Skip to content

src: remove deleted tls file - #57481

Merged
nodejs-github-bot merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
codebytere:fix-gn-build
Mar 17, 2025
Merged

src: remove deleted tls file#57481
nodejs-github-bot merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
codebytere:fix-gn-build

Conversation

@codebytere

@codebyterecodebytere commented Mar 15, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Refs #57361

cc @JonasBa

Fixes the following:

node on git:main ❯ ninja -C out/Release 10:13AM
ninja: Entering directory `out/Release'
ninja: error: '../../lib/internal/tls/secure-pair.js', needed by 'gen/node_javascript.cc', missing and no known rule to make it

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/startup

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels Mar 15, 2025
@codecov

codecovBot commented Mar 15, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.22%. Comparing base (72aa2ea) to head (5832d63).
Report is 21 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #57481 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 90.22% 90.22% =======================================
Files 629 629 Lines 184948 184948 Branches 36207 36204 -3 =======================================
+ Hits 166865 166871 +6 - Misses 11029 11033 +4 + Partials 7054 7044 -10 
Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
src/node_builtins.cc77.99% <ø> (ø)

... and 27 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@aduh95aduh95 added author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. labels Mar 15, 2025
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Mar 15, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@anonriganonrig added the semver-major PRs that contain breaking changes and should be released in the next major version. label Mar 15, 2025
@addaleax

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@anonrig Did you mean to add the semver-major label?

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@anonrig

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@anonrig Did you mean to add the semver-major label?

@addaleax Yes because the original PR is a semver-major. This fix should be a semver major as well.

@aduh95

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@anonrig Did you mean to add the semver-major label?

@addaleax Yes because the original PR is a semver-major. This fix should be a semver major as well.

That's not correct, it should not be semver-major as it is not a breaking change. We have the dont-land- labels for this kind of change that should not be backported while not being semver-major.

@aduh95aduh95 added commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. dont-land-on-v18.x dont-land-on-v22.x PRs that should not land on the v22.x-staging branch and should not be released in v22.x. and removed semver-major PRs that contain breaking changes and should be released in the next major version. labels Mar 16, 2025
@anonrig

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@aduh95 TIL. Thanks!

@JonasBa

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you @codebytere.

Maybe this is not the right place to ask, but how could I have caught this in my PR? Are there some obvious steps that I missed? Again, sorry for breaking this, and thank you for fixing it ❤️

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Mar 17, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot
nodejs-github-bot merged commit 7584284 into nodejs:mainMar 17, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Landed in 7584284

RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2025
PR-URL: #57481
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Xuguang Mei <meixuguang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 1, 2025
PR-URL: #57481
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Xuguang Mei <meixuguang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2025
PR-URL: #57481
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Xuguang Mei <meixuguang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

author readyPRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.c++Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.dont-land-on-v22.xPRs that should not land on the v22.x-staging branch and should not be released in v22.x.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@codebytere@nodejs-github-bot@addaleax@anonrig@aduh95@JonasBa@lpinca@meixg