Fix Tracker "idealTree:inflate:" already exists - #4298

Closed
fritzy wants to merge 1 commit into
latestfrom
release-next
Closed

Fix Tracker "idealTree:inflate:" already exists#4298
fritzy wants to merge 1 commit into
latestfrom
release-next

Conversation

@fritzy

@fritzyfritzy commented Jan 20, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

MIGRATED FROM ARBORIST

Originally from npm/arborist#364
Originally by @kirtangajjar

Fixes https://github.com/npm/arborist/issues/330 as per solution described in comments.

References

It turns out that `new Arborist().buildIdealTree().meta.toString()` does
not take into account the indentation in the package.json (tabs, in my
case) the way `npm install --package-lock-only` does.
This fixes that. Also included a bonus commit that removes redundant
Promise stuff inside an `async function`.
@fritzy
fritzy requested a review from a team as a code ownerJanuary 20, 2022 11:06
@fritzy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@kirtangajjar I've recreated this PR because the arborist repo is being archived. Arborist is now maintained as a workspace within the CLI. Your commit authorship is still yours.

@npm-robot

npm-robot commented Jan 20, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

found 20 benchmarks with statistically significant performance improvements

  • app-large: clean, lock-only, cache-only, cache-only:peer-deps, modules-only, no-lock, no-cache, no-modules, no-clean, no-clean:audit
  • app-medium: clean, lock-only, cache-only, cache-only:peer-deps, modules-only, no-lock, no-cache, no-modules, no-clean, no-clean:audit
timing results
app-largecleanlock-onlycache-onlycache-only
peer-deps
modules-onlyno-lockno-cacheno-modulesno-cleanno-clean
audit
npm@860.335 ±2.2036.978 ±0.1023.388 ±0.6026.371 ±1.293.799 ±0.063.810 ±0.093.050 ±0.0115.617 ±0.173.031 ±0.014.322 ±0.02
#42980.506 ±0.010.520 ±0.000.510 ±0.010.539 ±0.010.495 ±0.000.502 ±0.010.549 ±0.030.524 ±0.010.500 ±0.000.500 ±0.02
app-mediumcleanlock-onlycache-onlycache-only
peer-deps
modules-onlyno-lockno-cacheno-modulesno-cleanno-clean
audit
npm@844.529 ±0.4428.995 ±0.3716.976 ±0.1618.010 ±0.013.445 ±0.063.479 ±0.023.115 ±0.0911.698 ±0.072.860 ±0.033.866 ±0.02
#42980.511 ±0.020.538 ±0.010.513 ±0.000.534 ±0.010.514 ±0.010.514 ±0.010.531 ±0.020.506 ±0.010.543 ±0.010.533 ±0.02

@kirtangajjar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@fritzy Thanks for the heads up! I just have a question - why does my old pr diff and new pr diff look different?

I see another commit in this PR too. Is this expected?

@lukekarrys

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'm going to close this and reopen a new PR with only the relevant commit @kirtangajjar

lukekarrys added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2022
Fixes: #4273
Ref: #4298
Co-authored-by: Kirtan Gajjar <8456197+kirtangajjar@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@fritzy@npm-robot@kirtangajjar@lukekarrys@ljharb
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
 blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Fix Tracker "idealTree:inflate:" already exists - #4298

Closed
fritzy wants to merge 1 commit into
latestfrom
release-next
Closed

Fix Tracker "idealTree:inflate:" already exists#4298
fritzy wants to merge 1 commit into
latestfrom
release-next

Conversation

@fritzy

@fritzyfritzy commented Jan 20, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

MIGRATED FROM ARBORIST

Originally from npm/arborist#364
Originally by @kirtangajjar

Fixes https://github.com/npm/arborist/issues/330 as per solution described in comments.

References

It turns out that `new Arborist().buildIdealTree().meta.toString()` does
not take into account the indentation in the package.json (tabs, in my
case) the way `npm install --package-lock-only` does.
This fixes that. Also included a bonus commit that removes redundant
Promise stuff inside an `async function`.
@fritzy
fritzy requested a review from a team as a code ownerJanuary 20, 2022 11:06
@fritzy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@kirtangajjar I've recreated this PR because the arborist repo is being archived. Arborist is now maintained as a workspace within the CLI. Your commit authorship is still yours.

@npm-robot

npm-robot commented Jan 20, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

found 20 benchmarks with statistically significant performance improvements

  • app-large: clean, lock-only, cache-only, cache-only:peer-deps, modules-only, no-lock, no-cache, no-modules, no-clean, no-clean:audit
  • app-medium: clean, lock-only, cache-only, cache-only:peer-deps, modules-only, no-lock, no-cache, no-modules, no-clean, no-clean:audit
timing results
app-largecleanlock-onlycache-onlycache-only
peer-deps
modules-onlyno-lockno-cacheno-modulesno-cleanno-clean
audit
npm@860.335 ±2.2036.978 ±0.1023.388 ±0.6026.371 ±1.293.799 ±0.063.810 ±0.093.050 ±0.0115.617 ±0.173.031 ±0.014.322 ±0.02
#42980.506 ±0.010.520 ±0.000.510 ±0.010.539 ±0.010.495 ±0.000.502 ±0.010.549 ±0.030.524 ±0.010.500 ±0.000.500 ±0.02
app-mediumcleanlock-onlycache-onlycache-only
peer-deps
modules-onlyno-lockno-cacheno-modulesno-cleanno-clean
audit
npm@844.529 ±0.4428.995 ±0.3716.976 ±0.1618.010 ±0.013.445 ±0.063.479 ±0.023.115 ±0.0911.698 ±0.072.860 ±0.033.866 ±0.02
#42980.511 ±0.020.538 ±0.010.513 ±0.000.534 ±0.010.514 ±0.010.514 ±0.010.531 ±0.020.506 ±0.010.543 ±0.010.533 ±0.02

@kirtangajjar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@fritzy Thanks for the heads up! I just have a question - why does my old pr diff and new pr diff look different?

I see another commit in this PR too. Is this expected?

@lukekarrys

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'm going to close this and reopen a new PR with only the relevant commit @kirtangajjar

lukekarrys added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2022
Fixes: #4273
Ref: #4298
Co-authored-by: Kirtan Gajjar <8456197+kirtangajjar@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@fritzy@npm-robot@kirtangajjar@lukekarrys@ljharb
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix Tracker "idealTree:inflate:" already exists - #4298

Closed
fritzy wants to merge 1 commit into
latestfrom
release-next
Closed

Fix Tracker "idealTree:inflate:" already exists#4298
fritzy wants to merge 1 commit into
latestfrom
release-next

Conversation

@fritzy

@fritzyfritzy commented Jan 20, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

MIGRATED FROM ARBORIST

Originally from npm/arborist#364
Originally by @kirtangajjar

Fixes https://github.com/npm/arborist/issues/330 as per solution described in comments.

References

It turns out that `new Arborist().buildIdealTree().meta.toString()` does
not take into account the indentation in the package.json (tabs, in my
case) the way `npm install --package-lock-only` does.
This fixes that. Also included a bonus commit that removes redundant
Promise stuff inside an `async function`.
@fritzy
fritzy requested a review from a team as a code ownerJanuary 20, 2022 11:06
@fritzy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@kirtangajjar I've recreated this PR because the arborist repo is being archived. Arborist is now maintained as a workspace within the CLI. Your commit authorship is still yours.

@npm-robot

npm-robot commented Jan 20, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

found 20 benchmarks with statistically significant performance improvements

  • app-large: clean, lock-only, cache-only, cache-only:peer-deps, modules-only, no-lock, no-cache, no-modules, no-clean, no-clean:audit
  • app-medium: clean, lock-only, cache-only, cache-only:peer-deps, modules-only, no-lock, no-cache, no-modules, no-clean, no-clean:audit
timing results
app-largecleanlock-onlycache-onlycache-only
peer-deps
modules-onlyno-lockno-cacheno-modulesno-cleanno-clean
audit
npm@860.335 ±2.2036.978 ±0.1023.388 ±0.6026.371 ±1.293.799 ±0.063.810 ±0.093.050 ±0.0115.617 ±0.173.031 ±0.014.322 ±0.02
#42980.506 ±0.010.520 ±0.000.510 ±0.010.539 ±0.010.495 ±0.000.502 ±0.010.549 ±0.030.524 ±0.010.500 ±0.000.500 ±0.02
app-mediumcleanlock-onlycache-onlycache-only
peer-deps
modules-onlyno-lockno-cacheno-modulesno-cleanno-clean
audit
npm@844.529 ±0.4428.995 ±0.3716.976 ±0.1618.010 ±0.013.445 ±0.063.479 ±0.023.115 ±0.0911.698 ±0.072.860 ±0.033.866 ±0.02
#42980.511 ±0.020.538 ±0.010.513 ±0.000.534 ±0.010.514 ±0.010.514 ±0.010.531 ±0.020.506 ±0.010.543 ±0.010.533 ±0.02

@kirtangajjar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@fritzy Thanks for the heads up! I just have a question - why does my old pr diff and new pr diff look different?

I see another commit in this PR too. Is this expected?

@lukekarrys

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'm going to close this and reopen a new PR with only the relevant commit @kirtangajjar

lukekarrys added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2022
Fixes: #4273
Ref: #4298
Co-authored-by: Kirtan Gajjar <8456197+kirtangajjar@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@fritzy@npm-robot@kirtangajjar@lukekarrys@ljharb
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix Tracker "idealTree:inflate:" already exists - #4298

Closed
fritzy wants to merge 1 commit into
latestfrom
release-next
Closed

Fix Tracker "idealTree:inflate:" already exists#4298
fritzy wants to merge 1 commit into
latestfrom
release-next

Conversation

@fritzy

@fritzyfritzy commented Jan 20, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

MIGRATED FROM ARBORIST

Originally from npm/arborist#364
Originally by @kirtangajjar

Fixes https://github.com/npm/arborist/issues/330 as per solution described in comments.

References

It turns out that `new Arborist().buildIdealTree().meta.toString()` does
not take into account the indentation in the package.json (tabs, in my
case) the way `npm install --package-lock-only` does.
This fixes that. Also included a bonus commit that removes redundant
Promise stuff inside an `async function`.
@fritzy
fritzy requested a review from a team as a code ownerJanuary 20, 2022 11:06
@fritzy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@kirtangajjar I've recreated this PR because the arborist repo is being archived. Arborist is now maintained as a workspace within the CLI. Your commit authorship is still yours.

@npm-robot

npm-robot commented Jan 20, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

found 20 benchmarks with statistically significant performance improvements

  • app-large: clean, lock-only, cache-only, cache-only:peer-deps, modules-only, no-lock, no-cache, no-modules, no-clean, no-clean:audit
  • app-medium: clean, lock-only, cache-only, cache-only:peer-deps, modules-only, no-lock, no-cache, no-modules, no-clean, no-clean:audit
timing results
app-largecleanlock-onlycache-onlycache-only
peer-deps
modules-onlyno-lockno-cacheno-modulesno-cleanno-clean
audit
npm@860.335 ±2.2036.978 ±0.1023.388 ±0.6026.371 ±1.293.799 ±0.063.810 ±0.093.050 ±0.0115.617 ±0.173.031 ±0.014.322 ±0.02
#42980.506 ±0.010.520 ±0.000.510 ±0.010.539 ±0.010.495 ±0.000.502 ±0.010.549 ±0.030.524 ±0.010.500 ±0.000.500 ±0.02
app-mediumcleanlock-onlycache-onlycache-only
peer-deps
modules-onlyno-lockno-cacheno-modulesno-cleanno-clean
audit
npm@844.529 ±0.4428.995 ±0.3716.976 ±0.1618.010 ±0.013.445 ±0.063.479 ±0.023.115 ±0.0911.698 ±0.072.860 ±0.033.866 ±0.02
#42980.511 ±0.020.538 ±0.010.513 ±0.000.534 ±0.010.514 ±0.010.514 ±0.010.531 ±0.020.506 ±0.010.543 ±0.010.533 ±0.02

@kirtangajjar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@fritzy Thanks for the heads up! I just have a question - why does my old pr diff and new pr diff look different?

I see another commit in this PR too. Is this expected?

@lukekarrys

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'm going to close this and reopen a new PR with only the relevant commit @kirtangajjar

lukekarrys added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2022
Fixes: #4273
Ref: #4298
Co-authored-by: Kirtan Gajjar <8456197+kirtangajjar@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@fritzy@npm-robot@kirtangajjar@lukekarrys@ljharb
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
Skip to content

Fix Tracker "idealTree:inflate:" already exists - #4298

Closed
fritzy wants to merge 1 commit into
latestfrom
release-next
Closed

Fix Tracker "idealTree:inflate:" already exists#4298
fritzy wants to merge 1 commit into
latestfrom
release-next

Conversation

@fritzy

@fritzyfritzy commented Jan 20, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

MIGRATED FROM ARBORIST

Originally from npm/arborist#364
Originally by @kirtangajjar

Fixes https://github.com/npm/arborist/issues/330 as per solution described in comments.

References

It turns out that `new Arborist().buildIdealTree().meta.toString()` does
not take into account the indentation in the package.json (tabs, in my
case) the way `npm install --package-lock-only` does.
This fixes that. Also included a bonus commit that removes redundant
Promise stuff inside an `async function`.
@fritzy
fritzy requested a review from a team as a code ownerJanuary 20, 2022 11:06
@fritzy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@kirtangajjar I've recreated this PR because the arborist repo is being archived. Arborist is now maintained as a workspace within the CLI. Your commit authorship is still yours.

@npm-robot

npm-robot commented Jan 20, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

found 20 benchmarks with statistically significant performance improvements

  • app-large: clean, lock-only, cache-only, cache-only:peer-deps, modules-only, no-lock, no-cache, no-modules, no-clean, no-clean:audit
  • app-medium: clean, lock-only, cache-only, cache-only:peer-deps, modules-only, no-lock, no-cache, no-modules, no-clean, no-clean:audit
timing results
app-largecleanlock-onlycache-onlycache-only
peer-deps
modules-onlyno-lockno-cacheno-modulesno-cleanno-clean
audit
npm@860.335 ±2.2036.978 ±0.1023.388 ±0.6026.371 ±1.293.799 ±0.063.810 ±0.093.050 ±0.0115.617 ±0.173.031 ±0.014.322 ±0.02
#42980.506 ±0.010.520 ±0.000.510 ±0.010.539 ±0.010.495 ±0.000.502 ±0.010.549 ±0.030.524 ±0.010.500 ±0.000.500 ±0.02
app-mediumcleanlock-onlycache-onlycache-only
peer-deps
modules-onlyno-lockno-cacheno-modulesno-cleanno-clean
audit
npm@844.529 ±0.4428.995 ±0.3716.976 ±0.1618.010 ±0.013.445 ±0.063.479 ±0.023.115 ±0.0911.698 ±0.072.860 ±0.033.866 ±0.02
#42980.511 ±0.020.538 ±0.010.513 ±0.000.534 ±0.010.514 ±0.010.514 ±0.010.531 ±0.020.506 ±0.010.543 ±0.010.533 ±0.02

@kirtangajjar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@fritzy Thanks for the heads up! I just have a question - why does my old pr diff and new pr diff look different?

I see another commit in this PR too. Is this expected?

@lukekarrys

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'm going to close this and reopen a new PR with only the relevant commit @kirtangajjar

lukekarrys added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2022
Fixes: #4273
Ref: #4298
Co-authored-by: Kirtan Gajjar <8456197+kirtangajjar@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@fritzy@npm-robot@kirtangajjar@lukekarrys@ljharb
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix Tracker "idealTree:inflate:" already exists - #4298

Closed
fritzy wants to merge 1 commit into
latestfrom
release-next
Closed

Fix Tracker "idealTree:inflate:" already exists#4298
fritzy wants to merge 1 commit into
latestfrom
release-next

Conversation

@fritzy

@fritzyfritzy commented Jan 20, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

MIGRATED FROM ARBORIST

Originally from npm/arborist#364
Originally by @kirtangajjar

Fixes https://github.com/npm/arborist/issues/330 as per solution described in comments.

References

It turns out that `new Arborist().buildIdealTree().meta.toString()` does
not take into account the indentation in the package.json (tabs, in my
case) the way `npm install --package-lock-only` does.
This fixes that. Also included a bonus commit that removes redundant
Promise stuff inside an `async function`.
@fritzy
fritzy requested a review from a team as a code ownerJanuary 20, 2022 11:06
@fritzy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@kirtangajjar I've recreated this PR because the arborist repo is being archived. Arborist is now maintained as a workspace within the CLI. Your commit authorship is still yours.

@npm-robot

npm-robot commented Jan 20, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

found 20 benchmarks with statistically significant performance improvements

  • app-large: clean, lock-only, cache-only, cache-only:peer-deps, modules-only, no-lock, no-cache, no-modules, no-clean, no-clean:audit
  • app-medium: clean, lock-only, cache-only, cache-only:peer-deps, modules-only, no-lock, no-cache, no-modules, no-clean, no-clean:audit
timing results
app-largecleanlock-onlycache-onlycache-only
peer-deps
modules-onlyno-lockno-cacheno-modulesno-cleanno-clean
audit
npm@860.335 ±2.2036.978 ±0.1023.388 ±0.6026.371 ±1.293.799 ±0.063.810 ±0.093.050 ±0.0115.617 ±0.173.031 ±0.014.322 ±0.02
#42980.506 ±0.010.520 ±0.000.510 ±0.010.539 ±0.010.495 ±0.000.502 ±0.010.549 ±0.030.524 ±0.010.500 ±0.000.500 ±0.02
app-mediumcleanlock-onlycache-onlycache-only
peer-deps
modules-onlyno-lockno-cacheno-modulesno-cleanno-clean
audit
npm@844.529 ±0.4428.995 ±0.3716.976 ±0.1618.010 ±0.013.445 ±0.063.479 ±0.023.115 ±0.0911.698 ±0.072.860 ±0.033.866 ±0.02
#42980.511 ±0.020.538 ±0.010.513 ±0.000.534 ±0.010.514 ±0.010.514 ±0.010.531 ±0.020.506 ±0.010.543 ±0.010.533 ±0.02

@kirtangajjar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@fritzy Thanks for the heads up! I just have a question - why does my old pr diff and new pr diff look different?

I see another commit in this PR too. Is this expected?

@lukekarrys

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'm going to close this and reopen a new PR with only the relevant commit @kirtangajjar

lukekarrys added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2022
Fixes: #4273
Ref: #4298
Co-authored-by: Kirtan Gajjar <8456197+kirtangajjar@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@fritzy@npm-robot@kirtangajjar@lukekarrys@ljharb
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
Skip to content

Fix Tracker "idealTree:inflate:" already exists - #4298

Closed
fritzy wants to merge 1 commit into
latestfrom
release-next
Closed

Fix Tracker "idealTree:inflate:" already exists#4298
fritzy wants to merge 1 commit into
latestfrom
release-next

Conversation

@fritzy

@fritzyfritzy commented Jan 20, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

MIGRATED FROM ARBORIST

Originally from npm/arborist#364
Originally by @kirtangajjar

Fixes https://github.com/npm/arborist/issues/330 as per solution described in comments.

References

It turns out that `new Arborist().buildIdealTree().meta.toString()` does
not take into account the indentation in the package.json (tabs, in my
case) the way `npm install --package-lock-only` does.
This fixes that. Also included a bonus commit that removes redundant
Promise stuff inside an `async function`.
@fritzy
fritzy requested a review from a team as a code ownerJanuary 20, 2022 11:06
@fritzy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@kirtangajjar I've recreated this PR because the arborist repo is being archived. Arborist is now maintained as a workspace within the CLI. Your commit authorship is still yours.

@npm-robot

npm-robot commented Jan 20, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

found 20 benchmarks with statistically significant performance improvements

  • app-large: clean, lock-only, cache-only, cache-only:peer-deps, modules-only, no-lock, no-cache, no-modules, no-clean, no-clean:audit
  • app-medium: clean, lock-only, cache-only, cache-only:peer-deps, modules-only, no-lock, no-cache, no-modules, no-clean, no-clean:audit
timing results
app-largecleanlock-onlycache-onlycache-only
peer-deps
modules-onlyno-lockno-cacheno-modulesno-cleanno-clean
audit
npm@860.335 ±2.2036.978 ±0.1023.388 ±0.6026.371 ±1.293.799 ±0.063.810 ±0.093.050 ±0.0115.617 ±0.173.031 ±0.014.322 ±0.02
#42980.506 ±0.010.520 ±0.000.510 ±0.010.539 ±0.010.495 ±0.000.502 ±0.010.549 ±0.030.524 ±0.010.500 ±0.000.500 ±0.02
app-mediumcleanlock-onlycache-onlycache-only
peer-deps
modules-onlyno-lockno-cacheno-modulesno-cleanno-clean
audit
npm@844.529 ±0.4428.995 ±0.3716.976 ±0.1618.010 ±0.013.445 ±0.063.479 ±0.023.115 ±0.0911.698 ±0.072.860 ±0.033.866 ±0.02
#42980.511 ±0.020.538 ±0.010.513 ±0.000.534 ±0.010.514 ±0.010.514 ±0.010.531 ±0.020.506 ±0.010.543 ±0.010.533 ±0.02

@kirtangajjar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@fritzy Thanks for the heads up! I just have a question - why does my old pr diff and new pr diff look different?

I see another commit in this PR too. Is this expected?

@lukekarrys

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'm going to close this and reopen a new PR with only the relevant commit @kirtangajjar

lukekarrys added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2022
Fixes: #4273
Ref: #4298
Co-authored-by: Kirtan Gajjar <8456197+kirtangajjar@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@fritzy@npm-robot@kirtangajjar@lukekarrys@ljharb
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
Skip to content

Fix Tracker "idealTree:inflate:" already exists - #4298

Closed
fritzy wants to merge 1 commit into
latestfrom
release-next
Closed

Fix Tracker "idealTree:inflate:" already exists#4298
fritzy wants to merge 1 commit into
latestfrom
release-next

Conversation

@fritzy

@fritzyfritzy commented Jan 20, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown

MIGRATED FROM ARBORIST

Originally from npm/arborist#364
Originally by @kirtangajjar

Fixes https://github.com/npm/arborist/issues/330 as per solution described in comments.

References

It turns out that `new Arborist().buildIdealTree().meta.toString()` does
not take into account the indentation in the package.json (tabs, in my
case) the way `npm install --package-lock-only` does.
This fixes that. Also included a bonus commit that removes redundant
Promise stuff inside an `async function`.
@fritzy
fritzy requested a review from a team as a code ownerJanuary 20, 2022 11:06
@fritzy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@kirtangajjar I've recreated this PR because the arborist repo is being archived. Arborist is now maintained as a workspace within the CLI. Your commit authorship is still yours.

@npm-robot

npm-robot commented Jan 20, 2022

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

found 20 benchmarks with statistically significant performance improvements

  • app-large: clean, lock-only, cache-only, cache-only:peer-deps, modules-only, no-lock, no-cache, no-modules, no-clean, no-clean:audit
  • app-medium: clean, lock-only, cache-only, cache-only:peer-deps, modules-only, no-lock, no-cache, no-modules, no-clean, no-clean:audit
timing results
app-largecleanlock-onlycache-onlycache-only
peer-deps
modules-onlyno-lockno-cacheno-modulesno-cleanno-clean
audit
npm@860.335 ±2.2036.978 ±0.1023.388 ±0.6026.371 ±1.293.799 ±0.063.810 ±0.093.050 ±0.0115.617 ±0.173.031 ±0.014.322 ±0.02
#42980.506 ±0.010.520 ±0.000.510 ±0.010.539 ±0.010.495 ±0.000.502 ±0.010.549 ±0.030.524 ±0.010.500 ±0.000.500 ±0.02
app-mediumcleanlock-onlycache-onlycache-only
peer-deps
modules-onlyno-lockno-cacheno-modulesno-cleanno-clean
audit
npm@844.529 ±0.4428.995 ±0.3716.976 ±0.1618.010 ±0.013.445 ±0.063.479 ±0.023.115 ±0.0911.698 ±0.072.860 ±0.033.866 ±0.02
#42980.511 ±0.020.538 ±0.010.513 ±0.000.534 ±0.010.514 ±0.010.514 ±0.010.531 ±0.020.506 ±0.010.543 ±0.010.533 ±0.02

@kirtangajjar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@fritzy Thanks for the heads up! I just have a question - why does my old pr diff and new pr diff look different?

I see another commit in this PR too. Is this expected?

@lukekarrys

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'm going to close this and reopen a new PR with only the relevant commit @kirtangajjar

lukekarrys added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2022
Fixes: #4273
Ref: #4298
Co-authored-by: Kirtan Gajjar <8456197+kirtangajjar@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@fritzy@npm-robot@kirtangajjar@lukekarrys@ljharb