events: inline hybrid dispatch closures - #64473

Closed
slagiewka wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
slagiewka:et
Closed

events: inline hybrid dispatch closures#64473
slagiewka wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
slagiewka:et

Conversation

@slagiewka

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

lib: inline createEvent hybrid dispatch closure

Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.

lib: inline iterationCondition hybrid dispatch closure

While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark (30 runs).

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. label Jul 13, 2026
@slagiewka

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Looks like the convention for commit scope here is either events or lib. I'm fine with both, LMK and I will rewrite these commits.

Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
@slagiewkaslagiewka changed the title lib: inline hybrid dispatch closuresevents: inline hybrid dispatch closuresJul 14, 2026
@avivkelleravivkeller added the needs-benchmark-ci PRs that need a benchmark CI run. label Jul 21, 2026
@avivkeller

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@nodejs/events

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.24%. Comparing base (384d7a4) to head (27fce3a).
⚠️ Report is 632 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #64473 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.21% 90.24% +0.03% 
==========================================
Files 741 741 Lines 241608 241680 +72 Branches 45534 45542 +8 ==========================================
+ Hits 217972 218110 +138 + Misses 15154 15112 -42 + Partials 8482 8458 -24 
Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
lib/internal/event_target.js99.17% <100.00%> (-0.01%)⬇️

... and 40 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@slagiewka

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@nodejs/events

@atlowChemiatlowChemi left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Assuming benchmarks support this

@atlowChemiatlowChemi added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 23, 2026
@atlowChemi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 23, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@trivikrtrivikr added the author ready PRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments. label Aug 23, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@trivikr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Benchmark CI: ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js%20benchmark/job/benchmark-node-micro-benchmarks/1888

Output from Benchmarking CI

 confidence improvement accuracy (*) (**) (***)events/ee-add-remove.js n=1000000 removeListener=0 newListener=0 -0.63 % ±1.28% ±1.70% ±2.22%events/ee-add-remove.js n=1000000 removeListener=0 newListener=1 -0.28 % ±1.11% ±1.48% ±1.93%events/ee-add-remove.js n=1000000 removeListener=1 newListener=0 -1.02 % ±1.04% ±1.38% ±1.80%events/ee-add-remove.js n=1000000 removeListener=1 newListener=1 -0.15 % ±1.10% ±1.47% ±1.91%events/ee-emit.js listeners=1 argc=0 n=2000000 ** 4.95 % ±3.70% ±4.94% ±6.45%events/ee-emit.js listeners=1 argc=10 n=2000000 ** 9.13 % ±5.51% ±7.33% ±9.55%events/ee-emit.js listeners=1 argc=2 n=2000000 4.57 % ±5.80% ±7.72% ±10.04%events/ee-emit.js listeners=1 argc=4 n=2000000 *** 10.33 % ±5.72% ±7.62% ±9.94%events/ee-emit.js listeners=10 argc=0 n=2000000 0.25 % ±1.13% ±1.50% ±1.96%events/ee-emit.js listeners=10 argc=10 n=2000000 ** 3.40 % ±2.22% ±2.97% ±3.90%events/ee-emit.js listeners=10 argc=2 n=2000000 -0.42 % ±1.49% ±1.98% ±2.57%events/ee-emit.js listeners=10 argc=4 n=2000000 1.19 % ±1.56% ±2.08% ±2.71%events/ee-emit.js listeners=5 argc=0 n=2000000 -0.40 % ±2.02% ±2.68% ±3.49%events/ee-emit.js listeners=5 argc=10 n=2000000 ** 4.01 % ±2.52% ±3.36% ±4.38%events/ee-emit.js listeners=5 argc=2 n=2000000 ** 3.27 % ±2.31% ±3.08% ±4.02%events/ee-emit.js listeners=5 argc=4 n=2000000 *** 4.70 % ±2.29% ±3.05% ±3.98%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=1 0.61 % ±1.23% ±1.64% ±2.14%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=10 0.53 % ±1.61% ±2.14% ±2.78%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=2 -0.55 % ±1.31% ±1.74% ±2.27%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=20 -0.51 % ±1.70% ±2.26% ±2.95%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=3 0.39 % ±1.48% ±1.97% ±2.57%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=5 0.22 % ±1.26% ±1.68% ±2.19%events/ee-listener-count-on-prototype.js n=50000000 -0.95 % ±1.76% ±2.34% ±3.04%events/ee-listeners.js raw='false' listeners=5 n=5000000 1.05 % ±1.28% ±1.70% ±2.22%events/ee-listeners.js raw='false' listeners=50 n=5000000 -0.32 % ±0.52% ±0.69% ±0.90%events/ee-listeners.js raw='true' listeners=5 n=5000000 2.06 % ±2.25% ±3.00% ±3.93%events/ee-listeners.js raw='true' listeners=50 n=5000000 0.19 % ±0.64% ±0.86% ±1.11%events/ee-once.js argc=0 n=20000000 -0.55 % ±1.37% ±1.82% ±2.37%events/ee-once.js argc=1 n=20000000 0.71 % ±1.74% ±2.31% ±3.01%events/ee-once.js argc=4 n=20000000 -0.24 % ±1.77% ±2.36% ±3.07%events/ee-once.js argc=5 n=20000000 0.13 % ±1.31% ±1.75% ±2.28%events/eventtarget-add-remove-abort.js nListener=1 n=100000 1.87 % ±2.39% ±3.19% ±4.15%events/eventtarget-add-remove-abort.js nListener=10 n=100000 0.71 % ±1.48% ±1.97% ±2.57%events/eventtarget-add-remove-abort.js nListener=5 n=100000 0.59 % ±2.28% ±3.03% ±3.94%events/eventtarget-add-remove.js nListener=1 n=100000 -1.62 % ±2.94% ±3.91% ±5.11%events/eventtarget-add-remove.js nListener=10 n=100000 -0.48 % ±1.22% ±1.63% ±2.12%events/eventtarget-add-remove.js nListener=5 n=100000 0.67 % ±2.07% ±2.75% ±3.58%events/eventtarget-creation.js n=1000000 2.08 % ±4.94% ±6.60% ±8.65%events/eventtarget.js listeners=1 n=1000000 *** 19.23 % ±1.94% ±2.58% ±3.36%events/eventtarget.js listeners=10 n=1000000 *** 13.47 % ±1.09% ±1.46% ±1.90%events/eventtarget.js listeners=5 n=1000000 *** 14.48 % ±1.08% ±1.44% ±1.88%

@trivikr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@atlowChemi Looks like this is ready to merge.

@atlowChemiatlowChemi added commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. commit-queue-rebase PRs the Commit Queue should land as multiple self-contained commits. labels Aug 25, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Landed in e618b1b...984e46f

nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Aug 25, 2026
@slagiewka
slagiewka deleted the et branch August 25, 2026 08:17
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

author readyPRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments.commit-queue-rebasePRs the Commit Queue should land as multiple self-contained commits.needs-benchmark-ciPRs that need a benchmark CI run.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@slagiewka@avivkeller@atlowChemi@nodejs-github-bot@trivikr
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

events: inline hybrid dispatch closures - #64473

Closed
slagiewka wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
slagiewka:et
Closed

events: inline hybrid dispatch closures#64473
slagiewka wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
slagiewka:et

Conversation

@slagiewka

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

lib: inline createEvent hybrid dispatch closure

Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.

lib: inline iterationCondition hybrid dispatch closure

While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark (30 runs).

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. label Jul 13, 2026
@slagiewka

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Looks like the convention for commit scope here is either events or lib. I'm fine with both, LMK and I will rewrite these commits.

Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
@slagiewkaslagiewka changed the title lib: inline hybrid dispatch closuresevents: inline hybrid dispatch closuresJul 14, 2026
@avivkelleravivkeller added the needs-benchmark-ci PRs that need a benchmark CI run. label Jul 21, 2026
@avivkeller

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@nodejs/events

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.24%. Comparing base (384d7a4) to head (27fce3a).
⚠️ Report is 632 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #64473 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.21% 90.24% +0.03% 
==========================================
Files 741 741 Lines 241608 241680 +72 Branches 45534 45542 +8 ==========================================
+ Hits 217972 218110 +138 + Misses 15154 15112 -42 + Partials 8482 8458 -24 
Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
lib/internal/event_target.js99.17% <100.00%> (-0.01%)⬇️

... and 40 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@slagiewka

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@nodejs/events

@atlowChemiatlowChemi left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Assuming benchmarks support this

@atlowChemiatlowChemi added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 23, 2026
@atlowChemi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 23, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@trivikrtrivikr added the author ready PRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments. label Aug 23, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@trivikr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Benchmark CI: ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js%20benchmark/job/benchmark-node-micro-benchmarks/1888

Output from Benchmarking CI

 confidence improvement accuracy (*) (**) (***)events/ee-add-remove.js n=1000000 removeListener=0 newListener=0 -0.63 % ±1.28% ±1.70% ±2.22%events/ee-add-remove.js n=1000000 removeListener=0 newListener=1 -0.28 % ±1.11% ±1.48% ±1.93%events/ee-add-remove.js n=1000000 removeListener=1 newListener=0 -1.02 % ±1.04% ±1.38% ±1.80%events/ee-add-remove.js n=1000000 removeListener=1 newListener=1 -0.15 % ±1.10% ±1.47% ±1.91%events/ee-emit.js listeners=1 argc=0 n=2000000 ** 4.95 % ±3.70% ±4.94% ±6.45%events/ee-emit.js listeners=1 argc=10 n=2000000 ** 9.13 % ±5.51% ±7.33% ±9.55%events/ee-emit.js listeners=1 argc=2 n=2000000 4.57 % ±5.80% ±7.72% ±10.04%events/ee-emit.js listeners=1 argc=4 n=2000000 *** 10.33 % ±5.72% ±7.62% ±9.94%events/ee-emit.js listeners=10 argc=0 n=2000000 0.25 % ±1.13% ±1.50% ±1.96%events/ee-emit.js listeners=10 argc=10 n=2000000 ** 3.40 % ±2.22% ±2.97% ±3.90%events/ee-emit.js listeners=10 argc=2 n=2000000 -0.42 % ±1.49% ±1.98% ±2.57%events/ee-emit.js listeners=10 argc=4 n=2000000 1.19 % ±1.56% ±2.08% ±2.71%events/ee-emit.js listeners=5 argc=0 n=2000000 -0.40 % ±2.02% ±2.68% ±3.49%events/ee-emit.js listeners=5 argc=10 n=2000000 ** 4.01 % ±2.52% ±3.36% ±4.38%events/ee-emit.js listeners=5 argc=2 n=2000000 ** 3.27 % ±2.31% ±3.08% ±4.02%events/ee-emit.js listeners=5 argc=4 n=2000000 *** 4.70 % ±2.29% ±3.05% ±3.98%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=1 0.61 % ±1.23% ±1.64% ±2.14%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=10 0.53 % ±1.61% ±2.14% ±2.78%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=2 -0.55 % ±1.31% ±1.74% ±2.27%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=20 -0.51 % ±1.70% ±2.26% ±2.95%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=3 0.39 % ±1.48% ±1.97% ±2.57%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=5 0.22 % ±1.26% ±1.68% ±2.19%events/ee-listener-count-on-prototype.js n=50000000 -0.95 % ±1.76% ±2.34% ±3.04%events/ee-listeners.js raw='false' listeners=5 n=5000000 1.05 % ±1.28% ±1.70% ±2.22%events/ee-listeners.js raw='false' listeners=50 n=5000000 -0.32 % ±0.52% ±0.69% ±0.90%events/ee-listeners.js raw='true' listeners=5 n=5000000 2.06 % ±2.25% ±3.00% ±3.93%events/ee-listeners.js raw='true' listeners=50 n=5000000 0.19 % ±0.64% ±0.86% ±1.11%events/ee-once.js argc=0 n=20000000 -0.55 % ±1.37% ±1.82% ±2.37%events/ee-once.js argc=1 n=20000000 0.71 % ±1.74% ±2.31% ±3.01%events/ee-once.js argc=4 n=20000000 -0.24 % ±1.77% ±2.36% ±3.07%events/ee-once.js argc=5 n=20000000 0.13 % ±1.31% ±1.75% ±2.28%events/eventtarget-add-remove-abort.js nListener=1 n=100000 1.87 % ±2.39% ±3.19% ±4.15%events/eventtarget-add-remove-abort.js nListener=10 n=100000 0.71 % ±1.48% ±1.97% ±2.57%events/eventtarget-add-remove-abort.js nListener=5 n=100000 0.59 % ±2.28% ±3.03% ±3.94%events/eventtarget-add-remove.js nListener=1 n=100000 -1.62 % ±2.94% ±3.91% ±5.11%events/eventtarget-add-remove.js nListener=10 n=100000 -0.48 % ±1.22% ±1.63% ±2.12%events/eventtarget-add-remove.js nListener=5 n=100000 0.67 % ±2.07% ±2.75% ±3.58%events/eventtarget-creation.js n=1000000 2.08 % ±4.94% ±6.60% ±8.65%events/eventtarget.js listeners=1 n=1000000 *** 19.23 % ±1.94% ±2.58% ±3.36%events/eventtarget.js listeners=10 n=1000000 *** 13.47 % ±1.09% ±1.46% ±1.90%events/eventtarget.js listeners=5 n=1000000 *** 14.48 % ±1.08% ±1.44% ±1.88%

@trivikr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@atlowChemi Looks like this is ready to merge.

@atlowChemiatlowChemi added commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. commit-queue-rebase PRs the Commit Queue should land as multiple self-contained commits. labels Aug 25, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Landed in e618b1b...984e46f

nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Aug 25, 2026
@slagiewka
slagiewka deleted the et branch August 25, 2026 08:17
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

author readyPRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments.commit-queue-rebasePRs the Commit Queue should land as multiple self-contained commits.needs-benchmark-ciPRs that need a benchmark CI run.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@slagiewka@avivkeller@atlowChemi@nodejs-github-bot@trivikr
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

events: inline hybrid dispatch closures - #64473

Closed
slagiewka wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
slagiewka:et
Closed

events: inline hybrid dispatch closures#64473
slagiewka wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
slagiewka:et

Conversation

@slagiewka

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

lib: inline createEvent hybrid dispatch closure

Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.

lib: inline iterationCondition hybrid dispatch closure

While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark (30 runs).

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. label Jul 13, 2026
@slagiewka

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Looks like the convention for commit scope here is either events or lib. I'm fine with both, LMK and I will rewrite these commits.

Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
@slagiewkaslagiewka changed the title lib: inline hybrid dispatch closuresevents: inline hybrid dispatch closuresJul 14, 2026
@avivkelleravivkeller added the needs-benchmark-ci PRs that need a benchmark CI run. label Jul 21, 2026
@avivkeller

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@nodejs/events

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.24%. Comparing base (384d7a4) to head (27fce3a).
⚠️ Report is 632 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #64473 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.21% 90.24% +0.03% 
==========================================
Files 741 741 Lines 241608 241680 +72 Branches 45534 45542 +8 ==========================================
+ Hits 217972 218110 +138 + Misses 15154 15112 -42 + Partials 8482 8458 -24 
Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
lib/internal/event_target.js99.17% <100.00%> (-0.01%)⬇️

... and 40 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@slagiewka

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@nodejs/events

@atlowChemiatlowChemi left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Assuming benchmarks support this

@atlowChemiatlowChemi added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 23, 2026
@atlowChemi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 23, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@trivikrtrivikr added the author ready PRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments. label Aug 23, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@trivikr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Benchmark CI: ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js%20benchmark/job/benchmark-node-micro-benchmarks/1888

Output from Benchmarking CI

 confidence improvement accuracy (*) (**) (***)events/ee-add-remove.js n=1000000 removeListener=0 newListener=0 -0.63 % ±1.28% ±1.70% ±2.22%events/ee-add-remove.js n=1000000 removeListener=0 newListener=1 -0.28 % ±1.11% ±1.48% ±1.93%events/ee-add-remove.js n=1000000 removeListener=1 newListener=0 -1.02 % ±1.04% ±1.38% ±1.80%events/ee-add-remove.js n=1000000 removeListener=1 newListener=1 -0.15 % ±1.10% ±1.47% ±1.91%events/ee-emit.js listeners=1 argc=0 n=2000000 ** 4.95 % ±3.70% ±4.94% ±6.45%events/ee-emit.js listeners=1 argc=10 n=2000000 ** 9.13 % ±5.51% ±7.33% ±9.55%events/ee-emit.js listeners=1 argc=2 n=2000000 4.57 % ±5.80% ±7.72% ±10.04%events/ee-emit.js listeners=1 argc=4 n=2000000 *** 10.33 % ±5.72% ±7.62% ±9.94%events/ee-emit.js listeners=10 argc=0 n=2000000 0.25 % ±1.13% ±1.50% ±1.96%events/ee-emit.js listeners=10 argc=10 n=2000000 ** 3.40 % ±2.22% ±2.97% ±3.90%events/ee-emit.js listeners=10 argc=2 n=2000000 -0.42 % ±1.49% ±1.98% ±2.57%events/ee-emit.js listeners=10 argc=4 n=2000000 1.19 % ±1.56% ±2.08% ±2.71%events/ee-emit.js listeners=5 argc=0 n=2000000 -0.40 % ±2.02% ±2.68% ±3.49%events/ee-emit.js listeners=5 argc=10 n=2000000 ** 4.01 % ±2.52% ±3.36% ±4.38%events/ee-emit.js listeners=5 argc=2 n=2000000 ** 3.27 % ±2.31% ±3.08% ±4.02%events/ee-emit.js listeners=5 argc=4 n=2000000 *** 4.70 % ±2.29% ±3.05% ±3.98%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=1 0.61 % ±1.23% ±1.64% ±2.14%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=10 0.53 % ±1.61% ±2.14% ±2.78%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=2 -0.55 % ±1.31% ±1.74% ±2.27%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=20 -0.51 % ±1.70% ±2.26% ±2.95%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=3 0.39 % ±1.48% ±1.97% ±2.57%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=5 0.22 % ±1.26% ±1.68% ±2.19%events/ee-listener-count-on-prototype.js n=50000000 -0.95 % ±1.76% ±2.34% ±3.04%events/ee-listeners.js raw='false' listeners=5 n=5000000 1.05 % ±1.28% ±1.70% ±2.22%events/ee-listeners.js raw='false' listeners=50 n=5000000 -0.32 % ±0.52% ±0.69% ±0.90%events/ee-listeners.js raw='true' listeners=5 n=5000000 2.06 % ±2.25% ±3.00% ±3.93%events/ee-listeners.js raw='true' listeners=50 n=5000000 0.19 % ±0.64% ±0.86% ±1.11%events/ee-once.js argc=0 n=20000000 -0.55 % ±1.37% ±1.82% ±2.37%events/ee-once.js argc=1 n=20000000 0.71 % ±1.74% ±2.31% ±3.01%events/ee-once.js argc=4 n=20000000 -0.24 % ±1.77% ±2.36% ±3.07%events/ee-once.js argc=5 n=20000000 0.13 % ±1.31% ±1.75% ±2.28%events/eventtarget-add-remove-abort.js nListener=1 n=100000 1.87 % ±2.39% ±3.19% ±4.15%events/eventtarget-add-remove-abort.js nListener=10 n=100000 0.71 % ±1.48% ±1.97% ±2.57%events/eventtarget-add-remove-abort.js nListener=5 n=100000 0.59 % ±2.28% ±3.03% ±3.94%events/eventtarget-add-remove.js nListener=1 n=100000 -1.62 % ±2.94% ±3.91% ±5.11%events/eventtarget-add-remove.js nListener=10 n=100000 -0.48 % ±1.22% ±1.63% ±2.12%events/eventtarget-add-remove.js nListener=5 n=100000 0.67 % ±2.07% ±2.75% ±3.58%events/eventtarget-creation.js n=1000000 2.08 % ±4.94% ±6.60% ±8.65%events/eventtarget.js listeners=1 n=1000000 *** 19.23 % ±1.94% ±2.58% ±3.36%events/eventtarget.js listeners=10 n=1000000 *** 13.47 % ±1.09% ±1.46% ±1.90%events/eventtarget.js listeners=5 n=1000000 *** 14.48 % ±1.08% ±1.44% ±1.88%

@trivikr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@atlowChemi Looks like this is ready to merge.

@atlowChemiatlowChemi added commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. commit-queue-rebase PRs the Commit Queue should land as multiple self-contained commits. labels Aug 25, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Landed in e618b1b...984e46f

nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Aug 25, 2026
@slagiewka
slagiewka deleted the et branch August 25, 2026 08:17
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

author readyPRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments.commit-queue-rebasePRs the Commit Queue should land as multiple self-contained commits.needs-benchmark-ciPRs that need a benchmark CI run.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@slagiewka@avivkeller@atlowChemi@nodejs-github-bot@trivikr
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

events: inline hybrid dispatch closures - #64473

Closed
slagiewka wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
slagiewka:et
Closed

events: inline hybrid dispatch closures#64473
slagiewka wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
slagiewka:et

Conversation

@slagiewka

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

lib: inline createEvent hybrid dispatch closure

Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.

lib: inline iterationCondition hybrid dispatch closure

While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark (30 runs).

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. label Jul 13, 2026
@slagiewka

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Looks like the convention for commit scope here is either events or lib. I'm fine with both, LMK and I will rewrite these commits.

Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
@slagiewkaslagiewka changed the title lib: inline hybrid dispatch closuresevents: inline hybrid dispatch closuresJul 14, 2026
@avivkelleravivkeller added the needs-benchmark-ci PRs that need a benchmark CI run. label Jul 21, 2026
@avivkeller

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@nodejs/events

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.24%. Comparing base (384d7a4) to head (27fce3a).
⚠️ Report is 632 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #64473 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.21% 90.24% +0.03% 
==========================================
Files 741 741 Lines 241608 241680 +72 Branches 45534 45542 +8 ==========================================
+ Hits 217972 218110 +138 + Misses 15154 15112 -42 + Partials 8482 8458 -24 
Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
lib/internal/event_target.js99.17% <100.00%> (-0.01%)⬇️

... and 40 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@slagiewka

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@nodejs/events

@atlowChemiatlowChemi left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Assuming benchmarks support this

@atlowChemiatlowChemi added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 23, 2026
@atlowChemi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 23, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@trivikrtrivikr added the author ready PRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments. label Aug 23, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@trivikr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Benchmark CI: ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js%20benchmark/job/benchmark-node-micro-benchmarks/1888

Output from Benchmarking CI

 confidence improvement accuracy (*) (**) (***)events/ee-add-remove.js n=1000000 removeListener=0 newListener=0 -0.63 % ±1.28% ±1.70% ±2.22%events/ee-add-remove.js n=1000000 removeListener=0 newListener=1 -0.28 % ±1.11% ±1.48% ±1.93%events/ee-add-remove.js n=1000000 removeListener=1 newListener=0 -1.02 % ±1.04% ±1.38% ±1.80%events/ee-add-remove.js n=1000000 removeListener=1 newListener=1 -0.15 % ±1.10% ±1.47% ±1.91%events/ee-emit.js listeners=1 argc=0 n=2000000 ** 4.95 % ±3.70% ±4.94% ±6.45%events/ee-emit.js listeners=1 argc=10 n=2000000 ** 9.13 % ±5.51% ±7.33% ±9.55%events/ee-emit.js listeners=1 argc=2 n=2000000 4.57 % ±5.80% ±7.72% ±10.04%events/ee-emit.js listeners=1 argc=4 n=2000000 *** 10.33 % ±5.72% ±7.62% ±9.94%events/ee-emit.js listeners=10 argc=0 n=2000000 0.25 % ±1.13% ±1.50% ±1.96%events/ee-emit.js listeners=10 argc=10 n=2000000 ** 3.40 % ±2.22% ±2.97% ±3.90%events/ee-emit.js listeners=10 argc=2 n=2000000 -0.42 % ±1.49% ±1.98% ±2.57%events/ee-emit.js listeners=10 argc=4 n=2000000 1.19 % ±1.56% ±2.08% ±2.71%events/ee-emit.js listeners=5 argc=0 n=2000000 -0.40 % ±2.02% ±2.68% ±3.49%events/ee-emit.js listeners=5 argc=10 n=2000000 ** 4.01 % ±2.52% ±3.36% ±4.38%events/ee-emit.js listeners=5 argc=2 n=2000000 ** 3.27 % ±2.31% ±3.08% ±4.02%events/ee-emit.js listeners=5 argc=4 n=2000000 *** 4.70 % ±2.29% ±3.05% ±3.98%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=1 0.61 % ±1.23% ±1.64% ±2.14%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=10 0.53 % ±1.61% ±2.14% ±2.78%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=2 -0.55 % ±1.31% ±1.74% ±2.27%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=20 -0.51 % ±1.70% ±2.26% ±2.95%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=3 0.39 % ±1.48% ±1.97% ±2.57%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=5 0.22 % ±1.26% ±1.68% ±2.19%events/ee-listener-count-on-prototype.js n=50000000 -0.95 % ±1.76% ±2.34% ±3.04%events/ee-listeners.js raw='false' listeners=5 n=5000000 1.05 % ±1.28% ±1.70% ±2.22%events/ee-listeners.js raw='false' listeners=50 n=5000000 -0.32 % ±0.52% ±0.69% ±0.90%events/ee-listeners.js raw='true' listeners=5 n=5000000 2.06 % ±2.25% ±3.00% ±3.93%events/ee-listeners.js raw='true' listeners=50 n=5000000 0.19 % ±0.64% ±0.86% ±1.11%events/ee-once.js argc=0 n=20000000 -0.55 % ±1.37% ±1.82% ±2.37%events/ee-once.js argc=1 n=20000000 0.71 % ±1.74% ±2.31% ±3.01%events/ee-once.js argc=4 n=20000000 -0.24 % ±1.77% ±2.36% ±3.07%events/ee-once.js argc=5 n=20000000 0.13 % ±1.31% ±1.75% ±2.28%events/eventtarget-add-remove-abort.js nListener=1 n=100000 1.87 % ±2.39% ±3.19% ±4.15%events/eventtarget-add-remove-abort.js nListener=10 n=100000 0.71 % ±1.48% ±1.97% ±2.57%events/eventtarget-add-remove-abort.js nListener=5 n=100000 0.59 % ±2.28% ±3.03% ±3.94%events/eventtarget-add-remove.js nListener=1 n=100000 -1.62 % ±2.94% ±3.91% ±5.11%events/eventtarget-add-remove.js nListener=10 n=100000 -0.48 % ±1.22% ±1.63% ±2.12%events/eventtarget-add-remove.js nListener=5 n=100000 0.67 % ±2.07% ±2.75% ±3.58%events/eventtarget-creation.js n=1000000 2.08 % ±4.94% ±6.60% ±8.65%events/eventtarget.js listeners=1 n=1000000 *** 19.23 % ±1.94% ±2.58% ±3.36%events/eventtarget.js listeners=10 n=1000000 *** 13.47 % ±1.09% ±1.46% ±1.90%events/eventtarget.js listeners=5 n=1000000 *** 14.48 % ±1.08% ±1.44% ±1.88%

@trivikr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@atlowChemi Looks like this is ready to merge.

@atlowChemiatlowChemi added commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. commit-queue-rebase PRs the Commit Queue should land as multiple self-contained commits. labels Aug 25, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Landed in e618b1b...984e46f

nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Aug 25, 2026
@slagiewka
slagiewka deleted the et branch August 25, 2026 08:17
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

author readyPRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments.commit-queue-rebasePRs the Commit Queue should land as multiple self-contained commits.needs-benchmark-ciPRs that need a benchmark CI run.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@slagiewka@avivkeller@atlowChemi@nodejs-github-bot@trivikr
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

events: inline hybrid dispatch closures - #64473

Closed
slagiewka wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
slagiewka:et
Closed

events: inline hybrid dispatch closures#64473
slagiewka wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
slagiewka:et

Conversation

@slagiewka

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

lib: inline createEvent hybrid dispatch closure

Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.

lib: inline iterationCondition hybrid dispatch closure

While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark (30 runs).

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. label Jul 13, 2026
@slagiewka

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Looks like the convention for commit scope here is either events or lib. I'm fine with both, LMK and I will rewrite these commits.

Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
@slagiewkaslagiewka changed the title lib: inline hybrid dispatch closuresevents: inline hybrid dispatch closuresJul 14, 2026
@avivkelleravivkeller added the needs-benchmark-ci PRs that need a benchmark CI run. label Jul 21, 2026
@avivkeller

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@nodejs/events

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.24%. Comparing base (384d7a4) to head (27fce3a).
⚠️ Report is 632 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #64473 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.21% 90.24% +0.03% 
==========================================
Files 741 741 Lines 241608 241680 +72 Branches 45534 45542 +8 ==========================================
+ Hits 217972 218110 +138 + Misses 15154 15112 -42 + Partials 8482 8458 -24 
Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
lib/internal/event_target.js99.17% <100.00%> (-0.01%)⬇️

... and 40 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@slagiewka

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@nodejs/events

@atlowChemiatlowChemi left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Assuming benchmarks support this

@atlowChemiatlowChemi added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 23, 2026
@atlowChemi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 23, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@trivikrtrivikr added the author ready PRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments. label Aug 23, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@trivikr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Benchmark CI: ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js%20benchmark/job/benchmark-node-micro-benchmarks/1888

Output from Benchmarking CI

 confidence improvement accuracy (*) (**) (***)events/ee-add-remove.js n=1000000 removeListener=0 newListener=0 -0.63 % ±1.28% ±1.70% ±2.22%events/ee-add-remove.js n=1000000 removeListener=0 newListener=1 -0.28 % ±1.11% ±1.48% ±1.93%events/ee-add-remove.js n=1000000 removeListener=1 newListener=0 -1.02 % ±1.04% ±1.38% ±1.80%events/ee-add-remove.js n=1000000 removeListener=1 newListener=1 -0.15 % ±1.10% ±1.47% ±1.91%events/ee-emit.js listeners=1 argc=0 n=2000000 ** 4.95 % ±3.70% ±4.94% ±6.45%events/ee-emit.js listeners=1 argc=10 n=2000000 ** 9.13 % ±5.51% ±7.33% ±9.55%events/ee-emit.js listeners=1 argc=2 n=2000000 4.57 % ±5.80% ±7.72% ±10.04%events/ee-emit.js listeners=1 argc=4 n=2000000 *** 10.33 % ±5.72% ±7.62% ±9.94%events/ee-emit.js listeners=10 argc=0 n=2000000 0.25 % ±1.13% ±1.50% ±1.96%events/ee-emit.js listeners=10 argc=10 n=2000000 ** 3.40 % ±2.22% ±2.97% ±3.90%events/ee-emit.js listeners=10 argc=2 n=2000000 -0.42 % ±1.49% ±1.98% ±2.57%events/ee-emit.js listeners=10 argc=4 n=2000000 1.19 % ±1.56% ±2.08% ±2.71%events/ee-emit.js listeners=5 argc=0 n=2000000 -0.40 % ±2.02% ±2.68% ±3.49%events/ee-emit.js listeners=5 argc=10 n=2000000 ** 4.01 % ±2.52% ±3.36% ±4.38%events/ee-emit.js listeners=5 argc=2 n=2000000 ** 3.27 % ±2.31% ±3.08% ±4.02%events/ee-emit.js listeners=5 argc=4 n=2000000 *** 4.70 % ±2.29% ±3.05% ±3.98%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=1 0.61 % ±1.23% ±1.64% ±2.14%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=10 0.53 % ±1.61% ±2.14% ±2.78%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=2 -0.55 % ±1.31% ±1.74% ±2.27%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=20 -0.51 % ±1.70% ±2.26% ±2.95%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=3 0.39 % ±1.48% ±1.97% ±2.57%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=5 0.22 % ±1.26% ±1.68% ±2.19%events/ee-listener-count-on-prototype.js n=50000000 -0.95 % ±1.76% ±2.34% ±3.04%events/ee-listeners.js raw='false' listeners=5 n=5000000 1.05 % ±1.28% ±1.70% ±2.22%events/ee-listeners.js raw='false' listeners=50 n=5000000 -0.32 % ±0.52% ±0.69% ±0.90%events/ee-listeners.js raw='true' listeners=5 n=5000000 2.06 % ±2.25% ±3.00% ±3.93%events/ee-listeners.js raw='true' listeners=50 n=5000000 0.19 % ±0.64% ±0.86% ±1.11%events/ee-once.js argc=0 n=20000000 -0.55 % ±1.37% ±1.82% ±2.37%events/ee-once.js argc=1 n=20000000 0.71 % ±1.74% ±2.31% ±3.01%events/ee-once.js argc=4 n=20000000 -0.24 % ±1.77% ±2.36% ±3.07%events/ee-once.js argc=5 n=20000000 0.13 % ±1.31% ±1.75% ±2.28%events/eventtarget-add-remove-abort.js nListener=1 n=100000 1.87 % ±2.39% ±3.19% ±4.15%events/eventtarget-add-remove-abort.js nListener=10 n=100000 0.71 % ±1.48% ±1.97% ±2.57%events/eventtarget-add-remove-abort.js nListener=5 n=100000 0.59 % ±2.28% ±3.03% ±3.94%events/eventtarget-add-remove.js nListener=1 n=100000 -1.62 % ±2.94% ±3.91% ±5.11%events/eventtarget-add-remove.js nListener=10 n=100000 -0.48 % ±1.22% ±1.63% ±2.12%events/eventtarget-add-remove.js nListener=5 n=100000 0.67 % ±2.07% ±2.75% ±3.58%events/eventtarget-creation.js n=1000000 2.08 % ±4.94% ±6.60% ±8.65%events/eventtarget.js listeners=1 n=1000000 *** 19.23 % ±1.94% ±2.58% ±3.36%events/eventtarget.js listeners=10 n=1000000 *** 13.47 % ±1.09% ±1.46% ±1.90%events/eventtarget.js listeners=5 n=1000000 *** 14.48 % ±1.08% ±1.44% ±1.88%

@trivikr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@atlowChemi Looks like this is ready to merge.

@atlowChemiatlowChemi added commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. commit-queue-rebase PRs the Commit Queue should land as multiple self-contained commits. labels Aug 25, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Landed in e618b1b...984e46f

nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Aug 25, 2026
@slagiewka
slagiewka deleted the et branch August 25, 2026 08:17
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

author readyPRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments.commit-queue-rebasePRs the Commit Queue should land as multiple self-contained commits.needs-benchmark-ciPRs that need a benchmark CI run.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@slagiewka@avivkeller@atlowChemi@nodejs-github-bot@trivikr
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

events: inline hybrid dispatch closures - #64473

Closed
slagiewka wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
slagiewka:et
Closed

events: inline hybrid dispatch closures#64473
slagiewka wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
slagiewka:et

Conversation

@slagiewka

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

lib: inline createEvent hybrid dispatch closure

Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.

lib: inline iterationCondition hybrid dispatch closure

While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark (30 runs).

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. label Jul 13, 2026
@slagiewka

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Looks like the convention for commit scope here is either events or lib. I'm fine with both, LMK and I will rewrite these commits.

Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
@slagiewkaslagiewka changed the title lib: inline hybrid dispatch closuresevents: inline hybrid dispatch closuresJul 14, 2026
@avivkelleravivkeller added the needs-benchmark-ci PRs that need a benchmark CI run. label Jul 21, 2026
@avivkeller

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@nodejs/events

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.24%. Comparing base (384d7a4) to head (27fce3a).
⚠️ Report is 632 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #64473 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.21% 90.24% +0.03% 
==========================================
Files 741 741 Lines 241608 241680 +72 Branches 45534 45542 +8 ==========================================
+ Hits 217972 218110 +138 + Misses 15154 15112 -42 + Partials 8482 8458 -24 
Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
lib/internal/event_target.js99.17% <100.00%> (-0.01%)⬇️

... and 40 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@slagiewka

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@nodejs/events

@atlowChemiatlowChemi left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Assuming benchmarks support this

@atlowChemiatlowChemi added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 23, 2026
@atlowChemi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 23, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@trivikrtrivikr added the author ready PRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments. label Aug 23, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@trivikr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Benchmark CI: ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js%20benchmark/job/benchmark-node-micro-benchmarks/1888

Output from Benchmarking CI

 confidence improvement accuracy (*) (**) (***)events/ee-add-remove.js n=1000000 removeListener=0 newListener=0 -0.63 % ±1.28% ±1.70% ±2.22%events/ee-add-remove.js n=1000000 removeListener=0 newListener=1 -0.28 % ±1.11% ±1.48% ±1.93%events/ee-add-remove.js n=1000000 removeListener=1 newListener=0 -1.02 % ±1.04% ±1.38% ±1.80%events/ee-add-remove.js n=1000000 removeListener=1 newListener=1 -0.15 % ±1.10% ±1.47% ±1.91%events/ee-emit.js listeners=1 argc=0 n=2000000 ** 4.95 % ±3.70% ±4.94% ±6.45%events/ee-emit.js listeners=1 argc=10 n=2000000 ** 9.13 % ±5.51% ±7.33% ±9.55%events/ee-emit.js listeners=1 argc=2 n=2000000 4.57 % ±5.80% ±7.72% ±10.04%events/ee-emit.js listeners=1 argc=4 n=2000000 *** 10.33 % ±5.72% ±7.62% ±9.94%events/ee-emit.js listeners=10 argc=0 n=2000000 0.25 % ±1.13% ±1.50% ±1.96%events/ee-emit.js listeners=10 argc=10 n=2000000 ** 3.40 % ±2.22% ±2.97% ±3.90%events/ee-emit.js listeners=10 argc=2 n=2000000 -0.42 % ±1.49% ±1.98% ±2.57%events/ee-emit.js listeners=10 argc=4 n=2000000 1.19 % ±1.56% ±2.08% ±2.71%events/ee-emit.js listeners=5 argc=0 n=2000000 -0.40 % ±2.02% ±2.68% ±3.49%events/ee-emit.js listeners=5 argc=10 n=2000000 ** 4.01 % ±2.52% ±3.36% ±4.38%events/ee-emit.js listeners=5 argc=2 n=2000000 ** 3.27 % ±2.31% ±3.08% ±4.02%events/ee-emit.js listeners=5 argc=4 n=2000000 *** 4.70 % ±2.29% ±3.05% ±3.98%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=1 0.61 % ±1.23% ±1.64% ±2.14%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=10 0.53 % ±1.61% ±2.14% ±2.78%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=2 -0.55 % ±1.31% ±1.74% ±2.27%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=20 -0.51 % ±1.70% ±2.26% ±2.95%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=3 0.39 % ±1.48% ±1.97% ±2.57%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=5 0.22 % ±1.26% ±1.68% ±2.19%events/ee-listener-count-on-prototype.js n=50000000 -0.95 % ±1.76% ±2.34% ±3.04%events/ee-listeners.js raw='false' listeners=5 n=5000000 1.05 % ±1.28% ±1.70% ±2.22%events/ee-listeners.js raw='false' listeners=50 n=5000000 -0.32 % ±0.52% ±0.69% ±0.90%events/ee-listeners.js raw='true' listeners=5 n=5000000 2.06 % ±2.25% ±3.00% ±3.93%events/ee-listeners.js raw='true' listeners=50 n=5000000 0.19 % ±0.64% ±0.86% ±1.11%events/ee-once.js argc=0 n=20000000 -0.55 % ±1.37% ±1.82% ±2.37%events/ee-once.js argc=1 n=20000000 0.71 % ±1.74% ±2.31% ±3.01%events/ee-once.js argc=4 n=20000000 -0.24 % ±1.77% ±2.36% ±3.07%events/ee-once.js argc=5 n=20000000 0.13 % ±1.31% ±1.75% ±2.28%events/eventtarget-add-remove-abort.js nListener=1 n=100000 1.87 % ±2.39% ±3.19% ±4.15%events/eventtarget-add-remove-abort.js nListener=10 n=100000 0.71 % ±1.48% ±1.97% ±2.57%events/eventtarget-add-remove-abort.js nListener=5 n=100000 0.59 % ±2.28% ±3.03% ±3.94%events/eventtarget-add-remove.js nListener=1 n=100000 -1.62 % ±2.94% ±3.91% ±5.11%events/eventtarget-add-remove.js nListener=10 n=100000 -0.48 % ±1.22% ±1.63% ±2.12%events/eventtarget-add-remove.js nListener=5 n=100000 0.67 % ±2.07% ±2.75% ±3.58%events/eventtarget-creation.js n=1000000 2.08 % ±4.94% ±6.60% ±8.65%events/eventtarget.js listeners=1 n=1000000 *** 19.23 % ±1.94% ±2.58% ±3.36%events/eventtarget.js listeners=10 n=1000000 *** 13.47 % ±1.09% ±1.46% ±1.90%events/eventtarget.js listeners=5 n=1000000 *** 14.48 % ±1.08% ±1.44% ±1.88%

@trivikr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@atlowChemi Looks like this is ready to merge.

@atlowChemiatlowChemi added commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. commit-queue-rebase PRs the Commit Queue should land as multiple self-contained commits. labels Aug 25, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Landed in e618b1b...984e46f

nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Aug 25, 2026
@slagiewka
slagiewka deleted the et branch August 25, 2026 08:17
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

author readyPRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments.commit-queue-rebasePRs the Commit Queue should land as multiple self-contained commits.needs-benchmark-ciPRs that need a benchmark CI run.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@slagiewka@avivkeller@atlowChemi@nodejs-github-bot@trivikr
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

events: inline hybrid dispatch closures - #64473

Closed
slagiewka wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
slagiewka:et
Closed

events: inline hybrid dispatch closures#64473
slagiewka wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
slagiewka:et

Conversation

@slagiewka

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

lib: inline createEvent hybrid dispatch closure

Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.

lib: inline iterationCondition hybrid dispatch closure

While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark (30 runs).

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. label Jul 13, 2026
@slagiewka

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Looks like the convention for commit scope here is either events or lib. I'm fine with both, LMK and I will rewrite these commits.

Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
@slagiewkaslagiewka changed the title lib: inline hybrid dispatch closuresevents: inline hybrid dispatch closuresJul 14, 2026
@avivkelleravivkeller added the needs-benchmark-ci PRs that need a benchmark CI run. label Jul 21, 2026
@avivkeller

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@nodejs/events

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.24%. Comparing base (384d7a4) to head (27fce3a).
⚠️ Report is 632 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #64473 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.21% 90.24% +0.03% 
==========================================
Files 741 741 Lines 241608 241680 +72 Branches 45534 45542 +8 ==========================================
+ Hits 217972 218110 +138 + Misses 15154 15112 -42 + Partials 8482 8458 -24 
Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
lib/internal/event_target.js99.17% <100.00%> (-0.01%)⬇️

... and 40 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@slagiewka

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@nodejs/events

@atlowChemiatlowChemi left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Assuming benchmarks support this

@atlowChemiatlowChemi added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 23, 2026
@atlowChemi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 23, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@trivikrtrivikr added the author ready PRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments. label Aug 23, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@trivikr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Benchmark CI: ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js%20benchmark/job/benchmark-node-micro-benchmarks/1888

Output from Benchmarking CI

 confidence improvement accuracy (*) (**) (***)events/ee-add-remove.js n=1000000 removeListener=0 newListener=0 -0.63 % ±1.28% ±1.70% ±2.22%events/ee-add-remove.js n=1000000 removeListener=0 newListener=1 -0.28 % ±1.11% ±1.48% ±1.93%events/ee-add-remove.js n=1000000 removeListener=1 newListener=0 -1.02 % ±1.04% ±1.38% ±1.80%events/ee-add-remove.js n=1000000 removeListener=1 newListener=1 -0.15 % ±1.10% ±1.47% ±1.91%events/ee-emit.js listeners=1 argc=0 n=2000000 ** 4.95 % ±3.70% ±4.94% ±6.45%events/ee-emit.js listeners=1 argc=10 n=2000000 ** 9.13 % ±5.51% ±7.33% ±9.55%events/ee-emit.js listeners=1 argc=2 n=2000000 4.57 % ±5.80% ±7.72% ±10.04%events/ee-emit.js listeners=1 argc=4 n=2000000 *** 10.33 % ±5.72% ±7.62% ±9.94%events/ee-emit.js listeners=10 argc=0 n=2000000 0.25 % ±1.13% ±1.50% ±1.96%events/ee-emit.js listeners=10 argc=10 n=2000000 ** 3.40 % ±2.22% ±2.97% ±3.90%events/ee-emit.js listeners=10 argc=2 n=2000000 -0.42 % ±1.49% ±1.98% ±2.57%events/ee-emit.js listeners=10 argc=4 n=2000000 1.19 % ±1.56% ±2.08% ±2.71%events/ee-emit.js listeners=5 argc=0 n=2000000 -0.40 % ±2.02% ±2.68% ±3.49%events/ee-emit.js listeners=5 argc=10 n=2000000 ** 4.01 % ±2.52% ±3.36% ±4.38%events/ee-emit.js listeners=5 argc=2 n=2000000 ** 3.27 % ±2.31% ±3.08% ±4.02%events/ee-emit.js listeners=5 argc=4 n=2000000 *** 4.70 % ±2.29% ±3.05% ±3.98%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=1 0.61 % ±1.23% ±1.64% ±2.14%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=10 0.53 % ±1.61% ±2.14% ±2.78%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=2 -0.55 % ±1.31% ±1.74% ±2.27%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=20 -0.51 % ±1.70% ±2.26% ±2.95%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=3 0.39 % ±1.48% ±1.97% ±2.57%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=5 0.22 % ±1.26% ±1.68% ±2.19%events/ee-listener-count-on-prototype.js n=50000000 -0.95 % ±1.76% ±2.34% ±3.04%events/ee-listeners.js raw='false' listeners=5 n=5000000 1.05 % ±1.28% ±1.70% ±2.22%events/ee-listeners.js raw='false' listeners=50 n=5000000 -0.32 % ±0.52% ±0.69% ±0.90%events/ee-listeners.js raw='true' listeners=5 n=5000000 2.06 % ±2.25% ±3.00% ±3.93%events/ee-listeners.js raw='true' listeners=50 n=5000000 0.19 % ±0.64% ±0.86% ±1.11%events/ee-once.js argc=0 n=20000000 -0.55 % ±1.37% ±1.82% ±2.37%events/ee-once.js argc=1 n=20000000 0.71 % ±1.74% ±2.31% ±3.01%events/ee-once.js argc=4 n=20000000 -0.24 % ±1.77% ±2.36% ±3.07%events/ee-once.js argc=5 n=20000000 0.13 % ±1.31% ±1.75% ±2.28%events/eventtarget-add-remove-abort.js nListener=1 n=100000 1.87 % ±2.39% ±3.19% ±4.15%events/eventtarget-add-remove-abort.js nListener=10 n=100000 0.71 % ±1.48% ±1.97% ±2.57%events/eventtarget-add-remove-abort.js nListener=5 n=100000 0.59 % ±2.28% ±3.03% ±3.94%events/eventtarget-add-remove.js nListener=1 n=100000 -1.62 % ±2.94% ±3.91% ±5.11%events/eventtarget-add-remove.js nListener=10 n=100000 -0.48 % ±1.22% ±1.63% ±2.12%events/eventtarget-add-remove.js nListener=5 n=100000 0.67 % ±2.07% ±2.75% ±3.58%events/eventtarget-creation.js n=1000000 2.08 % ±4.94% ±6.60% ±8.65%events/eventtarget.js listeners=1 n=1000000 *** 19.23 % ±1.94% ±2.58% ±3.36%events/eventtarget.js listeners=10 n=1000000 *** 13.47 % ±1.09% ±1.46% ±1.90%events/eventtarget.js listeners=5 n=1000000 *** 14.48 % ±1.08% ±1.44% ±1.88%

@trivikr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@atlowChemi Looks like this is ready to merge.

@atlowChemiatlowChemi added commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. commit-queue-rebase PRs the Commit Queue should land as multiple self-contained commits. labels Aug 25, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Landed in e618b1b...984e46f

nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Aug 25, 2026
@slagiewka
slagiewka deleted the et branch August 25, 2026 08:17
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

author readyPRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments.commit-queue-rebasePRs the Commit Queue should land as multiple self-contained commits.needs-benchmark-ciPRs that need a benchmark CI run.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@slagiewka@avivkeller@atlowChemi@nodejs-github-bot@trivikr
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

events: inline hybrid dispatch closures - #64473

Closed
slagiewka wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
slagiewka:et
Closed

events: inline hybrid dispatch closures#64473
slagiewka wants to merge 2 commits into
nodejs:mainfrom
slagiewka:et

Conversation

@slagiewka

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

lib: inline createEvent hybrid dispatch closure

Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.

lib: inline iterationCondition hybrid dispatch closure

While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark (30 runs).

@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. label Jul 13, 2026
@slagiewka

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Looks like the convention for commit scope here is either events or lib. I'm fine with both, LMK and I will rewrite these commits.

Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
@slagiewkaslagiewka changed the title lib: inline hybrid dispatch closuresevents: inline hybrid dispatch closuresJul 14, 2026
@avivkelleravivkeller added the needs-benchmark-ci PRs that need a benchmark CI run. label Jul 21, 2026
@avivkeller

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@nodejs/events

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jul 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.24%. Comparing base (384d7a4) to head (27fce3a).
⚠️ Report is 632 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #64473 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.21% 90.24% +0.03% 
==========================================
Files 741 741 Lines 241608 241680 +72 Branches 45534 45542 +8 ==========================================
+ Hits 217972 218110 +138 + Misses 15154 15112 -42 + Partials 8482 8458 -24 
Files with missing linesCoverage Δ
lib/internal/event_target.js99.17% <100.00%> (-0.01%)⬇️

... and 40 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@slagiewka

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@nodejs/events

@atlowChemiatlowChemi left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Assuming benchmarks support this

@atlowChemiatlowChemi added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 23, 2026
@atlowChemi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 23, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@trivikrtrivikr added the author ready PRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments. label Aug 23, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@trivikr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Benchmark CI: ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js%20benchmark/job/benchmark-node-micro-benchmarks/1888

Output from Benchmarking CI

 confidence improvement accuracy (*) (**) (***)events/ee-add-remove.js n=1000000 removeListener=0 newListener=0 -0.63 % ±1.28% ±1.70% ±2.22%events/ee-add-remove.js n=1000000 removeListener=0 newListener=1 -0.28 % ±1.11% ±1.48% ±1.93%events/ee-add-remove.js n=1000000 removeListener=1 newListener=0 -1.02 % ±1.04% ±1.38% ±1.80%events/ee-add-remove.js n=1000000 removeListener=1 newListener=1 -0.15 % ±1.10% ±1.47% ±1.91%events/ee-emit.js listeners=1 argc=0 n=2000000 ** 4.95 % ±3.70% ±4.94% ±6.45%events/ee-emit.js listeners=1 argc=10 n=2000000 ** 9.13 % ±5.51% ±7.33% ±9.55%events/ee-emit.js listeners=1 argc=2 n=2000000 4.57 % ±5.80% ±7.72% ±10.04%events/ee-emit.js listeners=1 argc=4 n=2000000 *** 10.33 % ±5.72% ±7.62% ±9.94%events/ee-emit.js listeners=10 argc=0 n=2000000 0.25 % ±1.13% ±1.50% ±1.96%events/ee-emit.js listeners=10 argc=10 n=2000000 ** 3.40 % ±2.22% ±2.97% ±3.90%events/ee-emit.js listeners=10 argc=2 n=2000000 -0.42 % ±1.49% ±1.98% ±2.57%events/ee-emit.js listeners=10 argc=4 n=2000000 1.19 % ±1.56% ±2.08% ±2.71%events/ee-emit.js listeners=5 argc=0 n=2000000 -0.40 % ±2.02% ±2.68% ±3.49%events/ee-emit.js listeners=5 argc=10 n=2000000 ** 4.01 % ±2.52% ±3.36% ±4.38%events/ee-emit.js listeners=5 argc=2 n=2000000 ** 3.27 % ±2.31% ±3.08% ±4.02%events/ee-emit.js listeners=5 argc=4 n=2000000 *** 4.70 % ±2.29% ±3.05% ±3.98%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=1 0.61 % ±1.23% ±1.64% ±2.14%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=10 0.53 % ±1.61% ±2.14% ±2.78%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=2 -0.55 % ±1.31% ±1.74% ±2.27%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=20 -0.51 % ±1.70% ±2.26% ±2.95%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=3 0.39 % ±1.48% ±1.97% ±2.57%events/ee-listen-unique.js n=1000000 events=5 0.22 % ±1.26% ±1.68% ±2.19%events/ee-listener-count-on-prototype.js n=50000000 -0.95 % ±1.76% ±2.34% ±3.04%events/ee-listeners.js raw='false' listeners=5 n=5000000 1.05 % ±1.28% ±1.70% ±2.22%events/ee-listeners.js raw='false' listeners=50 n=5000000 -0.32 % ±0.52% ±0.69% ±0.90%events/ee-listeners.js raw='true' listeners=5 n=5000000 2.06 % ±2.25% ±3.00% ±3.93%events/ee-listeners.js raw='true' listeners=50 n=5000000 0.19 % ±0.64% ±0.86% ±1.11%events/ee-once.js argc=0 n=20000000 -0.55 % ±1.37% ±1.82% ±2.37%events/ee-once.js argc=1 n=20000000 0.71 % ±1.74% ±2.31% ±3.01%events/ee-once.js argc=4 n=20000000 -0.24 % ±1.77% ±2.36% ±3.07%events/ee-once.js argc=5 n=20000000 0.13 % ±1.31% ±1.75% ±2.28%events/eventtarget-add-remove-abort.js nListener=1 n=100000 1.87 % ±2.39% ±3.19% ±4.15%events/eventtarget-add-remove-abort.js nListener=10 n=100000 0.71 % ±1.48% ±1.97% ±2.57%events/eventtarget-add-remove-abort.js nListener=5 n=100000 0.59 % ±2.28% ±3.03% ±3.94%events/eventtarget-add-remove.js nListener=1 n=100000 -1.62 % ±2.94% ±3.91% ±5.11%events/eventtarget-add-remove.js nListener=10 n=100000 -0.48 % ±1.22% ±1.63% ±2.12%events/eventtarget-add-remove.js nListener=5 n=100000 0.67 % ±2.07% ±2.75% ±3.58%events/eventtarget-creation.js n=1000000 2.08 % ±4.94% ±6.60% ±8.65%events/eventtarget.js listeners=1 n=1000000 *** 19.23 % ±1.94% ±2.58% ±3.36%events/eventtarget.js listeners=10 n=1000000 *** 13.47 % ±1.09% ±1.46% ±1.90%events/eventtarget.js listeners=5 n=1000000 *** 14.48 % ±1.08% ±1.44% ±1.88%

@trivikr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@atlowChemi Looks like this is ready to merge.

@atlowChemiatlowChemi added commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. commit-queue-rebase PRs the Commit Queue should land as multiple self-contained commits. labels Aug 25, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Landed in e618b1b...984e46f

nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
nodejs-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Aug 25, 2026
@slagiewka
slagiewka deleted the et branch August 25, 2026 08:17
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
Originally added in 16b11cd, it first
had three callers. Now there's only one branch requireing it.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2026
While more readable, the removed closure overhead unlocks 10-20% in
eventtarget.js benchmark.
Signed-off-by: Szymon Łągiewka <slagiewka@users.noreply.github.com>
PR-URL: #64473
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

author readyPRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments.commit-queue-rebasePRs the Commit Queue should land as multiple self-contained commits.needs-benchmark-ciPRs that need a benchmark CI run.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@slagiewka@avivkeller@atlowChemi@nodejs-github-bot@trivikr