Skip to content

test: delete test-regress-GH-4948 - #19279

Closed
ryzokuken wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
ryzokuken:test/delete-4948
Closed

test: delete test-regress-GH-4948#19279
ryzokuken wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
ryzokuken:test/delete-4948

Conversation

@ryzokuken

@ryzokukenryzokuken commented Mar 11, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Mar 11, 2018
@ryzokukenryzokuken changed the title test: delete test/parallel/test-regress-GH-4948test: delete test-regress-GH-4948Mar 11, 2018
@lpinca

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Little background here.
This test was introduced in https://github.com/nodejs/node-v0.x-archive/pull/4948/files. At that time IncomingMessage.prototype._dump() was setting this.socket.parser.incoming to null. This no longer happens so I think the test is useless as it's not testing anything.

@lpincalpinca left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

SGTM

@lpinca

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ryzokuken

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@lpinca any idea why so many tests failed? I don't this should result in any test failure. Flaky tests?

@lpinca

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Yes, failures seem unrelated. I don't see how removing a test make others fail.

@BridgeARBridgeAR added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Mar 11, 2018
@lpinca

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@lpinca

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Landed in 52e869b.

lpinca pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2018
PR-URL: #19279
Refs: #19275 (comment)
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@lpincalpinca closed this Mar 13, 2018
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2018
PR-URL: #19279
Refs: #19275 (comment)
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@targostargos mentioned this pull request Mar 18, 2018
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2018
PR-URL: #19279
Refs: #19275 (comment)
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MayaLekova pushed a commit to MayaLekova/node that referenced this pull request May 8, 2018
PR-URL: nodejs#19279
Refs: nodejs#19275 (comment)
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

author readyPRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.testIssues and PRs related to the tests.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants

@ryzokuken@lpinca@jasnell@gireeshpunathil@BridgeAR@BethGriggs@nodejs-github-bot