Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
test: refactor test-crypto test files - #8597
Conversation
jasnell
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM. when landing the commits will need to be squashed and the commit messages should be fixed up.
jasnell
commented
Sep 20, 2016
@griffithtp ... thank you for this. Just to point out, the contributing.md file in the node.js project root directly includes the guidelines for commit message formatting. The person who lands this can clean these commits up but if you'd like to give it a go yourself that would be great! |
griffithtp
commented
Sep 21, 2016
@jasnell apologies for this. Rookie mistake. |
jasnell
commented
Sep 21, 2016
Yep. Specifically, the steps are |
57d10f6 to
435437fComparegriffithtp
commented
Sep 21, 2016
Cool, thanks James @jasnell ! |
addaleax
commented
Sep 21, 2016
Well, there’s https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22good+first+contribution%22 if you’re feeling up for one of those?
I don’t want to steal your thunder or anything, but… keep in mind that the kind of tasks we were doing was chosen specifically to have some good contributions to get used to the process. You can definitely look through the test files and watch for anything that you would consider a significant improvement! Also, things that we just always need are more benchmarks + more tests (code coverage on Linux). |
jasnell
commented
Sep 21, 2016
... and doc fixes! we always need doc fixes! |
jasnell
commented
Sep 22, 2016
addaleax
commented
Sep 24, 2016
|
lpinca
commented
Oct 1, 2016
@griffithtp can you take a look at the lint issues? |
c133999 to
83c7a88Compare435437f to
92c7917Comparegriffithtp
commented
Oct 28, 2016
Apologies for late reply. |
fhinkel
commented
Mar 26, 2017
ping @griffithtp Sorry that this PR didn't get more attention. Do you want to rebase (again, sorry!) and ping me? Then I'll start the CI and we can land this. Thanks, sorry for the extra work. |
* invoke callback with `common.mustCall()` in test-crypto-hash * order module declarations aphabetically per test-writing-guide
92c7917 to
e650c6fCompareTrott
commented
Aug 13, 2017
I took the liberty of rebasing, resolving conflicts, and pushing to your branch. Hope that's OK! Given the staleness of the PR, I figured it probably wasn't a problem. I also edited the commit message a bit to reflect commit message guidelines and the narrower scope of the PR now that it's been rebased (because some of the changes in this PR were already done elsewhere). |
Trott
commented
Aug 13, 2017
Landed in 1df9340. Thanks for the contribution! 🎉 |
* invoke callback with `common.mustCall()` in test-crypto-hash * order module declarations aphabetically per test-writing-guide PR-URL: #8597 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
* invoke callback with `common.mustCall()` in test-crypto-hash * order module declarations aphabetically per test-writing-guide PR-URL: #8597 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
* invoke callback with `common.mustCall()` in test-crypto-hash * order module declarations aphabetically per test-writing-guide PR-URL: #8597 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Checklist
make lintmake -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test nosign(Windows) passesDescription of change
Updated ./test/parallel/test-crypto*
vartoconstassert.equaltoassert.StrictEqual, same withnotEqualcommon.mustCall()