Skip to content

chore: make autofix workflow steps parallel - #2971

Merged
ghostdevv merged 1 commit into
npmx-dev:mainfrom
trueberryless:feat/ci-parallel
Jun 28, 2026
Merged

chore: make autofix workflow steps parallel#2971
ghostdevv merged 1 commit into
npmx-dev:mainfrom
trueberryless:feat/ci-parallel

Conversation

@trueberryless

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

🔗 Linked issue

🧭 Context

Using GitHub's new parallel feature for action steps: https://github.blog/changelog/2026-06-25-actions-steps-can-now-be-run-in-parallel/

I went through all our GitHub actions and this was the only place where we can really safe some seconds and where parallelism is possible.

📚 Description

This PR wraps the four main steps in the autofix.yml action in a parallel block, so they are executed simultaneously. This is only possible because they do not depend on each other:

  • lint:css and i18n:check only read
  • build:lunaria only generates files under dist/lunaria
  • lint:fix does not touch build outputs

@vercel

vercelBot commented Jun 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

ProjectDeploymentActionsUpdated (UTC)
npmx.devReadyReadyPreview, CommentJun 28, 2026 9:49am
2 Skipped Deployments
ProjectDeploymentActionsUpdated (UTC)
docs.npmx.devIgnoredIgnoredPreviewJun 28, 2026 9:49am
npmx-lunariaIgnoredIgnoredJun 28, 2026 9:49am

Request Review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitaiBot commented Jun 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The four autofix workflow steps (CSS class lint, translation comparison, lunaria data build, and lint fixing) in .github/workflows/autofix.yml are wrapped in a parallel block, changing their execution from sequential to concurrent. Step definitions and commands are unchanged.

Changes

Autofix Workflow Parallelisation

Layer / File(s)Summary
Wrap autofix steps in parallel block
.github/workflows/autofix.yml
The existing vp run ... steps for CSS class lint, translation comparison, lunaria data build, and lint fixing are grouped under a parallel section, making them run concurrently rather than sequentially.
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check nameStatusExplanation
Description check✅ PassedThe description is directly related and explains the parallelisation rationale and affected steps.
Linked Issues check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check✅ PassedCheck skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Title check✅ PassedThe title clearly matches the main change: running autofix workflow steps in parallel.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@codecov

codecovBot commented Jun 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@trueberrylesstrueberryless added the needs review This PR is waiting for a review from a maintainer label Jun 28, 2026
@ghostdevvghostdevv removed the needs review This PR is waiting for a review from a maintainer label Jun 28, 2026
@ghostdevvghostdevv changed the title feat: make autofix steps parallelchore(ci): make autofix steps parallelJun 28, 2026
@ghostdevvghostdevv changed the title chore(ci): make autofix steps parallelchore: make autofix workflow steps parallelJun 28, 2026
@ghostdevv
ghostdevv added this pull request to the merge queueJun 28, 2026
Merged via the queue into npmx-dev:main with commit 34c1e86Jun 28, 2026
26 of 27 checks passed
@github-actionsgithub-actionsBot mentioned this pull request Jun 28, 2026
ayo-run pushed a commit to ayo-run/npmx.dev that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2026
@luc122cluc122c mentioned this pull request Aug 5, 2026
Sign up for freeto join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@trueberryless@ghostdevv