Skip to content

test: see value of "hadError" - #22069

Closed
iamoryanmoshe wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
iamoryanmoshe:dev.tls_hello_parser.test
Closed

test: see value of "hadError"#22069
iamoryanmoshe wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
iamoryanmoshe:dev.tls_hello_parser.test

Conversation

@iamoryanmoshe

@iamoryanmosheiamoryanmoshe commented Aug 1, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The existing implementation created a state that if the assert failed
we got an error message without the values of hadError.
Removed the default error message and added a comment explaining the
assert.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

The existing implementation created a state that if the assert failed
we got an error message without the values of hadError.
Removed the default error message and added a comment explaining the
assert.
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Aug 1, 2018
@Trott

Trott commented Aug 1, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@benjamingr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Collaborators 👍 to fast track

@benjamingrbenjamingr added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Aug 1, 2018
@TrottTrott added the fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. label Aug 1, 2018
@Trott

Trott commented Aug 1, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Trott pushed a commit to Trott/io.js that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2018
The existing implementation created a state that if the assert failed
we got an error message without the values of hadError.
Removed the default error message and added a comment explaining the
assert.
PR-URL: nodejs#22069
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
@Trott

Trott commented Aug 2, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Landed in 90972d5

@TrottTrott closed this Aug 2, 2018
@Trott

Trott commented Aug 2, 2018

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks for the contribution! 🎉

(If you're interested in other possible contributions to Node.js but don't have a good idea of where to start looking, some ideas are posted at https://www.nodetodo.org/next-steps/.)

targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2018
The existing implementation created a state that if the assert failed
we got an error message without the values of hadError.
Removed the default error message and added a comment explaining the
assert.
PR-URL: #22069
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
@rvaggrvagg mentioned this pull request Aug 13, 2018
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

author readyPRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.fast-trackPRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land.testIssues and PRs related to the tests.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

11 participants

@iamoryanmoshe@Trott@benjamingr@jasnell@addaleax@lpinca@cjihrig@maclover7@BridgeAR@nodejs-github-bot@oryanmoshe