sqlite: bind ArrayBuffer - #62061

Merged
Renegade334 merged 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
mike-git374:bind-array-buffer
Aug 5, 2026
Merged

sqlite: bind ArrayBuffer#62061
Renegade334 merged 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
mike-git374:bind-array-buffer

Conversation

@mike-git374

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixes: #61396

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/sqlite

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. sqlite Issues and PRs related to the SQLite subsystem. labels Mar 1, 2026

@Renegade334Renegade334 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel like this is probably reasonable, given that we already allow non-Uint8Array array buffer views. There are certain API surfaces that return raw ArrayBuffers (thinking webcrypto in particular), the required change is a one-liner, and there's already asymmetry in terms of the type conversion for BLOBs.

Comment threadsrc/node_sqlite.cc Outdated
Comment threadsrc/node_sqlite.cc Outdated
@codecov

codecovBot commented Mar 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 83.33333% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 90.28%. Comparing base (c9acf34) to head (553af2a).
⚠️ Report is 1594 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
src/node_sqlite.cc83.33%0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #62061 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.74% 90.28% +0.53% 
==========================================
Files 674 759 +85 Lines 204883 247637 +42754 Branches 39379 46677 +7298 ==========================================
+ Hits 183882 223583 +39701 - Misses 13279 15514 +2235 - Partials 7722 8540 +818 
Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
src/node_sqlite.cc80.51% <83.33%> (-0.39%)⬇️

... and 525 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Comment threadsrc/node_sqlite.cc
Comment threadtest/parallel/test-sqlite-data-types.js
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request has been marked as stale due to 90 days of inactivity.
It will be automatically closed in 30 days if no further activity occurs. If this is still relevant, please leave a comment or update it to keep it open.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the stale Issues and PRs marked stale due to inactivity and scheduled for automatic closure. label Jul 28, 2026
@mike-git374

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Not stale, should be merged

@trivikr

This comment was marked as resolved.

@Renegade334Renegade334 added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 4, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 4, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@Renegade334

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@geeksilva97: if you're happy to ✅ the fixup commit, then I can land this manually once Jenkins is green.

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the stale Issues and PRs marked stale due to inactivity and scheduled for automatic closure. label Aug 5, 2026
@geeksilva97

geeksilva97 commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/75494/

yup, sounds good to me. first commit must be fixed though.

@Renegade334
Renegade334 merged commit 62acd48 into nodejs:mainAug 5, 2026
71 of 75 checks passed
@Renegade334

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Landed in 62acd48

nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2026
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Araújo <arauujogui@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65089
Refs: #62001
Refs: #62061
Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
mceachen added a commit to photostructure/node-sqlite that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2026
Neither is an ArrayBufferView, so both fell through the named-parameter check
in BindParameters() and were read as a parameter object. That bound an empty
named-parameter set and left the real parameter unbound, so run(arrayBuffer)
silently stored SQL NULL instead of the blob.
Both now bind as BLOBs, matching nodejs/node#62061. SharedArrayBuffer cannot
be cast to Napi::ArrayBuffer and node-addon-api gates IsSharedArrayBuffer()
behind an experimental flag, so it is detected via Symbol.toStringTag --
realm-safe, unlike instanceof, which matters under Jest's per-file vm context
and in worker threads.
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2026
PR-URL: #62061Fixes: #61396
Reviewed-By: René <contact.9a5d6388@renegade334.me.uk>
Reviewed-By: Edy Silva <edigleyssonsilva@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2026
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Araújo <arauujogui@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65089
Refs: #62001
Refs: #62061
Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
PR-URL: #62061Fixes: #61396
Reviewed-By: René <contact.9a5d6388@renegade334.me.uk>
Reviewed-By: Edy Silva <edigleyssonsilva@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Araújo <arauujogui@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65089
Refs: #62001
Refs: #62061
Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
PR-URL: #62061Fixes: #61396
Reviewed-By: René <contact.9a5d6388@renegade334.me.uk>
Reviewed-By: Edy Silva <edigleyssonsilva@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Araújo <arauujogui@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65089
Refs: #62001
Refs: #62061
Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

c++Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.sqliteIssues and PRs related to the SQLite subsystem.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

sqlite: bind ArrayBuffer

5 participants

@mike-git374@nodejs-github-bot@trivikr@Renegade334@geeksilva97
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

sqlite: bind ArrayBuffer - #62061

Merged
Renegade334 merged 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
mike-git374:bind-array-buffer
Aug 5, 2026
Merged

sqlite: bind ArrayBuffer#62061
Renegade334 merged 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
mike-git374:bind-array-buffer

Conversation

@mike-git374

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixes: #61396

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/sqlite

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. sqlite Issues and PRs related to the SQLite subsystem. labels Mar 1, 2026

@Renegade334Renegade334 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel like this is probably reasonable, given that we already allow non-Uint8Array array buffer views. There are certain API surfaces that return raw ArrayBuffers (thinking webcrypto in particular), the required change is a one-liner, and there's already asymmetry in terms of the type conversion for BLOBs.

Comment threadsrc/node_sqlite.cc Outdated
Comment threadsrc/node_sqlite.cc Outdated
@codecov

codecovBot commented Mar 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 83.33333% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 90.28%. Comparing base (c9acf34) to head (553af2a).
⚠️ Report is 1594 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
src/node_sqlite.cc83.33%0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #62061 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.74% 90.28% +0.53% 
==========================================
Files 674 759 +85 Lines 204883 247637 +42754 Branches 39379 46677 +7298 ==========================================
+ Hits 183882 223583 +39701 - Misses 13279 15514 +2235 - Partials 7722 8540 +818 
Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
src/node_sqlite.cc80.51% <83.33%> (-0.39%)⬇️

... and 525 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Comment threadsrc/node_sqlite.cc
Comment threadtest/parallel/test-sqlite-data-types.js
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request has been marked as stale due to 90 days of inactivity.
It will be automatically closed in 30 days if no further activity occurs. If this is still relevant, please leave a comment or update it to keep it open.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the stale Issues and PRs marked stale due to inactivity and scheduled for automatic closure. label Jul 28, 2026
@mike-git374

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Not stale, should be merged

@trivikr

This comment was marked as resolved.

@Renegade334Renegade334 added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 4, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 4, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@Renegade334

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@geeksilva97: if you're happy to ✅ the fixup commit, then I can land this manually once Jenkins is green.

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the stale Issues and PRs marked stale due to inactivity and scheduled for automatic closure. label Aug 5, 2026
@geeksilva97

geeksilva97 commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/75494/

yup, sounds good to me. first commit must be fixed though.

@Renegade334
Renegade334 merged commit 62acd48 into nodejs:mainAug 5, 2026
71 of 75 checks passed
@Renegade334

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Landed in 62acd48

nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2026
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Araújo <arauujogui@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65089
Refs: #62001
Refs: #62061
Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
mceachen added a commit to photostructure/node-sqlite that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2026
Neither is an ArrayBufferView, so both fell through the named-parameter check
in BindParameters() and were read as a parameter object. That bound an empty
named-parameter set and left the real parameter unbound, so run(arrayBuffer)
silently stored SQL NULL instead of the blob.
Both now bind as BLOBs, matching nodejs/node#62061. SharedArrayBuffer cannot
be cast to Napi::ArrayBuffer and node-addon-api gates IsSharedArrayBuffer()
behind an experimental flag, so it is detected via Symbol.toStringTag --
realm-safe, unlike instanceof, which matters under Jest's per-file vm context
and in worker threads.
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2026
PR-URL: #62061Fixes: #61396
Reviewed-By: René <contact.9a5d6388@renegade334.me.uk>
Reviewed-By: Edy Silva <edigleyssonsilva@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2026
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Araújo <arauujogui@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65089
Refs: #62001
Refs: #62061
Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
PR-URL: #62061Fixes: #61396
Reviewed-By: René <contact.9a5d6388@renegade334.me.uk>
Reviewed-By: Edy Silva <edigleyssonsilva@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Araújo <arauujogui@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65089
Refs: #62001
Refs: #62061
Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
PR-URL: #62061Fixes: #61396
Reviewed-By: René <contact.9a5d6388@renegade334.me.uk>
Reviewed-By: Edy Silva <edigleyssonsilva@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Araújo <arauujogui@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65089
Refs: #62001
Refs: #62061
Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

c++Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.sqliteIssues and PRs related to the SQLite subsystem.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

sqlite: bind ArrayBuffer

5 participants

@mike-git374@nodejs-github-bot@trivikr@Renegade334@geeksilva97
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

sqlite: bind ArrayBuffer - #62061

Merged
Renegade334 merged 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
mike-git374:bind-array-buffer
Aug 5, 2026
Merged

sqlite: bind ArrayBuffer#62061
Renegade334 merged 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
mike-git374:bind-array-buffer

Conversation

@mike-git374

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixes: #61396

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/sqlite

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. sqlite Issues and PRs related to the SQLite subsystem. labels Mar 1, 2026

@Renegade334Renegade334 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel like this is probably reasonable, given that we already allow non-Uint8Array array buffer views. There are certain API surfaces that return raw ArrayBuffers (thinking webcrypto in particular), the required change is a one-liner, and there's already asymmetry in terms of the type conversion for BLOBs.

Comment threadsrc/node_sqlite.cc Outdated
Comment threadsrc/node_sqlite.cc Outdated
@codecov

codecovBot commented Mar 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 83.33333% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 90.28%. Comparing base (c9acf34) to head (553af2a).
⚠️ Report is 1594 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
src/node_sqlite.cc83.33%0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #62061 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.74% 90.28% +0.53% 
==========================================
Files 674 759 +85 Lines 204883 247637 +42754 Branches 39379 46677 +7298 ==========================================
+ Hits 183882 223583 +39701 - Misses 13279 15514 +2235 - Partials 7722 8540 +818 
Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
src/node_sqlite.cc80.51% <83.33%> (-0.39%)⬇️

... and 525 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Comment threadsrc/node_sqlite.cc
Comment threadtest/parallel/test-sqlite-data-types.js
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request has been marked as stale due to 90 days of inactivity.
It will be automatically closed in 30 days if no further activity occurs. If this is still relevant, please leave a comment or update it to keep it open.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the stale Issues and PRs marked stale due to inactivity and scheduled for automatic closure. label Jul 28, 2026
@mike-git374

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Not stale, should be merged

@trivikr

This comment was marked as resolved.

@Renegade334Renegade334 added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 4, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 4, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@Renegade334

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@geeksilva97: if you're happy to ✅ the fixup commit, then I can land this manually once Jenkins is green.

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the stale Issues and PRs marked stale due to inactivity and scheduled for automatic closure. label Aug 5, 2026
@geeksilva97

geeksilva97 commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/75494/

yup, sounds good to me. first commit must be fixed though.

@Renegade334
Renegade334 merged commit 62acd48 into nodejs:mainAug 5, 2026
71 of 75 checks passed
@Renegade334

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Landed in 62acd48

nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2026
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Araújo <arauujogui@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65089
Refs: #62001
Refs: #62061
Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
mceachen added a commit to photostructure/node-sqlite that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2026
Neither is an ArrayBufferView, so both fell through the named-parameter check
in BindParameters() and were read as a parameter object. That bound an empty
named-parameter set and left the real parameter unbound, so run(arrayBuffer)
silently stored SQL NULL instead of the blob.
Both now bind as BLOBs, matching nodejs/node#62061. SharedArrayBuffer cannot
be cast to Napi::ArrayBuffer and node-addon-api gates IsSharedArrayBuffer()
behind an experimental flag, so it is detected via Symbol.toStringTag --
realm-safe, unlike instanceof, which matters under Jest's per-file vm context
and in worker threads.
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2026
PR-URL: #62061Fixes: #61396
Reviewed-By: René <contact.9a5d6388@renegade334.me.uk>
Reviewed-By: Edy Silva <edigleyssonsilva@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2026
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Araújo <arauujogui@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65089
Refs: #62001
Refs: #62061
Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
PR-URL: #62061Fixes: #61396
Reviewed-By: René <contact.9a5d6388@renegade334.me.uk>
Reviewed-By: Edy Silva <edigleyssonsilva@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Araújo <arauujogui@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65089
Refs: #62001
Refs: #62061
Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
PR-URL: #62061Fixes: #61396
Reviewed-By: René <contact.9a5d6388@renegade334.me.uk>
Reviewed-By: Edy Silva <edigleyssonsilva@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Araújo <arauujogui@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65089
Refs: #62001
Refs: #62061
Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

c++Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.sqliteIssues and PRs related to the SQLite subsystem.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

sqlite: bind ArrayBuffer

5 participants

@mike-git374@nodejs-github-bot@trivikr@Renegade334@geeksilva97
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

sqlite: bind ArrayBuffer - #62061

Merged
Renegade334 merged 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
mike-git374:bind-array-buffer
Aug 5, 2026
Merged

sqlite: bind ArrayBuffer#62061
Renegade334 merged 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
mike-git374:bind-array-buffer

Conversation

@mike-git374

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixes: #61396

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/sqlite

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. sqlite Issues and PRs related to the SQLite subsystem. labels Mar 1, 2026

@Renegade334Renegade334 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel like this is probably reasonable, given that we already allow non-Uint8Array array buffer views. There are certain API surfaces that return raw ArrayBuffers (thinking webcrypto in particular), the required change is a one-liner, and there's already asymmetry in terms of the type conversion for BLOBs.

Comment threadsrc/node_sqlite.cc Outdated
Comment threadsrc/node_sqlite.cc Outdated
@codecov

codecovBot commented Mar 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 83.33333% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 90.28%. Comparing base (c9acf34) to head (553af2a).
⚠️ Report is 1594 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
src/node_sqlite.cc83.33%0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #62061 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.74% 90.28% +0.53% 
==========================================
Files 674 759 +85 Lines 204883 247637 +42754 Branches 39379 46677 +7298 ==========================================
+ Hits 183882 223583 +39701 - Misses 13279 15514 +2235 - Partials 7722 8540 +818 
Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
src/node_sqlite.cc80.51% <83.33%> (-0.39%)⬇️

... and 525 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Comment threadsrc/node_sqlite.cc
Comment threadtest/parallel/test-sqlite-data-types.js
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request has been marked as stale due to 90 days of inactivity.
It will be automatically closed in 30 days if no further activity occurs. If this is still relevant, please leave a comment or update it to keep it open.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the stale Issues and PRs marked stale due to inactivity and scheduled for automatic closure. label Jul 28, 2026
@mike-git374

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Not stale, should be merged

@trivikr

This comment was marked as resolved.

@Renegade334Renegade334 added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 4, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 4, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@Renegade334

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@geeksilva97: if you're happy to ✅ the fixup commit, then I can land this manually once Jenkins is green.

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the stale Issues and PRs marked stale due to inactivity and scheduled for automatic closure. label Aug 5, 2026
@geeksilva97

geeksilva97 commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/75494/

yup, sounds good to me. first commit must be fixed though.

@Renegade334
Renegade334 merged commit 62acd48 into nodejs:mainAug 5, 2026
71 of 75 checks passed
@Renegade334

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Landed in 62acd48

nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2026
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Araújo <arauujogui@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65089
Refs: #62001
Refs: #62061
Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
mceachen added a commit to photostructure/node-sqlite that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2026
Neither is an ArrayBufferView, so both fell through the named-parameter check
in BindParameters() and were read as a parameter object. That bound an empty
named-parameter set and left the real parameter unbound, so run(arrayBuffer)
silently stored SQL NULL instead of the blob.
Both now bind as BLOBs, matching nodejs/node#62061. SharedArrayBuffer cannot
be cast to Napi::ArrayBuffer and node-addon-api gates IsSharedArrayBuffer()
behind an experimental flag, so it is detected via Symbol.toStringTag --
realm-safe, unlike instanceof, which matters under Jest's per-file vm context
and in worker threads.
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2026
PR-URL: #62061Fixes: #61396
Reviewed-By: René <contact.9a5d6388@renegade334.me.uk>
Reviewed-By: Edy Silva <edigleyssonsilva@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2026
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Araújo <arauujogui@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65089
Refs: #62001
Refs: #62061
Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
PR-URL: #62061Fixes: #61396
Reviewed-By: René <contact.9a5d6388@renegade334.me.uk>
Reviewed-By: Edy Silva <edigleyssonsilva@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Araújo <arauujogui@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65089
Refs: #62001
Refs: #62061
Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
PR-URL: #62061Fixes: #61396
Reviewed-By: René <contact.9a5d6388@renegade334.me.uk>
Reviewed-By: Edy Silva <edigleyssonsilva@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Araújo <arauujogui@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65089
Refs: #62001
Refs: #62061
Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

c++Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.sqliteIssues and PRs related to the SQLite subsystem.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

sqlite: bind ArrayBuffer

5 participants

@mike-git374@nodejs-github-bot@trivikr@Renegade334@geeksilva97
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

sqlite: bind ArrayBuffer - #62061

Merged
Renegade334 merged 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
mike-git374:bind-array-buffer
Aug 5, 2026
Merged

sqlite: bind ArrayBuffer#62061
Renegade334 merged 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
mike-git374:bind-array-buffer

Conversation

@mike-git374

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixes: #61396

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/sqlite

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. sqlite Issues and PRs related to the SQLite subsystem. labels Mar 1, 2026

@Renegade334Renegade334 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel like this is probably reasonable, given that we already allow non-Uint8Array array buffer views. There are certain API surfaces that return raw ArrayBuffers (thinking webcrypto in particular), the required change is a one-liner, and there's already asymmetry in terms of the type conversion for BLOBs.

Comment threadsrc/node_sqlite.cc Outdated
Comment threadsrc/node_sqlite.cc Outdated
@codecov

codecovBot commented Mar 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 83.33333% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 90.28%. Comparing base (c9acf34) to head (553af2a).
⚠️ Report is 1594 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
src/node_sqlite.cc83.33%0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #62061 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.74% 90.28% +0.53% 
==========================================
Files 674 759 +85 Lines 204883 247637 +42754 Branches 39379 46677 +7298 ==========================================
+ Hits 183882 223583 +39701 - Misses 13279 15514 +2235 - Partials 7722 8540 +818 
Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
src/node_sqlite.cc80.51% <83.33%> (-0.39%)⬇️

... and 525 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Comment threadsrc/node_sqlite.cc
Comment threadtest/parallel/test-sqlite-data-types.js
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request has been marked as stale due to 90 days of inactivity.
It will be automatically closed in 30 days if no further activity occurs. If this is still relevant, please leave a comment or update it to keep it open.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the stale Issues and PRs marked stale due to inactivity and scheduled for automatic closure. label Jul 28, 2026
@mike-git374

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Not stale, should be merged

@trivikr

This comment was marked as resolved.

@Renegade334Renegade334 added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 4, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 4, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@Renegade334

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@geeksilva97: if you're happy to ✅ the fixup commit, then I can land this manually once Jenkins is green.

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the stale Issues and PRs marked stale due to inactivity and scheduled for automatic closure. label Aug 5, 2026
@geeksilva97

geeksilva97 commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/75494/

yup, sounds good to me. first commit must be fixed though.

@Renegade334
Renegade334 merged commit 62acd48 into nodejs:mainAug 5, 2026
71 of 75 checks passed
@Renegade334

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Landed in 62acd48

nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2026
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Araújo <arauujogui@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65089
Refs: #62001
Refs: #62061
Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
mceachen added a commit to photostructure/node-sqlite that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2026
Neither is an ArrayBufferView, so both fell through the named-parameter check
in BindParameters() and were read as a parameter object. That bound an empty
named-parameter set and left the real parameter unbound, so run(arrayBuffer)
silently stored SQL NULL instead of the blob.
Both now bind as BLOBs, matching nodejs/node#62061. SharedArrayBuffer cannot
be cast to Napi::ArrayBuffer and node-addon-api gates IsSharedArrayBuffer()
behind an experimental flag, so it is detected via Symbol.toStringTag --
realm-safe, unlike instanceof, which matters under Jest's per-file vm context
and in worker threads.
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2026
PR-URL: #62061Fixes: #61396
Reviewed-By: René <contact.9a5d6388@renegade334.me.uk>
Reviewed-By: Edy Silva <edigleyssonsilva@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2026
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Araújo <arauujogui@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65089
Refs: #62001
Refs: #62061
Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
PR-URL: #62061Fixes: #61396
Reviewed-By: René <contact.9a5d6388@renegade334.me.uk>
Reviewed-By: Edy Silva <edigleyssonsilva@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Araújo <arauujogui@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65089
Refs: #62001
Refs: #62061
Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
PR-URL: #62061Fixes: #61396
Reviewed-By: René <contact.9a5d6388@renegade334.me.uk>
Reviewed-By: Edy Silva <edigleyssonsilva@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Araújo <arauujogui@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65089
Refs: #62001
Refs: #62061
Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

c++Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.sqliteIssues and PRs related to the SQLite subsystem.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

sqlite: bind ArrayBuffer

5 participants

@mike-git374@nodejs-github-bot@trivikr@Renegade334@geeksilva97
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

sqlite: bind ArrayBuffer - #62061

Merged
Renegade334 merged 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
mike-git374:bind-array-buffer
Aug 5, 2026
Merged

sqlite: bind ArrayBuffer#62061
Renegade334 merged 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
mike-git374:bind-array-buffer

Conversation

@mike-git374

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixes: #61396

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/sqlite

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. sqlite Issues and PRs related to the SQLite subsystem. labels Mar 1, 2026

@Renegade334Renegade334 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel like this is probably reasonable, given that we already allow non-Uint8Array array buffer views. There are certain API surfaces that return raw ArrayBuffers (thinking webcrypto in particular), the required change is a one-liner, and there's already asymmetry in terms of the type conversion for BLOBs.

Comment threadsrc/node_sqlite.cc Outdated
Comment threadsrc/node_sqlite.cc Outdated
@codecov

codecovBot commented Mar 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 83.33333% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 90.28%. Comparing base (c9acf34) to head (553af2a).
⚠️ Report is 1594 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
src/node_sqlite.cc83.33%0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #62061 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.74% 90.28% +0.53% 
==========================================
Files 674 759 +85 Lines 204883 247637 +42754 Branches 39379 46677 +7298 ==========================================
+ Hits 183882 223583 +39701 - Misses 13279 15514 +2235 - Partials 7722 8540 +818 
Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
src/node_sqlite.cc80.51% <83.33%> (-0.39%)⬇️

... and 525 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Comment threadsrc/node_sqlite.cc
Comment threadtest/parallel/test-sqlite-data-types.js
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request has been marked as stale due to 90 days of inactivity.
It will be automatically closed in 30 days if no further activity occurs. If this is still relevant, please leave a comment or update it to keep it open.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the stale Issues and PRs marked stale due to inactivity and scheduled for automatic closure. label Jul 28, 2026
@mike-git374

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Not stale, should be merged

@trivikr

This comment was marked as resolved.

@Renegade334Renegade334 added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 4, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 4, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@Renegade334

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@geeksilva97: if you're happy to ✅ the fixup commit, then I can land this manually once Jenkins is green.

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the stale Issues and PRs marked stale due to inactivity and scheduled for automatic closure. label Aug 5, 2026
@geeksilva97

geeksilva97 commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/75494/

yup, sounds good to me. first commit must be fixed though.

@Renegade334
Renegade334 merged commit 62acd48 into nodejs:mainAug 5, 2026
71 of 75 checks passed
@Renegade334

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Landed in 62acd48

nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2026
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Araújo <arauujogui@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65089
Refs: #62001
Refs: #62061
Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
mceachen added a commit to photostructure/node-sqlite that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2026
Neither is an ArrayBufferView, so both fell through the named-parameter check
in BindParameters() and were read as a parameter object. That bound an empty
named-parameter set and left the real parameter unbound, so run(arrayBuffer)
silently stored SQL NULL instead of the blob.
Both now bind as BLOBs, matching nodejs/node#62061. SharedArrayBuffer cannot
be cast to Napi::ArrayBuffer and node-addon-api gates IsSharedArrayBuffer()
behind an experimental flag, so it is detected via Symbol.toStringTag --
realm-safe, unlike instanceof, which matters under Jest's per-file vm context
and in worker threads.
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2026
PR-URL: #62061Fixes: #61396
Reviewed-By: René <contact.9a5d6388@renegade334.me.uk>
Reviewed-By: Edy Silva <edigleyssonsilva@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2026
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Araújo <arauujogui@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65089
Refs: #62001
Refs: #62061
Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
PR-URL: #62061Fixes: #61396
Reviewed-By: René <contact.9a5d6388@renegade334.me.uk>
Reviewed-By: Edy Silva <edigleyssonsilva@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Araújo <arauujogui@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65089
Refs: #62001
Refs: #62061
Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
PR-URL: #62061Fixes: #61396
Reviewed-By: René <contact.9a5d6388@renegade334.me.uk>
Reviewed-By: Edy Silva <edigleyssonsilva@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Araújo <arauujogui@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65089
Refs: #62001
Refs: #62061
Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

c++Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.sqliteIssues and PRs related to the SQLite subsystem.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

sqlite: bind ArrayBuffer

5 participants

@mike-git374@nodejs-github-bot@trivikr@Renegade334@geeksilva97
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

sqlite: bind ArrayBuffer - #62061

Merged
Renegade334 merged 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
mike-git374:bind-array-buffer
Aug 5, 2026
Merged

sqlite: bind ArrayBuffer#62061
Renegade334 merged 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
mike-git374:bind-array-buffer

Conversation

@mike-git374

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixes: #61396

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/sqlite

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. sqlite Issues and PRs related to the SQLite subsystem. labels Mar 1, 2026

@Renegade334Renegade334 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel like this is probably reasonable, given that we already allow non-Uint8Array array buffer views. There are certain API surfaces that return raw ArrayBuffers (thinking webcrypto in particular), the required change is a one-liner, and there's already asymmetry in terms of the type conversion for BLOBs.

Comment threadsrc/node_sqlite.cc Outdated
Comment threadsrc/node_sqlite.cc Outdated
@codecov

codecovBot commented Mar 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 83.33333% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 90.28%. Comparing base (c9acf34) to head (553af2a).
⚠️ Report is 1594 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
src/node_sqlite.cc83.33%0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #62061 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.74% 90.28% +0.53% 
==========================================
Files 674 759 +85 Lines 204883 247637 +42754 Branches 39379 46677 +7298 ==========================================
+ Hits 183882 223583 +39701 - Misses 13279 15514 +2235 - Partials 7722 8540 +818 
Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
src/node_sqlite.cc80.51% <83.33%> (-0.39%)⬇️

... and 525 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Comment threadsrc/node_sqlite.cc
Comment threadtest/parallel/test-sqlite-data-types.js
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request has been marked as stale due to 90 days of inactivity.
It will be automatically closed in 30 days if no further activity occurs. If this is still relevant, please leave a comment or update it to keep it open.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the stale Issues and PRs marked stale due to inactivity and scheduled for automatic closure. label Jul 28, 2026
@mike-git374

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Not stale, should be merged

@trivikr

This comment was marked as resolved.

@Renegade334Renegade334 added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 4, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 4, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@Renegade334

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@geeksilva97: if you're happy to ✅ the fixup commit, then I can land this manually once Jenkins is green.

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the stale Issues and PRs marked stale due to inactivity and scheduled for automatic closure. label Aug 5, 2026
@geeksilva97

geeksilva97 commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/75494/

yup, sounds good to me. first commit must be fixed though.

@Renegade334
Renegade334 merged commit 62acd48 into nodejs:mainAug 5, 2026
71 of 75 checks passed
@Renegade334

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Landed in 62acd48

nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2026
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Araújo <arauujogui@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65089
Refs: #62001
Refs: #62061
Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
mceachen added a commit to photostructure/node-sqlite that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2026
Neither is an ArrayBufferView, so both fell through the named-parameter check
in BindParameters() and were read as a parameter object. That bound an empty
named-parameter set and left the real parameter unbound, so run(arrayBuffer)
silently stored SQL NULL instead of the blob.
Both now bind as BLOBs, matching nodejs/node#62061. SharedArrayBuffer cannot
be cast to Napi::ArrayBuffer and node-addon-api gates IsSharedArrayBuffer()
behind an experimental flag, so it is detected via Symbol.toStringTag --
realm-safe, unlike instanceof, which matters under Jest's per-file vm context
and in worker threads.
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2026
PR-URL: #62061Fixes: #61396
Reviewed-By: René <contact.9a5d6388@renegade334.me.uk>
Reviewed-By: Edy Silva <edigleyssonsilva@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2026
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Araújo <arauujogui@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65089
Refs: #62001
Refs: #62061
Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
PR-URL: #62061Fixes: #61396
Reviewed-By: René <contact.9a5d6388@renegade334.me.uk>
Reviewed-By: Edy Silva <edigleyssonsilva@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Araújo <arauujogui@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65089
Refs: #62001
Refs: #62061
Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
PR-URL: #62061Fixes: #61396
Reviewed-By: René <contact.9a5d6388@renegade334.me.uk>
Reviewed-By: Edy Silva <edigleyssonsilva@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Araújo <arauujogui@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65089
Refs: #62001
Refs: #62061
Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

c++Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.sqliteIssues and PRs related to the SQLite subsystem.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

sqlite: bind ArrayBuffer

5 participants

@mike-git374@nodejs-github-bot@trivikr@Renegade334@geeksilva97
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

sqlite: bind ArrayBuffer - #62061

Merged
Renegade334 merged 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
mike-git374:bind-array-buffer
Aug 5, 2026
Merged

sqlite: bind ArrayBuffer#62061
Renegade334 merged 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
mike-git374:bind-array-buffer

Conversation

@mike-git374

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixes: #61396

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/sqlite

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. sqlite Issues and PRs related to the SQLite subsystem. labels Mar 1, 2026

@Renegade334Renegade334 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel like this is probably reasonable, given that we already allow non-Uint8Array array buffer views. There are certain API surfaces that return raw ArrayBuffers (thinking webcrypto in particular), the required change is a one-liner, and there's already asymmetry in terms of the type conversion for BLOBs.

Comment threadsrc/node_sqlite.cc Outdated
Comment threadsrc/node_sqlite.cc Outdated
@codecov

codecovBot commented Mar 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 83.33333% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 90.28%. Comparing base (c9acf34) to head (553af2a).
⚠️ Report is 1594 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing linesPatch %Lines
src/node_sqlite.cc83.33%0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #62061 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.74% 90.28% +0.53% 
==========================================
Files 674 759 +85 Lines 204883 247637 +42754 Branches 39379 46677 +7298 ==========================================
+ Hits 183882 223583 +39701 - Misses 13279 15514 +2235 - Partials 7722 8540 +818 
Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
src/node_sqlite.cc80.51% <83.33%> (-0.39%)⬇️

... and 525 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Comment threadsrc/node_sqlite.cc
Comment threadtest/parallel/test-sqlite-data-types.js
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request has been marked as stale due to 90 days of inactivity.
It will be automatically closed in 30 days if no further activity occurs. If this is still relevant, please leave a comment or update it to keep it open.

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot added the stale Issues and PRs marked stale due to inactivity and scheduled for automatic closure. label Jul 28, 2026
@mike-git374

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Not stale, should be merged

@trivikr

This comment was marked as resolved.

@Renegade334Renegade334 added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 4, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 4, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@Renegade334

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@geeksilva97: if you're happy to ✅ the fixup commit, then I can land this manually once Jenkins is green.

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the stale Issues and PRs marked stale due to inactivity and scheduled for automatic closure. label Aug 5, 2026
@geeksilva97

geeksilva97 commented Aug 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/75494/

yup, sounds good to me. first commit must be fixed though.

@Renegade334
Renegade334 merged commit 62acd48 into nodejs:mainAug 5, 2026
71 of 75 checks passed
@Renegade334

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Landed in 62acd48

nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2026
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Araújo <arauujogui@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65089
Refs: #62001
Refs: #62061
Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
mceachen added a commit to photostructure/node-sqlite that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2026
Neither is an ArrayBufferView, so both fell through the named-parameter check
in BindParameters() and were read as a parameter object. That bound an empty
named-parameter set and left the real parameter unbound, so run(arrayBuffer)
silently stored SQL NULL instead of the blob.
Both now bind as BLOBs, matching nodejs/node#62061. SharedArrayBuffer cannot
be cast to Napi::ArrayBuffer and node-addon-api gates IsSharedArrayBuffer()
behind an experimental flag, so it is detected via Symbol.toStringTag --
realm-safe, unlike instanceof, which matters under Jest's per-file vm context
and in worker threads.
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2026
PR-URL: #62061Fixes: #61396
Reviewed-By: René <contact.9a5d6388@renegade334.me.uk>
Reviewed-By: Edy Silva <edigleyssonsilva@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2026
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Araújo <arauujogui@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65089
Refs: #62001
Refs: #62061
Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
PR-URL: #62061Fixes: #61396
Reviewed-By: René <contact.9a5d6388@renegade334.me.uk>
Reviewed-By: Edy Silva <edigleyssonsilva@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Araújo <arauujogui@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65089
Refs: #62001
Refs: #62061
Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
PR-URL: #62061Fixes: #61396
Reviewed-By: René <contact.9a5d6388@renegade334.me.uk>
Reviewed-By: Edy Silva <edigleyssonsilva@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
Signed-off-by: Guilherme Araújo <arauujogui@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65089
Refs: #62001
Refs: #62061
Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

c++Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.sqliteIssues and PRs related to the SQLite subsystem.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

sqlite: bind ArrayBuffer

5 participants

@mike-git374@nodejs-github-bot@trivikr@Renegade334@geeksilva97