Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
tools: support environment variables via comments - #58186
Conversation
pmarchini
commented
May 5, 2025
I've already seen a bunch of regressions, changing the method signature may not have been the best decision(I'm trying to avoid reading the test file twice) |
830bb71 to
d674f42CompareCodecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #58186 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.15% 90.17% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 630 629 -1 Lines 186756 186643 -113 Branches 36648 36651 +3 ==========================================
- Hits 168362 168306 -56 + Misses 11193 11133 -60 - Partials 7201 7204 +3 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
d674f42 to
77e4612CompareThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Just a nit but I'd prefer the more compact: // Env: ...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
+1 (@joyeecheung suggested the same name)
I’ll go ahead and update the PR
77e4612 to
dfeec6eComparenodejs-github-bot
commented
May 9, 2025
nodejs-github-bot
commented
May 11, 2025
Landed in 6184730 |
PR-URL: #58186 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com>
aduh95
commented
Jun 10, 2025
Added tests are failing when cherry-picked on v22.x-staging, it will require a manual backport if we want it there |
It should address #58179 by adding support for environment variables via comments.
I've not run the entire test suite, only a subset.
A full CI run will be needed to catch any potential regressions!