npm version --no-git-tag-version --verbose should not log git error - #263

Closed
woppa684 wants to merge 1 commit into
npm:latestfrom
woppa684:no-error-when-no-git-tagging
Closed

npm version --no-git-tag-version --verbose should not log git error#263
woppa684 wants to merge 1 commit into
npm:latestfrom
woppa684:no-error-when-no-git-tagging

Conversation

@woppa684

Copy link
Copy Markdown

When npm version is run with both the --no-git-tag-version and --verbose flags, it logs an error if it cannot find a .git folder in the current folder. This error is very annoying for our automated build tooling and seems not relevant in the case that I don't want to update git.

Example of the error:

npm verb version Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, stat 'C:\some-git-repo\dist\some-folder\.git'
npm verb version error checking for .git { [Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, stat 'C:\some-git-repo\dist\some-folder\.git']
npm verb version stack:
npm verb version 'Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, stat \'C:\\some-git-repo\\dist\\some-folder\\.git\'',
npm verb version errno: -4058,
npm verb version code: 'ENOENT',
npm verb version syscall: 'stat',
npm verb version path: 'C:\\some-git-repo\\dist\\some-folder\\.git' }
npm verb version not tagging in git

Expected output:

npm verb version not tagging in git

This PR just prevents the error from being logged. Of course another option would be to skip the statGitFolder altogether...

@woppa684
woppa684 requested a review from a team as a code ownerOctober 7, 2019 13:44
@isaacs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hm, this bit of code looks a bit odd to me. It probably needs a more thorough review at some point. You're right, it's a bit weird that we stat the git folder in that case just to log a verbose message saying that we're not doing anything with it. It would be good to keep the verbose log, but without the stat, if git-tag-version is turned off. It looks like even when git-tag-version is disabled, we still attempt to commit the change to git, later on in the _commit function.

I'm inclined to punt on this until we have some time to dig deeper into the issue. Would it be terrible to just run without --verbose? Do you need it for other things?

@woppa684

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

That's indeed the route we're currently on, but in the mean time we want to be able to track this issue somewhere so that we can point at an issue or PR. I totally agree that this code looks a bit weird (not only my "fix" but _commit as well as you say).

What would be the proper way to make sure that this gets fixed at some point? I could dig a bit deeper myself and make a more complete solution of course.

@isaacs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We can just leave this open, it's fine. We may decide to take this change (or something like it), but I'd like to have a bit of time to track through the logic and make sure we're not causing other problems. (All too often I've found, when making a seemingly reasonable change in strange-seeming code, the results are strange and unexpected.)

@claudiahdzclaudiahdz added the Needs Discussion is pending a discussion label Nov 12, 2019
@mikemimikmikemimik added Release 6.x work is associated with a specific npm 6 release semver:patch semver patch level for changes labels Nov 26, 2019
@mikemimikmikemimik added this to the Release 6.14.0 milestone Nov 26, 2019
mikemimik pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2019
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Needs Discussionis pending a discussionRelease 6.xwork is associated with a specific npm 6 releasesemver:patchsemver patch level for changes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@woppa684@isaacs@claudiahdz@mikemimik
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

npm version --no-git-tag-version --verbose should not log git error - #263

Closed
woppa684 wants to merge 1 commit into
npm:latestfrom
woppa684:no-error-when-no-git-tagging
Closed

npm version --no-git-tag-version --verbose should not log git error#263
woppa684 wants to merge 1 commit into
npm:latestfrom
woppa684:no-error-when-no-git-tagging

Conversation

@woppa684

Copy link
Copy Markdown

When npm version is run with both the --no-git-tag-version and --verbose flags, it logs an error if it cannot find a .git folder in the current folder. This error is very annoying for our automated build tooling and seems not relevant in the case that I don't want to update git.

Example of the error:

npm verb version Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, stat 'C:\some-git-repo\dist\some-folder\.git'
npm verb version error checking for .git { [Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, stat 'C:\some-git-repo\dist\some-folder\.git']
npm verb version stack:
npm verb version 'Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, stat \'C:\\some-git-repo\\dist\\some-folder\\.git\'',
npm verb version errno: -4058,
npm verb version code: 'ENOENT',
npm verb version syscall: 'stat',
npm verb version path: 'C:\\some-git-repo\\dist\\some-folder\\.git' }
npm verb version not tagging in git

Expected output:

npm verb version not tagging in git

This PR just prevents the error from being logged. Of course another option would be to skip the statGitFolder altogether...

@woppa684
woppa684 requested a review from a team as a code ownerOctober 7, 2019 13:44
@isaacs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hm, this bit of code looks a bit odd to me. It probably needs a more thorough review at some point. You're right, it's a bit weird that we stat the git folder in that case just to log a verbose message saying that we're not doing anything with it. It would be good to keep the verbose log, but without the stat, if git-tag-version is turned off. It looks like even when git-tag-version is disabled, we still attempt to commit the change to git, later on in the _commit function.

I'm inclined to punt on this until we have some time to dig deeper into the issue. Would it be terrible to just run without --verbose? Do you need it for other things?

@woppa684

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

That's indeed the route we're currently on, but in the mean time we want to be able to track this issue somewhere so that we can point at an issue or PR. I totally agree that this code looks a bit weird (not only my "fix" but _commit as well as you say).

What would be the proper way to make sure that this gets fixed at some point? I could dig a bit deeper myself and make a more complete solution of course.

@isaacs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We can just leave this open, it's fine. We may decide to take this change (or something like it), but I'd like to have a bit of time to track through the logic and make sure we're not causing other problems. (All too often I've found, when making a seemingly reasonable change in strange-seeming code, the results are strange and unexpected.)

@claudiahdzclaudiahdz added the Needs Discussion is pending a discussion label Nov 12, 2019
@mikemimikmikemimik added Release 6.x work is associated with a specific npm 6 release semver:patch semver patch level for changes labels Nov 26, 2019
@mikemimikmikemimik added this to the Release 6.14.0 milestone Nov 26, 2019
mikemimik pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2019
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Needs Discussionis pending a discussionRelease 6.xwork is associated with a specific npm 6 releasesemver:patchsemver patch level for changes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@woppa684@isaacs@claudiahdz@mikemimik
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

npm version --no-git-tag-version --verbose should not log git error - #263

Closed
woppa684 wants to merge 1 commit into
npm:latestfrom
woppa684:no-error-when-no-git-tagging
Closed

npm version --no-git-tag-version --verbose should not log git error#263
woppa684 wants to merge 1 commit into
npm:latestfrom
woppa684:no-error-when-no-git-tagging

Conversation

@woppa684

Copy link
Copy Markdown

When npm version is run with both the --no-git-tag-version and --verbose flags, it logs an error if it cannot find a .git folder in the current folder. This error is very annoying for our automated build tooling and seems not relevant in the case that I don't want to update git.

Example of the error:

npm verb version Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, stat 'C:\some-git-repo\dist\some-folder\.git'
npm verb version error checking for .git { [Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, stat 'C:\some-git-repo\dist\some-folder\.git']
npm verb version stack:
npm verb version 'Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, stat \'C:\\some-git-repo\\dist\\some-folder\\.git\'',
npm verb version errno: -4058,
npm verb version code: 'ENOENT',
npm verb version syscall: 'stat',
npm verb version path: 'C:\\some-git-repo\\dist\\some-folder\\.git' }
npm verb version not tagging in git

Expected output:

npm verb version not tagging in git

This PR just prevents the error from being logged. Of course another option would be to skip the statGitFolder altogether...

@woppa684
woppa684 requested a review from a team as a code ownerOctober 7, 2019 13:44
@isaacs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hm, this bit of code looks a bit odd to me. It probably needs a more thorough review at some point. You're right, it's a bit weird that we stat the git folder in that case just to log a verbose message saying that we're not doing anything with it. It would be good to keep the verbose log, but without the stat, if git-tag-version is turned off. It looks like even when git-tag-version is disabled, we still attempt to commit the change to git, later on in the _commit function.

I'm inclined to punt on this until we have some time to dig deeper into the issue. Would it be terrible to just run without --verbose? Do you need it for other things?

@woppa684

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

That's indeed the route we're currently on, but in the mean time we want to be able to track this issue somewhere so that we can point at an issue or PR. I totally agree that this code looks a bit weird (not only my "fix" but _commit as well as you say).

What would be the proper way to make sure that this gets fixed at some point? I could dig a bit deeper myself and make a more complete solution of course.

@isaacs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We can just leave this open, it's fine. We may decide to take this change (or something like it), but I'd like to have a bit of time to track through the logic and make sure we're not causing other problems. (All too often I've found, when making a seemingly reasonable change in strange-seeming code, the results are strange and unexpected.)

@claudiahdzclaudiahdz added the Needs Discussion is pending a discussion label Nov 12, 2019
@mikemimikmikemimik added Release 6.x work is associated with a specific npm 6 release semver:patch semver patch level for changes labels Nov 26, 2019
@mikemimikmikemimik added this to the Release 6.14.0 milestone Nov 26, 2019
mikemimik pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2019
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Needs Discussionis pending a discussionRelease 6.xwork is associated with a specific npm 6 releasesemver:patchsemver patch level for changes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@woppa684@isaacs@claudiahdz@mikemimik
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

npm version --no-git-tag-version --verbose should not log git error - #263

Closed
woppa684 wants to merge 1 commit into
npm:latestfrom
woppa684:no-error-when-no-git-tagging
Closed

npm version --no-git-tag-version --verbose should not log git error#263
woppa684 wants to merge 1 commit into
npm:latestfrom
woppa684:no-error-when-no-git-tagging

Conversation

@woppa684

Copy link
Copy Markdown

When npm version is run with both the --no-git-tag-version and --verbose flags, it logs an error if it cannot find a .git folder in the current folder. This error is very annoying for our automated build tooling and seems not relevant in the case that I don't want to update git.

Example of the error:

npm verb version Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, stat 'C:\some-git-repo\dist\some-folder\.git'
npm verb version error checking for .git { [Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, stat 'C:\some-git-repo\dist\some-folder\.git']
npm verb version stack:
npm verb version 'Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, stat \'C:\\some-git-repo\\dist\\some-folder\\.git\'',
npm verb version errno: -4058,
npm verb version code: 'ENOENT',
npm verb version syscall: 'stat',
npm verb version path: 'C:\\some-git-repo\\dist\\some-folder\\.git' }
npm verb version not tagging in git

Expected output:

npm verb version not tagging in git

This PR just prevents the error from being logged. Of course another option would be to skip the statGitFolder altogether...

@woppa684
woppa684 requested a review from a team as a code ownerOctober 7, 2019 13:44
@isaacs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hm, this bit of code looks a bit odd to me. It probably needs a more thorough review at some point. You're right, it's a bit weird that we stat the git folder in that case just to log a verbose message saying that we're not doing anything with it. It would be good to keep the verbose log, but without the stat, if git-tag-version is turned off. It looks like even when git-tag-version is disabled, we still attempt to commit the change to git, later on in the _commit function.

I'm inclined to punt on this until we have some time to dig deeper into the issue. Would it be terrible to just run without --verbose? Do you need it for other things?

@woppa684

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

That's indeed the route we're currently on, but in the mean time we want to be able to track this issue somewhere so that we can point at an issue or PR. I totally agree that this code looks a bit weird (not only my "fix" but _commit as well as you say).

What would be the proper way to make sure that this gets fixed at some point? I could dig a bit deeper myself and make a more complete solution of course.

@isaacs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We can just leave this open, it's fine. We may decide to take this change (or something like it), but I'd like to have a bit of time to track through the logic and make sure we're not causing other problems. (All too often I've found, when making a seemingly reasonable change in strange-seeming code, the results are strange and unexpected.)

@claudiahdzclaudiahdz added the Needs Discussion is pending a discussion label Nov 12, 2019
@mikemimikmikemimik added Release 6.x work is associated with a specific npm 6 release semver:patch semver patch level for changes labels Nov 26, 2019
@mikemimikmikemimik added this to the Release 6.14.0 milestone Nov 26, 2019
mikemimik pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2019
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Needs Discussionis pending a discussionRelease 6.xwork is associated with a specific npm 6 releasesemver:patchsemver patch level for changes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@woppa684@isaacs@claudiahdz@mikemimik
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

npm version --no-git-tag-version --verbose should not log git error - #263

Closed
woppa684 wants to merge 1 commit into
npm:latestfrom
woppa684:no-error-when-no-git-tagging
Closed

npm version --no-git-tag-version --verbose should not log git error#263
woppa684 wants to merge 1 commit into
npm:latestfrom
woppa684:no-error-when-no-git-tagging

Conversation

@woppa684

Copy link
Copy Markdown

When npm version is run with both the --no-git-tag-version and --verbose flags, it logs an error if it cannot find a .git folder in the current folder. This error is very annoying for our automated build tooling and seems not relevant in the case that I don't want to update git.

Example of the error:

npm verb version Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, stat 'C:\some-git-repo\dist\some-folder\.git'
npm verb version error checking for .git { [Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, stat 'C:\some-git-repo\dist\some-folder\.git']
npm verb version stack:
npm verb version 'Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, stat \'C:\\some-git-repo\\dist\\some-folder\\.git\'',
npm verb version errno: -4058,
npm verb version code: 'ENOENT',
npm verb version syscall: 'stat',
npm verb version path: 'C:\\some-git-repo\\dist\\some-folder\\.git' }
npm verb version not tagging in git

Expected output:

npm verb version not tagging in git

This PR just prevents the error from being logged. Of course another option would be to skip the statGitFolder altogether...

@woppa684
woppa684 requested a review from a team as a code ownerOctober 7, 2019 13:44
@isaacs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hm, this bit of code looks a bit odd to me. It probably needs a more thorough review at some point. You're right, it's a bit weird that we stat the git folder in that case just to log a verbose message saying that we're not doing anything with it. It would be good to keep the verbose log, but without the stat, if git-tag-version is turned off. It looks like even when git-tag-version is disabled, we still attempt to commit the change to git, later on in the _commit function.

I'm inclined to punt on this until we have some time to dig deeper into the issue. Would it be terrible to just run without --verbose? Do you need it for other things?

@woppa684

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

That's indeed the route we're currently on, but in the mean time we want to be able to track this issue somewhere so that we can point at an issue or PR. I totally agree that this code looks a bit weird (not only my "fix" but _commit as well as you say).

What would be the proper way to make sure that this gets fixed at some point? I could dig a bit deeper myself and make a more complete solution of course.

@isaacs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We can just leave this open, it's fine. We may decide to take this change (or something like it), but I'd like to have a bit of time to track through the logic and make sure we're not causing other problems. (All too often I've found, when making a seemingly reasonable change in strange-seeming code, the results are strange and unexpected.)

@claudiahdzclaudiahdz added the Needs Discussion is pending a discussion label Nov 12, 2019
@mikemimikmikemimik added Release 6.x work is associated with a specific npm 6 release semver:patch semver patch level for changes labels Nov 26, 2019
@mikemimikmikemimik added this to the Release 6.14.0 milestone Nov 26, 2019
mikemimik pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2019
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Needs Discussionis pending a discussionRelease 6.xwork is associated with a specific npm 6 releasesemver:patchsemver patch level for changes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@woppa684@isaacs@claudiahdz@mikemimik
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

npm version --no-git-tag-version --verbose should not log git error - #263

Closed
woppa684 wants to merge 1 commit into
npm:latestfrom
woppa684:no-error-when-no-git-tagging
Closed

npm version --no-git-tag-version --verbose should not log git error#263
woppa684 wants to merge 1 commit into
npm:latestfrom
woppa684:no-error-when-no-git-tagging

Conversation

@woppa684

Copy link
Copy Markdown

When npm version is run with both the --no-git-tag-version and --verbose flags, it logs an error if it cannot find a .git folder in the current folder. This error is very annoying for our automated build tooling and seems not relevant in the case that I don't want to update git.

Example of the error:

npm verb version Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, stat 'C:\some-git-repo\dist\some-folder\.git'
npm verb version error checking for .git { [Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, stat 'C:\some-git-repo\dist\some-folder\.git']
npm verb version stack:
npm verb version 'Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, stat \'C:\\some-git-repo\\dist\\some-folder\\.git\'',
npm verb version errno: -4058,
npm verb version code: 'ENOENT',
npm verb version syscall: 'stat',
npm verb version path: 'C:\\some-git-repo\\dist\\some-folder\\.git' }
npm verb version not tagging in git

Expected output:

npm verb version not tagging in git

This PR just prevents the error from being logged. Of course another option would be to skip the statGitFolder altogether...

@woppa684
woppa684 requested a review from a team as a code ownerOctober 7, 2019 13:44
@isaacs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hm, this bit of code looks a bit odd to me. It probably needs a more thorough review at some point. You're right, it's a bit weird that we stat the git folder in that case just to log a verbose message saying that we're not doing anything with it. It would be good to keep the verbose log, but without the stat, if git-tag-version is turned off. It looks like even when git-tag-version is disabled, we still attempt to commit the change to git, later on in the _commit function.

I'm inclined to punt on this until we have some time to dig deeper into the issue. Would it be terrible to just run without --verbose? Do you need it for other things?

@woppa684

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

That's indeed the route we're currently on, but in the mean time we want to be able to track this issue somewhere so that we can point at an issue or PR. I totally agree that this code looks a bit weird (not only my "fix" but _commit as well as you say).

What would be the proper way to make sure that this gets fixed at some point? I could dig a bit deeper myself and make a more complete solution of course.

@isaacs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We can just leave this open, it's fine. We may decide to take this change (or something like it), but I'd like to have a bit of time to track through the logic and make sure we're not causing other problems. (All too often I've found, when making a seemingly reasonable change in strange-seeming code, the results are strange and unexpected.)

@claudiahdzclaudiahdz added the Needs Discussion is pending a discussion label Nov 12, 2019
@mikemimikmikemimik added Release 6.x work is associated with a specific npm 6 release semver:patch semver patch level for changes labels Nov 26, 2019
@mikemimikmikemimik added this to the Release 6.14.0 milestone Nov 26, 2019
mikemimik pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2019
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Needs Discussionis pending a discussionRelease 6.xwork is associated with a specific npm 6 releasesemver:patchsemver patch level for changes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@woppa684@isaacs@claudiahdz@mikemimik
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

npm version --no-git-tag-version --verbose should not log git error - #263

Closed
woppa684 wants to merge 1 commit into
npm:latestfrom
woppa684:no-error-when-no-git-tagging
Closed

npm version --no-git-tag-version --verbose should not log git error#263
woppa684 wants to merge 1 commit into
npm:latestfrom
woppa684:no-error-when-no-git-tagging

Conversation

@woppa684

Copy link
Copy Markdown

When npm version is run with both the --no-git-tag-version and --verbose flags, it logs an error if it cannot find a .git folder in the current folder. This error is very annoying for our automated build tooling and seems not relevant in the case that I don't want to update git.

Example of the error:

npm verb version Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, stat 'C:\some-git-repo\dist\some-folder\.git'
npm verb version error checking for .git { [Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, stat 'C:\some-git-repo\dist\some-folder\.git']
npm verb version stack:
npm verb version 'Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, stat \'C:\\some-git-repo\\dist\\some-folder\\.git\'',
npm verb version errno: -4058,
npm verb version code: 'ENOENT',
npm verb version syscall: 'stat',
npm verb version path: 'C:\\some-git-repo\\dist\\some-folder\\.git' }
npm verb version not tagging in git

Expected output:

npm verb version not tagging in git

This PR just prevents the error from being logged. Of course another option would be to skip the statGitFolder altogether...

@woppa684
woppa684 requested a review from a team as a code ownerOctober 7, 2019 13:44
@isaacs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hm, this bit of code looks a bit odd to me. It probably needs a more thorough review at some point. You're right, it's a bit weird that we stat the git folder in that case just to log a verbose message saying that we're not doing anything with it. It would be good to keep the verbose log, but without the stat, if git-tag-version is turned off. It looks like even when git-tag-version is disabled, we still attempt to commit the change to git, later on in the _commit function.

I'm inclined to punt on this until we have some time to dig deeper into the issue. Would it be terrible to just run without --verbose? Do you need it for other things?

@woppa684

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

That's indeed the route we're currently on, but in the mean time we want to be able to track this issue somewhere so that we can point at an issue or PR. I totally agree that this code looks a bit weird (not only my "fix" but _commit as well as you say).

What would be the proper way to make sure that this gets fixed at some point? I could dig a bit deeper myself and make a more complete solution of course.

@isaacs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We can just leave this open, it's fine. We may decide to take this change (or something like it), but I'd like to have a bit of time to track through the logic and make sure we're not causing other problems. (All too often I've found, when making a seemingly reasonable change in strange-seeming code, the results are strange and unexpected.)

@claudiahdzclaudiahdz added the Needs Discussion is pending a discussion label Nov 12, 2019
@mikemimikmikemimik added Release 6.x work is associated with a specific npm 6 release semver:patch semver patch level for changes labels Nov 26, 2019
@mikemimikmikemimik added this to the Release 6.14.0 milestone Nov 26, 2019
mikemimik pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2019
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Needs Discussionis pending a discussionRelease 6.xwork is associated with a specific npm 6 releasesemver:patchsemver patch level for changes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@woppa684@isaacs@claudiahdz@mikemimik
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

npm version --no-git-tag-version --verbose should not log git error - #263

Closed
woppa684 wants to merge 1 commit into
npm:latestfrom
woppa684:no-error-when-no-git-tagging
Closed

npm version --no-git-tag-version --verbose should not log git error#263
woppa684 wants to merge 1 commit into
npm:latestfrom
woppa684:no-error-when-no-git-tagging

Conversation

@woppa684

Copy link
Copy Markdown

When npm version is run with both the --no-git-tag-version and --verbose flags, it logs an error if it cannot find a .git folder in the current folder. This error is very annoying for our automated build tooling and seems not relevant in the case that I don't want to update git.

Example of the error:

npm verb version Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, stat 'C:\some-git-repo\dist\some-folder\.git'
npm verb version error checking for .git { [Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, stat 'C:\some-git-repo\dist\some-folder\.git']
npm verb version stack:
npm verb version 'Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, stat \'C:\\some-git-repo\\dist\\some-folder\\.git\'',
npm verb version errno: -4058,
npm verb version code: 'ENOENT',
npm verb version syscall: 'stat',
npm verb version path: 'C:\\some-git-repo\\dist\\some-folder\\.git' }
npm verb version not tagging in git

Expected output:

npm verb version not tagging in git

This PR just prevents the error from being logged. Of course another option would be to skip the statGitFolder altogether...

@woppa684
woppa684 requested a review from a team as a code ownerOctober 7, 2019 13:44
@isaacs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hm, this bit of code looks a bit odd to me. It probably needs a more thorough review at some point. You're right, it's a bit weird that we stat the git folder in that case just to log a verbose message saying that we're not doing anything with it. It would be good to keep the verbose log, but without the stat, if git-tag-version is turned off. It looks like even when git-tag-version is disabled, we still attempt to commit the change to git, later on in the _commit function.

I'm inclined to punt on this until we have some time to dig deeper into the issue. Would it be terrible to just run without --verbose? Do you need it for other things?

@woppa684

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

That's indeed the route we're currently on, but in the mean time we want to be able to track this issue somewhere so that we can point at an issue or PR. I totally agree that this code looks a bit weird (not only my "fix" but _commit as well as you say).

What would be the proper way to make sure that this gets fixed at some point? I could dig a bit deeper myself and make a more complete solution of course.

@isaacs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We can just leave this open, it's fine. We may decide to take this change (or something like it), but I'd like to have a bit of time to track through the logic and make sure we're not causing other problems. (All too often I've found, when making a seemingly reasonable change in strange-seeming code, the results are strange and unexpected.)

@claudiahdzclaudiahdz added the Needs Discussion is pending a discussion label Nov 12, 2019
@mikemimikmikemimik added Release 6.x work is associated with a specific npm 6 release semver:patch semver patch level for changes labels Nov 26, 2019
@mikemimikmikemimik added this to the Release 6.14.0 milestone Nov 26, 2019
mikemimik pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2019
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Needs Discussionis pending a discussionRelease 6.xwork is associated with a specific npm 6 releasesemver:patchsemver patch level for changes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@woppa684@isaacs@claudiahdz@mikemimik