Skip to content

fix(publish): split github workflow ref - #6978

Merged
wraithgar merged 3 commits into
npm:latestfrom
sxzz:fix/github-ref
Nov 13, 2023
Merged

fix(publish): split github workflow ref#6978
wraithgar merged 3 commits into
npm:latestfrom
sxzz:fix/github-ref

Conversation

@sxzz

@sxzzsxzz commented Nov 8, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fix split GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF environment variable.

After npm version 9.8.0 and onwards, the Vite publish script is malfunctioning. Upon investigation, it was discovered that the problem stems from splitting the env.GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF at the @ symbol. This becomes problematic when a @ symbol is present in the git tag, such as in plugin-vue@1.0.0.

If the value of GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF is octocat/hello-world/.github/workflows/my-workflow.yml@refs/tags/plugin-vue@1.0.0, it results in an incomplete workflowRef.

https://github.com/npm/cli/blob/0f7008851f1c250405e8dc326f15d535e8fc1eae/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js#L22C1-L24

References

@sxzz
sxzz requested a review from a team as a code ownerNovember 8, 2023 20:21

@bdehamerbdehamer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for working on a fix for this!

I think we need to rework it a bit to properly capture the full workflow ref. Also, can you add a test to exercise this case.

Comment threadworkspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js Outdated
sxzz added a commit to vitejs/vite-plugin-vue that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2023
@sxzz
sxzz marked this pull request as draft November 8, 2023 20:46
@sxzz
sxzz marked this pull request as ready for review November 8, 2023 20:56
@sxzz

sxzz commented Nov 8, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Sorry, I forgot to mark the PR as a draft before testing. It should work now, and I just changed a existing test - by adding a @ symbol to ref.

Comment threadworkspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js Outdated
@bdehamer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sxzz I've got a few more requests . . .

Let's add an explicit test to check that we're getting the expected value for the workflow reference:

diff --git a/workspaces/libnpmpublish/test/publish.js b/workspaces/libnpmpublish/test/publish.js
index 05ca0a9ad..584508d34 100644
--- a/workspaces/libnpmpublish/test/publish.js+++ b/workspaces/libnpmpublish/test/publish.js@@ -529,6 +529,9 @@ t.test('publish existing package with provenance in gha', async t => {
t.hasStrict(provenance.predicate.buildDefinition.buildType,
'https://slsa-framework.github.io/github-actions-buildtypes/workflow/v1',
'buildType matches expectations')
+ t.hasStrict(provenance.predicate.buildDefinition.externalParameters.workflow.ref,+ 'refs/tags/pkg@1.0.0',+ 'workflowRef matches expectations')
t.hasStrict(provenance.predicate.runDetails.builder.id,
`https://github.com/actions/runner/${runnerEnv}`,
'builder id matches expectations')

Also, I'm concerned that the split logic is getting overly-clever. I think something like this makes the intent more clear:

diff --git a/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js b/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js
index 8788c6514..8eb8880ad 100644
--- a/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js+++ b/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js@@ -19,10 +19,9 @@ const generateProvenance = async (subject, opts) => {
let payload
if (ci.GITHUB_ACTIONS) {
/* istanbul ignore next - not covering missing env var case */
- const [workflowPath, ...rest] = (env.GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF || '')- .replace(env.GITHUB_REPOSITORY + '/', '')- .split('@')- const workflowRef = rest.join('@')+ const relativeRef = (env.GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF || '').replace(env.GITHUB_REPOSITORY + '/', '')+ const workflowPath = relativeRef.slice(0, relativeRef.indexOf('@'))+ const workflowRef = relativeRef.slice(relativeRef.indexOf('@') + 1)
payload = {
_type: INTOTO_STATEMENT_V1_TYPE,
subject,

@sxzz

sxzz commented Nov 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@bdehamer Thanks for your code. Updated.

@bdehamerbdehamer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

bdehamer
bdehamer previously requested changes Nov 10, 2023
Comment threadworkspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js
Co-authored-by: Brian DeHamer <bdehamer@github.com>
@wraithgar
wraithgar merged commit fff8698 into npm:latestNov 13, 2023
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot mentioned this pull request Nov 13, 2023
@sxzz
sxzz deleted the fix/github-ref branch November 13, 2023 16:32
@wraithgar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

If you want this in npm 9 you can cherry-pick commit the commit from latest into a new PR against release/v9

bdehamer pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
Properly splits the github workflow ref on only the first `@`, ignoring any potential extras in the tag field.
wraithgar pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
fix(publish): split github workflow ref (#6978)
Properly splits the github workflow ref on only the first `@`, ignoring any potential extras in the tag field.
Co-authored-by: 三咲智子 Kevin Deng <sxzz@sxzz.moe>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@sxzz@bdehamer@wraithgar@ljharb@haoqunjiang
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Add copy buttons to all
 blocks
(function() {
function addCopyButtons() {
document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {
if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;
codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');
var btn = document.createElement('button');
btn.textContent = 'Copy';
btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';
btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };
btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };
btn.onclick = function() {
navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {
btn.textContent = 'Copied!';
setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);
});
};
codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';
codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);
});
}
addCopyButtons();
// Re-run on dynamic content
var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);
observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });
})();
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
fix(publish): split github workflow ref by sxzz · Pull Request #6978 · npm/cli · GitHub
Skip to content

fix(publish): split github workflow ref - #6978

Merged
wraithgar merged 3 commits into
npm:latestfrom
sxzz:fix/github-ref
Nov 13, 2023
Merged

fix(publish): split github workflow ref#6978
wraithgar merged 3 commits into
npm:latestfrom
sxzz:fix/github-ref

Conversation

@sxzz

@sxzzsxzz commented Nov 8, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fix split GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF environment variable.

After npm version 9.8.0 and onwards, the Vite publish script is malfunctioning. Upon investigation, it was discovered that the problem stems from splitting the env.GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF at the @ symbol. This becomes problematic when a @ symbol is present in the git tag, such as in plugin-vue@1.0.0.

If the value of GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF is octocat/hello-world/.github/workflows/my-workflow.yml@refs/tags/plugin-vue@1.0.0, it results in an incomplete workflowRef.

https://github.com/npm/cli/blob/0f7008851f1c250405e8dc326f15d535e8fc1eae/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js#L22C1-L24

References

@sxzz
sxzz requested a review from a team as a code ownerNovember 8, 2023 20:21

@bdehamerbdehamer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for working on a fix for this!

I think we need to rework it a bit to properly capture the full workflow ref. Also, can you add a test to exercise this case.

Comment threadworkspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js Outdated
sxzz added a commit to vitejs/vite-plugin-vue that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2023
@sxzz
sxzz marked this pull request as draft November 8, 2023 20:46
@sxzz
sxzz marked this pull request as ready for review November 8, 2023 20:56
@sxzz

sxzz commented Nov 8, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Sorry, I forgot to mark the PR as a draft before testing. It should work now, and I just changed a existing test - by adding a @ symbol to ref.

Comment threadworkspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js Outdated
@bdehamer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sxzz I've got a few more requests . . .

Let's add an explicit test to check that we're getting the expected value for the workflow reference:

diff --git a/workspaces/libnpmpublish/test/publish.js b/workspaces/libnpmpublish/test/publish.js
index 05ca0a9ad..584508d34 100644
--- a/workspaces/libnpmpublish/test/publish.js+++ b/workspaces/libnpmpublish/test/publish.js@@ -529,6 +529,9 @@ t.test('publish existing package with provenance in gha', async t => {
t.hasStrict(provenance.predicate.buildDefinition.buildType,
'https://slsa-framework.github.io/github-actions-buildtypes/workflow/v1',
'buildType matches expectations')
+ t.hasStrict(provenance.predicate.buildDefinition.externalParameters.workflow.ref,+ 'refs/tags/pkg@1.0.0',+ 'workflowRef matches expectations')
t.hasStrict(provenance.predicate.runDetails.builder.id,
`https://github.com/actions/runner/${runnerEnv}`,
'builder id matches expectations')

Also, I'm concerned that the split logic is getting overly-clever. I think something like this makes the intent more clear:

diff --git a/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js b/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js
index 8788c6514..8eb8880ad 100644
--- a/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js+++ b/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js@@ -19,10 +19,9 @@ const generateProvenance = async (subject, opts) => {
let payload
if (ci.GITHUB_ACTIONS) {
/* istanbul ignore next - not covering missing env var case */
- const [workflowPath, ...rest] = (env.GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF || '')- .replace(env.GITHUB_REPOSITORY + '/', '')- .split('@')- const workflowRef = rest.join('@')+ const relativeRef = (env.GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF || '').replace(env.GITHUB_REPOSITORY + '/', '')+ const workflowPath = relativeRef.slice(0, relativeRef.indexOf('@'))+ const workflowRef = relativeRef.slice(relativeRef.indexOf('@') + 1)
payload = {
_type: INTOTO_STATEMENT_V1_TYPE,
subject,

@sxzz

sxzz commented Nov 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@bdehamer Thanks for your code. Updated.

@bdehamerbdehamer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

bdehamer
bdehamer previously requested changes Nov 10, 2023
Comment threadworkspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js
Co-authored-by: Brian DeHamer <bdehamer@github.com>
@wraithgar
wraithgar merged commit fff8698 into npm:latestNov 13, 2023
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot mentioned this pull request Nov 13, 2023
@sxzz
sxzz deleted the fix/github-ref branch November 13, 2023 16:32
@wraithgar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

If you want this in npm 9 you can cherry-pick commit the commit from latest into a new PR against release/v9

bdehamer pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
Properly splits the github workflow ref on only the first `@`, ignoring any potential extras in the tag field.
wraithgar pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
fix(publish): split github workflow ref (#6978)
Properly splits the github workflow ref on only the first `@`, ignoring any potential extras in the tag field.
Co-authored-by: 三咲智子 Kevin Deng <sxzz@sxzz.moe>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@sxzz@bdehamer@wraithgar@ljharb@haoqunjiang
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Force GitHub README to respect dark mode (function() { var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = ' .markdown-body { color-scheme: dark light; } .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; } .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; } .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; } .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; } .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; } .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; } '; document.head.appendChild(style); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' fix(publish): split github workflow ref by sxzz · Pull Request #6978 · npm/cli · GitHub
Skip to content

fix(publish): split github workflow ref - #6978

Merged
wraithgar merged 3 commits into
npm:latestfrom
sxzz:fix/github-ref
Nov 13, 2023
Merged

fix(publish): split github workflow ref#6978
wraithgar merged 3 commits into
npm:latestfrom
sxzz:fix/github-ref

Conversation

@sxzz

@sxzzsxzz commented Nov 8, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fix split GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF environment variable.

After npm version 9.8.0 and onwards, the Vite publish script is malfunctioning. Upon investigation, it was discovered that the problem stems from splitting the env.GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF at the @ symbol. This becomes problematic when a @ symbol is present in the git tag, such as in plugin-vue@1.0.0.

If the value of GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF is octocat/hello-world/.github/workflows/my-workflow.yml@refs/tags/plugin-vue@1.0.0, it results in an incomplete workflowRef.

https://github.com/npm/cli/blob/0f7008851f1c250405e8dc326f15d535e8fc1eae/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js#L22C1-L24

References

@sxzz
sxzz requested a review from a team as a code ownerNovember 8, 2023 20:21

@bdehamerbdehamer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for working on a fix for this!

I think we need to rework it a bit to properly capture the full workflow ref. Also, can you add a test to exercise this case.

Comment threadworkspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js Outdated
sxzz added a commit to vitejs/vite-plugin-vue that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2023
@sxzz
sxzz marked this pull request as draft November 8, 2023 20:46
@sxzz
sxzz marked this pull request as ready for review November 8, 2023 20:56
@sxzz

sxzz commented Nov 8, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Sorry, I forgot to mark the PR as a draft before testing. It should work now, and I just changed a existing test - by adding a @ symbol to ref.

Comment threadworkspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js Outdated
@bdehamer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sxzz I've got a few more requests . . .

Let's add an explicit test to check that we're getting the expected value for the workflow reference:

diff --git a/workspaces/libnpmpublish/test/publish.js b/workspaces/libnpmpublish/test/publish.js
index 05ca0a9ad..584508d34 100644
--- a/workspaces/libnpmpublish/test/publish.js+++ b/workspaces/libnpmpublish/test/publish.js@@ -529,6 +529,9 @@ t.test('publish existing package with provenance in gha', async t => {
t.hasStrict(provenance.predicate.buildDefinition.buildType,
'https://slsa-framework.github.io/github-actions-buildtypes/workflow/v1',
'buildType matches expectations')
+ t.hasStrict(provenance.predicate.buildDefinition.externalParameters.workflow.ref,+ 'refs/tags/pkg@1.0.0',+ 'workflowRef matches expectations')
t.hasStrict(provenance.predicate.runDetails.builder.id,
`https://github.com/actions/runner/${runnerEnv}`,
'builder id matches expectations')

Also, I'm concerned that the split logic is getting overly-clever. I think something like this makes the intent more clear:

diff --git a/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js b/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js
index 8788c6514..8eb8880ad 100644
--- a/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js+++ b/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js@@ -19,10 +19,9 @@ const generateProvenance = async (subject, opts) => {
let payload
if (ci.GITHUB_ACTIONS) {
/* istanbul ignore next - not covering missing env var case */
- const [workflowPath, ...rest] = (env.GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF || '')- .replace(env.GITHUB_REPOSITORY + '/', '')- .split('@')- const workflowRef = rest.join('@')+ const relativeRef = (env.GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF || '').replace(env.GITHUB_REPOSITORY + '/', '')+ const workflowPath = relativeRef.slice(0, relativeRef.indexOf('@'))+ const workflowRef = relativeRef.slice(relativeRef.indexOf('@') + 1)
payload = {
_type: INTOTO_STATEMENT_V1_TYPE,
subject,

@sxzz

sxzz commented Nov 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@bdehamer Thanks for your code. Updated.

@bdehamerbdehamer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

bdehamer
bdehamer previously requested changes Nov 10, 2023
Comment threadworkspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js
Co-authored-by: Brian DeHamer <bdehamer@github.com>
@wraithgar
wraithgar merged commit fff8698 into npm:latestNov 13, 2023
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot mentioned this pull request Nov 13, 2023
@sxzz
sxzz deleted the fix/github-ref branch November 13, 2023 16:32
@wraithgar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

If you want this in npm 9 you can cherry-pick commit the commit from latest into a new PR against release/v9

bdehamer pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
Properly splits the github workflow ref on only the first `@`, ignoring any potential extras in the tag field.
wraithgar pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
fix(publish): split github workflow ref (#6978)
Properly splits the github workflow ref on only the first `@`, ignoring any potential extras in the tag field.
Co-authored-by: 三咲智子 Kevin Deng <sxzz@sxzz.moe>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@sxzz@bdehamer@wraithgar@ljharb@haoqunjiang
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer (function() { var ref = document.referrer; var terms = []; if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) { var url = new URL(ref); var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p'); if (q) { terms = q.split(/\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; }); } } if (terms.length === 0) return; var style = document.createElement('style'); style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }'; document.head.appendChild(style); function highlight(node) { if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node var text = node.textContent; var found = false; terms.forEach(function(term) { var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\') + ')', 'gi'); if (regex.test(text)) { found = true; var frag = document.createDocumentFragment(); var parts = text.split(regex); parts.forEach(function(part, i) { if (i % 2 === 0) { frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part)); } else { var span = document.createElement('span'); span.className = 'userscript-highlight'; span.textContent = part; frag.appendChild(span); } }); node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node); } }); } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT']; if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) { Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight); } } } highlight(document.body); // Re-highlight on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node); }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' fix(publish): split github workflow ref by sxzz · Pull Request #6978 · npm/cli · GitHub
Skip to content

fix(publish): split github workflow ref - #6978

Merged
wraithgar merged 3 commits into
npm:latestfrom
sxzz:fix/github-ref
Nov 13, 2023
Merged

fix(publish): split github workflow ref#6978
wraithgar merged 3 commits into
npm:latestfrom
sxzz:fix/github-ref

Conversation

@sxzz

@sxzzsxzz commented Nov 8, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fix split GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF environment variable.

After npm version 9.8.0 and onwards, the Vite publish script is malfunctioning. Upon investigation, it was discovered that the problem stems from splitting the env.GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF at the @ symbol. This becomes problematic when a @ symbol is present in the git tag, such as in plugin-vue@1.0.0.

If the value of GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF is octocat/hello-world/.github/workflows/my-workflow.yml@refs/tags/plugin-vue@1.0.0, it results in an incomplete workflowRef.

https://github.com/npm/cli/blob/0f7008851f1c250405e8dc326f15d535e8fc1eae/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js#L22C1-L24

References

@sxzz
sxzz requested a review from a team as a code ownerNovember 8, 2023 20:21

@bdehamerbdehamer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for working on a fix for this!

I think we need to rework it a bit to properly capture the full workflow ref. Also, can you add a test to exercise this case.

Comment threadworkspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js Outdated
sxzz added a commit to vitejs/vite-plugin-vue that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2023
@sxzz
sxzz marked this pull request as draft November 8, 2023 20:46
@sxzz
sxzz marked this pull request as ready for review November 8, 2023 20:56
@sxzz

sxzz commented Nov 8, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Sorry, I forgot to mark the PR as a draft before testing. It should work now, and I just changed a existing test - by adding a @ symbol to ref.

Comment threadworkspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js Outdated
@bdehamer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sxzz I've got a few more requests . . .

Let's add an explicit test to check that we're getting the expected value for the workflow reference:

diff --git a/workspaces/libnpmpublish/test/publish.js b/workspaces/libnpmpublish/test/publish.js
index 05ca0a9ad..584508d34 100644
--- a/workspaces/libnpmpublish/test/publish.js+++ b/workspaces/libnpmpublish/test/publish.js@@ -529,6 +529,9 @@ t.test('publish existing package with provenance in gha', async t => {
t.hasStrict(provenance.predicate.buildDefinition.buildType,
'https://slsa-framework.github.io/github-actions-buildtypes/workflow/v1',
'buildType matches expectations')
+ t.hasStrict(provenance.predicate.buildDefinition.externalParameters.workflow.ref,+ 'refs/tags/pkg@1.0.0',+ 'workflowRef matches expectations')
t.hasStrict(provenance.predicate.runDetails.builder.id,
`https://github.com/actions/runner/${runnerEnv}`,
'builder id matches expectations')

Also, I'm concerned that the split logic is getting overly-clever. I think something like this makes the intent more clear:

diff --git a/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js b/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js
index 8788c6514..8eb8880ad 100644
--- a/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js+++ b/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js@@ -19,10 +19,9 @@ const generateProvenance = async (subject, opts) => {
let payload
if (ci.GITHUB_ACTIONS) {
/* istanbul ignore next - not covering missing env var case */
- const [workflowPath, ...rest] = (env.GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF || '')- .replace(env.GITHUB_REPOSITORY + '/', '')- .split('@')- const workflowRef = rest.join('@')+ const relativeRef = (env.GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF || '').replace(env.GITHUB_REPOSITORY + '/', '')+ const workflowPath = relativeRef.slice(0, relativeRef.indexOf('@'))+ const workflowRef = relativeRef.slice(relativeRef.indexOf('@') + 1)
payload = {
_type: INTOTO_STATEMENT_V1_TYPE,
subject,

@sxzz

sxzz commented Nov 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@bdehamer Thanks for your code. Updated.

@bdehamerbdehamer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

bdehamer
bdehamer previously requested changes Nov 10, 2023
Comment threadworkspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js
Co-authored-by: Brian DeHamer <bdehamer@github.com>
@wraithgar
wraithgar merged commit fff8698 into npm:latestNov 13, 2023
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot mentioned this pull request Nov 13, 2023
@sxzz
sxzz deleted the fix/github-ref branch November 13, 2023 16:32
@wraithgar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

If you want this in npm 9 you can cherry-pick commit the commit from latest into a new PR against release/v9

bdehamer pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
Properly splits the github workflow ref on only the first `@`, ignoring any potential extras in the tag field.
wraithgar pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
fix(publish): split github workflow ref (#6978)
Properly splits the github workflow ref on only the first `@`, ignoring any potential extras in the tag field.
Co-authored-by: 三咲智子 Kevin Deng <sxzz@sxzz.moe>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@sxzz@bdehamer@wraithgar@ljharb@haoqunjiang
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page (function() { var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content', 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid', 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign']; function cleanUrl(url) { try { var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin); var changed = false; trackingParams.forEach(function(p) { if (u.searchParams.has(p)) { u.searchParams.delete(p); changed = true; } }); return changed ? u.toString() : url; } catch (e) { return url; } } function cleanLinks() { document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } cleanLinks(); var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { mutations.forEach(function(m) { m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) { if (node.nodeType === 1) { if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks(); node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) { var clean = cleanUrl(a.href); if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean; }); } }); }); }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + ' fix(publish): split github workflow ref by sxzz · Pull Request #6978 · npm/cli · GitHub
Skip to content

fix(publish): split github workflow ref - #6978

Merged
wraithgar merged 3 commits into
npm:latestfrom
sxzz:fix/github-ref
Nov 13, 2023
Merged

fix(publish): split github workflow ref#6978
wraithgar merged 3 commits into
npm:latestfrom
sxzz:fix/github-ref

Conversation

@sxzz

@sxzzsxzz commented Nov 8, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fix split GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF environment variable.

After npm version 9.8.0 and onwards, the Vite publish script is malfunctioning. Upon investigation, it was discovered that the problem stems from splitting the env.GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF at the @ symbol. This becomes problematic when a @ symbol is present in the git tag, such as in plugin-vue@1.0.0.

If the value of GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF is octocat/hello-world/.github/workflows/my-workflow.yml@refs/tags/plugin-vue@1.0.0, it results in an incomplete workflowRef.

https://github.com/npm/cli/blob/0f7008851f1c250405e8dc326f15d535e8fc1eae/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js#L22C1-L24

References

@sxzz
sxzz requested a review from a team as a code ownerNovember 8, 2023 20:21

@bdehamerbdehamer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for working on a fix for this!

I think we need to rework it a bit to properly capture the full workflow ref. Also, can you add a test to exercise this case.

Comment threadworkspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js Outdated
sxzz added a commit to vitejs/vite-plugin-vue that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2023
@sxzz
sxzz marked this pull request as draft November 8, 2023 20:46
@sxzz
sxzz marked this pull request as ready for review November 8, 2023 20:56
@sxzz

sxzz commented Nov 8, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Sorry, I forgot to mark the PR as a draft before testing. It should work now, and I just changed a existing test - by adding a @ symbol to ref.

Comment threadworkspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js Outdated
@bdehamer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sxzz I've got a few more requests . . .

Let's add an explicit test to check that we're getting the expected value for the workflow reference:

diff --git a/workspaces/libnpmpublish/test/publish.js b/workspaces/libnpmpublish/test/publish.js
index 05ca0a9ad..584508d34 100644
--- a/workspaces/libnpmpublish/test/publish.js+++ b/workspaces/libnpmpublish/test/publish.js@@ -529,6 +529,9 @@ t.test('publish existing package with provenance in gha', async t => {
t.hasStrict(provenance.predicate.buildDefinition.buildType,
'https://slsa-framework.github.io/github-actions-buildtypes/workflow/v1',
'buildType matches expectations')
+ t.hasStrict(provenance.predicate.buildDefinition.externalParameters.workflow.ref,+ 'refs/tags/pkg@1.0.0',+ 'workflowRef matches expectations')
t.hasStrict(provenance.predicate.runDetails.builder.id,
`https://github.com/actions/runner/${runnerEnv}`,
'builder id matches expectations')

Also, I'm concerned that the split logic is getting overly-clever. I think something like this makes the intent more clear:

diff --git a/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js b/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js
index 8788c6514..8eb8880ad 100644
--- a/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js+++ b/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js@@ -19,10 +19,9 @@ const generateProvenance = async (subject, opts) => {
let payload
if (ci.GITHUB_ACTIONS) {
/* istanbul ignore next - not covering missing env var case */
- const [workflowPath, ...rest] = (env.GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF || '')- .replace(env.GITHUB_REPOSITORY + '/', '')- .split('@')- const workflowRef = rest.join('@')+ const relativeRef = (env.GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF || '').replace(env.GITHUB_REPOSITORY + '/', '')+ const workflowPath = relativeRef.slice(0, relativeRef.indexOf('@'))+ const workflowRef = relativeRef.slice(relativeRef.indexOf('@') + 1)
payload = {
_type: INTOTO_STATEMENT_V1_TYPE,
subject,

@sxzz

sxzz commented Nov 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@bdehamer Thanks for your code. Updated.

@bdehamerbdehamer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

bdehamer
bdehamer previously requested changes Nov 10, 2023
Comment threadworkspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js
Co-authored-by: Brian DeHamer <bdehamer@github.com>
@wraithgar
wraithgar merged commit fff8698 into npm:latestNov 13, 2023
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot mentioned this pull request Nov 13, 2023
@sxzz
sxzz deleted the fix/github-ref branch November 13, 2023 16:32
@wraithgar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

If you want this in npm 9 you can cherry-pick commit the commit from latest into a new PR against release/v9

bdehamer pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
Properly splits the github workflow ref on only the first `@`, ignoring any potential extras in the tag field.
wraithgar pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
fix(publish): split github workflow ref (#6978)
Properly splits the github workflow ref on only the first `@`, ignoring any potential extras in the tag field.
Co-authored-by: 三咲智子 Kevin Deng <sxzz@sxzz.moe>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@sxzz@bdehamer@wraithgar@ljharb@haoqunjiang
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube (function() { function tryTheater() { var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label="Theater mode"], ytd-player #player button[title="Theater mode"]'); if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) { btn.click(); } } // Try immediately tryTheater(); // Try after navigation (SPA) var lastUrl = location.href; setInterval(function() { if (location.href !== lastUrl) { lastUrl = location.href; setTimeout(tryTheater, 500); } }, 1000); // Also try on player load var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' fix(publish): split github workflow ref by sxzz · Pull Request #6978 · npm/cli · GitHub
Skip to content

fix(publish): split github workflow ref - #6978

Merged
wraithgar merged 3 commits into
npm:latestfrom
sxzz:fix/github-ref
Nov 13, 2023
Merged

fix(publish): split github workflow ref#6978
wraithgar merged 3 commits into
npm:latestfrom
sxzz:fix/github-ref

Conversation

@sxzz

@sxzzsxzz commented Nov 8, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fix split GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF environment variable.

After npm version 9.8.0 and onwards, the Vite publish script is malfunctioning. Upon investigation, it was discovered that the problem stems from splitting the env.GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF at the @ symbol. This becomes problematic when a @ symbol is present in the git tag, such as in plugin-vue@1.0.0.

If the value of GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF is octocat/hello-world/.github/workflows/my-workflow.yml@refs/tags/plugin-vue@1.0.0, it results in an incomplete workflowRef.

https://github.com/npm/cli/blob/0f7008851f1c250405e8dc326f15d535e8fc1eae/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js#L22C1-L24

References

@sxzz
sxzz requested a review from a team as a code ownerNovember 8, 2023 20:21

@bdehamerbdehamer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for working on a fix for this!

I think we need to rework it a bit to properly capture the full workflow ref. Also, can you add a test to exercise this case.

Comment threadworkspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js Outdated
sxzz added a commit to vitejs/vite-plugin-vue that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2023
@sxzz
sxzz marked this pull request as draft November 8, 2023 20:46
@sxzz
sxzz marked this pull request as ready for review November 8, 2023 20:56
@sxzz

sxzz commented Nov 8, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Sorry, I forgot to mark the PR as a draft before testing. It should work now, and I just changed a existing test - by adding a @ symbol to ref.

Comment threadworkspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js Outdated
@bdehamer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sxzz I've got a few more requests . . .

Let's add an explicit test to check that we're getting the expected value for the workflow reference:

diff --git a/workspaces/libnpmpublish/test/publish.js b/workspaces/libnpmpublish/test/publish.js
index 05ca0a9ad..584508d34 100644
--- a/workspaces/libnpmpublish/test/publish.js+++ b/workspaces/libnpmpublish/test/publish.js@@ -529,6 +529,9 @@ t.test('publish existing package with provenance in gha', async t => {
t.hasStrict(provenance.predicate.buildDefinition.buildType,
'https://slsa-framework.github.io/github-actions-buildtypes/workflow/v1',
'buildType matches expectations')
+ t.hasStrict(provenance.predicate.buildDefinition.externalParameters.workflow.ref,+ 'refs/tags/pkg@1.0.0',+ 'workflowRef matches expectations')
t.hasStrict(provenance.predicate.runDetails.builder.id,
`https://github.com/actions/runner/${runnerEnv}`,
'builder id matches expectations')

Also, I'm concerned that the split logic is getting overly-clever. I think something like this makes the intent more clear:

diff --git a/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js b/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js
index 8788c6514..8eb8880ad 100644
--- a/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js+++ b/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js@@ -19,10 +19,9 @@ const generateProvenance = async (subject, opts) => {
let payload
if (ci.GITHUB_ACTIONS) {
/* istanbul ignore next - not covering missing env var case */
- const [workflowPath, ...rest] = (env.GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF || '')- .replace(env.GITHUB_REPOSITORY + '/', '')- .split('@')- const workflowRef = rest.join('@')+ const relativeRef = (env.GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF || '').replace(env.GITHUB_REPOSITORY + '/', '')+ const workflowPath = relativeRef.slice(0, relativeRef.indexOf('@'))+ const workflowRef = relativeRef.slice(relativeRef.indexOf('@') + 1)
payload = {
_type: INTOTO_STATEMENT_V1_TYPE,
subject,

@sxzz

sxzz commented Nov 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@bdehamer Thanks for your code. Updated.

@bdehamerbdehamer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

bdehamer
bdehamer previously requested changes Nov 10, 2023
Comment threadworkspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js
Co-authored-by: Brian DeHamer <bdehamer@github.com>
@wraithgar
wraithgar merged commit fff8698 into npm:latestNov 13, 2023
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot mentioned this pull request Nov 13, 2023
@sxzz
sxzz deleted the fix/github-ref branch November 13, 2023 16:32
@wraithgar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

If you want this in npm 9 you can cherry-pick commit the commit from latest into a new PR against release/v9

bdehamer pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
Properly splits the github workflow ref on only the first `@`, ignoring any potential extras in the tag field.
wraithgar pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
fix(publish): split github workflow ref (#6978)
Properly splits the github workflow ref on only the first `@`, ignoring any potential extras in the tag field.
Co-authored-by: 三咲智子 Kevin Deng <sxzz@sxzz.moe>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@sxzz@bdehamer@wraithgar@ljharb@haoqunjiang
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content (function() { function unstick() { document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role="banner"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*="position: fixed"], [style*="position:sticky"]').forEach(function(el) { if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') { el.style.position = 'static'; el.style.top = 'auto'; el.style.zIndex = 'auto'; } }); } unstick(); var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] }); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + ' fix(publish): split github workflow ref by sxzz · Pull Request #6978 · npm/cli · GitHub
Skip to content

fix(publish): split github workflow ref - #6978

Merged
wraithgar merged 3 commits into
npm:latestfrom
sxzz:fix/github-ref
Nov 13, 2023
Merged

fix(publish): split github workflow ref#6978
wraithgar merged 3 commits into
npm:latestfrom
sxzz:fix/github-ref

Conversation

@sxzz

@sxzzsxzz commented Nov 8, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fix split GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF environment variable.

After npm version 9.8.0 and onwards, the Vite publish script is malfunctioning. Upon investigation, it was discovered that the problem stems from splitting the env.GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF at the @ symbol. This becomes problematic when a @ symbol is present in the git tag, such as in plugin-vue@1.0.0.

If the value of GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF is octocat/hello-world/.github/workflows/my-workflow.yml@refs/tags/plugin-vue@1.0.0, it results in an incomplete workflowRef.

https://github.com/npm/cli/blob/0f7008851f1c250405e8dc326f15d535e8fc1eae/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js#L22C1-L24

References

@sxzz
sxzz requested a review from a team as a code ownerNovember 8, 2023 20:21

@bdehamerbdehamer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for working on a fix for this!

I think we need to rework it a bit to properly capture the full workflow ref. Also, can you add a test to exercise this case.

Comment threadworkspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js Outdated
sxzz added a commit to vitejs/vite-plugin-vue that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2023
@sxzz
sxzz marked this pull request as draft November 8, 2023 20:46
@sxzz
sxzz marked this pull request as ready for review November 8, 2023 20:56
@sxzz

sxzz commented Nov 8, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Sorry, I forgot to mark the PR as a draft before testing. It should work now, and I just changed a existing test - by adding a @ symbol to ref.

Comment threadworkspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js Outdated
@bdehamer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sxzz I've got a few more requests . . .

Let's add an explicit test to check that we're getting the expected value for the workflow reference:

diff --git a/workspaces/libnpmpublish/test/publish.js b/workspaces/libnpmpublish/test/publish.js
index 05ca0a9ad..584508d34 100644
--- a/workspaces/libnpmpublish/test/publish.js+++ b/workspaces/libnpmpublish/test/publish.js@@ -529,6 +529,9 @@ t.test('publish existing package with provenance in gha', async t => {
t.hasStrict(provenance.predicate.buildDefinition.buildType,
'https://slsa-framework.github.io/github-actions-buildtypes/workflow/v1',
'buildType matches expectations')
+ t.hasStrict(provenance.predicate.buildDefinition.externalParameters.workflow.ref,+ 'refs/tags/pkg@1.0.0',+ 'workflowRef matches expectations')
t.hasStrict(provenance.predicate.runDetails.builder.id,
`https://github.com/actions/runner/${runnerEnv}`,
'builder id matches expectations')

Also, I'm concerned that the split logic is getting overly-clever. I think something like this makes the intent more clear:

diff --git a/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js b/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js
index 8788c6514..8eb8880ad 100644
--- a/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js+++ b/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js@@ -19,10 +19,9 @@ const generateProvenance = async (subject, opts) => {
let payload
if (ci.GITHUB_ACTIONS) {
/* istanbul ignore next - not covering missing env var case */
- const [workflowPath, ...rest] = (env.GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF || '')- .replace(env.GITHUB_REPOSITORY + '/', '')- .split('@')- const workflowRef = rest.join('@')+ const relativeRef = (env.GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF || '').replace(env.GITHUB_REPOSITORY + '/', '')+ const workflowPath = relativeRef.slice(0, relativeRef.indexOf('@'))+ const workflowRef = relativeRef.slice(relativeRef.indexOf('@') + 1)
payload = {
_type: INTOTO_STATEMENT_V1_TYPE,
subject,

@sxzz

sxzz commented Nov 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@bdehamer Thanks for your code. Updated.

@bdehamerbdehamer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

bdehamer
bdehamer previously requested changes Nov 10, 2023
Comment threadworkspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js
Co-authored-by: Brian DeHamer <bdehamer@github.com>
@wraithgar
wraithgar merged commit fff8698 into npm:latestNov 13, 2023
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot mentioned this pull request Nov 13, 2023
@sxzz
sxzz deleted the fix/github-ref branch November 13, 2023 16:32
@wraithgar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

If you want this in npm 9 you can cherry-pick commit the commit from latest into a new PR against release/v9

bdehamer pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
Properly splits the github workflow ref on only the first `@`, ignoring any potential extras in the tag field.
wraithgar pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
fix(publish): split github workflow ref (#6978)
Properly splits the github workflow ref on only the first `@`, ignoring any potential extras in the tag field.
Co-authored-by: 三咲智子 Kevin Deng <sxzz@sxzz.moe>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@sxzz@bdehamer@wraithgar@ljharb@haoqunjiang
, 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { // Universal Dark Mode - works on any site (function() { var enabled = true; function applyDarkMode() { if (!enabled) return; // Create style element if it doesn't exist var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (!style) { style = document.createElement('style'); style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style'; document.head.appendChild(style); } // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video style.textContent = ' /* Invert everything except media */ html { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #1a1a2e !important; } /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */ img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*="background-image"] { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; } /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */ .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *, [data-theme="light"], [data-theme="light"], .ace_editor, .ace_editor *, .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *, .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *, .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *, .highlight, .highlight *, pre code, pre code * { filter: none !important; } /* Fix common UI elements */ .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover { filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important; background: #2d2d44 !important; border-color: #444 !important; } /* Scrollbars */ ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; } ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; } /* Selection */ ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; } '; } function removeDarkMode() { var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style'); if (style) style.remove(); } // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) { if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') { e.preventDefault(); enabled = !enabled; if (enabled) { applyDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled'); } else { removeDarkMode(); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled'); } } }); // Apply on load applyDarkMode(); // Re-apply on dynamic content var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) { if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) { applyDarkMode(); } }); observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true }); console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle'); })(); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })(); fix(publish): split github workflow ref by sxzz · Pull Request #6978 · npm/cli · GitHub
Skip to content

fix(publish): split github workflow ref - #6978

Merged
wraithgar merged 3 commits into
npm:latestfrom
sxzz:fix/github-ref
Nov 13, 2023
Merged

fix(publish): split github workflow ref#6978
wraithgar merged 3 commits into
npm:latestfrom
sxzz:fix/github-ref

Conversation

@sxzz

@sxzzsxzz commented Nov 8, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fix split GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF environment variable.

After npm version 9.8.0 and onwards, the Vite publish script is malfunctioning. Upon investigation, it was discovered that the problem stems from splitting the env.GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF at the @ symbol. This becomes problematic when a @ symbol is present in the git tag, such as in plugin-vue@1.0.0.

If the value of GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF is octocat/hello-world/.github/workflows/my-workflow.yml@refs/tags/plugin-vue@1.0.0, it results in an incomplete workflowRef.

https://github.com/npm/cli/blob/0f7008851f1c250405e8dc326f15d535e8fc1eae/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js#L22C1-L24

References

@sxzz
sxzz requested a review from a team as a code ownerNovember 8, 2023 20:21

@bdehamerbdehamer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for working on a fix for this!

I think we need to rework it a bit to properly capture the full workflow ref. Also, can you add a test to exercise this case.

Comment threadworkspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js Outdated
sxzz added a commit to vitejs/vite-plugin-vue that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2023
@sxzz
sxzz marked this pull request as draft November 8, 2023 20:46
@sxzz
sxzz marked this pull request as ready for review November 8, 2023 20:56
@sxzz

sxzz commented Nov 8, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

Sorry, I forgot to mark the PR as a draft before testing. It should work now, and I just changed a existing test - by adding a @ symbol to ref.

Comment threadworkspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js Outdated
@bdehamer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sxzz I've got a few more requests . . .

Let's add an explicit test to check that we're getting the expected value for the workflow reference:

diff --git a/workspaces/libnpmpublish/test/publish.js b/workspaces/libnpmpublish/test/publish.js
index 05ca0a9ad..584508d34 100644
--- a/workspaces/libnpmpublish/test/publish.js+++ b/workspaces/libnpmpublish/test/publish.js@@ -529,6 +529,9 @@ t.test('publish existing package with provenance in gha', async t => {
t.hasStrict(provenance.predicate.buildDefinition.buildType,
'https://slsa-framework.github.io/github-actions-buildtypes/workflow/v1',
'buildType matches expectations')
+ t.hasStrict(provenance.predicate.buildDefinition.externalParameters.workflow.ref,+ 'refs/tags/pkg@1.0.0',+ 'workflowRef matches expectations')
t.hasStrict(provenance.predicate.runDetails.builder.id,
`https://github.com/actions/runner/${runnerEnv}`,
'builder id matches expectations')

Also, I'm concerned that the split logic is getting overly-clever. I think something like this makes the intent more clear:

diff --git a/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js b/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js
index 8788c6514..8eb8880ad 100644
--- a/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js+++ b/workspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js@@ -19,10 +19,9 @@ const generateProvenance = async (subject, opts) => {
let payload
if (ci.GITHUB_ACTIONS) {
/* istanbul ignore next - not covering missing env var case */
- const [workflowPath, ...rest] = (env.GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF || '')- .replace(env.GITHUB_REPOSITORY + '/', '')- .split('@')- const workflowRef = rest.join('@')+ const relativeRef = (env.GITHUB_WORKFLOW_REF || '').replace(env.GITHUB_REPOSITORY + '/', '')+ const workflowPath = relativeRef.slice(0, relativeRef.indexOf('@'))+ const workflowRef = relativeRef.slice(relativeRef.indexOf('@') + 1)
payload = {
_type: INTOTO_STATEMENT_V1_TYPE,
subject,

@sxzz

sxzz commented Nov 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
ContributorAuthor

@bdehamer Thanks for your code. Updated.

@bdehamerbdehamer left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

bdehamer
bdehamer previously requested changes Nov 10, 2023
Comment threadworkspaces/libnpmpublish/lib/provenance.js
Co-authored-by: Brian DeHamer <bdehamer@github.com>
@wraithgar
wraithgar merged commit fff8698 into npm:latestNov 13, 2023
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot mentioned this pull request Nov 13, 2023
@sxzz
sxzz deleted the fix/github-ref branch November 13, 2023 16:32
@wraithgar

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

If you want this in npm 9 you can cherry-pick commit the commit from latest into a new PR against release/v9

bdehamer pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
Properly splits the github workflow ref on only the first `@`, ignoring any potential extras in the tag field.
wraithgar pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2023
fix(publish): split github workflow ref (#6978)
Properly splits the github workflow ref on only the first `@`, ignoring any potential extras in the tag field.
Co-authored-by: 三咲智子 Kevin Deng <sxzz@sxzz.moe>
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@sxzz@bdehamer@wraithgar@ljharb@haoqunjiang