close
of the namespace with 'namespace' while others used
'anonymous namespace'. It was suggested I should use
'anonymous namespace' in a recent PR review so make all of the
tests consistent with this.
PR-URL: #18583
Reviewed-By: Eugene Ostroukhov <eostroukhov@google.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
@MylesBorinsMylesBorins mentioned this pull request Feb 21, 2018
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2018
For tests that use anonymous namespaces, some tagged the close
of the namespace with 'namespace' while others used
'anonymous namespace'. It was suggested I should use
'anonymous namespace' in a recent PR review so make all of the
tests consistent with this.
PR-URL: #18583
Reviewed-By: Eugene Ostroukhov <eostroukhov@google.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
MayaLekova pushed a commit to MayaLekova/node that referenced this pull request May 8, 2018
For tests that use anonymous namespaces, some tagged the close
of the namespace with 'namespace' while others used
'anonymous namespace'. It was suggested I should use
'anonymous namespace' in a recent PR review so make all of the
tests consistent with this.
PR-URL: nodejs#18583
Reviewed-By: Eugene Ostroukhov <eostroukhov@google.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 25, 2018
For tests that use anonymous namespaces, some tagged the close
of the namespace with 'namespace' while others used
'anonymous namespace'. It was suggested I should use
'anonymous namespace' in a recent PR review so make all of the
tests consistent with this.
PR-URL: #18583
Reviewed-By: Eugene Ostroukhov <eostroukhov@google.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
@MylesBorinsMylesBorins mentioned this pull request Jul 9, 2018
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2018
For tests that use anonymous namespaces, some tagged the close
of the namespace with 'namespace' while others used
'anonymous namespace'. It was suggested I should use
'anonymous namespace' in a recent PR review so make all of the
tests consistent with this.
PR-URL: #18583
Reviewed-By: Eugene Ostroukhov <eostroukhov@google.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
@mhdawson
mhdawson deleted the anonymous-scope branch September 30, 2019 13:15
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

addonsIssues and PRs related to native addons.author readyPRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.inspectorIssues and PRs related to the V8 inspector protocolnode-apiIssues and PRs related to the Node-API.testIssues and PRs related to the tests.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants

@mhdawson@bnoordhuis@eugeneo@cjihrig@BridgeAR@MylesBorins@nodejs-github-bot