Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
docs: update gpg key for Myles Borins - #4657
Closed
MylesBorins wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Original key did not have personal information associated with it. The new key rectifies this problem
MylesBorins
commented
Jan 13, 2016
ContributorAuthor
cjihrig
commented
Jan 13, 2016
Contributor
LGTM |
rvagg
commented
Jan 13, 2016
Member
I believe these errors are just debug messages https://bugs.gnupg.org/gnupg/issue1934, I can't test this on my Linux machine atm so this is just OSX. Does anyone else get odd messages when importing the new key? |
cjihrig
commented
Jan 13, 2016
Contributor
@rvagg I saw similar error messages importing @thealphanerd and @evanlucas keys when they joined the release team. EDIT: Also: |
rvagg
commented
Jan 13, 2016
Member
ok .. well it imported, so lgtm I suppose |
This was referenced Jan 13, 2016
Merged
jasnell
commented
Jan 13, 2016
Member
LGTM |
jasnell pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2016
Original key did not have personal information associated with it. The new key rectifies this problem PR-URL: #4657 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
jasnell
commented
Jan 13, 2016
Member
Landed in 287325c |
MylesBorins pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2016
Original key did not have personal information associated with it. The new key rectifies this problem PR-URL: #4657 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Starefossen pushed a commit
to Starefossen/docker-node
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2016
PR-URL: nodejs#85 Related: nodejs/node#4657 Signed-off-by: Hans Kristian Flaatten <hans.kristian.flaatten@dnt.no>
MylesBorins pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2016
Original key did not have personal information associated with it. The new key rectifies this problem PR-URL: #4657 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
rvagg pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2016
Original key did not have personal information associated with it. The new key rectifies this problem PR-URL: #4657 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2016
Original key did not have personal information associated with it. The new key rectifies this problem PR-URL: #4657 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
bnoordhuis
commented
Jan 14, 2016
Member
Should there perhaps be some kind of audit trail in the docs to help users understand why Myles' key changed between releases? It's going to be confusing now when they download an older binary or tarball. |
MylesBorins
commented
Jan 14, 2016
ContributorAuthor
@bnoordhuis v5.4.1 was signed by @Fishrock123 to avoid that exact case. My prior key was never used |
MylesBorins pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 19, 2016
Original key did not have personal information associated with it. The new key rectifies this problem PR-URL: #4657 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Merged
scovetta pushed a commit
to scovetta/node
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 2, 2016
Original key did not have personal information associated with it. The new key rectifies this problem PR-URL: nodejs#4657 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Original key did not have personal information associated with it.
The new key rectifies this problem