Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
src: refactor SplitString in util - #48491
Merged
Merged
Conversation
nodejs-github-bot
commented
Jun 18, 2023
Collaborator
Review requested:
|
targos
commented
Jun 18, 2023
Member
Please at least post the benchmark results in the PR. Your link may become dead in the future |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
jasnell
approved these changes
Jun 20, 2023
nodejs-github-bot
commented
Jun 21, 2023
Collaborator
nodejs-github-bot
commented
Jun 22, 2023
Collaborator
lemire
reviewed
Jun 22, 2023
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
lemire
reviewed
Jun 22, 2023
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
lemire
reviewed
Jun 22, 2023
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
lemire
reviewed
Jun 22, 2023
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
lemire
reviewed
Jun 22, 2023
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
lemire
reviewed
Jun 22, 2023
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
lemire
reviewed
Jun 22, 2023
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
anonrigforce-pushed
the
refactor-split-string
branch
from
June 22, 2023 19:27
8304083 to
27d1a87Compareanonrig
commented
Jun 22, 2023
MemberAuthor
cc @nodejs/cpp-reviewers |
anonrigforce-pushed
the
refactor-split-string
branch
from
June 22, 2023 19:47
27d1a87 to
63f8f96CompareQard
approved these changes
Jun 22, 2023
lemire
approved these changes
Jun 22, 2023
RafaelGSS
approved these changes
Jun 22, 2023
nodejs-github-bot
commented
Jun 22, 2023
Collaborator
nodejs-github-bot
commented
Jun 22, 2023
Collaborator
Landed in 640a791 |
This was referenced Jun 23, 2023
RafaelGSS pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 3, 2023
PR-URL: #48491 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <admin@stephenbelanger.com> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com>
Merged
Ceres6 pushed a commit
to Ceres6/node
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 14, 2023
PR-URL: nodejs#48491 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <admin@stephenbelanger.com> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com>
Ceres6 pushed a commit
to Ceres6/node
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 14, 2023
PR-URL: nodejs#48491 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <admin@stephenbelanger.com> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com>
ruyadorno pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 10, 2023
PR-URL: #48491 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <admin@stephenbelanger.com> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com>
Merged
ruyadorno pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 13, 2023
PR-URL: #48491 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Stephen Belanger <admin@stephenbelanger.com> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com>
tniessen added a commit
to tniessen/node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 17, 2023
The use of string_view and subsequent copying to a string was supposed to be a minor optimization in 640a791, however, since 413c16e, no string splitting occurs anymore. Therefore, we can simply pass around some references instead of using string_view or copying strings. Refs: nodejs#48491 Refs: nodejs#49047
nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 19, 2023
The use of string_view and subsequent copying to a string was supposed to be a minor optimization in 640a791, however, since 413c16e, no string splitting occurs anymore. Therefore, we can simply pass around some references instead of using string_view or copying strings. Refs: #48491 Refs: #49047 PR-URL: #50662 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
targos pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 23, 2023
The use of string_view and subsequent copying to a string was supposed to be a minor optimization in 640a7918, however, since 413c16e, no string splitting occurs anymore. Therefore, we can simply pass around some references instead of using string_view or copying strings. Refs: #48491 Refs: #49047 PR-URL: #50662 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
lucshi pushed a commit
to lucshi/node
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 27, 2023
The use of string_view and subsequent copying to a string was supposed to be a minor optimization in 640a791, however, since 413c16e, no string splitting occurs anymore. Therefore, we can simply pass around some references instead of using string_view or copying strings. Refs: nodejs#48491 Refs: nodejs#49047 PR-URL: nodejs#50662 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 29, 2023
The use of string_view and subsequent copying to a string was supposed to be a minor optimization in 640a791, however, since 413c16e, no string splitting occurs anymore. Therefore, we can simply pass around some references instead of using string_view or copying strings. Refs: #48491 Refs: #49047 PR-URL: #50662 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
UlisesGascon pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 11, 2023
The use of string_view and subsequent copying to a string was supposed to be a minor optimization in 640a791, however, since 413c16e, no string splitting occurs anymore. Therefore, we can simply pass around some references instead of using string_view or copying strings. Refs: #48491 Refs: #49047 PR-URL: #50662 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
UlisesGascon pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 19, 2023
The use of string_view and subsequent copying to a string was supposed to be a minor optimization in 640a791, however, since 413c16e, no string splitting occurs anymore. Therefore, we can simply pass around some references instead of using string_view or copying strings. Refs: #48491 Refs: #49047 PR-URL: #50662 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See quick-bench.com
benchmark code