Skip to content

doc: improve unhandledException doc copy - #5287

Closed
jasnell wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
jasnell:doc-unhandled-exception-improvement
Closed

doc: improve unhandledException doc copy#5287
jasnell wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
jasnell:doc-unhandled-exception-improvement

Conversation

@jasnell

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Rework the doc a bit to tighten it up, including removing the
use of you

@jasnelljasnell added doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. process Issues and PRs related to the process subsystem. labels Feb 17, 2016
Comment threaddoc/api/process.markdown Outdated

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tiniest nit: consistent would be "Example:" afaik

@eljefedelrodeodeljefe

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Good one. LGTM, minus (nit and) conflicts. /cc @nodejs/documentation

@a0viedo

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM

Comment threaddoc/api/process.markdown Outdated

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't this line longer than the usual limit?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yep, will correct the wrapping on landing.

@jasnell

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@nodejs/documentation ... can I get some more LGTM's on this from Collaborators?

@r-52

r-52 commented Mar 2, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

LGTM

@thefourtheye

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

LGTM - the merge conflict.

@jasnell

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

yep, will rebase before landing

Rework the doc a bit to tighten it up, including removing the
use of `you`
@jasnell
jasnellforce-pushed the doc-unhandled-exception-improvement branch from 1657b60 to 72d29e6CompareMarch 3, 2016 20:57
@jasnell

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Rebased!

jasnell added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2016
Rework the doc a bit to tighten it up, including removing the
use of `you`
Fix some line wrapping issues.
PR-URL: #5287
Reviewed-By: Roman Klauke <romaaan.git@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
...
@jasnell

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Landed in 831b30e

@jasnelljasnell closed this Mar 3, 2016
@Fishrock123Fishrock123 mentioned this pull request Mar 7, 2016
Fishrock123 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2016
Rework the doc a bit to tighten it up, including removing the
use of `you`
Fix some line wrapping issues.
PR-URL: #5287
Reviewed-By: Roman Klauke <romaaan.git@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
...
Fishrock123 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2016
Rework the doc a bit to tighten it up, including removing the
use of `you`
Fix some line wrapping issues.
PR-URL: #5287
Reviewed-By: Roman Klauke <romaaan.git@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
...
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2016
Rework the doc a bit to tighten it up, including removing the
use of `you`
Fix some line wrapping issues.
PR-URL: #5287
Reviewed-By: Roman Klauke <romaaan.git@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
...
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2016
Rework the doc a bit to tighten it up, including removing the
use of `you`
Fix some line wrapping issues.
PR-URL: #5287
Reviewed-By: Roman Klauke <romaaan.git@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
...
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

docIssues and PRs related to the documentations.processIssues and PRs related to the process subsystem.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants

@jasnell@eljefedelrodeodeljefe@a0viedo@r-52@thefourtheye@Knighton910@MylesBorins