docs: add missing changelog and timeline routes

[BittuBarnwal7479]

🔗 Linked issue

🧭 Context

📚 Description

Adds the missing route entries for package changelog and timeline pages to the route reference table in CONTRIBUTING.md.

• Added /package-changelog/:path+
• Added /package-timeline/:path+

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
npmx.dev	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jun 13, 2026 8:20pm

2 Skipped Deployments

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
docs.npmx.dev	Ignored	Preview	Jun 13, 2026 8:20pm
npmx-lunaria	Ignored		Jun 13, 2026 8:20pm

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 67c8d8b4-bf63-4312-afbf-644d7c0d4437

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1c48d0c and a737ac7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• CONTRIBUTING.md

---

📝 Walkthrough

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated contributor guide to add new named routes: "changelog" and "changelog-version" for package changelog navigation.
  • Added documentation for a new "timeline" named route for package timeline views.
  • Included route parameter details for the newly documented routes.

Walkthrough

Adds three named route entries to CONTRIBUTING.md's "Available route names" table: changelog, changelog-version, and timeline, with their URL patterns and parameter descriptions.

Changes

Route Names Documentation

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Route names table entries CONTRIBUTING.md	Adds changelog → /package-changelog/:org?/:name, changelog-version → /package-changelog/:org?/:name/v/:version, and timeline → /package-timeline/:org?/:packageName/v/:version rows to the "Available route names" reference table, including parameter descriptions.

Possibly related issues

• Missing package-changelog and package-timeline routes in CONTRIBUTING.md #2905: Adds the missing /package-changelog and /package-timeline route entries referenced by the issue.

Possibly related PRs

• npmx-dev/npmx.dev#2866: Related documentation updates for timeline and changelog shortcuts.

Suggested reviewers

• ghostdevv

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: adding missing changelog and timeline routes to the documentation.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description is related to the changeset, explaining that missing route entries were added to CONTRIBUTING.md for changelog and timeline pages.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@CONTRIBUTING.md`:
- Around line 450-451: The table entries for the new routes are incorrect and
incomplete: replace the two lines with explicit-parameter entries and add the
missing changelog-version route; specifically, change the changelog entry to use
explicit params matching the route helper (name "changelog" with path pattern
"/package-changelog/:org?/:name" and params [org, name]), add a second entry
"changelog-version" with path "/package-changelog/:org?/:name/v/:version" and
params [org, name, version], and update the timeline entry to use the explicit
pattern "/package-timeline/:org?/:packageName/v/:version" with params [org,
packageName, version] so the table mirrors the actual route signatures (see
changelogRoute() and the package-timeline path).

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 6934e5cb-dcc9-4720-9bbb-a3df6287fa5a

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1c48d0c and 0dd8196.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• CONTRIBUTING.md

[trueberryless]

Please you resolve this comment?

[BittuBarnwal7479]

@CodeRabbit review.

[coderabbitai]

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash# Get the PR diff
gh pr view 2906 --repo npmx-dev/npmx.dev --json files,body,title
# Get the specific review comment
gh api repos/npmx-dev/npmx.dev/pulls/comments/3408421437

Length of output: 7445

---

---

@BittuBarnwal7479 The changes in the current commit look correct — my earlier concern (discussion_r3408421437) was already addressed in commit a737ac7. The route table now properly documents:

Route name	Pattern	Params
changelog	/package-changelog/:org?/:name	org?, name
changelog-version	/package-changelog/:org?/:name/v/:version	org?, name, version
timeline	/package-timeline/:org?/:packageName/v/:version	org?, packageName, version

This matches the actual route implementations, so the documentation is accurate now.

Regarding @trueberryless's request — they are asking you to resolve the conversation thread on GitHub. You can do that by clicking the "Resolve conversation" button on that comment in the Files Changed tab.

I'll trigger a full review now.

✅ Action performed

Full review finished.

[serhalp]

Thanks!