Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
test: improve pummel/test-timers.js - #35175
Merged
Merged
Conversation
MemberAuthor
watilde
approved these changes
Sep 15, 2020
addaleax
approved these changes
Sep 15, 2020
Leko
approved these changes
Sep 15, 2020
* use Date.now() instead of new Date() because only the timestamp is ever used, so we don't need the full Date object * use separate start times recorded for the two different test cases * improve assertion messages PR-URL: nodejs#35175 Reviewed-By: Daijiro Wachi <daijiro.wachi@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Shingo Inoue <leko.noor@gmail.com>
Trott
commented
Sep 15, 2020
MemberAuthor
Landed in ae257ca |
ruyadorno pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 21, 2020
* use Date.now() instead of new Date() because only the timestamp is ever used, so we don't need the full Date object * use separate start times recorded for the two different test cases * improve assertion messages PR-URL: #35175 Reviewed-By: Daijiro Wachi <daijiro.wachi@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Shingo Inoue <leko.noor@gmail.com>
addaleax pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 22, 2020
* use Date.now() instead of new Date() because only the timestamp is ever used, so we don't need the full Date object * use separate start times recorded for the two different test cases * improve assertion messages PR-URL: #35175 Reviewed-By: Daijiro Wachi <daijiro.wachi@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Shingo Inoue <leko.noor@gmail.com>
Merged
joesepi pushed a commit
to joesepi/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 8, 2021
* use Date.now() instead of new Date() because only the timestamp is ever used, so we don't need the full Date object * use separate start times recorded for the two different test cases * improve assertion messages PR-URL: nodejs#35175 Reviewed-By: Daijiro Wachi <daijiro.wachi@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Shingo Inoue <leko.noor@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
ever used, so we don't need the full Date object
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passes