Skip to content

test: fix test-debugger-repl-term - #6682

Closed
Trott wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
Trott:dogpatch
Closed

test: fix test-debugger-repl-term#6682
Trott wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
Trott:dogpatch

Conversation

@Trott

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member
Checklist
  • tests and code linting passes
  • the commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

test debugger

Description of change

test-debugger-repl-term had incorrect expected output and so was
failing. It was likely dependent on previous bugs in the debugger.
The fixture file has been modified so that the output is as expected.

test-debugger-repl-term had incorrect expected output and so was
failing. It was likely dependent on previous bugs in the debugger.
The fixture file has been modified so that the output is as expected.
@TrottTrott added debugger test Issues and PRs related to the tests. labels May 11, 2016
@Trott

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@nodejs/testing

@santigimeno

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It passes in my box with this change. LGTM.
Maybe we could move the test to parallel as it's not specially slow.

@bnoordhuis

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM, passes for me locally as well with your change.

I second moving to sequential or parallel. It doesn't appear to be flaky (common issue with the debugger tests); I ran it a few hundred times in a loop and it never failed.

@Trott

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

@Trott

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Single failure in CI seems unrelated, but just in case:

https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/2616/

@Trott

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

And this time, the only failure was a buildbot explosion. Landing...

Trott added a commit to Trott/io.js that referenced this pull request May 13, 2016
test-debugger-repl-term had incorrect expected output and so was
failing. It was likely dependent on previous bugs in the debugger.
The fixture file has been modified so that the output is as expected.
PR-URL: nodejs#6682
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noorhduis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
@Trott

Copy link
Copy Markdown
MemberAuthor

Landed in 991ce2d

@TrottTrott closed this May 13, 2016
evanlucas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2016
test-debugger-repl-term had incorrect expected output and so was
failing. It was likely dependent on previous bugs in the debugger.
The fixture file has been modified so that the output is as expected.
PR-URL: #6682
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noorhduis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2016
test-debugger-repl-term had incorrect expected output and so was
failing. It was likely dependent on previous bugs in the debugger.
The fixture file has been modified so that the output is as expected.
PR-URL: #6682
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noorhduis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2016
test-debugger-repl-term had incorrect expected output and so was
failing. It was likely dependent on previous bugs in the debugger.
The fixture file has been modified so that the output is as expected.
PR-URL: #6682
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noorhduis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
@MylesBorinsMylesBorins mentioned this pull request Jun 24, 2016
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2016
test-debugger-repl-term had incorrect expected output and so was
failing. It was likely dependent on previous bugs in the debugger.
The fixture file has been modified so that the output is as expected.
PR-URL: #6682
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noorhduis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2016
test-debugger-repl-term had incorrect expected output and so was
failing. It was likely dependent on previous bugs in the debugger.
The fixture file has been modified so that the output is as expected.
PR-URL: #6682
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noorhduis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
@Trott
Trott deleted the dogpatch branch January 13, 2022 22:43
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

testIssues and PRs related to the tests.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@Trott@santigimeno@bnoordhuis@MylesBorins