Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Fix crash in GetInterfaceAddresses - #4272
Closed
martinbark wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
cjihrig
commented
Dec 14, 2015
Contributor
LGTM |
mscdex
commented
Dec 14, 2015
Contributor
LGTM |
cjihrig
commented
Dec 14, 2015
Contributor
saghul
commented
Dec 14, 2015
Member
LGTM. |
jasnell
commented
Dec 14, 2015
Member
LGTM. One small nit tho: can you please update the commit log message to fit the style guidelines described here: https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#step-3-commit |
If uv_interface_addresses() returns UV_ENOSYS then interfaces and count are uninitialised. This can cause a segmentation fault inside GetInterfaceAddresses when it tries to use the invalid interfaces[]. Fix the issue by returning from GetInterfaceAddresses on the UV_ENOSYS error. This issue was observed when using uCLibc-ng version 1.0.9 because uv_interface_addresses() in deps/uv/src/unix/linux-core.c incorrectly undefines HAVE_IFADDRS_H. Signed-off-by: Martin Bark <martin@barkynet.com>
martinbark
commented
Dec 14, 2015
ContributorAuthor
Sorry about that, I just updated the commit message, hope that's OK now. BTW, forgot to say this issue is in all versions of node after 0.12.0 |
trevnorris
commented
Dec 28, 2015
Contributor
Any hold up here? |
cjihrig
commented
Dec 30, 2015
Contributor
rvagg pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 4, 2016
If uv_interface_addresses() returns UV_ENOSYS then interfaces and count are uninitialised. This can cause a segmentation fault inside GetInterfaceAddresses when it tries to use the invalid interfaces[]. Fix the issue by returning from GetInterfaceAddresses on the UV_ENOSYS error. This issue was observed when using uCLibc-ng version 1.0.9 because uv_interface_addresses() in deps/uv/src/unix/linux-core.c incorrectly undefines HAVE_IFADDRS_H. Signed-off-by: Martin Bark <martin@barkynet.com> PR-URL: #4272 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <saghul@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
rvagg
commented
Jan 4, 2016
Member
Only CI error wasn't fatal to tests and is purely Jenkins related. Change LGTM. Landed @ 028194b. Thanks for hunting this one down and submitting a fix @martinbark. I believe this is your first commit to core, welcome on board, I hope you find other ways to contribute! |
Fishrock123 pushed a commit
to Fishrock123/node
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2016
If uv_interface_addresses() returns UV_ENOSYS then interfaces and count are uninitialised. This can cause a segmentation fault inside GetInterfaceAddresses when it tries to use the invalid interfaces[]. Fix the issue by returning from GetInterfaceAddresses on the UV_ENOSYS error. This issue was observed when using uCLibc-ng version 1.0.9 because uv_interface_addresses() in deps/uv/src/unix/linux-core.c incorrectly undefines HAVE_IFADDRS_H. Signed-off-by: Martin Bark <martin@barkynet.com> PR-URL: nodejs#4272 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <saghul@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
MylesBorins pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2016
If uv_interface_addresses() returns UV_ENOSYS then interfaces and count are uninitialised. This can cause a segmentation fault inside GetInterfaceAddresses when it tries to use the invalid interfaces[]. Fix the issue by returning from GetInterfaceAddresses on the UV_ENOSYS error. This issue was observed when using uCLibc-ng version 1.0.9 because uv_interface_addresses() in deps/uv/src/unix/linux-core.c incorrectly undefines HAVE_IFADDRS_H. Signed-off-by: Martin Bark <martin@barkynet.com> PR-URL: #4272 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <saghul@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
MylesBorins pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 19, 2016
If uv_interface_addresses() returns UV_ENOSYS then interfaces and count are uninitialised. This can cause a segmentation fault inside GetInterfaceAddresses when it tries to use the invalid interfaces[]. Fix the issue by returning from GetInterfaceAddresses on the UV_ENOSYS error. This issue was observed when using uCLibc-ng version 1.0.9 because uv_interface_addresses() in deps/uv/src/unix/linux-core.c incorrectly undefines HAVE_IFADDRS_H. Signed-off-by: Martin Bark <martin@barkynet.com> PR-URL: #4272 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <saghul@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
Merged
scovetta pushed a commit
to scovetta/node
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 2, 2016
If uv_interface_addresses() returns UV_ENOSYS then interfaces and count are uninitialised. This can cause a segmentation fault inside GetInterfaceAddresses when it tries to use the invalid interfaces[]. Fix the issue by returning from GetInterfaceAddresses on the UV_ENOSYS error. This issue was observed when using uCLibc-ng version 1.0.9 because uv_interface_addresses() in deps/uv/src/unix/linux-core.c incorrectly undefines HAVE_IFADDRS_H. Signed-off-by: Martin Bark <martin@barkynet.com> PR-URL: nodejs#4272 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <saghul@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
8 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If uv_interface_addresses() returns UV_ENOSYS then interfaces and count are
uninitialised. This can cause a segmentation fault inside
GetInterfaceAddresses when it tries to use the invalid interfaces[]. Fix
the issue by returning from GetInterfaceAddresses on the UV_ENOSYS error.
This issue was observed when using uCLibc-ng version 1.0.9 because
uv_interface_addresses() in deps/uv/src/unix/linux-core.c incorrectly
undefines HAVE_IFADDRS_H.
I have submitted a pull request to libuv to fix uClibc-ng support, see libuv/libuv#653.
Also, see https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=8296 for further details on
the origins of this bug.