Skip to content

meta: clarify collaborators & ctc members relationships - #7996

Closed
yorkie wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
yorkie:improve/readme
Closed

meta: clarify collaborators & ctc members relationships#7996
yorkie wants to merge 1 commit into
nodejs:masterfrom
yorkie:improve/readme

Conversation

@yorkie

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
Checklist
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

meta

Description of change

Clarifying collaborators & ctc members relationships inspired by this conversation
#7183 (comment)

This patches only the README, so I removed test relevant checks :-)

R= @jasnell

@yorkieyorkie added the meta Issues and PRs related to the general management of the project. label Aug 6, 2016
@nodejs-github-botnodejs-github-bot added the doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. label Aug 6, 2016
@yorkieyorkie mentioned this pull request Aug 6, 2016
2 tasks
@jasnell

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM! Thank you!

Comment threadREADME.md Outdated

@ChALkeRChALkeRAug 6, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Something is wrong on this line. Perhaps, Collaborators (including CTC members)? Also, why is would needed here? Also not sure about Therefore.

@yorkie

yorkie commented Aug 6, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Fixed nits by @ChALkeR and still leave the word Therefore, thank you :-)

Comment threadREADME.md Outdated

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's a comma splice in there and a personal pronoun that should be removed. I'd simplify the whole sentence to just this:

Note that all CTC members are also Collaboartors.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, I'd suggest removing all the added text and just changing the original sentence from starting with Collaborators & CTC members follow... to Collaborators (which includes CTC members) follow...

@yorkie

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Fixed again @Trott

Comment threadREADME.md Outdated

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

& CTC members is probably not needed here.

@yorkie

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Fixed @ChALkeR :-)

@Trott

Trott commented Aug 7, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

LGTM

@yorkie

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Rebased commits to d743a8b, I will land it after 48 hours without running CI because this only patches README which is not covered by any tests, if CI is still required to run, tell me please :-)

BTW, ping @ChALkeR is this pr looks good to you?

@ChALkeR

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@yorkie Yes, it does LGTM. Note that I'm not a native English speaker, though, so my LGTM is less valuable here.

because this only patches README which is not covered by any tests

It's not yet, but soon will be =). Not in under 48 hours ofc.
This passes the remark-lint tests, I manually verified.

@yorkie

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

It's not yet, but soon will be =). Not in under 48 hours ofc.
This passes the remark-lint tests, I manually verified.

So may I land it today?

@evanlucas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

LGTM

@ChALkeR

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@yorkie Yes =).

@cjihrig

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

LGTM

inspired by this conversation
nodejs#7183 (comment)
PR-URL: nodejs#7996
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <chalkerx@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
@yorkie

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Landed at accaa34 :-)

@yorkieyorkie closed this Aug 8, 2016
yorkie added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2016
inspired by this conversation
#7183 (comment)
PR-URL: #7996
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <chalkerx@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
@yorkie
yorkie deleted the improve/readme branch August 8, 2016 15:25
@cjihrigcjihrig mentioned this pull request Aug 8, 2016
cjihrig pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2016
inspired by this conversation
#7183 (comment)
PR-URL: #7996
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <chalkerx@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
@cjihrigcjihrig mentioned this pull request Aug 11, 2016
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2016
inspired by this conversation
#7183 (comment)
PR-URL: #7996
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <chalkerx@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2016
inspired by this conversation
#7183 (comment)
PR-URL: #7996
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <chalkerx@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2016
inspired by this conversation
#7183 (comment)
PR-URL: #7996
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <chalkerx@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2016
inspired by this conversation
#7183 (comment)
PR-URL: #7996
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <chalkerx@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
@MylesBorinsMylesBorins mentioned this pull request Oct 26, 2016
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

docIssues and PRs related to the documentations.metaIssues and PRs related to the general management of the project.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@yorkie@jasnell@Trott@ChALkeR@evanlucas@cjihrig@MylesBorins@nodejs-github-bot