chore: mitigate security advisory 886 - #198

Closed
hughrawlinson wants to merge 2 commits into
npm:latestfrom
hughrawlinson:bump-node-gyp
Closed

chore: mitigate security advisory 886#198
hughrawlinson wants to merge 2 commits into
npm:latestfrom
hughrawlinson:bump-node-gyp

Conversation

@hughrawlinson

@hughrawlinsonhughrawlinson commented May 22, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown

node-gyp@3.8.0 uses fstream@1.0.11, which has this advisory: https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/886

node-gyp@4.0.0 resolved that vulnerability by removing dependencies on fstream.

I also bumped npm-lifecycle@2.1.0 to 2.1.1, which does the same as above.

The tests don't pass locally, but I'm hoping the reasons why become more clear by running on CI, so that I can resolve them.

Please feel free to close this if it doesn't make sense for some reason I haven't thought of (or of course for any other reason). Thank you all for all you do! 😄

node-gyp@3.8.0 uses fstream@1.0.11, which has this advisory: https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/886
node-gyp@4.0.0 uses fstream@1.0.12, which has resolved the issue
@hughrawlinson
hughrawlinson requested a review from a team as a code ownerMay 22, 2019 13:05
npm-lifecycle@2.1.0 also depends on node-gyp@3.8.0.
Bumping to npm-lifecycle@2.1.1 addresses the issue
@hughrawlinsonhughrawlinson changed the title chore: update node-gyp to mitigate a security advisorychore: mitigate security advisory 886May 22, 2019
@brettz9

brettz9 commented Jun 10, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Would be great to get this looked at, as npm audit is listing 12 high risk advisories resulting from these two packages (none of which is npm audit fix working to fix)...

@isaacs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bumping to node-gyp v4 will take some more refactoring, but the fstream vuln will be fixed in the next release. Thanks!

@isaacsisaacs closed this Jun 26, 2019
@hughrawlinson
hughrawlinson deleted the bump-node-gyp branch June 27, 2019 16:58
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@hughrawlinson@brettz9@isaacs
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

chore: mitigate security advisory 886 - #198

Closed
hughrawlinson wants to merge 2 commits into
npm:latestfrom
hughrawlinson:bump-node-gyp
Closed

chore: mitigate security advisory 886#198
hughrawlinson wants to merge 2 commits into
npm:latestfrom
hughrawlinson:bump-node-gyp

Conversation

@hughrawlinson

@hughrawlinsonhughrawlinson commented May 22, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown

node-gyp@3.8.0 uses fstream@1.0.11, which has this advisory: https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/886

node-gyp@4.0.0 resolved that vulnerability by removing dependencies on fstream.

I also bumped npm-lifecycle@2.1.0 to 2.1.1, which does the same as above.

The tests don't pass locally, but I'm hoping the reasons why become more clear by running on CI, so that I can resolve them.

Please feel free to close this if it doesn't make sense for some reason I haven't thought of (or of course for any other reason). Thank you all for all you do! 😄

node-gyp@3.8.0 uses fstream@1.0.11, which has this advisory: https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/886
node-gyp@4.0.0 uses fstream@1.0.12, which has resolved the issue
@hughrawlinson
hughrawlinson requested a review from a team as a code ownerMay 22, 2019 13:05
npm-lifecycle@2.1.0 also depends on node-gyp@3.8.0.
Bumping to npm-lifecycle@2.1.1 addresses the issue
@hughrawlinsonhughrawlinson changed the title chore: update node-gyp to mitigate a security advisorychore: mitigate security advisory 886May 22, 2019
@brettz9

brettz9 commented Jun 10, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Would be great to get this looked at, as npm audit is listing 12 high risk advisories resulting from these two packages (none of which is npm audit fix working to fix)...

@isaacs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bumping to node-gyp v4 will take some more refactoring, but the fstream vuln will be fixed in the next release. Thanks!

@isaacsisaacs closed this Jun 26, 2019
@hughrawlinson
hughrawlinson deleted the bump-node-gyp branch June 27, 2019 16:58
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@hughrawlinson@brettz9@isaacs
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

chore: mitigate security advisory 886 - #198

Closed
hughrawlinson wants to merge 2 commits into
npm:latestfrom
hughrawlinson:bump-node-gyp
Closed

chore: mitigate security advisory 886#198
hughrawlinson wants to merge 2 commits into
npm:latestfrom
hughrawlinson:bump-node-gyp

Conversation

@hughrawlinson

@hughrawlinsonhughrawlinson commented May 22, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown

node-gyp@3.8.0 uses fstream@1.0.11, which has this advisory: https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/886

node-gyp@4.0.0 resolved that vulnerability by removing dependencies on fstream.

I also bumped npm-lifecycle@2.1.0 to 2.1.1, which does the same as above.

The tests don't pass locally, but I'm hoping the reasons why become more clear by running on CI, so that I can resolve them.

Please feel free to close this if it doesn't make sense for some reason I haven't thought of (or of course for any other reason). Thank you all for all you do! 😄

node-gyp@3.8.0 uses fstream@1.0.11, which has this advisory: https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/886
node-gyp@4.0.0 uses fstream@1.0.12, which has resolved the issue
@hughrawlinson
hughrawlinson requested a review from a team as a code ownerMay 22, 2019 13:05
npm-lifecycle@2.1.0 also depends on node-gyp@3.8.0.
Bumping to npm-lifecycle@2.1.1 addresses the issue
@hughrawlinsonhughrawlinson changed the title chore: update node-gyp to mitigate a security advisorychore: mitigate security advisory 886May 22, 2019
@brettz9

brettz9 commented Jun 10, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Would be great to get this looked at, as npm audit is listing 12 high risk advisories resulting from these two packages (none of which is npm audit fix working to fix)...

@isaacs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bumping to node-gyp v4 will take some more refactoring, but the fstream vuln will be fixed in the next release. Thanks!

@isaacsisaacs closed this Jun 26, 2019
@hughrawlinson
hughrawlinson deleted the bump-node-gyp branch June 27, 2019 16:58
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@hughrawlinson@brettz9@isaacs
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

chore: mitigate security advisory 886 - #198

Closed
hughrawlinson wants to merge 2 commits into
npm:latestfrom
hughrawlinson:bump-node-gyp
Closed

chore: mitigate security advisory 886#198
hughrawlinson wants to merge 2 commits into
npm:latestfrom
hughrawlinson:bump-node-gyp

Conversation

@hughrawlinson

@hughrawlinsonhughrawlinson commented May 22, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown

node-gyp@3.8.0 uses fstream@1.0.11, which has this advisory: https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/886

node-gyp@4.0.0 resolved that vulnerability by removing dependencies on fstream.

I also bumped npm-lifecycle@2.1.0 to 2.1.1, which does the same as above.

The tests don't pass locally, but I'm hoping the reasons why become more clear by running on CI, so that I can resolve them.

Please feel free to close this if it doesn't make sense for some reason I haven't thought of (or of course for any other reason). Thank you all for all you do! 😄

node-gyp@3.8.0 uses fstream@1.0.11, which has this advisory: https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/886
node-gyp@4.0.0 uses fstream@1.0.12, which has resolved the issue
@hughrawlinson
hughrawlinson requested a review from a team as a code ownerMay 22, 2019 13:05
npm-lifecycle@2.1.0 also depends on node-gyp@3.8.0.
Bumping to npm-lifecycle@2.1.1 addresses the issue
@hughrawlinsonhughrawlinson changed the title chore: update node-gyp to mitigate a security advisorychore: mitigate security advisory 886May 22, 2019
@brettz9

brettz9 commented Jun 10, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Would be great to get this looked at, as npm audit is listing 12 high risk advisories resulting from these two packages (none of which is npm audit fix working to fix)...

@isaacs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bumping to node-gyp v4 will take some more refactoring, but the fstream vuln will be fixed in the next release. Thanks!

@isaacsisaacs closed this Jun 26, 2019
@hughrawlinson
hughrawlinson deleted the bump-node-gyp branch June 27, 2019 16:58
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@hughrawlinson@brettz9@isaacs
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

chore: mitigate security advisory 886 - #198

Closed
hughrawlinson wants to merge 2 commits into
npm:latestfrom
hughrawlinson:bump-node-gyp
Closed

chore: mitigate security advisory 886#198
hughrawlinson wants to merge 2 commits into
npm:latestfrom
hughrawlinson:bump-node-gyp

Conversation

@hughrawlinson

@hughrawlinsonhughrawlinson commented May 22, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown

node-gyp@3.8.0 uses fstream@1.0.11, which has this advisory: https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/886

node-gyp@4.0.0 resolved that vulnerability by removing dependencies on fstream.

I also bumped npm-lifecycle@2.1.0 to 2.1.1, which does the same as above.

The tests don't pass locally, but I'm hoping the reasons why become more clear by running on CI, so that I can resolve them.

Please feel free to close this if it doesn't make sense for some reason I haven't thought of (or of course for any other reason). Thank you all for all you do! 😄

node-gyp@3.8.0 uses fstream@1.0.11, which has this advisory: https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/886
node-gyp@4.0.0 uses fstream@1.0.12, which has resolved the issue
@hughrawlinson
hughrawlinson requested a review from a team as a code ownerMay 22, 2019 13:05
npm-lifecycle@2.1.0 also depends on node-gyp@3.8.0.
Bumping to npm-lifecycle@2.1.1 addresses the issue
@hughrawlinsonhughrawlinson changed the title chore: update node-gyp to mitigate a security advisorychore: mitigate security advisory 886May 22, 2019
@brettz9

brettz9 commented Jun 10, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Would be great to get this looked at, as npm audit is listing 12 high risk advisories resulting from these two packages (none of which is npm audit fix working to fix)...

@isaacs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bumping to node-gyp v4 will take some more refactoring, but the fstream vuln will be fixed in the next release. Thanks!

@isaacsisaacs closed this Jun 26, 2019
@hughrawlinson
hughrawlinson deleted the bump-node-gyp branch June 27, 2019 16:58
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@hughrawlinson@brettz9@isaacs
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

chore: mitigate security advisory 886 - #198

Closed
hughrawlinson wants to merge 2 commits into
npm:latestfrom
hughrawlinson:bump-node-gyp
Closed

chore: mitigate security advisory 886#198
hughrawlinson wants to merge 2 commits into
npm:latestfrom
hughrawlinson:bump-node-gyp

Conversation

@hughrawlinson

@hughrawlinsonhughrawlinson commented May 22, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown

node-gyp@3.8.0 uses fstream@1.0.11, which has this advisory: https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/886

node-gyp@4.0.0 resolved that vulnerability by removing dependencies on fstream.

I also bumped npm-lifecycle@2.1.0 to 2.1.1, which does the same as above.

The tests don't pass locally, but I'm hoping the reasons why become more clear by running on CI, so that I can resolve them.

Please feel free to close this if it doesn't make sense for some reason I haven't thought of (or of course for any other reason). Thank you all for all you do! 😄

node-gyp@3.8.0 uses fstream@1.0.11, which has this advisory: https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/886
node-gyp@4.0.0 uses fstream@1.0.12, which has resolved the issue
@hughrawlinson
hughrawlinson requested a review from a team as a code ownerMay 22, 2019 13:05
npm-lifecycle@2.1.0 also depends on node-gyp@3.8.0.
Bumping to npm-lifecycle@2.1.1 addresses the issue
@hughrawlinsonhughrawlinson changed the title chore: update node-gyp to mitigate a security advisorychore: mitigate security advisory 886May 22, 2019
@brettz9

brettz9 commented Jun 10, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Would be great to get this looked at, as npm audit is listing 12 high risk advisories resulting from these two packages (none of which is npm audit fix working to fix)...

@isaacs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bumping to node-gyp v4 will take some more refactoring, but the fstream vuln will be fixed in the next release. Thanks!

@isaacsisaacs closed this Jun 26, 2019
@hughrawlinson
hughrawlinson deleted the bump-node-gyp branch June 27, 2019 16:58
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@hughrawlinson@brettz9@isaacs
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

chore: mitigate security advisory 886 - #198

Closed
hughrawlinson wants to merge 2 commits into
npm:latestfrom
hughrawlinson:bump-node-gyp
Closed

chore: mitigate security advisory 886#198
hughrawlinson wants to merge 2 commits into
npm:latestfrom
hughrawlinson:bump-node-gyp

Conversation

@hughrawlinson

@hughrawlinsonhughrawlinson commented May 22, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown

node-gyp@3.8.0 uses fstream@1.0.11, which has this advisory: https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/886

node-gyp@4.0.0 resolved that vulnerability by removing dependencies on fstream.

I also bumped npm-lifecycle@2.1.0 to 2.1.1, which does the same as above.

The tests don't pass locally, but I'm hoping the reasons why become more clear by running on CI, so that I can resolve them.

Please feel free to close this if it doesn't make sense for some reason I haven't thought of (or of course for any other reason). Thank you all for all you do! 😄

node-gyp@3.8.0 uses fstream@1.0.11, which has this advisory: https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/886
node-gyp@4.0.0 uses fstream@1.0.12, which has resolved the issue
@hughrawlinson
hughrawlinson requested a review from a team as a code ownerMay 22, 2019 13:05
npm-lifecycle@2.1.0 also depends on node-gyp@3.8.0.
Bumping to npm-lifecycle@2.1.1 addresses the issue
@hughrawlinsonhughrawlinson changed the title chore: update node-gyp to mitigate a security advisorychore: mitigate security advisory 886May 22, 2019
@brettz9

brettz9 commented Jun 10, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Would be great to get this looked at, as npm audit is listing 12 high risk advisories resulting from these two packages (none of which is npm audit fix working to fix)...

@isaacs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bumping to node-gyp v4 will take some more refactoring, but the fstream vuln will be fixed in the next release. Thanks!

@isaacsisaacs closed this Jun 26, 2019
@hughrawlinson
hughrawlinson deleted the bump-node-gyp branch June 27, 2019 16:58
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@hughrawlinson@brettz9@isaacs
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

chore: mitigate security advisory 886 - #198

Closed
hughrawlinson wants to merge 2 commits into
npm:latestfrom
hughrawlinson:bump-node-gyp
Closed

chore: mitigate security advisory 886#198
hughrawlinson wants to merge 2 commits into
npm:latestfrom
hughrawlinson:bump-node-gyp

Conversation

@hughrawlinson

@hughrawlinsonhughrawlinson commented May 22, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown

node-gyp@3.8.0 uses fstream@1.0.11, which has this advisory: https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/886

node-gyp@4.0.0 resolved that vulnerability by removing dependencies on fstream.

I also bumped npm-lifecycle@2.1.0 to 2.1.1, which does the same as above.

The tests don't pass locally, but I'm hoping the reasons why become more clear by running on CI, so that I can resolve them.

Please feel free to close this if it doesn't make sense for some reason I haven't thought of (or of course for any other reason). Thank you all for all you do! 😄

node-gyp@3.8.0 uses fstream@1.0.11, which has this advisory: https://www.npmjs.com/advisories/886
node-gyp@4.0.0 uses fstream@1.0.12, which has resolved the issue
@hughrawlinson
hughrawlinson requested a review from a team as a code ownerMay 22, 2019 13:05
npm-lifecycle@2.1.0 also depends on node-gyp@3.8.0.
Bumping to npm-lifecycle@2.1.1 addresses the issue
@hughrawlinsonhughrawlinson changed the title chore: update node-gyp to mitigate a security advisorychore: mitigate security advisory 886May 22, 2019
@brettz9

brettz9 commented Jun 10, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Would be great to get this looked at, as npm audit is listing 12 high risk advisories resulting from these two packages (none of which is npm audit fix working to fix)...

@isaacs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bumping to node-gyp v4 will take some more refactoring, but the fstream vuln will be fixed in the next release. Thanks!

@isaacsisaacs closed this Jun 26, 2019
@hughrawlinson
hughrawlinson deleted the bump-node-gyp branch June 27, 2019 16:58
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2026
github-actionsBot added a commit to Kevinlee7250/cli that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@hughrawlinson@brettz9@isaacs