Skip to content

lib: use primordials for navigator.userAgent - #50467

Merged
nodejs-github-bot merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
Uzlopak:primordials-useragent
Nov 2, 2023
Merged

lib: use primordials for navigator.userAgent#50467
nodejs-github-bot merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
Uzlopak:primordials-useragent

Conversation

@Uzlopak

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@anonrig
@ljharb

I got the PR comment, that we should use primordials for userAgent by ljharb As that line was not touched by my PR I want to mark it as resolved, but not lose the information. So here I provide the corresponding PR and resolve that remark in my PR ;)

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/web-standards

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. label Oct 29, 2023
@GeoffreyBoothGeoffreyBooth added author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. labels Oct 29, 2023
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Oct 29, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@anonriganonrig left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd like to get answer to my questions before merging this PR

Comment threadlib/internal/navigator.js
@anonriganonrig removed the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Oct 29, 2023

@tniessentniessen left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems like a constant that might as well be constructed before any user code runs, but LGTM either way.

@Uzlopak

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

What is the conclusion? :)
Can somebody please retrigger the failing ci?

@anonrig

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What is the conclusion? :) Can somebody please retrigger the failing ci?

I've left a comment: #50467 (comment)

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@Uzlopak

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Can somebody please have a look if the CI issues are unrelated and maybe merge?

@Uzlopak

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@GeoffreyBooth
I think the failing tests are unrelated. Should I rebase from main?

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@GeoffreyBooth

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Don't rebase unless you have to, we won't be able to resume CI once you do that.

@Uzlopak

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Seems that the CI is green.

Can somebody add the author-ready label and/or merge it?

@H4adH4ad added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Nov 2, 2023
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Nov 2, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot
nodejs-github-bot merged commit 45f5c9b into nodejs:mainNov 2, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Landed in 45f5c9b

@Uzlopak
Uzlopak deleted the primordials-useragent branch November 2, 2023 13:33
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2023
PR-URL: #50467
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
Reviewed-By: Vinícius Lourenço Claro Cardoso <contact@viniciusl.com.br>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Ethan Arrowood <ethan@arrowood.dev>
@targostargos mentioned this pull request Nov 12, 2023
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2023
PR-URL: #50467
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
Reviewed-By: Vinícius Lourenço Claro Cardoso <contact@viniciusl.com.br>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Ethan Arrowood <ethan@arrowood.dev>
UlisesGascon pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2023
PR-URL: #50467
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
Reviewed-By: Vinícius Lourenço Claro Cardoso <contact@viniciusl.com.br>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Ethan Arrowood <ethan@arrowood.dev>
@UlisesGasconUlisesGascon mentioned this pull request Dec 12, 2023
UlisesGascon pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2023
PR-URL: #50467
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
Reviewed-By: Vinícius Lourenço Claro Cardoso <contact@viniciusl.com.br>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Ethan Arrowood <ethan@arrowood.dev>
UlisesGascon pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2023
PR-URL: #50467
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
Reviewed-By: Vinícius Lourenço Claro Cardoso <contact@viniciusl.com.br>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Ethan Arrowood <ethan@arrowood.dev>
UlisesGascon pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2023
PR-URL: #50467
Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webadmin@geoffreybooth.com>
Reviewed-By: Vinícius Lourenço Claro Cardoso <contact@viniciusl.com.br>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Ethan Arrowood <ethan@arrowood.dev>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

11 participants

@Uzlopak@nodejs-github-bot@anonrig@GeoffreyBooth@ljharb@jasnell@benjamingr@tniessen@MoLow@H4ad@Ethan-Arrowood