Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
deps: add support for interface broadcast addresses - #23438
Conversation
addaleax
commented
Oct 12, 2018
Hi! Could you open a pull request against https://github.com/libuv/libuv/ with the libuv changes first? We generally avoid doing our own patches on top of libuv releases. (The libuv part also looks semver-major, which may be a challenge on its own.) |
4e8f315 to
fe4e223Comparerichardlau
commented
Oct 12, 2018
There are existing discussions in libuv/libuv#158 and libuv/libuv#1371 about extending libuv's support for network interfaces. |
Done. See libuv/libuv#2033. |
fe4e223 to
d2111b4Comparepprindeville
commented
Oct 13, 2018
I saw those, and from what I can tell they deal with larger architectural issues, like getting addresses for non-IP families, interfaces with no layer-3 configuration, etc. That's a bit orthogonal to what I'm doing here. |
8dc06d4 to
e219e50Comparepprindeville
commented
Oct 21, 2018
I managed to get this ( |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
pprindeville
commented
Oct 22, 2018
Currently it returns the empty string |
8ae28ff to
2935f72Comparegireeshpunathil
commented
Dec 1, 2020
how do we move forward on this one? |
bnb
commented
Jan 7, 2022
heya @pprindeville! any chance you're going to pick this up again? No worries if not. If not, anyone else? If not... we should probably close this out. |
pprindeville
commented
Jan 8, 2022
I can try, but I'm not entirely sure what the blocker is. What do I need to do that I haven't done, or redo, in order to advance this? |
bnb
commented
Jan 11, 2022
@pprindeville it looks like there's an open question (similar to mine!) in libuv/libuv#2033 (review). I'm assuming that if those can get merged in, this can get merged in if I'm reading the PRs correctly. So, ideally, finishing that PR up then coming back to this one once that lands :) |
marco-ippolito
commented
Dec 21, 2023
@pprindeville I think the PR that was blocking was merged, or I am wrong? |
This issue/PR was marked as stalled, it will be automatically closed in 30 days. If it should remain open, please leave a comment explaining why it should remain open. |
avivkeller
commented
Sep 24, 2024
@pprindeville This PR hasn't had any activity for a while (and the stalebot isn't up), so I've marked this as |
pprindeville
commented
Sep 24, 2024
Yeah, after 6 years, whatever expectation of progress I had has dwindled. |
e219e50 to
dd745f2CompareNot using the correct broadcast address in applications can cause disasterous results. Rather than letting the programmer guess at the broadcast address and try to derive it correctly, allow him to query the system instead for the correctly configured state. Fixes: nodejs#23437 Depends-on: libuv/libuv#2033
dd745f2 to
840cc89CompareThis pull request has been marked as stale due to 90 days of inactivity. |
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passes