Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
stream: Fix readableState.awaitDrain mechanism - #6023
Closed
addaleax wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
addaleaxforce-pushed
the
fix-readablestate-awaitdrain
branch
from
April 2, 2016 22:38
138b59d to
4b07c8fCompareFishrock123
commented
Apr 2, 2016
Contributor
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Isn't .includes() for strings and not arrays? If I'm right, that means the included test isn't failing like it should?
MemberAuthor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It’s from ES2016, but it does what you think it does, i.e. [1, 2, 3].includes(2) === true. I like the clarity of it, but if you’d rather stick with .indexOf(…), I’d definitely understand that.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we'd need .indexOf() if we're backporting to v4.x/v5.x anyway.
MemberAuthor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@mscdex You’re right, sorry. Updated this PR with indexOf.
In 6899094 (nodejs#2325), the conditions for increasing `readableState.awaitDrain` when writing to a piping destination returns false were changed so that they could not actually be met, effectively leaving `readableState.awaitDrain` with a constant value of 0. This patch changes the conditions to testing whether the stream for which `.write()` returned false is still a piping destination, which was likely the intention of the original patch. Fixes: nodejs#5820
addaleaxforce-pushed
the
fix-readablestate-awaitdrain
branch
from
April 3, 2016 13:31
4b07c8f to
21f7246Comparemscdex
commented
Apr 3, 2016
Contributor
LGTM. CI once more: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/2142/ |
jasnell
commented
Apr 4, 2016
Member
CI failure looks unrelated. |
mcollina
commented
Apr 4, 2016
Member
LGTM |
addaleax
commented
Apr 12, 2016
MemberAuthor
jasnell
commented
Apr 12, 2016
Member
LGTM |
jasnell pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 12, 2016
In 6899094 (#2325), the conditions for increasing `readableState.awaitDrain` when writing to a piping destination returns false were changed so that they could not actually be met, effectively leaving `readableState.awaitDrain` with a constant value of 0. This patch changes the conditions to testing whether the stream for which `.write()` returned false is still a piping destination, which was likely the intention of the original patch. Fixes: #5820Fixes: #5257 PR-URL: #6023 Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
jasnell
commented
Apr 12, 2016
Member
Landed in 819b2d3 |
MylesBorins pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 19, 2016
In 6899094 (#2325), the conditions for increasing `readableState.awaitDrain` when writing to a piping destination returns false were changed so that they could not actually be met, effectively leaving `readableState.awaitDrain` with a constant value of 0. This patch changes the conditions to testing whether the stream for which `.write()` returned false is still a piping destination, which was likely the intention of the original patch. Fixes: #5820Fixes: #5257 PR-URL: #6023 Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 20, 2016
In 6899094 (#2325), the conditions for increasing `readableState.awaitDrain` when writing to a piping destination returns false were changed so that they could not actually be met, effectively leaving `readableState.awaitDrain` with a constant value of 0. This patch changes the conditions to testing whether the stream for which `.write()` returned false is still a piping destination, which was likely the intention of the original patch. Fixes: #5820Fixes: #5257 PR-URL: #6023 Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Closed
MylesBorins pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 20, 2016
In 6899094 (#2325), the conditions for increasing `readableState.awaitDrain` when writing to a piping destination returns false were changed so that they could not actually be met, effectively leaving `readableState.awaitDrain` with a constant value of 0. This patch changes the conditions to testing whether the stream for which `.write()` returned false is still a piping destination, which was likely the intention of the original patch. Fixes: #5820Fixes: #5257 PR-URL: #6023 Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
jasnell pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 26, 2016
In 6899094 (#2325), the conditions for increasing `readableState.awaitDrain` when writing to a piping destination returns false were changed so that they could not actually be met, effectively leaving `readableState.awaitDrain` with a constant value of 0. This patch changes the conditions to testing whether the stream for which `.write()` returned false is still a piping destination, which was likely the intention of the original patch. Fixes: #5820Fixes: #5257 PR-URL: #6023 Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 30, 2016
In 6899094 (#2325), the conditions for increasing `readableState.awaitDrain` when writing to a piping destination returns false were changed so that they could not actually be met, effectively leaving `readableState.awaitDrain` with a constant value of 0. This patch changes the conditions to testing whether the stream for which `.write()` returned false is still a piping destination, which was likely the intention of the original patch. Fixes: #5820Fixes: #5257 PR-URL: #6023 Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 6, 2016
In 6899094 (#2325), the conditions for increasing `readableState.awaitDrain` when writing to a piping destination returns false were changed so that they could not actually be met, effectively leaving `readableState.awaitDrain` with a constant value of 0. This patch changes the conditions to testing whether the stream for which `.write()` returned false is still a piping destination, which was likely the intention of the original patch. Fixes: #5820Fixes: #5257 PR-URL: #6023 Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 18, 2016
In 6899094 (#2325), the conditions for increasing `readableState.awaitDrain` when writing to a piping destination returns false were changed so that they could not actually be met, effectively leaving `readableState.awaitDrain` with a constant value of 0. This patch changes the conditions to testing whether the stream for which `.write()` returned false is still a piping destination, which was likely the intention of the original patch. Fixes: #5820Fixes: #5257 PR-URL: #6023 Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Merged
4 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
6 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull Request check-list
Please make sure to review and check all of these items:
make -j8 test(UNIX) orvcbuild test nosign(Windows) pass withthis change (including linting)?
test (or a benchmark) included?
Is a documentation update included (if this change modifiesexisting APIs, or introduces new ones)?
Affected core subsystem(s)
stream
Description of change
In 6899094 (#2325), the conditions for increasing
readableState.awaitDrainwhen writing to a piping destination returns false were changed so that they could not actually be met, effectively leavingreadableState.awaitDrainwith a constant value of 0.This patch changes the conditions to testing whether the stream for which
.write()returned false is still a piping destination, which was likely the intention of the original patch.Fixes: #5820
/cc @mscdex