Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
test: make test-worker-prof more robust - #49274
Merged
Merged
Conversation
joyeecheung
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 21, 2023 17:01
joyeecheungforce-pushed
the
worker-prof-test
branch
from
August 21, 2023 17:03
097acb3 to
c5d821dCompareMemberAuthor
Stress test on Windows 2022 + VS 2019 https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-stress-single-test/418/ |
nodejs-github-bot
commented
Aug 22, 2023
Collaborator
joyeecheungforce-pushed
the
worker-prof-test
branch
from
August 22, 2023 17:12
c5d821d to
d966328Comparejoyeecheung
commented
Aug 22, 2023
MemberAuthor
Looks like it can still be flaky with the current workload. Switching to a time-based workload... |
nodejs-github-bot
commented
Aug 22, 2023
Collaborator
27 tasks
nodejs-github-bot
commented
Aug 23, 2023
Collaborator
joyeecheung
commented
Aug 23, 2023
MemberAuthor
Another stress test on more platforms: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-stress-single-test/420/ |
This was referenced Aug 24, 2023
joyeecheung
commented
Aug 25, 2023
MemberAuthor
Updated the workload a bit, this seems to guarantee ~1000 ticks on both the parent and the worker. |
joyeecheungforce-pushed
the
worker-prof-test
branch
from
August 25, 2023 10:26
7779fab to
5c66341Comparenodejs-github-bot
commented
Aug 25, 2023
Collaborator
joyeecheung
commented
Aug 25, 2023
MemberAuthor
Another stress test: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-stress-single-test/422/ |
This was referenced Aug 26, 2023
nodejs-github-bot
commented
Aug 27, 2023
Collaborator
nodejs-github-bot
commented
Aug 27, 2023
Collaborator
25 tasks
Use a JS workload instead of repeating FS operations and use a timer to make it less flaky on machines with little resources.
joyeecheungforce-pushed
the
worker-prof-test
branch
from
August 28, 2023 08:15
5c66341 to
0d3a6f2Comparejoyeecheung
commented
Aug 28, 2023
MemberAuthor
Looks like the CI is having trouble rebasing the PR. Manually rebased instead. |
nodejs-github-bot
commented
Aug 28, 2023
Collaborator
This was referenced Aug 29, 2023
nodejs-github-bot
commented
Aug 30, 2023
Collaborator
18 tasks
nodejs-github-bot
commented
Aug 31, 2023
Collaborator
20 tasks
nodejs-github-bot
commented
Sep 1, 2023
Collaborator
22 tasks
nodejs-github-bot
commented
Sep 2, 2023
Collaborator
This was referenced Sep 3, 2023
benjamingr
approved these changes
Sep 4, 2023
nodejs-github-bot
commented
Sep 4, 2023
Collaborator
Landed in 7f001c2 |
This was referenced Sep 5, 2023
ruyadorno pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 28, 2023
Use a JS workload instead of repeating FS operations and use a timer to make it less flaky on machines with little resources. PR-URL: #49274 Refs: #26401 Refs: nodejs/reliability#640 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Use a JS workload instead of repeating FS operations to make it less flaky on machines with little resources.
Refs: #26401
Refs: nodejs/reliability#640