test: replace `forEach()` with `for...of` in parallel tests by pmarkert · Pull Request #65272 · nodejs/node

pmarkert · 2026-08-13T21:51:14Z

test: replace forEach() with for...of in parallel tests

Replace Array.prototype.forEach() with for...of loops across 17
tests in test/parallel, so each loop body reads as a plain statement
rather than an arrow callback.

None of the iterated values are sparse arrays, the one case where
forEach and for...of genuinely differ, so both constructs visit the
same elements in the same order. No callback relied on this, an early
return, or async behaviour, and the number of assertions run in each
file is unchanged.

Replace `Array.prototype.forEach()` with `for...of` loops across 17 tests in `test/parallel`, so each loop body reads as a plain statement rather than an arrow callback. None of the iterated values are sparse arrays, the one case where `forEach` and `for...of` genuinely differ, so both constructs visit the same elements in the same order. No callback relied on `this`, an early return, or async behaviour, and the number of assertions run in each file is unchanged. Signed-off-by: Phillip Markert <phillip@ephisys.com>

nodejs-github-bot · 2026-08-13T22:21:18Z

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/75821/ 💛

jasnell · 2026-08-14T01:15:43Z

Awesome! This passed CI and will be ready to land. If there's another sign off, it can land after 48 hours of opening. If no one else signs off, then it will be one week. But otherwise, it is ready to go. Thank you for participating in the code and learn!

Ethan-Arrowood

Great work!

codecov · 2026-08-15T16:38:38Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.33%. Comparing base (1662b69) to head (f51f69b).
⚠️ Report is 29 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #65272 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.31% 90.33% +0.02% 
==========================================
Files 751 751 Lines 249776 249840 +64 Branches 47173 47188 +15 ==========================================
+ Hits 225587 225697 +110 + Misses 15585 15533 -52 - Partials 8604 8610 +6

see 42 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

nodejs-github-bot · 2026-08-15T21:59:46Z

Landed in 86c871e

Replace `Array.prototype.forEach()` with `for...of` loops across 17 tests in `test/parallel`, so each loop body reads as a plain statement rather than an arrow callback. None of the iterated values are sparse arrays, the one case where `forEach` and `for...of` genuinely differ, so both constructs visit the same elements in the same order. No callback relied on `this`, an early return, or async behaviour, and the number of assertions run in each file is unchanged. Signed-off-by: Phillip Markert <phillip@ephisys.com> PR-URL: #65272 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh> Reviewed-By: Ethan Arrowood <ethan@arrowood.dev>

pmarkert · 2026-08-13T21:51:14Z

test: replace forEach() with for...of in parallel tests

Replace Array.prototype.forEach() with for...of loops across 17
tests in test/parallel, so each loop body reads as a plain statement
rather than an arrow callback.

None of the iterated values are sparse arrays, the one case where
forEach and for...of genuinely differ, so both constructs visit the
same elements in the same order. No callback relied on this, an early
return, or async behaviour, and the number of assertions run in each
file is unchanged.

Replace `Array.prototype.forEach()` with `for...of` loops across 17 tests in `test/parallel`, so each loop body reads as a plain statement rather than an arrow callback. None of the iterated values are sparse arrays, the one case where `forEach` and `for...of` genuinely differ, so both constructs visit the same elements in the same order. No callback relied on `this`, an early return, or async behaviour, and the number of assertions run in each file is unchanged. Signed-off-by: Phillip Markert <phillip@ephisys.com>

nodejs-github-bot · 2026-08-13T22:21:18Z

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/75821/ 💛

jasnell · 2026-08-14T01:15:43Z

Awesome! This passed CI and will be ready to land. If there's another sign off, it can land after 48 hours of opening. If no one else signs off, then it will be one week. But otherwise, it is ready to go. Thank you for participating in the code and learn!

Ethan-Arrowood

Great work!

codecov · 2026-08-15T16:38:38Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.33%. Comparing base (1662b69) to head (f51f69b).
⚠️ Report is 29 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #65272 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.31% 90.33% +0.02% 
==========================================
Files 751 751 Lines 249776 249840 +64 Branches 47173 47188 +15 ==========================================
+ Hits 225587 225697 +110 + Misses 15585 15533 -52 - Partials 8604 8610 +6

see 42 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

nodejs-github-bot · 2026-08-15T21:59:46Z

Landed in 86c871e

Replace `Array.prototype.forEach()` with `for...of` loops across 17 tests in `test/parallel`, so each loop body reads as a plain statement rather than an arrow callback. None of the iterated values are sparse arrays, the one case where `forEach` and `for...of` genuinely differ, so both constructs visit the same elements in the same order. No callback relied on `this`, an early return, or async behaviour, and the number of assertions run in each file is unchanged. Signed-off-by: Phillip Markert <phillip@ephisys.com> PR-URL: #65272 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh> Reviewed-By: Ethan Arrowood <ethan@arrowood.dev>

pmarkert · 2026-08-13T21:51:14Z

test: replace forEach() with for...of in parallel tests

Replace Array.prototype.forEach() with for...of loops across 17
tests in test/parallel, so each loop body reads as a plain statement
rather than an arrow callback.

None of the iterated values are sparse arrays, the one case where
forEach and for...of genuinely differ, so both constructs visit the
same elements in the same order. No callback relied on this, an early
return, or async behaviour, and the number of assertions run in each
file is unchanged.

Replace `Array.prototype.forEach()` with `for...of` loops across 17 tests in `test/parallel`, so each loop body reads as a plain statement rather than an arrow callback. None of the iterated values are sparse arrays, the one case where `forEach` and `for...of` genuinely differ, so both constructs visit the same elements in the same order. No callback relied on `this`, an early return, or async behaviour, and the number of assertions run in each file is unchanged. Signed-off-by: Phillip Markert <phillip@ephisys.com>

nodejs-github-bot · 2026-08-13T22:21:18Z

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/75821/ 💛

jasnell · 2026-08-14T01:15:43Z

Awesome! This passed CI and will be ready to land. If there's another sign off, it can land after 48 hours of opening. If no one else signs off, then it will be one week. But otherwise, it is ready to go. Thank you for participating in the code and learn!

Ethan-Arrowood

Great work!

codecov · 2026-08-15T16:38:38Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.33%. Comparing base (1662b69) to head (f51f69b).
⚠️ Report is 29 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #65272 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.31% 90.33% +0.02% 
==========================================
Files 751 751 Lines 249776 249840 +64 Branches 47173 47188 +15 ==========================================
+ Hits 225587 225697 +110 + Misses 15585 15533 -52 - Partials 8604 8610 +6

see 42 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

nodejs-github-bot · 2026-08-15T21:59:46Z

Landed in 86c871e

Replace `Array.prototype.forEach()` with `for...of` loops across 17 tests in `test/parallel`, so each loop body reads as a plain statement rather than an arrow callback. None of the iterated values are sparse arrays, the one case where `forEach` and `for...of` genuinely differ, so both constructs visit the same elements in the same order. No callback relied on `this`, an early return, or async behaviour, and the number of assertions run in each file is unchanged. Signed-off-by: Phillip Markert <phillip@ephisys.com> PR-URL: #65272 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh> Reviewed-By: Ethan Arrowood <ethan@arrowood.dev>

pmarkert · 2026-08-13T21:51:14Z

test: replace forEach() with for...of in parallel tests

Replace Array.prototype.forEach() with for...of loops across 17
tests in test/parallel, so each loop body reads as a plain statement
rather than an arrow callback.

None of the iterated values are sparse arrays, the one case where
forEach and for...of genuinely differ, so both constructs visit the
same elements in the same order. No callback relied on this, an early
return, or async behaviour, and the number of assertions run in each
file is unchanged.

Replace `Array.prototype.forEach()` with `for...of` loops across 17 tests in `test/parallel`, so each loop body reads as a plain statement rather than an arrow callback. None of the iterated values are sparse arrays, the one case where `forEach` and `for...of` genuinely differ, so both constructs visit the same elements in the same order. No callback relied on `this`, an early return, or async behaviour, and the number of assertions run in each file is unchanged. Signed-off-by: Phillip Markert <phillip@ephisys.com>

nodejs-github-bot · 2026-08-13T22:21:18Z

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/75821/ 💛

jasnell · 2026-08-14T01:15:43Z

Awesome! This passed CI and will be ready to land. If there's another sign off, it can land after 48 hours of opening. If no one else signs off, then it will be one week. But otherwise, it is ready to go. Thank you for participating in the code and learn!

Ethan-Arrowood

Great work!

codecov · 2026-08-15T16:38:38Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.33%. Comparing base (1662b69) to head (f51f69b).
⚠️ Report is 29 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #65272 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.31% 90.33% +0.02% 
==========================================
Files 751 751 Lines 249776 249840 +64 Branches 47173 47188 +15 ==========================================
+ Hits 225587 225697 +110 + Misses 15585 15533 -52 - Partials 8604 8610 +6

see 42 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

nodejs-github-bot · 2026-08-15T21:59:46Z

Landed in 86c871e

Replace `Array.prototype.forEach()` with `for...of` loops across 17 tests in `test/parallel`, so each loop body reads as a plain statement rather than an arrow callback. None of the iterated values are sparse arrays, the one case where `forEach` and `for...of` genuinely differ, so both constructs visit the same elements in the same order. No callback relied on `this`, an early return, or async behaviour, and the number of assertions run in each file is unchanged. Signed-off-by: Phillip Markert <phillip@ephisys.com> PR-URL: #65272 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh> Reviewed-By: Ethan Arrowood <ethan@arrowood.dev>

pmarkert · 2026-08-13T21:51:14Z

test: replace forEach() with for...of in parallel tests

Replace Array.prototype.forEach() with for...of loops across 17
tests in test/parallel, so each loop body reads as a plain statement
rather than an arrow callback.

None of the iterated values are sparse arrays, the one case where
forEach and for...of genuinely differ, so both constructs visit the
same elements in the same order. No callback relied on this, an early
return, or async behaviour, and the number of assertions run in each
file is unchanged.

Replace `Array.prototype.forEach()` with `for...of` loops across 17 tests in `test/parallel`, so each loop body reads as a plain statement rather than an arrow callback. None of the iterated values are sparse arrays, the one case where `forEach` and `for...of` genuinely differ, so both constructs visit the same elements in the same order. No callback relied on `this`, an early return, or async behaviour, and the number of assertions run in each file is unchanged. Signed-off-by: Phillip Markert <phillip@ephisys.com>

nodejs-github-bot · 2026-08-13T22:21:18Z

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/75821/ 💛

jasnell · 2026-08-14T01:15:43Z

Awesome! This passed CI and will be ready to land. If there's another sign off, it can land after 48 hours of opening. If no one else signs off, then it will be one week. But otherwise, it is ready to go. Thank you for participating in the code and learn!

Ethan-Arrowood

Great work!

codecov · 2026-08-15T16:38:38Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.33%. Comparing base (1662b69) to head (f51f69b).
⚠️ Report is 29 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #65272 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.31% 90.33% +0.02% 
==========================================
Files 751 751 Lines 249776 249840 +64 Branches 47173 47188 +15 ==========================================
+ Hits 225587 225697 +110 + Misses 15585 15533 -52 - Partials 8604 8610 +6

see 42 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

nodejs-github-bot · 2026-08-15T21:59:46Z

Landed in 86c871e

Replace `Array.prototype.forEach()` with `for...of` loops across 17 tests in `test/parallel`, so each loop body reads as a plain statement rather than an arrow callback. None of the iterated values are sparse arrays, the one case where `forEach` and `for...of` genuinely differ, so both constructs visit the same elements in the same order. No callback relied on `this`, an early return, or async behaviour, and the number of assertions run in each file is unchanged. Signed-off-by: Phillip Markert <phillip@ephisys.com> PR-URL: #65272 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh> Reviewed-By: Ethan Arrowood <ethan@arrowood.dev>

pmarkert · 2026-08-13T21:51:14Z

test: replace forEach() with for...of in parallel tests

Replace Array.prototype.forEach() with for...of loops across 17
tests in test/parallel, so each loop body reads as a plain statement
rather than an arrow callback.

None of the iterated values are sparse arrays, the one case where
forEach and for...of genuinely differ, so both constructs visit the
same elements in the same order. No callback relied on this, an early
return, or async behaviour, and the number of assertions run in each
file is unchanged.

Replace `Array.prototype.forEach()` with `for...of` loops across 17 tests in `test/parallel`, so each loop body reads as a plain statement rather than an arrow callback. None of the iterated values are sparse arrays, the one case where `forEach` and `for...of` genuinely differ, so both constructs visit the same elements in the same order. No callback relied on `this`, an early return, or async behaviour, and the number of assertions run in each file is unchanged. Signed-off-by: Phillip Markert <phillip@ephisys.com>

nodejs-github-bot · 2026-08-13T22:21:18Z

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/75821/ 💛

jasnell · 2026-08-14T01:15:43Z

Awesome! This passed CI and will be ready to land. If there's another sign off, it can land after 48 hours of opening. If no one else signs off, then it will be one week. But otherwise, it is ready to go. Thank you for participating in the code and learn!

Ethan-Arrowood

Great work!

codecov · 2026-08-15T16:38:38Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.33%. Comparing base (1662b69) to head (f51f69b).
⚠️ Report is 29 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #65272 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.31% 90.33% +0.02% 
==========================================
Files 751 751 Lines 249776 249840 +64 Branches 47173 47188 +15 ==========================================
+ Hits 225587 225697 +110 + Misses 15585 15533 -52 - Partials 8604 8610 +6

see 42 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

nodejs-github-bot · 2026-08-15T21:59:46Z

Landed in 86c871e

Replace `Array.prototype.forEach()` with `for...of` loops across 17 tests in `test/parallel`, so each loop body reads as a plain statement rather than an arrow callback. None of the iterated values are sparse arrays, the one case where `forEach` and `for...of` genuinely differ, so both constructs visit the same elements in the same order. No callback relied on `this`, an early return, or async behaviour, and the number of assertions run in each file is unchanged. Signed-off-by: Phillip Markert <phillip@ephisys.com> PR-URL: #65272 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh> Reviewed-By: Ethan Arrowood <ethan@arrowood.dev>

pmarkert · 2026-08-13T21:51:14Z

test: replace forEach() with for...of in parallel tests

Replace Array.prototype.forEach() with for...of loops across 17
tests in test/parallel, so each loop body reads as a plain statement
rather than an arrow callback.

None of the iterated values are sparse arrays, the one case where
forEach and for...of genuinely differ, so both constructs visit the
same elements in the same order. No callback relied on this, an early
return, or async behaviour, and the number of assertions run in each
file is unchanged.

Replace `Array.prototype.forEach()` with `for...of` loops across 17 tests in `test/parallel`, so each loop body reads as a plain statement rather than an arrow callback. None of the iterated values are sparse arrays, the one case where `forEach` and `for...of` genuinely differ, so both constructs visit the same elements in the same order. No callback relied on `this`, an early return, or async behaviour, and the number of assertions run in each file is unchanged. Signed-off-by: Phillip Markert <phillip@ephisys.com>

nodejs-github-bot · 2026-08-13T22:21:18Z

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/75821/ 💛

jasnell · 2026-08-14T01:15:43Z

Awesome! This passed CI and will be ready to land. If there's another sign off, it can land after 48 hours of opening. If no one else signs off, then it will be one week. But otherwise, it is ready to go. Thank you for participating in the code and learn!

Ethan-Arrowood

Great work!

codecov · 2026-08-15T16:38:38Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.33%. Comparing base (1662b69) to head (f51f69b).
⚠️ Report is 29 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #65272 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.31% 90.33% +0.02% 
==========================================
Files 751 751 Lines 249776 249840 +64 Branches 47173 47188 +15 ==========================================
+ Hits 225587 225697 +110 + Misses 15585 15533 -52 - Partials 8604 8610 +6

see 42 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

nodejs-github-bot · 2026-08-15T21:59:46Z

Landed in 86c871e

Replace `Array.prototype.forEach()` with `for...of` loops across 17 tests in `test/parallel`, so each loop body reads as a plain statement rather than an arrow callback. None of the iterated values are sparse arrays, the one case where `forEach` and `for...of` genuinely differ, so both constructs visit the same elements in the same order. No callback relied on `this`, an early return, or async behaviour, and the number of assertions run in each file is unchanged. Signed-off-by: Phillip Markert <phillip@ephisys.com> PR-URL: #65272 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh> Reviewed-By: Ethan Arrowood <ethan@arrowood.dev>

pmarkert · 2026-08-13T21:51:14Z

test: replace forEach() with for...of in parallel tests

Replace Array.prototype.forEach() with for...of loops across 17
tests in test/parallel, so each loop body reads as a plain statement
rather than an arrow callback.

None of the iterated values are sparse arrays, the one case where
forEach and for...of genuinely differ, so both constructs visit the
same elements in the same order. No callback relied on this, an early
return, or async behaviour, and the number of assertions run in each
file is unchanged.

Replace `Array.prototype.forEach()` with `for...of` loops across 17 tests in `test/parallel`, so each loop body reads as a plain statement rather than an arrow callback. None of the iterated values are sparse arrays, the one case where `forEach` and `for...of` genuinely differ, so both constructs visit the same elements in the same order. No callback relied on `this`, an early return, or async behaviour, and the number of assertions run in each file is unchanged. Signed-off-by: Phillip Markert <phillip@ephisys.com>

nodejs-github-bot · 2026-08-13T22:21:18Z

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/75821/ 💛

jasnell · 2026-08-14T01:15:43Z

Awesome! This passed CI and will be ready to land. If there's another sign off, it can land after 48 hours of opening. If no one else signs off, then it will be one week. But otherwise, it is ready to go. Thank you for participating in the code and learn!

Ethan-Arrowood

Great work!

codecov · 2026-08-15T16:38:38Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.33%. Comparing base (1662b69) to head (f51f69b).
⚠️ Report is 29 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #65272 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 90.31% 90.33% +0.02% 
==========================================
Files 751 751 Lines 249776 249840 +64 Branches 47173 47188 +15 ==========================================
+ Hits 225587 225697 +110 + Misses 15585 15533 -52 - Partials 8604 8610 +6

see 42 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

nodejs-github-bot · 2026-08-15T21:59:46Z

Landed in 86c871e

Replace `Array.prototype.forEach()` with `for...of` loops across 17 tests in `test/parallel`, so each loop body reads as a plain statement rather than an arrow callback. None of the iterated values are sparse arrays, the one case where `forEach` and `for...of` genuinely differ, so both constructs visit the same elements in the same order. No callback relied on `this`, an early return, or async behaviour, and the number of assertions run in each file is unchanged. Signed-off-by: Phillip Markert <phillip@ephisys.com> PR-URL: #65272 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Aviv Keller <me@aviv.sh> Reviewed-By: Ethan Arrowood <ethan@arrowood.dev>

nodejs-github-bot added needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to Node.js core tests and test infrastructure. labels Aug 13, 2026

jasnell added the code-and-learn Issues related to the Code-and-Learn events and PRs submitted during the events. label Aug 13, 2026

jasnell approved these changes Aug 13, 2026
View reviewed changes

jasnell added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 13, 2026

github-actionsBot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Aug 13, 2026

jasnell added the author ready PRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments. label Aug 14, 2026

avivkeller approved these changes Aug 14, 2026
View reviewed changes

Ethan-Arrowood approved these changes Aug 14, 2026
View reviewed changes

avivkeller added request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. and removed request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. labels Aug 15, 2026

nodejs-github-bot merged commit 86c871e into nodejs:mainAug 15, 2026
92 checks passed

nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Aug 15, 2026

github-actionsBot mentioned this pull request Aug 25, 2026
2026-08-26, Version 26.8.0 (Current) #65551
Merged