test: fix flaky http2 maxOriginSetSize test - #64407

Merged
nodejs-github-bot merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
pimterry:fix-h2-origin-flake
Jul 13, 2026
Merged

test: fix flaky http2 maxOriginSetSize test#64407
nodejs-github-bot merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
pimterry:fix-h2-origin-flake

Conversation

@pimterry

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

A fix for a flake from today's list: nodejs/reliability#1597.

Can't reproduce the flake locally directly, but I can with a small delay on the server stream response to simulate the very plausible IO delay on the response. Flake 100% reproduces with a setTimeout into the server stream handler at the top:

server.on('stream',(stream)=>{stream.on('error',()=>{});// We need errors handlers just for the reprosetTimeout(()=>{// Delay longer than the setInterval belowtry{stream.respond();stream.end('ok');}catch{}},100);});

This fails every time, as in the flake example in https://github.com/nodejs/reliability/blob/main/reports/2026-07-10.md:

Error [ERR_HTTP2_TOO_MANY_ORIGINS]: The server sent more ORIGIN frames than the allowed number of -0
at Http2Session.onOrigin (node:internal/http2/core:783:23)
Emitted 'error' event on ClientHttp2Stream instance at:
at emitErrorNT (node:internal/streams/destroy:170:8)
at emitErrorCloseNT (node:internal/streams/destroy:129:3)
at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:90:21) {
code: 'ERR_HTTP2_TOO_MANY_ORIGINS'
}

I'll do a stress test as well and see if I can confirm the fix directly.

Flake explanation:

  • The server runs a 10ms interval on every session which sends 10 origins
  • The test tries different <10 max origin limits, which will all fail
  • The test also sends a request
  • When the origins are rejected, the session is destroyed
  • All open request streams will also be destroyed when the session is destroyed
  • This creates a race:
    • If the request completes before the interval then the test passes (request finishes clean, session destroyed as expected)
    • If the request is still open when the interval fires and destroys the session, the request fails and emits an unhandled error => flake.

This PR fixes that by dropping the request (and server handler) completely from all tests here (the immediate flake, as well as the others). They aren't necessary - I think they exist because this was copied from test-http2-origin, which does actually use the request flow.

These tests though operate purely on just the session directly (server session handler triggers the interval, client session emits the error). The requests were ignored and the server handler did nothing. Dropping the requests completely simplifies the test and kills the race.

Would be good to get confirmation of that from @mcollina, since this was added as a security fix (https://github.com/nodejs-private/node-private/pull/855) which I can't see but I'm fairly confident.

Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
@pimterry
pimterry requested a review from mcollinaJuly 10, 2026 11:59
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure. labels Jul 10, 2026
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.23%. Comparing base (7036199) to head (e623a99).
⚠️ Report is 25 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #64407 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.25% 90.23% -0.02% 
==========================================
Files 741 741 Lines 241207 241216 +9 Branches 45424 45445 +21 ==========================================
- Hits 217696 217671 -25 - Misses 15087 15123 +36 + Partials 8424 8422 -2 

see 35 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@pimterry

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CC @nodejs/http2

@pimterry

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Stress test on main & PR both pass 🤦. Can't verify that way then, but I'm still fairly confident this is the right fix.

@anonriganonrig added the fast-track PRs proposed for a shorter-than-standard waiting period before landing. label Jul 10, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fast-track has been requested by @anonrig. Please 👍 to approve.

@anonriganonrig added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jul 10, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jul 10, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@mcollinamcollina left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@trivikrtrivikr added the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Jul 13, 2026
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Jul 13, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot
nodejs-github-bot merged commit a1e3e6d into nodejs:mainJul 13, 2026
84 checks passed
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Landed in a1e3e6d

aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2026
Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64407
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2026
Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64407
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2026
Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64407
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2026
Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64407
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

fast-trackPRs proposed for a shorter-than-standard waiting period before landing.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.testIssues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@pimterry@nodejs-github-bot@mcollina@anonrig@trivikr
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

test: fix flaky http2 maxOriginSetSize test - #64407

Merged
nodejs-github-bot merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
pimterry:fix-h2-origin-flake
Jul 13, 2026
Merged

test: fix flaky http2 maxOriginSetSize test#64407
nodejs-github-bot merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
pimterry:fix-h2-origin-flake

Conversation

@pimterry

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

A fix for a flake from today's list: nodejs/reliability#1597.

Can't reproduce the flake locally directly, but I can with a small delay on the server stream response to simulate the very plausible IO delay on the response. Flake 100% reproduces with a setTimeout into the server stream handler at the top:

server.on('stream',(stream)=>{stream.on('error',()=>{});// We need errors handlers just for the reprosetTimeout(()=>{// Delay longer than the setInterval belowtry{stream.respond();stream.end('ok');}catch{}},100);});

This fails every time, as in the flake example in https://github.com/nodejs/reliability/blob/main/reports/2026-07-10.md:

Error [ERR_HTTP2_TOO_MANY_ORIGINS]: The server sent more ORIGIN frames than the allowed number of -0
at Http2Session.onOrigin (node:internal/http2/core:783:23)
Emitted 'error' event on ClientHttp2Stream instance at:
at emitErrorNT (node:internal/streams/destroy:170:8)
at emitErrorCloseNT (node:internal/streams/destroy:129:3)
at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:90:21) {
code: 'ERR_HTTP2_TOO_MANY_ORIGINS'
}

I'll do a stress test as well and see if I can confirm the fix directly.

Flake explanation:

  • The server runs a 10ms interval on every session which sends 10 origins
  • The test tries different <10 max origin limits, which will all fail
  • The test also sends a request
  • When the origins are rejected, the session is destroyed
  • All open request streams will also be destroyed when the session is destroyed
  • This creates a race:
    • If the request completes before the interval then the test passes (request finishes clean, session destroyed as expected)
    • If the request is still open when the interval fires and destroys the session, the request fails and emits an unhandled error => flake.

This PR fixes that by dropping the request (and server handler) completely from all tests here (the immediate flake, as well as the others). They aren't necessary - I think they exist because this was copied from test-http2-origin, which does actually use the request flow.

These tests though operate purely on just the session directly (server session handler triggers the interval, client session emits the error). The requests were ignored and the server handler did nothing. Dropping the requests completely simplifies the test and kills the race.

Would be good to get confirmation of that from @mcollina, since this was added as a security fix (https://github.com/nodejs-private/node-private/pull/855) which I can't see but I'm fairly confident.

Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
@pimterry
pimterry requested a review from mcollinaJuly 10, 2026 11:59
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure. labels Jul 10, 2026
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.23%. Comparing base (7036199) to head (e623a99).
⚠️ Report is 25 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #64407 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.25% 90.23% -0.02% 
==========================================
Files 741 741 Lines 241207 241216 +9 Branches 45424 45445 +21 ==========================================
- Hits 217696 217671 -25 - Misses 15087 15123 +36 + Partials 8424 8422 -2 

see 35 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@pimterry

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CC @nodejs/http2

@pimterry

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Stress test on main & PR both pass 🤦. Can't verify that way then, but I'm still fairly confident this is the right fix.

@anonriganonrig added the fast-track PRs proposed for a shorter-than-standard waiting period before landing. label Jul 10, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fast-track has been requested by @anonrig. Please 👍 to approve.

@anonriganonrig added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jul 10, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jul 10, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@mcollinamcollina left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@trivikrtrivikr added the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Jul 13, 2026
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Jul 13, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot
nodejs-github-bot merged commit a1e3e6d into nodejs:mainJul 13, 2026
84 checks passed
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Landed in a1e3e6d

aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2026
Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64407
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2026
Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64407
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2026
Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64407
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2026
Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64407
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

fast-trackPRs proposed for a shorter-than-standard waiting period before landing.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.testIssues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@pimterry@nodejs-github-bot@mcollina@anonrig@trivikr
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

test: fix flaky http2 maxOriginSetSize test - #64407

Merged
nodejs-github-bot merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
pimterry:fix-h2-origin-flake
Jul 13, 2026
Merged

test: fix flaky http2 maxOriginSetSize test#64407
nodejs-github-bot merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
pimterry:fix-h2-origin-flake

Conversation

@pimterry

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

A fix for a flake from today's list: nodejs/reliability#1597.

Can't reproduce the flake locally directly, but I can with a small delay on the server stream response to simulate the very plausible IO delay on the response. Flake 100% reproduces with a setTimeout into the server stream handler at the top:

server.on('stream',(stream)=>{stream.on('error',()=>{});// We need errors handlers just for the reprosetTimeout(()=>{// Delay longer than the setInterval belowtry{stream.respond();stream.end('ok');}catch{}},100);});

This fails every time, as in the flake example in https://github.com/nodejs/reliability/blob/main/reports/2026-07-10.md:

Error [ERR_HTTP2_TOO_MANY_ORIGINS]: The server sent more ORIGIN frames than the allowed number of -0
at Http2Session.onOrigin (node:internal/http2/core:783:23)
Emitted 'error' event on ClientHttp2Stream instance at:
at emitErrorNT (node:internal/streams/destroy:170:8)
at emitErrorCloseNT (node:internal/streams/destroy:129:3)
at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:90:21) {
code: 'ERR_HTTP2_TOO_MANY_ORIGINS'
}

I'll do a stress test as well and see if I can confirm the fix directly.

Flake explanation:

  • The server runs a 10ms interval on every session which sends 10 origins
  • The test tries different <10 max origin limits, which will all fail
  • The test also sends a request
  • When the origins are rejected, the session is destroyed
  • All open request streams will also be destroyed when the session is destroyed
  • This creates a race:
    • If the request completes before the interval then the test passes (request finishes clean, session destroyed as expected)
    • If the request is still open when the interval fires and destroys the session, the request fails and emits an unhandled error => flake.

This PR fixes that by dropping the request (and server handler) completely from all tests here (the immediate flake, as well as the others). They aren't necessary - I think they exist because this was copied from test-http2-origin, which does actually use the request flow.

These tests though operate purely on just the session directly (server session handler triggers the interval, client session emits the error). The requests were ignored and the server handler did nothing. Dropping the requests completely simplifies the test and kills the race.

Would be good to get confirmation of that from @mcollina, since this was added as a security fix (https://github.com/nodejs-private/node-private/pull/855) which I can't see but I'm fairly confident.

Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
@pimterry
pimterry requested a review from mcollinaJuly 10, 2026 11:59
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure. labels Jul 10, 2026
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.23%. Comparing base (7036199) to head (e623a99).
⚠️ Report is 25 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #64407 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.25% 90.23% -0.02% 
==========================================
Files 741 741 Lines 241207 241216 +9 Branches 45424 45445 +21 ==========================================
- Hits 217696 217671 -25 - Misses 15087 15123 +36 + Partials 8424 8422 -2 

see 35 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@pimterry

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CC @nodejs/http2

@pimterry

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Stress test on main & PR both pass 🤦. Can't verify that way then, but I'm still fairly confident this is the right fix.

@anonriganonrig added the fast-track PRs proposed for a shorter-than-standard waiting period before landing. label Jul 10, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fast-track has been requested by @anonrig. Please 👍 to approve.

@anonriganonrig added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jul 10, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jul 10, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@mcollinamcollina left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@trivikrtrivikr added the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Jul 13, 2026
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Jul 13, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot
nodejs-github-bot merged commit a1e3e6d into nodejs:mainJul 13, 2026
84 checks passed
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Landed in a1e3e6d

aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2026
Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64407
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2026
Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64407
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2026
Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64407
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2026
Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64407
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

fast-trackPRs proposed for a shorter-than-standard waiting period before landing.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.testIssues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@pimterry@nodejs-github-bot@mcollina@anonrig@trivikr
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

test: fix flaky http2 maxOriginSetSize test - #64407

Merged
nodejs-github-bot merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
pimterry:fix-h2-origin-flake
Jul 13, 2026
Merged

test: fix flaky http2 maxOriginSetSize test#64407
nodejs-github-bot merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
pimterry:fix-h2-origin-flake

Conversation

@pimterry

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

A fix for a flake from today's list: nodejs/reliability#1597.

Can't reproduce the flake locally directly, but I can with a small delay on the server stream response to simulate the very plausible IO delay on the response. Flake 100% reproduces with a setTimeout into the server stream handler at the top:

server.on('stream',(stream)=>{stream.on('error',()=>{});// We need errors handlers just for the reprosetTimeout(()=>{// Delay longer than the setInterval belowtry{stream.respond();stream.end('ok');}catch{}},100);});

This fails every time, as in the flake example in https://github.com/nodejs/reliability/blob/main/reports/2026-07-10.md:

Error [ERR_HTTP2_TOO_MANY_ORIGINS]: The server sent more ORIGIN frames than the allowed number of -0
at Http2Session.onOrigin (node:internal/http2/core:783:23)
Emitted 'error' event on ClientHttp2Stream instance at:
at emitErrorNT (node:internal/streams/destroy:170:8)
at emitErrorCloseNT (node:internal/streams/destroy:129:3)
at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:90:21) {
code: 'ERR_HTTP2_TOO_MANY_ORIGINS'
}

I'll do a stress test as well and see if I can confirm the fix directly.

Flake explanation:

  • The server runs a 10ms interval on every session which sends 10 origins
  • The test tries different <10 max origin limits, which will all fail
  • The test also sends a request
  • When the origins are rejected, the session is destroyed
  • All open request streams will also be destroyed when the session is destroyed
  • This creates a race:
    • If the request completes before the interval then the test passes (request finishes clean, session destroyed as expected)
    • If the request is still open when the interval fires and destroys the session, the request fails and emits an unhandled error => flake.

This PR fixes that by dropping the request (and server handler) completely from all tests here (the immediate flake, as well as the others). They aren't necessary - I think they exist because this was copied from test-http2-origin, which does actually use the request flow.

These tests though operate purely on just the session directly (server session handler triggers the interval, client session emits the error). The requests were ignored and the server handler did nothing. Dropping the requests completely simplifies the test and kills the race.

Would be good to get confirmation of that from @mcollina, since this was added as a security fix (https://github.com/nodejs-private/node-private/pull/855) which I can't see but I'm fairly confident.

Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
@pimterry
pimterry requested a review from mcollinaJuly 10, 2026 11:59
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure. labels Jul 10, 2026
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.23%. Comparing base (7036199) to head (e623a99).
⚠️ Report is 25 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #64407 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.25% 90.23% -0.02% 
==========================================
Files 741 741 Lines 241207 241216 +9 Branches 45424 45445 +21 ==========================================
- Hits 217696 217671 -25 - Misses 15087 15123 +36 + Partials 8424 8422 -2 

see 35 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@pimterry

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CC @nodejs/http2

@pimterry

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Stress test on main & PR both pass 🤦. Can't verify that way then, but I'm still fairly confident this is the right fix.

@anonriganonrig added the fast-track PRs proposed for a shorter-than-standard waiting period before landing. label Jul 10, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fast-track has been requested by @anonrig. Please 👍 to approve.

@anonriganonrig added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jul 10, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jul 10, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@mcollinamcollina left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@trivikrtrivikr added the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Jul 13, 2026
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Jul 13, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot
nodejs-github-bot merged commit a1e3e6d into nodejs:mainJul 13, 2026
84 checks passed
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Landed in a1e3e6d

aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2026
Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64407
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2026
Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64407
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2026
Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64407
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2026
Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64407
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

fast-trackPRs proposed for a shorter-than-standard waiting period before landing.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.testIssues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@pimterry@nodejs-github-bot@mcollina@anonrig@trivikr
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

test: fix flaky http2 maxOriginSetSize test - #64407

Merged
nodejs-github-bot merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
pimterry:fix-h2-origin-flake
Jul 13, 2026
Merged

test: fix flaky http2 maxOriginSetSize test#64407
nodejs-github-bot merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
pimterry:fix-h2-origin-flake

Conversation

@pimterry

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

A fix for a flake from today's list: nodejs/reliability#1597.

Can't reproduce the flake locally directly, but I can with a small delay on the server stream response to simulate the very plausible IO delay on the response. Flake 100% reproduces with a setTimeout into the server stream handler at the top:

server.on('stream',(stream)=>{stream.on('error',()=>{});// We need errors handlers just for the reprosetTimeout(()=>{// Delay longer than the setInterval belowtry{stream.respond();stream.end('ok');}catch{}},100);});

This fails every time, as in the flake example in https://github.com/nodejs/reliability/blob/main/reports/2026-07-10.md:

Error [ERR_HTTP2_TOO_MANY_ORIGINS]: The server sent more ORIGIN frames than the allowed number of -0
at Http2Session.onOrigin (node:internal/http2/core:783:23)
Emitted 'error' event on ClientHttp2Stream instance at:
at emitErrorNT (node:internal/streams/destroy:170:8)
at emitErrorCloseNT (node:internal/streams/destroy:129:3)
at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:90:21) {
code: 'ERR_HTTP2_TOO_MANY_ORIGINS'
}

I'll do a stress test as well and see if I can confirm the fix directly.

Flake explanation:

  • The server runs a 10ms interval on every session which sends 10 origins
  • The test tries different <10 max origin limits, which will all fail
  • The test also sends a request
  • When the origins are rejected, the session is destroyed
  • All open request streams will also be destroyed when the session is destroyed
  • This creates a race:
    • If the request completes before the interval then the test passes (request finishes clean, session destroyed as expected)
    • If the request is still open when the interval fires and destroys the session, the request fails and emits an unhandled error => flake.

This PR fixes that by dropping the request (and server handler) completely from all tests here (the immediate flake, as well as the others). They aren't necessary - I think they exist because this was copied from test-http2-origin, which does actually use the request flow.

These tests though operate purely on just the session directly (server session handler triggers the interval, client session emits the error). The requests were ignored and the server handler did nothing. Dropping the requests completely simplifies the test and kills the race.

Would be good to get confirmation of that from @mcollina, since this was added as a security fix (https://github.com/nodejs-private/node-private/pull/855) which I can't see but I'm fairly confident.

Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
@pimterry
pimterry requested a review from mcollinaJuly 10, 2026 11:59
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure. labels Jul 10, 2026
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.23%. Comparing base (7036199) to head (e623a99).
⚠️ Report is 25 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #64407 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.25% 90.23% -0.02% 
==========================================
Files 741 741 Lines 241207 241216 +9 Branches 45424 45445 +21 ==========================================
- Hits 217696 217671 -25 - Misses 15087 15123 +36 + Partials 8424 8422 -2 

see 35 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@pimterry

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CC @nodejs/http2

@pimterry

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Stress test on main & PR both pass 🤦. Can't verify that way then, but I'm still fairly confident this is the right fix.

@anonriganonrig added the fast-track PRs proposed for a shorter-than-standard waiting period before landing. label Jul 10, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fast-track has been requested by @anonrig. Please 👍 to approve.

@anonriganonrig added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jul 10, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jul 10, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@mcollinamcollina left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@trivikrtrivikr added the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Jul 13, 2026
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Jul 13, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot
nodejs-github-bot merged commit a1e3e6d into nodejs:mainJul 13, 2026
84 checks passed
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Landed in a1e3e6d

aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2026
Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64407
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2026
Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64407
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2026
Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64407
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2026
Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64407
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

fast-trackPRs proposed for a shorter-than-standard waiting period before landing.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.testIssues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@pimterry@nodejs-github-bot@mcollina@anonrig@trivikr
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

test: fix flaky http2 maxOriginSetSize test - #64407

Merged
nodejs-github-bot merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
pimterry:fix-h2-origin-flake
Jul 13, 2026
Merged

test: fix flaky http2 maxOriginSetSize test#64407
nodejs-github-bot merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
pimterry:fix-h2-origin-flake

Conversation

@pimterry

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

A fix for a flake from today's list: nodejs/reliability#1597.

Can't reproduce the flake locally directly, but I can with a small delay on the server stream response to simulate the very plausible IO delay on the response. Flake 100% reproduces with a setTimeout into the server stream handler at the top:

server.on('stream',(stream)=>{stream.on('error',()=>{});// We need errors handlers just for the reprosetTimeout(()=>{// Delay longer than the setInterval belowtry{stream.respond();stream.end('ok');}catch{}},100);});

This fails every time, as in the flake example in https://github.com/nodejs/reliability/blob/main/reports/2026-07-10.md:

Error [ERR_HTTP2_TOO_MANY_ORIGINS]: The server sent more ORIGIN frames than the allowed number of -0
at Http2Session.onOrigin (node:internal/http2/core:783:23)
Emitted 'error' event on ClientHttp2Stream instance at:
at emitErrorNT (node:internal/streams/destroy:170:8)
at emitErrorCloseNT (node:internal/streams/destroy:129:3)
at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:90:21) {
code: 'ERR_HTTP2_TOO_MANY_ORIGINS'
}

I'll do a stress test as well and see if I can confirm the fix directly.

Flake explanation:

  • The server runs a 10ms interval on every session which sends 10 origins
  • The test tries different <10 max origin limits, which will all fail
  • The test also sends a request
  • When the origins are rejected, the session is destroyed
  • All open request streams will also be destroyed when the session is destroyed
  • This creates a race:
    • If the request completes before the interval then the test passes (request finishes clean, session destroyed as expected)
    • If the request is still open when the interval fires and destroys the session, the request fails and emits an unhandled error => flake.

This PR fixes that by dropping the request (and server handler) completely from all tests here (the immediate flake, as well as the others). They aren't necessary - I think they exist because this was copied from test-http2-origin, which does actually use the request flow.

These tests though operate purely on just the session directly (server session handler triggers the interval, client session emits the error). The requests were ignored and the server handler did nothing. Dropping the requests completely simplifies the test and kills the race.

Would be good to get confirmation of that from @mcollina, since this was added as a security fix (https://github.com/nodejs-private/node-private/pull/855) which I can't see but I'm fairly confident.

Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
@pimterry
pimterry requested a review from mcollinaJuly 10, 2026 11:59
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure. labels Jul 10, 2026
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.23%. Comparing base (7036199) to head (e623a99).
⚠️ Report is 25 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #64407 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.25% 90.23% -0.02% 
==========================================
Files 741 741 Lines 241207 241216 +9 Branches 45424 45445 +21 ==========================================
- Hits 217696 217671 -25 - Misses 15087 15123 +36 + Partials 8424 8422 -2 

see 35 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@pimterry

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CC @nodejs/http2

@pimterry

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Stress test on main & PR both pass 🤦. Can't verify that way then, but I'm still fairly confident this is the right fix.

@anonriganonrig added the fast-track PRs proposed for a shorter-than-standard waiting period before landing. label Jul 10, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fast-track has been requested by @anonrig. Please 👍 to approve.

@anonriganonrig added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jul 10, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jul 10, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@mcollinamcollina left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@trivikrtrivikr added the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Jul 13, 2026
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Jul 13, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot
nodejs-github-bot merged commit a1e3e6d into nodejs:mainJul 13, 2026
84 checks passed
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Landed in a1e3e6d

aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2026
Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64407
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2026
Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64407
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2026
Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64407
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2026
Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64407
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

fast-trackPRs proposed for a shorter-than-standard waiting period before landing.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.testIssues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@pimterry@nodejs-github-bot@mcollina@anonrig@trivikr
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

test: fix flaky http2 maxOriginSetSize test - #64407

Merged
nodejs-github-bot merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
pimterry:fix-h2-origin-flake
Jul 13, 2026
Merged

test: fix flaky http2 maxOriginSetSize test#64407
nodejs-github-bot merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
pimterry:fix-h2-origin-flake

Conversation

@pimterry

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

A fix for a flake from today's list: nodejs/reliability#1597.

Can't reproduce the flake locally directly, but I can with a small delay on the server stream response to simulate the very plausible IO delay on the response. Flake 100% reproduces with a setTimeout into the server stream handler at the top:

server.on('stream',(stream)=>{stream.on('error',()=>{});// We need errors handlers just for the reprosetTimeout(()=>{// Delay longer than the setInterval belowtry{stream.respond();stream.end('ok');}catch{}},100);});

This fails every time, as in the flake example in https://github.com/nodejs/reliability/blob/main/reports/2026-07-10.md:

Error [ERR_HTTP2_TOO_MANY_ORIGINS]: The server sent more ORIGIN frames than the allowed number of -0
at Http2Session.onOrigin (node:internal/http2/core:783:23)
Emitted 'error' event on ClientHttp2Stream instance at:
at emitErrorNT (node:internal/streams/destroy:170:8)
at emitErrorCloseNT (node:internal/streams/destroy:129:3)
at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:90:21) {
code: 'ERR_HTTP2_TOO_MANY_ORIGINS'
}

I'll do a stress test as well and see if I can confirm the fix directly.

Flake explanation:

  • The server runs a 10ms interval on every session which sends 10 origins
  • The test tries different <10 max origin limits, which will all fail
  • The test also sends a request
  • When the origins are rejected, the session is destroyed
  • All open request streams will also be destroyed when the session is destroyed
  • This creates a race:
    • If the request completes before the interval then the test passes (request finishes clean, session destroyed as expected)
    • If the request is still open when the interval fires and destroys the session, the request fails and emits an unhandled error => flake.

This PR fixes that by dropping the request (and server handler) completely from all tests here (the immediate flake, as well as the others). They aren't necessary - I think they exist because this was copied from test-http2-origin, which does actually use the request flow.

These tests though operate purely on just the session directly (server session handler triggers the interval, client session emits the error). The requests were ignored and the server handler did nothing. Dropping the requests completely simplifies the test and kills the race.

Would be good to get confirmation of that from @mcollina, since this was added as a security fix (https://github.com/nodejs-private/node-private/pull/855) which I can't see but I'm fairly confident.

Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
@pimterry
pimterry requested a review from mcollinaJuly 10, 2026 11:59
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure. labels Jul 10, 2026
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.23%. Comparing base (7036199) to head (e623a99).
⚠️ Report is 25 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #64407 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.25% 90.23% -0.02% 
==========================================
Files 741 741 Lines 241207 241216 +9 Branches 45424 45445 +21 ==========================================
- Hits 217696 217671 -25 - Misses 15087 15123 +36 + Partials 8424 8422 -2 

see 35 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@pimterry

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CC @nodejs/http2

@pimterry

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Stress test on main & PR both pass 🤦. Can't verify that way then, but I'm still fairly confident this is the right fix.

@anonriganonrig added the fast-track PRs proposed for a shorter-than-standard waiting period before landing. label Jul 10, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fast-track has been requested by @anonrig. Please 👍 to approve.

@anonriganonrig added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jul 10, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jul 10, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@mcollinamcollina left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@trivikrtrivikr added the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Jul 13, 2026
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Jul 13, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot
nodejs-github-bot merged commit a1e3e6d into nodejs:mainJul 13, 2026
84 checks passed
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Landed in a1e3e6d

aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2026
Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64407
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2026
Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64407
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2026
Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64407
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2026
Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64407
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

fast-trackPRs proposed for a shorter-than-standard waiting period before landing.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.testIssues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@pimterry@nodejs-github-bot@mcollina@anonrig@trivikr
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

test: fix flaky http2 maxOriginSetSize test - #64407

Merged
nodejs-github-bot merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
pimterry:fix-h2-origin-flake
Jul 13, 2026
Merged

test: fix flaky http2 maxOriginSetSize test#64407
nodejs-github-bot merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
pimterry:fix-h2-origin-flake

Conversation

@pimterry

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

A fix for a flake from today's list: nodejs/reliability#1597.

Can't reproduce the flake locally directly, but I can with a small delay on the server stream response to simulate the very plausible IO delay on the response. Flake 100% reproduces with a setTimeout into the server stream handler at the top:

server.on('stream',(stream)=>{stream.on('error',()=>{});// We need errors handlers just for the reprosetTimeout(()=>{// Delay longer than the setInterval belowtry{stream.respond();stream.end('ok');}catch{}},100);});

This fails every time, as in the flake example in https://github.com/nodejs/reliability/blob/main/reports/2026-07-10.md:

Error [ERR_HTTP2_TOO_MANY_ORIGINS]: The server sent more ORIGIN frames than the allowed number of -0
at Http2Session.onOrigin (node:internal/http2/core:783:23)
Emitted 'error' event on ClientHttp2Stream instance at:
at emitErrorNT (node:internal/streams/destroy:170:8)
at emitErrorCloseNT (node:internal/streams/destroy:129:3)
at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:90:21) {
code: 'ERR_HTTP2_TOO_MANY_ORIGINS'
}

I'll do a stress test as well and see if I can confirm the fix directly.

Flake explanation:

  • The server runs a 10ms interval on every session which sends 10 origins
  • The test tries different <10 max origin limits, which will all fail
  • The test also sends a request
  • When the origins are rejected, the session is destroyed
  • All open request streams will also be destroyed when the session is destroyed
  • This creates a race:
    • If the request completes before the interval then the test passes (request finishes clean, session destroyed as expected)
    • If the request is still open when the interval fires and destroys the session, the request fails and emits an unhandled error => flake.

This PR fixes that by dropping the request (and server handler) completely from all tests here (the immediate flake, as well as the others). They aren't necessary - I think they exist because this was copied from test-http2-origin, which does actually use the request flow.

These tests though operate purely on just the session directly (server session handler triggers the interval, client session emits the error). The requests were ignored and the server handler did nothing. Dropping the requests completely simplifies the test and kills the race.

Would be good to get confirmation of that from @mcollina, since this was added as a security fix (https://github.com/nodejs-private/node-private/pull/855) which I can't see but I'm fairly confident.

Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
@pimterry
pimterry requested a review from mcollinaJuly 10, 2026 11:59
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure. labels Jul 10, 2026
@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.23%. Comparing base (7036199) to head (e623a99).
⚠️ Report is 25 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #64407 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 90.25% 90.23% -0.02% 
==========================================
Files 741 741 Lines 241207 241216 +9 Branches 45424 45445 +21 ==========================================
- Hits 217696 217671 -25 - Misses 15087 15123 +36 + Partials 8424 8422 -2 

see 35 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@pimterry

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

CC @nodejs/http2

@pimterry

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Stress test on main & PR both pass 🤦. Can't verify that way then, but I'm still fairly confident this is the right fix.

@anonriganonrig added the fast-track PRs proposed for a shorter-than-standard waiting period before landing. label Jul 10, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fast-track has been requested by @anonrig. Please 👍 to approve.

@anonriganonrig added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jul 10, 2026
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jul 10, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@mcollinamcollina left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@trivikrtrivikr added the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Jul 13, 2026
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Jul 13, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot
nodejs-github-bot merged commit a1e3e6d into nodejs:mainJul 13, 2026
84 checks passed
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Landed in a1e3e6d

aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2026
Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64407
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2026
Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64407
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2026
Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64407
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2026
Signed-off-by: Tim Perry <pimterry@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #64407
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

fast-trackPRs proposed for a shorter-than-standard waiting period before landing.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.testIssues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@pimterry@nodejs-github-bot@mcollina@anonrig@trivikr