Skip to content

util: prefer Reflect.ownKeys(…) in util.inspect(…)#36740

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
aduh95 merged 1 commit into from
Jan 20, 2021
Merged

util: prefer Reflect.ownKeys(…) in util.inspect(…)#36740

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
9 changes: 3 additions & 6 deletions lib/internal/util/inspect.js
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
Expand Up@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ const {
ObjectPrototypePropertyIsEnumerable,
ObjectSeal,
ObjectSetPrototypeOf,
ReflectOwnKeys,
RegExp,
RegExpPrototypeTest,
RegExpPrototypeToString,
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -615,11 +616,7 @@ function addPrototypeProperties(ctx, main, obj, recurseTimes, output) {
ArrayPrototypeForEach(keys, (key) => keySet.add(key));
}
// Get all own property names and symbols.
keys = ObjectGetOwnPropertyNames(obj);
const symbols = ObjectGetOwnPropertySymbols(obj);
if (symbols.length !== 0) {
ArrayPrototypePush(keys, ...symbols);
}
keys = ReflectOwnKeys(obj);
for (const key of keys) {
// Ignore the `constructor` property and keys that exist on layers above.
if (key === 'constructor' ||
Expand DownExpand Up@@ -667,7 +664,7 @@ function getKeys(value, showHidden) {
if (showHidden) {
keys = ObjectGetOwnPropertyNames(value);
if (symbols.length !== 0)
keys.push(...symbols);
ArrayPrototypePush(keys, ...symbols);
} else {
// This might throw if `value` is a Module Namespace Object from an
// unevaluated module, but we don't want to perform the actual type
Expand Down