fs: expose glob and globSync

[MoLow]

Fixes#40731
This PR introduces fs.globand fsPromises.glob.

[MoLow]

this capability was originally added to core for the use of the test runner, and we did not expose it since some dependencies don't use primordials.
there have been recent discussions regarding the primordials and whether or not they are a must for 100% of core code.
My personal opinion is primordials should be used to prevent catastrophic failures and such an addition to core has more benefits than drawbacks.
this will also not be precedential - we have some dependencies that don't use primordials, such as undici
we might want to add tsc-agendaIssues and PRs to discuss during the meetings of the TSC. to discuss this

[github-actions]

The notable-changePRs with changes that should be highlighted in changelogs. label has been added by @MoLow.

Please suggest a text for the release notes if you'd like to include a more detailed summary, then proceed to update the PR description with the text or a link to the notable change suggested text comment. Otherwise, the commit will be placed in the Other Notable Changes section.

[MoLow]

this is pretty much the same implementation as globSync except using yield instead if this.#results.push

[benjamingr]

The implementations can be unified probably if you yield where you await and then do sync/async I/O depending on the path not sure if it's worth it

[MoLow]

CC @nodejs/fs

[benjamingr]

lgtm for experimental

[aduh95]

/cc @nodejs/fs

[atlowChemi]

cc @nodejs/primordials

[nodejs-github-bot]

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/57563/

[styfle]

@jonschlinkert It might be worth creating a new issue since this one is closed

[danielbayley]

I see that his is actually depending on minimatch, I would have preferred to see picomatch or micromatch given that minimatch is subject to catastrophic backtracking, and both picomatch and micromatch are more performant, support more patterns, and are better tested. Picomatch also has a tokenizer that can be used. Is there a reason minimatch is being used or can we do a PR to swap in micromatch?

Here are the benchmarks.

I know this isn't the issue for this, I'd be happy to open a new one.

@jonschlinkert It might be worth creating a new issue since this one is closed

@jonschlinkert@styfle See: #53547.