Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
src: move req_wrap_queue to base class of ReqWrap - #26148
Closed
addaleax wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Introduce a second base class for `ReqWrap` that does not depend on a template parameter and move the `req_wrap_queue_` field to it. This addresses undefined behaviour that occurs when casting to `ReqWrap<uv_req_t>` in the `ReqWrap` constructor. Refs: nodejs#26131
danbev
approved these changes
Feb 18, 2019
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
jasnell
approved these changes
Feb 18, 2019
addaleax
commented
Feb 19, 2019
MemberAuthor
danbev
commented
Feb 20, 2019
Contributor
Re-run of failing node-test-commit-freebsd |
addaleax
commented
Feb 20, 2019
MemberAuthor
Landed in 49a2e40 |
addaleax added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2019
Introduce a second base class for `ReqWrap` that does not depend on a template parameter and move the `req_wrap_queue_` field to it. This addresses undefined behaviour that occurs when casting to `ReqWrap<uv_req_t>` in the `ReqWrap` constructor. Refs: #26131 PR-URL: #26148 Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
addaleax added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2019
Introduce a second base class for `ReqWrap` that does not depend on a template parameter and move the `req_wrap_queue_` field to it. This addresses undefined behaviour that occurs when casting to `ReqWrap<uv_req_t>` in the `ReqWrap` constructor. Refs: #26131 PR-URL: #26148 Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Merged
rvagg pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2019
Introduce a second base class for `ReqWrap` that does not depend on a template parameter and move the `req_wrap_queue_` field to it. This addresses undefined behaviour that occurs when casting to `ReqWrap<uv_req_t>` in the `ReqWrap` constructor. Refs: #26131 PR-URL: #26148 Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Introduce a second base class for
ReqWrapthat does notdepend on a template parameter and move the
req_wrap_queue_field to it.
This addresses undefined behaviour that occurs when casting
to
ReqWrap<uv_req_t>in theReqWrapconstructor.Refs: #26131
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passes