lib: use validateArray for array arguments - #65344

Closed
DevJunz wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
DevJunz:lib/validate-array-followup
Closed

lib: use validateArray for array arguments#65344
DevJunz wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
DevJunz:lib/validate-array-followup

Conversation

@DevJunz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Follow-up to #64959: replace the three remaining ArrayIsArray checks in
histogram.js and blocklist.js with validateArray(). The thrown error
is identical β€” validateArray throws the same
ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE(name, 'Array', value), and its minLength branch
cannot trigger at the default of 0.

The existing tests only asserted the error code, so this also adds
assertions on the exact error messages at all three call sites. They pass
both before and after the change.

Other similar sites in lib/ throw different expected-type strings and
are intentionally left alone.

Refs: #64959

Three call sites still duplicated the ArrayIsArray check that
validateArray already performs. Both files were already importing other
validators next to these checks. The error code, argument name and
expected type are unchanged, so the thrown error stays identical.
The ArrayIsArray primordial is no longer used in histogram.js and is
dropped from its destructuring; blocklist.js still uses it elsewhere.
The existing tests only asserted the error code, so assertions covering
the full error message are added for all three call sites. They pass
both before and after this change.
Refs: nodejs#64959
Assisted-by: claude:fable-5
Signed-off-by: JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. label Aug 17, 2026
@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

βœ… All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
βœ… Project coverage is 90.13%. Comparing base (26398a9) to head (6bebdc2).
⚠️ Report is 120 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #65344 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 90.13% 90.13% =======================================
Files 752 752 Lines 251569 251604 +35 Branches 47264 47272 +8 =======================================
+ Hits 226745 226790 +45 + Misses 16181 16164 -17 - Partials 8643 8650 +7 
Files with missing linesCoverage Ξ”
lib/internal/blocklist.js94.70% <100.00%> (-0.05%)⬇️
lib/internal/histogram.js94.76% <100.00%> (-0.01%)⬇️

... and 35 files with indirect coverage changes

πŸš€ New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • πŸ“¦ JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@atlowChemiatlowChemi added the author ready PRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments. label Aug 17, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@atlowChemiatlowChemi added the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Aug 22, 2026
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added commit-queue-failed PRs whose Commit Queue landing failed and need manual intervention before retrying. and removed commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. labels Aug 22, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Commit Queue failed

 ⚠ Could not retrieve the email or name of the PR author's from user's GitHub profile!
✘ GitHub CI is still running

The pull request was removed from the Commit Queue and labeled commit-queue-failedPRs whose Commit Queue landing failed and need manual intervention before retrying. . After resolving the failure, remove that label and add commit-queuePRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. to retry.

Full Commit Queue output
- Loading data for nodejs/node/pull/65344
βœ” Done loading data for nodejs/node/pull/65344
----------------------------------- PR info ------------------------------------
Title lib: use validateArray for array arguments (#65344)
⚠ Could not retrieve the email or name of the PR author's from user's GitHub profile!
Branch DevJunz:lib/validate-array-followup -> nodejs:main
Labels author ready, needs-ci, commit-queue
Commits 1
- lib: use validateArray for array arguments
Committers 1
- JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/64959
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
------------------------------ Generated metadata ------------------------------
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/64959
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
β„Ή This PR was created on Mon, 17 Aug 2026 05:18:37 GMT
βœ” Approvals: 3
βœ” - James M Snell (@jasnell) (TSC): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344#pullrequestreview-4951952871
βœ” - Chemi Atlow (@atlowChemi): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344#pullrequestreview-4952974308
βœ” - Luigi Pinca (@lpinca): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344#pullrequestreview-4953475083
✘ GitHub CI is still running
β„Ή Last Full PR CI on 2026-08-21T00:16:23Z: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/76093/
- Querying data for job/node-test-pull-request/76093/
βœ” Build data downloaded
βœ” Last Jenkins CI successful
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
βœ” Aborted `git node land` session in /home/runner/work/node/node/.ncu

View workflow run

@trivikrtrivikr removed the commit-queue-failed PRs whose Commit Queue landing failed and need manual intervention before retrying. label Aug 22, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

trivikr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Three call sites still duplicated the ArrayIsArray check that
validateArray already performs. Both files were already importing other
validators next to these checks. The error code, argument name and
expected type are unchanged, so the thrown error stays identical.
The ArrayIsArray primordial is no longer used in histogram.js and is
dropped from its destructuring; blocklist.js still uses it elsewhere.
The existing tests only asserted the error code, so assertions covering
the full error message are added for all three call sites. They pass
both before and after this change.
Refs: #64959
Assisted-by: claude:fable-5
Signed-off-by: JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65344
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
@trivikr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Landed in 96b1293

@trivikrtrivikr closed this Aug 25, 2026
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2026
Three call sites still duplicated the ArrayIsArray check that
validateArray already performs. Both files were already importing other
validators next to these checks. The error code, argument name and
expected type are unchanged, so the thrown error stays identical.
The ArrayIsArray primordial is no longer used in histogram.js and is
dropped from its destructuring; blocklist.js still uses it elsewhere.
The existing tests only asserted the error code, so assertions covering
the full error message are added for all three call sites. They pass
both before and after this change.
Refs: #64959
Assisted-by: claude:fable-5
Signed-off-by: JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65344
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2026
Three call sites still duplicated the ArrayIsArray check that
validateArray already performs. Both files were already importing other
validators next to these checks. The error code, argument name and
expected type are unchanged, so the thrown error stays identical.
The ArrayIsArray primordial is no longer used in histogram.js and is
dropped from its destructuring; blocklist.js still uses it elsewhere.
The existing tests only asserted the error code, so assertions covering
the full error message are added for all three call sites. They pass
both before and after this change.
Refs: #64959
Assisted-by: claude:fable-5
Signed-off-by: JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65344
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

author readyPRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@DevJunz@nodejs-github-bot@trivikr@jasnell@lpinca@atlowChemi
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

lib: use validateArray for array arguments - #65344

Closed
DevJunz wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
DevJunz:lib/validate-array-followup
Closed

lib: use validateArray for array arguments#65344
DevJunz wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
DevJunz:lib/validate-array-followup

Conversation

@DevJunz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Follow-up to #64959: replace the three remaining ArrayIsArray checks in
histogram.js and blocklist.js with validateArray(). The thrown error
is identical β€” validateArray throws the same
ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE(name, 'Array', value), and its minLength branch
cannot trigger at the default of 0.

The existing tests only asserted the error code, so this also adds
assertions on the exact error messages at all three call sites. They pass
both before and after the change.

Other similar sites in lib/ throw different expected-type strings and
are intentionally left alone.

Refs: #64959

Three call sites still duplicated the ArrayIsArray check that
validateArray already performs. Both files were already importing other
validators next to these checks. The error code, argument name and
expected type are unchanged, so the thrown error stays identical.
The ArrayIsArray primordial is no longer used in histogram.js and is
dropped from its destructuring; blocklist.js still uses it elsewhere.
The existing tests only asserted the error code, so assertions covering
the full error message are added for all three call sites. They pass
both before and after this change.
Refs: nodejs#64959
Assisted-by: claude:fable-5
Signed-off-by: JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. label Aug 17, 2026
@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

βœ… All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
βœ… Project coverage is 90.13%. Comparing base (26398a9) to head (6bebdc2).
⚠️ Report is 120 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #65344 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 90.13% 90.13% =======================================
Files 752 752 Lines 251569 251604 +35 Branches 47264 47272 +8 =======================================
+ Hits 226745 226790 +45 + Misses 16181 16164 -17 - Partials 8643 8650 +7 
Files with missing linesCoverage Ξ”
lib/internal/blocklist.js94.70% <100.00%> (-0.05%)⬇️
lib/internal/histogram.js94.76% <100.00%> (-0.01%)⬇️

... and 35 files with indirect coverage changes

πŸš€ New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • πŸ“¦ JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@atlowChemiatlowChemi added the author ready PRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments. label Aug 17, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@atlowChemiatlowChemi added the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Aug 22, 2026
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added commit-queue-failed PRs whose Commit Queue landing failed and need manual intervention before retrying. and removed commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. labels Aug 22, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Commit Queue failed

 ⚠ Could not retrieve the email or name of the PR author's from user's GitHub profile!
✘ GitHub CI is still running

The pull request was removed from the Commit Queue and labeled commit-queue-failedPRs whose Commit Queue landing failed and need manual intervention before retrying. . After resolving the failure, remove that label and add commit-queuePRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. to retry.

Full Commit Queue output
- Loading data for nodejs/node/pull/65344
βœ” Done loading data for nodejs/node/pull/65344
----------------------------------- PR info ------------------------------------
Title lib: use validateArray for array arguments (#65344)
⚠ Could not retrieve the email or name of the PR author's from user's GitHub profile!
Branch DevJunz:lib/validate-array-followup -> nodejs:main
Labels author ready, needs-ci, commit-queue
Commits 1
- lib: use validateArray for array arguments
Committers 1
- JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/64959
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
------------------------------ Generated metadata ------------------------------
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/64959
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
β„Ή This PR was created on Mon, 17 Aug 2026 05:18:37 GMT
βœ” Approvals: 3
βœ” - James M Snell (@jasnell) (TSC): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344#pullrequestreview-4951952871
βœ” - Chemi Atlow (@atlowChemi): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344#pullrequestreview-4952974308
βœ” - Luigi Pinca (@lpinca): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344#pullrequestreview-4953475083
✘ GitHub CI is still running
β„Ή Last Full PR CI on 2026-08-21T00:16:23Z: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/76093/
- Querying data for job/node-test-pull-request/76093/
βœ” Build data downloaded
βœ” Last Jenkins CI successful
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
βœ” Aborted `git node land` session in /home/runner/work/node/node/.ncu

View workflow run

@trivikrtrivikr removed the commit-queue-failed PRs whose Commit Queue landing failed and need manual intervention before retrying. label Aug 22, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

trivikr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Three call sites still duplicated the ArrayIsArray check that
validateArray already performs. Both files were already importing other
validators next to these checks. The error code, argument name and
expected type are unchanged, so the thrown error stays identical.
The ArrayIsArray primordial is no longer used in histogram.js and is
dropped from its destructuring; blocklist.js still uses it elsewhere.
The existing tests only asserted the error code, so assertions covering
the full error message are added for all three call sites. They pass
both before and after this change.
Refs: #64959
Assisted-by: claude:fable-5
Signed-off-by: JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65344
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
@trivikr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Landed in 96b1293

@trivikrtrivikr closed this Aug 25, 2026
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2026
Three call sites still duplicated the ArrayIsArray check that
validateArray already performs. Both files were already importing other
validators next to these checks. The error code, argument name and
expected type are unchanged, so the thrown error stays identical.
The ArrayIsArray primordial is no longer used in histogram.js and is
dropped from its destructuring; blocklist.js still uses it elsewhere.
The existing tests only asserted the error code, so assertions covering
the full error message are added for all three call sites. They pass
both before and after this change.
Refs: #64959
Assisted-by: claude:fable-5
Signed-off-by: JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65344
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2026
Three call sites still duplicated the ArrayIsArray check that
validateArray already performs. Both files were already importing other
validators next to these checks. The error code, argument name and
expected type are unchanged, so the thrown error stays identical.
The ArrayIsArray primordial is no longer used in histogram.js and is
dropped from its destructuring; blocklist.js still uses it elsewhere.
The existing tests only asserted the error code, so assertions covering
the full error message are added for all three call sites. They pass
both before and after this change.
Refs: #64959
Assisted-by: claude:fable-5
Signed-off-by: JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65344
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

author readyPRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@DevJunz@nodejs-github-bot@trivikr@jasnell@lpinca@atlowChemi
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

lib: use validateArray for array arguments - #65344

Closed
DevJunz wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
DevJunz:lib/validate-array-followup
Closed

lib: use validateArray for array arguments#65344
DevJunz wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
DevJunz:lib/validate-array-followup

Conversation

@DevJunz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Follow-up to #64959: replace the three remaining ArrayIsArray checks in
histogram.js and blocklist.js with validateArray(). The thrown error
is identical β€” validateArray throws the same
ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE(name, 'Array', value), and its minLength branch
cannot trigger at the default of 0.

The existing tests only asserted the error code, so this also adds
assertions on the exact error messages at all three call sites. They pass
both before and after the change.

Other similar sites in lib/ throw different expected-type strings and
are intentionally left alone.

Refs: #64959

Three call sites still duplicated the ArrayIsArray check that
validateArray already performs. Both files were already importing other
validators next to these checks. The error code, argument name and
expected type are unchanged, so the thrown error stays identical.
The ArrayIsArray primordial is no longer used in histogram.js and is
dropped from its destructuring; blocklist.js still uses it elsewhere.
The existing tests only asserted the error code, so assertions covering
the full error message are added for all three call sites. They pass
both before and after this change.
Refs: nodejs#64959
Assisted-by: claude:fable-5
Signed-off-by: JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. label Aug 17, 2026
@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

βœ… All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
βœ… Project coverage is 90.13%. Comparing base (26398a9) to head (6bebdc2).
⚠️ Report is 120 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #65344 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 90.13% 90.13% =======================================
Files 752 752 Lines 251569 251604 +35 Branches 47264 47272 +8 =======================================
+ Hits 226745 226790 +45 + Misses 16181 16164 -17 - Partials 8643 8650 +7 
Files with missing linesCoverage Ξ”
lib/internal/blocklist.js94.70% <100.00%> (-0.05%)⬇️
lib/internal/histogram.js94.76% <100.00%> (-0.01%)⬇️

... and 35 files with indirect coverage changes

πŸš€ New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • πŸ“¦ JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@atlowChemiatlowChemi added the author ready PRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments. label Aug 17, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@atlowChemiatlowChemi added the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Aug 22, 2026
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added commit-queue-failed PRs whose Commit Queue landing failed and need manual intervention before retrying. and removed commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. labels Aug 22, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Commit Queue failed

 ⚠ Could not retrieve the email or name of the PR author's from user's GitHub profile!
✘ GitHub CI is still running

The pull request was removed from the Commit Queue and labeled commit-queue-failedPRs whose Commit Queue landing failed and need manual intervention before retrying. . After resolving the failure, remove that label and add commit-queuePRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. to retry.

Full Commit Queue output
- Loading data for nodejs/node/pull/65344
βœ” Done loading data for nodejs/node/pull/65344
----------------------------------- PR info ------------------------------------
Title lib: use validateArray for array arguments (#65344)
⚠ Could not retrieve the email or name of the PR author's from user's GitHub profile!
Branch DevJunz:lib/validate-array-followup -> nodejs:main
Labels author ready, needs-ci, commit-queue
Commits 1
- lib: use validateArray for array arguments
Committers 1
- JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/64959
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
------------------------------ Generated metadata ------------------------------
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/64959
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
β„Ή This PR was created on Mon, 17 Aug 2026 05:18:37 GMT
βœ” Approvals: 3
βœ” - James M Snell (@jasnell) (TSC): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344#pullrequestreview-4951952871
βœ” - Chemi Atlow (@atlowChemi): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344#pullrequestreview-4952974308
βœ” - Luigi Pinca (@lpinca): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344#pullrequestreview-4953475083
✘ GitHub CI is still running
β„Ή Last Full PR CI on 2026-08-21T00:16:23Z: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/76093/
- Querying data for job/node-test-pull-request/76093/
βœ” Build data downloaded
βœ” Last Jenkins CI successful
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
βœ” Aborted `git node land` session in /home/runner/work/node/node/.ncu

View workflow run

@trivikrtrivikr removed the commit-queue-failed PRs whose Commit Queue landing failed and need manual intervention before retrying. label Aug 22, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

trivikr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Three call sites still duplicated the ArrayIsArray check that
validateArray already performs. Both files were already importing other
validators next to these checks. The error code, argument name and
expected type are unchanged, so the thrown error stays identical.
The ArrayIsArray primordial is no longer used in histogram.js and is
dropped from its destructuring; blocklist.js still uses it elsewhere.
The existing tests only asserted the error code, so assertions covering
the full error message are added for all three call sites. They pass
both before and after this change.
Refs: #64959
Assisted-by: claude:fable-5
Signed-off-by: JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65344
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
@trivikr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Landed in 96b1293

@trivikrtrivikr closed this Aug 25, 2026
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2026
Three call sites still duplicated the ArrayIsArray check that
validateArray already performs. Both files were already importing other
validators next to these checks. The error code, argument name and
expected type are unchanged, so the thrown error stays identical.
The ArrayIsArray primordial is no longer used in histogram.js and is
dropped from its destructuring; blocklist.js still uses it elsewhere.
The existing tests only asserted the error code, so assertions covering
the full error message are added for all three call sites. They pass
both before and after this change.
Refs: #64959
Assisted-by: claude:fable-5
Signed-off-by: JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65344
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2026
Three call sites still duplicated the ArrayIsArray check that
validateArray already performs. Both files were already importing other
validators next to these checks. The error code, argument name and
expected type are unchanged, so the thrown error stays identical.
The ArrayIsArray primordial is no longer used in histogram.js and is
dropped from its destructuring; blocklist.js still uses it elsewhere.
The existing tests only asserted the error code, so assertions covering
the full error message are added for all three call sites. They pass
both before and after this change.
Refs: #64959
Assisted-by: claude:fable-5
Signed-off-by: JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65344
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

author readyPRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@DevJunz@nodejs-github-bot@trivikr@jasnell@lpinca@atlowChemi
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

lib: use validateArray for array arguments - #65344

Closed
DevJunz wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
DevJunz:lib/validate-array-followup
Closed

lib: use validateArray for array arguments#65344
DevJunz wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
DevJunz:lib/validate-array-followup

Conversation

@DevJunz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Follow-up to #64959: replace the three remaining ArrayIsArray checks in
histogram.js and blocklist.js with validateArray(). The thrown error
is identical β€” validateArray throws the same
ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE(name, 'Array', value), and its minLength branch
cannot trigger at the default of 0.

The existing tests only asserted the error code, so this also adds
assertions on the exact error messages at all three call sites. They pass
both before and after the change.

Other similar sites in lib/ throw different expected-type strings and
are intentionally left alone.

Refs: #64959

Three call sites still duplicated the ArrayIsArray check that
validateArray already performs. Both files were already importing other
validators next to these checks. The error code, argument name and
expected type are unchanged, so the thrown error stays identical.
The ArrayIsArray primordial is no longer used in histogram.js and is
dropped from its destructuring; blocklist.js still uses it elsewhere.
The existing tests only asserted the error code, so assertions covering
the full error message are added for all three call sites. They pass
both before and after this change.
Refs: nodejs#64959
Assisted-by: claude:fable-5
Signed-off-by: JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. label Aug 17, 2026
@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

βœ… All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
βœ… Project coverage is 90.13%. Comparing base (26398a9) to head (6bebdc2).
⚠️ Report is 120 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #65344 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 90.13% 90.13% =======================================
Files 752 752 Lines 251569 251604 +35 Branches 47264 47272 +8 =======================================
+ Hits 226745 226790 +45 + Misses 16181 16164 -17 - Partials 8643 8650 +7 
Files with missing linesCoverage Ξ”
lib/internal/blocklist.js94.70% <100.00%> (-0.05%)⬇️
lib/internal/histogram.js94.76% <100.00%> (-0.01%)⬇️

... and 35 files with indirect coverage changes

πŸš€ New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • πŸ“¦ JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@atlowChemiatlowChemi added the author ready PRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments. label Aug 17, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@atlowChemiatlowChemi added the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Aug 22, 2026
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added commit-queue-failed PRs whose Commit Queue landing failed and need manual intervention before retrying. and removed commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. labels Aug 22, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Commit Queue failed

 ⚠ Could not retrieve the email or name of the PR author's from user's GitHub profile!
✘ GitHub CI is still running

The pull request was removed from the Commit Queue and labeled commit-queue-failedPRs whose Commit Queue landing failed and need manual intervention before retrying. . After resolving the failure, remove that label and add commit-queuePRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. to retry.

Full Commit Queue output
- Loading data for nodejs/node/pull/65344
βœ” Done loading data for nodejs/node/pull/65344
----------------------------------- PR info ------------------------------------
Title lib: use validateArray for array arguments (#65344)
⚠ Could not retrieve the email or name of the PR author's from user's GitHub profile!
Branch DevJunz:lib/validate-array-followup -> nodejs:main
Labels author ready, needs-ci, commit-queue
Commits 1
- lib: use validateArray for array arguments
Committers 1
- JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/64959
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
------------------------------ Generated metadata ------------------------------
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/64959
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
β„Ή This PR was created on Mon, 17 Aug 2026 05:18:37 GMT
βœ” Approvals: 3
βœ” - James M Snell (@jasnell) (TSC): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344#pullrequestreview-4951952871
βœ” - Chemi Atlow (@atlowChemi): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344#pullrequestreview-4952974308
βœ” - Luigi Pinca (@lpinca): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344#pullrequestreview-4953475083
✘ GitHub CI is still running
β„Ή Last Full PR CI on 2026-08-21T00:16:23Z: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/76093/
- Querying data for job/node-test-pull-request/76093/
βœ” Build data downloaded
βœ” Last Jenkins CI successful
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
βœ” Aborted `git node land` session in /home/runner/work/node/node/.ncu

View workflow run

@trivikrtrivikr removed the commit-queue-failed PRs whose Commit Queue landing failed and need manual intervention before retrying. label Aug 22, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

trivikr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Three call sites still duplicated the ArrayIsArray check that
validateArray already performs. Both files were already importing other
validators next to these checks. The error code, argument name and
expected type are unchanged, so the thrown error stays identical.
The ArrayIsArray primordial is no longer used in histogram.js and is
dropped from its destructuring; blocklist.js still uses it elsewhere.
The existing tests only asserted the error code, so assertions covering
the full error message are added for all three call sites. They pass
both before and after this change.
Refs: #64959
Assisted-by: claude:fable-5
Signed-off-by: JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65344
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
@trivikr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Landed in 96b1293

@trivikrtrivikr closed this Aug 25, 2026
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2026
Three call sites still duplicated the ArrayIsArray check that
validateArray already performs. Both files were already importing other
validators next to these checks. The error code, argument name and
expected type are unchanged, so the thrown error stays identical.
The ArrayIsArray primordial is no longer used in histogram.js and is
dropped from its destructuring; blocklist.js still uses it elsewhere.
The existing tests only asserted the error code, so assertions covering
the full error message are added for all three call sites. They pass
both before and after this change.
Refs: #64959
Assisted-by: claude:fable-5
Signed-off-by: JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65344
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2026
Three call sites still duplicated the ArrayIsArray check that
validateArray already performs. Both files were already importing other
validators next to these checks. The error code, argument name and
expected type are unchanged, so the thrown error stays identical.
The ArrayIsArray primordial is no longer used in histogram.js and is
dropped from its destructuring; blocklist.js still uses it elsewhere.
The existing tests only asserted the error code, so assertions covering
the full error message are added for all three call sites. They pass
both before and after this change.
Refs: #64959
Assisted-by: claude:fable-5
Signed-off-by: JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65344
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

author readyPRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@DevJunz@nodejs-github-bot@trivikr@jasnell@lpinca@atlowChemi
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

lib: use validateArray for array arguments - #65344

Closed
DevJunz wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
DevJunz:lib/validate-array-followup
Closed

lib: use validateArray for array arguments#65344
DevJunz wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
DevJunz:lib/validate-array-followup

Conversation

@DevJunz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Follow-up to #64959: replace the three remaining ArrayIsArray checks in
histogram.js and blocklist.js with validateArray(). The thrown error
is identical β€” validateArray throws the same
ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE(name, 'Array', value), and its minLength branch
cannot trigger at the default of 0.

The existing tests only asserted the error code, so this also adds
assertions on the exact error messages at all three call sites. They pass
both before and after the change.

Other similar sites in lib/ throw different expected-type strings and
are intentionally left alone.

Refs: #64959

Three call sites still duplicated the ArrayIsArray check that
validateArray already performs. Both files were already importing other
validators next to these checks. The error code, argument name and
expected type are unchanged, so the thrown error stays identical.
The ArrayIsArray primordial is no longer used in histogram.js and is
dropped from its destructuring; blocklist.js still uses it elsewhere.
The existing tests only asserted the error code, so assertions covering
the full error message are added for all three call sites. They pass
both before and after this change.
Refs: nodejs#64959
Assisted-by: claude:fable-5
Signed-off-by: JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. label Aug 17, 2026
@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

βœ… All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
βœ… Project coverage is 90.13%. Comparing base (26398a9) to head (6bebdc2).
⚠️ Report is 120 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #65344 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 90.13% 90.13% =======================================
Files 752 752 Lines 251569 251604 +35 Branches 47264 47272 +8 =======================================
+ Hits 226745 226790 +45 + Misses 16181 16164 -17 - Partials 8643 8650 +7 
Files with missing linesCoverage Ξ”
lib/internal/blocklist.js94.70% <100.00%> (-0.05%)⬇️
lib/internal/histogram.js94.76% <100.00%> (-0.01%)⬇️

... and 35 files with indirect coverage changes

πŸš€ New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • πŸ“¦ JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@atlowChemiatlowChemi added the author ready PRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments. label Aug 17, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@atlowChemiatlowChemi added the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Aug 22, 2026
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added commit-queue-failed PRs whose Commit Queue landing failed and need manual intervention before retrying. and removed commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. labels Aug 22, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Commit Queue failed

 ⚠ Could not retrieve the email or name of the PR author's from user's GitHub profile!
✘ GitHub CI is still running

The pull request was removed from the Commit Queue and labeled commit-queue-failedPRs whose Commit Queue landing failed and need manual intervention before retrying. . After resolving the failure, remove that label and add commit-queuePRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. to retry.

Full Commit Queue output
- Loading data for nodejs/node/pull/65344
βœ” Done loading data for nodejs/node/pull/65344
----------------------------------- PR info ------------------------------------
Title lib: use validateArray for array arguments (#65344)
⚠ Could not retrieve the email or name of the PR author's from user's GitHub profile!
Branch DevJunz:lib/validate-array-followup -> nodejs:main
Labels author ready, needs-ci, commit-queue
Commits 1
- lib: use validateArray for array arguments
Committers 1
- JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/64959
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
------------------------------ Generated metadata ------------------------------
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/64959
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
β„Ή This PR was created on Mon, 17 Aug 2026 05:18:37 GMT
βœ” Approvals: 3
βœ” - James M Snell (@jasnell) (TSC): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344#pullrequestreview-4951952871
βœ” - Chemi Atlow (@atlowChemi): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344#pullrequestreview-4952974308
βœ” - Luigi Pinca (@lpinca): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344#pullrequestreview-4953475083
✘ GitHub CI is still running
β„Ή Last Full PR CI on 2026-08-21T00:16:23Z: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/76093/
- Querying data for job/node-test-pull-request/76093/
βœ” Build data downloaded
βœ” Last Jenkins CI successful
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
βœ” Aborted `git node land` session in /home/runner/work/node/node/.ncu

View workflow run

@trivikrtrivikr removed the commit-queue-failed PRs whose Commit Queue landing failed and need manual intervention before retrying. label Aug 22, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

trivikr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Three call sites still duplicated the ArrayIsArray check that
validateArray already performs. Both files were already importing other
validators next to these checks. The error code, argument name and
expected type are unchanged, so the thrown error stays identical.
The ArrayIsArray primordial is no longer used in histogram.js and is
dropped from its destructuring; blocklist.js still uses it elsewhere.
The existing tests only asserted the error code, so assertions covering
the full error message are added for all three call sites. They pass
both before and after this change.
Refs: #64959
Assisted-by: claude:fable-5
Signed-off-by: JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65344
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
@trivikr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Landed in 96b1293

@trivikrtrivikr closed this Aug 25, 2026
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2026
Three call sites still duplicated the ArrayIsArray check that
validateArray already performs. Both files were already importing other
validators next to these checks. The error code, argument name and
expected type are unchanged, so the thrown error stays identical.
The ArrayIsArray primordial is no longer used in histogram.js and is
dropped from its destructuring; blocklist.js still uses it elsewhere.
The existing tests only asserted the error code, so assertions covering
the full error message are added for all three call sites. They pass
both before and after this change.
Refs: #64959
Assisted-by: claude:fable-5
Signed-off-by: JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65344
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2026
Three call sites still duplicated the ArrayIsArray check that
validateArray already performs. Both files were already importing other
validators next to these checks. The error code, argument name and
expected type are unchanged, so the thrown error stays identical.
The ArrayIsArray primordial is no longer used in histogram.js and is
dropped from its destructuring; blocklist.js still uses it elsewhere.
The existing tests only asserted the error code, so assertions covering
the full error message are added for all three call sites. They pass
both before and after this change.
Refs: #64959
Assisted-by: claude:fable-5
Signed-off-by: JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65344
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

author readyPRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@DevJunz@nodejs-github-bot@trivikr@jasnell@lpinca@atlowChemi
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

lib: use validateArray for array arguments - #65344

Closed
DevJunz wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
DevJunz:lib/validate-array-followup
Closed

lib: use validateArray for array arguments#65344
DevJunz wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
DevJunz:lib/validate-array-followup

Conversation

@DevJunz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Follow-up to #64959: replace the three remaining ArrayIsArray checks in
histogram.js and blocklist.js with validateArray(). The thrown error
is identical β€” validateArray throws the same
ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE(name, 'Array', value), and its minLength branch
cannot trigger at the default of 0.

The existing tests only asserted the error code, so this also adds
assertions on the exact error messages at all three call sites. They pass
both before and after the change.

Other similar sites in lib/ throw different expected-type strings and
are intentionally left alone.

Refs: #64959

Three call sites still duplicated the ArrayIsArray check that
validateArray already performs. Both files were already importing other
validators next to these checks. The error code, argument name and
expected type are unchanged, so the thrown error stays identical.
The ArrayIsArray primordial is no longer used in histogram.js and is
dropped from its destructuring; blocklist.js still uses it elsewhere.
The existing tests only asserted the error code, so assertions covering
the full error message are added for all three call sites. They pass
both before and after this change.
Refs: nodejs#64959
Assisted-by: claude:fable-5
Signed-off-by: JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. label Aug 17, 2026
@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

βœ… All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
βœ… Project coverage is 90.13%. Comparing base (26398a9) to head (6bebdc2).
⚠️ Report is 120 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #65344 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 90.13% 90.13% =======================================
Files 752 752 Lines 251569 251604 +35 Branches 47264 47272 +8 =======================================
+ Hits 226745 226790 +45 + Misses 16181 16164 -17 - Partials 8643 8650 +7 
Files with missing linesCoverage Ξ”
lib/internal/blocklist.js94.70% <100.00%> (-0.05%)⬇️
lib/internal/histogram.js94.76% <100.00%> (-0.01%)⬇️

... and 35 files with indirect coverage changes

πŸš€ New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • πŸ“¦ JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@atlowChemiatlowChemi added the author ready PRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments. label Aug 17, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@atlowChemiatlowChemi added the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Aug 22, 2026
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added commit-queue-failed PRs whose Commit Queue landing failed and need manual intervention before retrying. and removed commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. labels Aug 22, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Commit Queue failed

 ⚠ Could not retrieve the email or name of the PR author's from user's GitHub profile!
✘ GitHub CI is still running

The pull request was removed from the Commit Queue and labeled commit-queue-failedPRs whose Commit Queue landing failed and need manual intervention before retrying. . After resolving the failure, remove that label and add commit-queuePRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. to retry.

Full Commit Queue output
- Loading data for nodejs/node/pull/65344
βœ” Done loading data for nodejs/node/pull/65344
----------------------------------- PR info ------------------------------------
Title lib: use validateArray for array arguments (#65344)
⚠ Could not retrieve the email or name of the PR author's from user's GitHub profile!
Branch DevJunz:lib/validate-array-followup -> nodejs:main
Labels author ready, needs-ci, commit-queue
Commits 1
- lib: use validateArray for array arguments
Committers 1
- JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/64959
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
------------------------------ Generated metadata ------------------------------
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/64959
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
β„Ή This PR was created on Mon, 17 Aug 2026 05:18:37 GMT
βœ” Approvals: 3
βœ” - James M Snell (@jasnell) (TSC): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344#pullrequestreview-4951952871
βœ” - Chemi Atlow (@atlowChemi): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344#pullrequestreview-4952974308
βœ” - Luigi Pinca (@lpinca): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344#pullrequestreview-4953475083
✘ GitHub CI is still running
β„Ή Last Full PR CI on 2026-08-21T00:16:23Z: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/76093/
- Querying data for job/node-test-pull-request/76093/
βœ” Build data downloaded
βœ” Last Jenkins CI successful
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
βœ” Aborted `git node land` session in /home/runner/work/node/node/.ncu

View workflow run

@trivikrtrivikr removed the commit-queue-failed PRs whose Commit Queue landing failed and need manual intervention before retrying. label Aug 22, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

trivikr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Three call sites still duplicated the ArrayIsArray check that
validateArray already performs. Both files were already importing other
validators next to these checks. The error code, argument name and
expected type are unchanged, so the thrown error stays identical.
The ArrayIsArray primordial is no longer used in histogram.js and is
dropped from its destructuring; blocklist.js still uses it elsewhere.
The existing tests only asserted the error code, so assertions covering
the full error message are added for all three call sites. They pass
both before and after this change.
Refs: #64959
Assisted-by: claude:fable-5
Signed-off-by: JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65344
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
@trivikr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Landed in 96b1293

@trivikrtrivikr closed this Aug 25, 2026
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2026
Three call sites still duplicated the ArrayIsArray check that
validateArray already performs. Both files were already importing other
validators next to these checks. The error code, argument name and
expected type are unchanged, so the thrown error stays identical.
The ArrayIsArray primordial is no longer used in histogram.js and is
dropped from its destructuring; blocklist.js still uses it elsewhere.
The existing tests only asserted the error code, so assertions covering
the full error message are added for all three call sites. They pass
both before and after this change.
Refs: #64959
Assisted-by: claude:fable-5
Signed-off-by: JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65344
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2026
Three call sites still duplicated the ArrayIsArray check that
validateArray already performs. Both files were already importing other
validators next to these checks. The error code, argument name and
expected type are unchanged, so the thrown error stays identical.
The ArrayIsArray primordial is no longer used in histogram.js and is
dropped from its destructuring; blocklist.js still uses it elsewhere.
The existing tests only asserted the error code, so assertions covering
the full error message are added for all three call sites. They pass
both before and after this change.
Refs: #64959
Assisted-by: claude:fable-5
Signed-off-by: JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65344
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

author readyPRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@DevJunz@nodejs-github-bot@trivikr@jasnell@lpinca@atlowChemi
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

lib: use validateArray for array arguments - #65344

Closed
DevJunz wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
DevJunz:lib/validate-array-followup
Closed

lib: use validateArray for array arguments#65344
DevJunz wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
DevJunz:lib/validate-array-followup

Conversation

@DevJunz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Follow-up to #64959: replace the three remaining ArrayIsArray checks in
histogram.js and blocklist.js with validateArray(). The thrown error
is identical β€” validateArray throws the same
ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE(name, 'Array', value), and its minLength branch
cannot trigger at the default of 0.

The existing tests only asserted the error code, so this also adds
assertions on the exact error messages at all three call sites. They pass
both before and after the change.

Other similar sites in lib/ throw different expected-type strings and
are intentionally left alone.

Refs: #64959

Three call sites still duplicated the ArrayIsArray check that
validateArray already performs. Both files were already importing other
validators next to these checks. The error code, argument name and
expected type are unchanged, so the thrown error stays identical.
The ArrayIsArray primordial is no longer used in histogram.js and is
dropped from its destructuring; blocklist.js still uses it elsewhere.
The existing tests only asserted the error code, so assertions covering
the full error message are added for all three call sites. They pass
both before and after this change.
Refs: nodejs#64959
Assisted-by: claude:fable-5
Signed-off-by: JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. label Aug 17, 2026
@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

βœ… All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
βœ… Project coverage is 90.13%. Comparing base (26398a9) to head (6bebdc2).
⚠️ Report is 120 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #65344 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 90.13% 90.13% =======================================
Files 752 752 Lines 251569 251604 +35 Branches 47264 47272 +8 =======================================
+ Hits 226745 226790 +45 + Misses 16181 16164 -17 - Partials 8643 8650 +7 
Files with missing linesCoverage Ξ”
lib/internal/blocklist.js94.70% <100.00%> (-0.05%)⬇️
lib/internal/histogram.js94.76% <100.00%> (-0.01%)⬇️

... and 35 files with indirect coverage changes

πŸš€ New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • πŸ“¦ JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@atlowChemiatlowChemi added the author ready PRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments. label Aug 17, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@atlowChemiatlowChemi added the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Aug 22, 2026
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added commit-queue-failed PRs whose Commit Queue landing failed and need manual intervention before retrying. and removed commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. labels Aug 22, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Commit Queue failed

 ⚠ Could not retrieve the email or name of the PR author's from user's GitHub profile!
✘ GitHub CI is still running

The pull request was removed from the Commit Queue and labeled commit-queue-failedPRs whose Commit Queue landing failed and need manual intervention before retrying. . After resolving the failure, remove that label and add commit-queuePRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. to retry.

Full Commit Queue output
- Loading data for nodejs/node/pull/65344
βœ” Done loading data for nodejs/node/pull/65344
----------------------------------- PR info ------------------------------------
Title lib: use validateArray for array arguments (#65344)
⚠ Could not retrieve the email or name of the PR author's from user's GitHub profile!
Branch DevJunz:lib/validate-array-followup -> nodejs:main
Labels author ready, needs-ci, commit-queue
Commits 1
- lib: use validateArray for array arguments
Committers 1
- JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/64959
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
------------------------------ Generated metadata ------------------------------
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/64959
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
β„Ή This PR was created on Mon, 17 Aug 2026 05:18:37 GMT
βœ” Approvals: 3
βœ” - James M Snell (@jasnell) (TSC): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344#pullrequestreview-4951952871
βœ” - Chemi Atlow (@atlowChemi): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344#pullrequestreview-4952974308
βœ” - Luigi Pinca (@lpinca): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344#pullrequestreview-4953475083
✘ GitHub CI is still running
β„Ή Last Full PR CI on 2026-08-21T00:16:23Z: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/76093/
- Querying data for job/node-test-pull-request/76093/
βœ” Build data downloaded
βœ” Last Jenkins CI successful
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
βœ” Aborted `git node land` session in /home/runner/work/node/node/.ncu

View workflow run

@trivikrtrivikr removed the commit-queue-failed PRs whose Commit Queue landing failed and need manual intervention before retrying. label Aug 22, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

trivikr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Three call sites still duplicated the ArrayIsArray check that
validateArray already performs. Both files were already importing other
validators next to these checks. The error code, argument name and
expected type are unchanged, so the thrown error stays identical.
The ArrayIsArray primordial is no longer used in histogram.js and is
dropped from its destructuring; blocklist.js still uses it elsewhere.
The existing tests only asserted the error code, so assertions covering
the full error message are added for all three call sites. They pass
both before and after this change.
Refs: #64959
Assisted-by: claude:fable-5
Signed-off-by: JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65344
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
@trivikr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Landed in 96b1293

@trivikrtrivikr closed this Aug 25, 2026
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2026
Three call sites still duplicated the ArrayIsArray check that
validateArray already performs. Both files were already importing other
validators next to these checks. The error code, argument name and
expected type are unchanged, so the thrown error stays identical.
The ArrayIsArray primordial is no longer used in histogram.js and is
dropped from its destructuring; blocklist.js still uses it elsewhere.
The existing tests only asserted the error code, so assertions covering
the full error message are added for all three call sites. They pass
both before and after this change.
Refs: #64959
Assisted-by: claude:fable-5
Signed-off-by: JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65344
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2026
Three call sites still duplicated the ArrayIsArray check that
validateArray already performs. Both files were already importing other
validators next to these checks. The error code, argument name and
expected type are unchanged, so the thrown error stays identical.
The ArrayIsArray primordial is no longer used in histogram.js and is
dropped from its destructuring; blocklist.js still uses it elsewhere.
The existing tests only asserted the error code, so assertions covering
the full error message are added for all three call sites. They pass
both before and after this change.
Refs: #64959
Assisted-by: claude:fable-5
Signed-off-by: JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65344
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

author readyPRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@DevJunz@nodejs-github-bot@trivikr@jasnell@lpinca@atlowChemi
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

lib: use validateArray for array arguments - #65344

Closed
DevJunz wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
DevJunz:lib/validate-array-followup
Closed

lib: use validateArray for array arguments#65344
DevJunz wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
DevJunz:lib/validate-array-followup

Conversation

@DevJunz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Follow-up to #64959: replace the three remaining ArrayIsArray checks in
histogram.js and blocklist.js with validateArray(). The thrown error
is identical β€” validateArray throws the same
ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE(name, 'Array', value), and its minLength branch
cannot trigger at the default of 0.

The existing tests only asserted the error code, so this also adds
assertions on the exact error messages at all three call sites. They pass
both before and after the change.

Other similar sites in lib/ throw different expected-type strings and
are intentionally left alone.

Refs: #64959

Three call sites still duplicated the ArrayIsArray check that
validateArray already performs. Both files were already importing other
validators next to these checks. The error code, argument name and
expected type are unchanged, so the thrown error stays identical.
The ArrayIsArray primordial is no longer used in histogram.js and is
dropped from its destructuring; blocklist.js still uses it elsewhere.
The existing tests only asserted the error code, so assertions covering
the full error message are added for all three call sites. They pass
both before and after this change.
Refs: nodejs#64959
Assisted-by: claude:fable-5
Signed-off-by: JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. label Aug 17, 2026
@codecov

codecovBot commented Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

βœ… All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
βœ… Project coverage is 90.13%. Comparing base (26398a9) to head (6bebdc2).
⚠️ Report is 120 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@## main #65344 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 90.13% 90.13% =======================================
Files 752 752 Lines 251569 251604 +35 Branches 47264 47272 +8 =======================================
+ Hits 226745 226790 +45 + Misses 16181 16164 -17 - Partials 8643 8650 +7 
Files with missing linesCoverage Ξ”
lib/internal/blocklist.js94.70% <100.00%> (-0.05%)⬇️
lib/internal/histogram.js94.76% <100.00%> (-0.01%)⬇️

... and 35 files with indirect coverage changes

πŸš€ New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • πŸ“¦ JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@atlowChemiatlowChemi added the author ready PRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments. label Aug 17, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@atlowChemiatlowChemi added the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Aug 22, 2026
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added commit-queue-failed PRs whose Commit Queue landing failed and need manual intervention before retrying. and removed commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. labels Aug 22, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Commit Queue failed

 ⚠ Could not retrieve the email or name of the PR author's from user's GitHub profile!
✘ GitHub CI is still running

The pull request was removed from the Commit Queue and labeled commit-queue-failedPRs whose Commit Queue landing failed and need manual intervention before retrying. . After resolving the failure, remove that label and add commit-queuePRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. to retry.

Full Commit Queue output
- Loading data for nodejs/node/pull/65344
βœ” Done loading data for nodejs/node/pull/65344
----------------------------------- PR info ------------------------------------
Title lib: use validateArray for array arguments (#65344)
⚠ Could not retrieve the email or name of the PR author's from user's GitHub profile!
Branch DevJunz:lib/validate-array-followup -> nodejs:main
Labels author ready, needs-ci, commit-queue
Commits 1
- lib: use validateArray for array arguments
Committers 1
- JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/64959
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
------------------------------ Generated metadata ------------------------------
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/64959
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
β„Ή This PR was created on Mon, 17 Aug 2026 05:18:37 GMT
βœ” Approvals: 3
βœ” - James M Snell (@jasnell) (TSC): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344#pullrequestreview-4951952871
βœ” - Chemi Atlow (@atlowChemi): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344#pullrequestreview-4952974308
βœ” - Luigi Pinca (@lpinca): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/65344#pullrequestreview-4953475083
✘ GitHub CI is still running
β„Ή Last Full PR CI on 2026-08-21T00:16:23Z: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/76093/
- Querying data for job/node-test-pull-request/76093/
βœ” Build data downloaded
βœ” Last Jenkins CI successful
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
βœ” Aborted `git node land` session in /home/runner/work/node/node/.ncu

View workflow run

@trivikrtrivikr removed the commit-queue-failed PRs whose Commit Queue landing failed and need manual intervention before retrying. label Aug 22, 2026
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

trivikr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2026
Three call sites still duplicated the ArrayIsArray check that
validateArray already performs. Both files were already importing other
validators next to these checks. The error code, argument name and
expected type are unchanged, so the thrown error stays identical.
The ArrayIsArray primordial is no longer used in histogram.js and is
dropped from its destructuring; blocklist.js still uses it elsewhere.
The existing tests only asserted the error code, so assertions covering
the full error message are added for all three call sites. They pass
both before and after this change.
Refs: #64959
Assisted-by: claude:fable-5
Signed-off-by: JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65344
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
@trivikr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Landed in 96b1293

@trivikrtrivikr closed this Aug 25, 2026
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2026
Three call sites still duplicated the ArrayIsArray check that
validateArray already performs. Both files were already importing other
validators next to these checks. The error code, argument name and
expected type are unchanged, so the thrown error stays identical.
The ArrayIsArray primordial is no longer used in histogram.js and is
dropped from its destructuring; blocklist.js still uses it elsewhere.
The existing tests only asserted the error code, so assertions covering
the full error message are added for all three call sites. They pass
both before and after this change.
Refs: #64959
Assisted-by: claude:fable-5
Signed-off-by: JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65344
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2026
Three call sites still duplicated the ArrayIsArray check that
validateArray already performs. Both files were already importing other
validators next to these checks. The error code, argument name and
expected type are unchanged, so the thrown error stays identical.
The ArrayIsArray primordial is no longer used in histogram.js and is
dropped from its destructuring; blocklist.js still uses it elsewhere.
The existing tests only asserted the error code, so assertions covering
the full error message are added for all three call sites. They pass
both before and after this change.
Refs: #64959
Assisted-by: claude:fable-5
Signed-off-by: JunHwan Choi <devjunsday@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #65344
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

author readyPRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments.needs-ciPRs that need a full CI run.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@DevJunz@nodejs-github-bot@trivikr@jasnell@lpinca@atlowChemi