Object-less ("global") actions have no UI home in protocol 17 — the onboarding flow is API-only #27

Description

@os-warren

Found while implementing catalog instantiation (#5). Reported rather than redesigned around, because which way this goes is a product call.

What was measured

duly_catalog_apply and duly_catalog_sync are global actions — neither operates on a record, so neither declares an objectName. In @objectstack/spec@17.2.0 that means they have no place to surface in the UI:

  • global_nav was removed from ACTION_LOCATIONS in spec 17 (#6888, ADR-0049 enforce-or-remove). The console's ⌘K palette composes its groups from nav items, objects, dashboards, pages, reports and record search — it reads no action metadata, so the location never rendered anything.
  • Every surviving location is object-bound: list_toolbar, list_item, record_header, record_more, record_related, record_section.

The spec's own prescription for this case is locations: [] (headless), which is what both actions declare. They keep their param contract, capability gate and audit trail, and they are invoked over the platform action route:

POST /api/v1/actions/global/duly_catalog_apply
{ "position_code": "plant_compliance_officer", "users": ["u1","u2","u3"] }

...or over MCP. There is no button.

Why it is worth a decision

#5 opens by calling this "the onboarding path, and the single biggest adoption risk in the product" — the thing that has to be easy or the rollout dies in week one. An admin who has just imported their catalog currently cannot click anything to apply it; they need an API client, or the MCP surface (#21).

Options

  • A. Leave it headless. Honest to the platform, and day-one bulk onboarding over API/MCP is arguably the right shape for "26 duties × 40 people". Pairs naturally with 清单导入走平台标准 Import:提供样例 CSV,浏览器走通目录项与职责的导入并留档 #19 (spreadsheet import) and Document the MCP surface — ask the system what is late #21 (MCP surface).
  • B. Also attach an object-bound twin to duly_catalog_item with objectName: 'duly_catalog_item' and locations: ['list_toolbar'] — a real button on the Role catalog list view, which is exactly where an admin is standing when they want it. Costs a second declaration whose handler can be the same function.
  • C. A page (src/pages/) that collects the inputs and calls the action. Most control over the onboarding experience, most work.
  • D. ai: { exposed: true, requiresConfirmation: true, description: … } so the MCP/agent surface can drive it conversationally. Deliberately not done in Catalog instantiation — apply a position's duty catalog to a person #5: nothing needs it for reachability (the REST route works without it), and arming an agent to bulk-create duties for arbitrary users is a decision to take deliberately rather than as a side effect.

Filing unassigned for triage. B is the cheapest thing that gives the onboarding flow a button, and it does not invalidate A.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
     blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
    }
    } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
    })();
    (function(){
    try {
    var __m = "github.com";
    var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
    
    Skip to content

    Object-less ("global") actions have no UI home in protocol 17 — the onboarding flow is API-only #27

    Description

    @os-warren

    Found while implementing catalog instantiation (#5). Reported rather than redesigned around, because which way this goes is a product call.

    What was measured

    duly_catalog_apply and duly_catalog_sync are global actions — neither operates on a record, so neither declares an objectName. In @objectstack/spec@17.2.0 that means they have no place to surface in the UI:

    • global_nav was removed from ACTION_LOCATIONS in spec 17 (#6888, ADR-0049 enforce-or-remove). The console's ⌘K palette composes its groups from nav items, objects, dashboards, pages, reports and record search — it reads no action metadata, so the location never rendered anything.
    • Every surviving location is object-bound: list_toolbar, list_item, record_header, record_more, record_related, record_section.

    The spec's own prescription for this case is locations: [] (headless), which is what both actions declare. They keep their param contract, capability gate and audit trail, and they are invoked over the platform action route:

    POST /api/v1/actions/global/duly_catalog_apply
    { "position_code": "plant_compliance_officer", "users": ["u1","u2","u3"] }
    

    ...or over MCP. There is no button.

    Why it is worth a decision

    #5 opens by calling this "the onboarding path, and the single biggest adoption risk in the product" — the thing that has to be easy or the rollout dies in week one. An admin who has just imported their catalog currently cannot click anything to apply it; they need an API client, or the MCP surface (#21).

    Options

    • A. Leave it headless. Honest to the platform, and day-one bulk onboarding over API/MCP is arguably the right shape for "26 duties × 40 people". Pairs naturally with 清单导入走平台标准 Import:提供样例 CSV,浏览器走通目录项与职责的导入并留档 #19 (spreadsheet import) and Document the MCP surface — ask the system what is late #21 (MCP surface).
    • B. Also attach an object-bound twin to duly_catalog_item with objectName: 'duly_catalog_item' and locations: ['list_toolbar'] — a real button on the Role catalog list view, which is exactly where an admin is standing when they want it. Costs a second declaration whose handler can be the same function.
    • C. A page (src/pages/) that collects the inputs and calls the action. Most control over the onboarding experience, most work.
    • D. ai: { exposed: true, requiresConfirmation: true, description: … } so the MCP/agent surface can drive it conversationally. Deliberately not done in Catalog instantiation — apply a position's duty catalog to a person #5: nothing needs it for reachability (the REST route works without it), and arming an agent to bulk-create duties for arbitrary users is a decision to take deliberately rather than as a side effect.

    Filing unassigned for triage. B is the cheapest thing that gives the onboarding flow a button, and it does not invalidate A.

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Assignees

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
      Skip to content

      Object-less ("global") actions have no UI home in protocol 17 — the onboarding flow is API-only #27

      Description

      @os-warren

      Found while implementing catalog instantiation (#5). Reported rather than redesigned around, because which way this goes is a product call.

      What was measured

      duly_catalog_apply and duly_catalog_sync are global actions — neither operates on a record, so neither declares an objectName. In @objectstack/spec@17.2.0 that means they have no place to surface in the UI:

      • global_nav was removed from ACTION_LOCATIONS in spec 17 (#6888, ADR-0049 enforce-or-remove). The console's ⌘K palette composes its groups from nav items, objects, dashboards, pages, reports and record search — it reads no action metadata, so the location never rendered anything.
      • Every surviving location is object-bound: list_toolbar, list_item, record_header, record_more, record_related, record_section.

      The spec's own prescription for this case is locations: [] (headless), which is what both actions declare. They keep their param contract, capability gate and audit trail, and they are invoked over the platform action route:

      POST /api/v1/actions/global/duly_catalog_apply
      { "position_code": "plant_compliance_officer", "users": ["u1","u2","u3"] }
      

      ...or over MCP. There is no button.

      Why it is worth a decision

      #5 opens by calling this "the onboarding path, and the single biggest adoption risk in the product" — the thing that has to be easy or the rollout dies in week one. An admin who has just imported their catalog currently cannot click anything to apply it; they need an API client, or the MCP surface (#21).

      Options

      • A. Leave it headless. Honest to the platform, and day-one bulk onboarding over API/MCP is arguably the right shape for "26 duties × 40 people". Pairs naturally with 清单导入走平台标准 Import:提供样例 CSV,浏览器走通目录项与职责的导入并留档 #19 (spreadsheet import) and Document the MCP surface — ask the system what is late #21 (MCP surface).
      • B. Also attach an object-bound twin to duly_catalog_item with objectName: 'duly_catalog_item' and locations: ['list_toolbar'] — a real button on the Role catalog list view, which is exactly where an admin is standing when they want it. Costs a second declaration whose handler can be the same function.
      • C. A page (src/pages/) that collects the inputs and calls the action. Most control over the onboarding experience, most work.
      • D. ai: { exposed: true, requiresConfirmation: true, description: … } so the MCP/agent surface can drive it conversationally. Deliberately not done in Catalog instantiation — apply a position's duty catalog to a person #5: nothing needs it for reachability (the REST route works without it), and arming an agent to bulk-create duties for arbitrary users is a decision to take deliberately rather than as a side effect.

      Filing unassigned for triage. B is the cheapest thing that gives the onboarding flow a button, and it does not invalidate A.

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      Type

      No type

      Projects

      No projects

        Milestone

        No milestone

        Relationships

        None yet

        Development

        No branches or pull requests

        Issue actions

        , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
        Skip to content

        Object-less ("global") actions have no UI home in protocol 17 — the onboarding flow is API-only #27

        Description

        @os-warren

        Found while implementing catalog instantiation (#5). Reported rather than redesigned around, because which way this goes is a product call.

        What was measured

        duly_catalog_apply and duly_catalog_sync are global actions — neither operates on a record, so neither declares an objectName. In @objectstack/spec@17.2.0 that means they have no place to surface in the UI:

        • global_nav was removed from ACTION_LOCATIONS in spec 17 (#6888, ADR-0049 enforce-or-remove). The console's ⌘K palette composes its groups from nav items, objects, dashboards, pages, reports and record search — it reads no action metadata, so the location never rendered anything.
        • Every surviving location is object-bound: list_toolbar, list_item, record_header, record_more, record_related, record_section.

        The spec's own prescription for this case is locations: [] (headless), which is what both actions declare. They keep their param contract, capability gate and audit trail, and they are invoked over the platform action route:

        POST /api/v1/actions/global/duly_catalog_apply
        { "position_code": "plant_compliance_officer", "users": ["u1","u2","u3"] }
        

        ...or over MCP. There is no button.

        Why it is worth a decision

        #5 opens by calling this "the onboarding path, and the single biggest adoption risk in the product" — the thing that has to be easy or the rollout dies in week one. An admin who has just imported their catalog currently cannot click anything to apply it; they need an API client, or the MCP surface (#21).

        Options

        • A. Leave it headless. Honest to the platform, and day-one bulk onboarding over API/MCP is arguably the right shape for "26 duties × 40 people". Pairs naturally with 清单导入走平台标准 Import:提供样例 CSV,浏览器走通目录项与职责的导入并留档 #19 (spreadsheet import) and Document the MCP surface — ask the system what is late #21 (MCP surface).
        • B. Also attach an object-bound twin to duly_catalog_item with objectName: 'duly_catalog_item' and locations: ['list_toolbar'] — a real button on the Role catalog list view, which is exactly where an admin is standing when they want it. Costs a second declaration whose handler can be the same function.
        • C. A page (src/pages/) that collects the inputs and calls the action. Most control over the onboarding experience, most work.
        • D. ai: { exposed: true, requiresConfirmation: true, description: … } so the MCP/agent surface can drive it conversationally. Deliberately not done in Catalog instantiation — apply a position's duty catalog to a person #5: nothing needs it for reachability (the REST route works without it), and arming an agent to bulk-create duties for arbitrary users is a decision to take deliberately rather than as a side effect.

        Filing unassigned for triage. B is the cheapest thing that gives the onboarding flow a button, and it does not invalidate A.

        Metadata

        Metadata

        Assignees

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
          Skip to content

          Object-less ("global") actions have no UI home in protocol 17 — the onboarding flow is API-only #27

          Description

          @os-warren

          Found while implementing catalog instantiation (#5). Reported rather than redesigned around, because which way this goes is a product call.

          What was measured

          duly_catalog_apply and duly_catalog_sync are global actions — neither operates on a record, so neither declares an objectName. In @objectstack/spec@17.2.0 that means they have no place to surface in the UI:

          • global_nav was removed from ACTION_LOCATIONS in spec 17 (#6888, ADR-0049 enforce-or-remove). The console's ⌘K palette composes its groups from nav items, objects, dashboards, pages, reports and record search — it reads no action metadata, so the location never rendered anything.
          • Every surviving location is object-bound: list_toolbar, list_item, record_header, record_more, record_related, record_section.

          The spec's own prescription for this case is locations: [] (headless), which is what both actions declare. They keep their param contract, capability gate and audit trail, and they are invoked over the platform action route:

          POST /api/v1/actions/global/duly_catalog_apply
          { "position_code": "plant_compliance_officer", "users": ["u1","u2","u3"] }
          

          ...or over MCP. There is no button.

          Why it is worth a decision

          #5 opens by calling this "the onboarding path, and the single biggest adoption risk in the product" — the thing that has to be easy or the rollout dies in week one. An admin who has just imported their catalog currently cannot click anything to apply it; they need an API client, or the MCP surface (#21).

          Options

          • A. Leave it headless. Honest to the platform, and day-one bulk onboarding over API/MCP is arguably the right shape for "26 duties × 40 people". Pairs naturally with 清单导入走平台标准 Import:提供样例 CSV,浏览器走通目录项与职责的导入并留档 #19 (spreadsheet import) and Document the MCP surface — ask the system what is late #21 (MCP surface).
          • B. Also attach an object-bound twin to duly_catalog_item with objectName: 'duly_catalog_item' and locations: ['list_toolbar'] — a real button on the Role catalog list view, which is exactly where an admin is standing when they want it. Costs a second declaration whose handler can be the same function.
          • C. A page (src/pages/) that collects the inputs and calls the action. Most control over the onboarding experience, most work.
          • D. ai: { exposed: true, requiresConfirmation: true, description: … } so the MCP/agent surface can drive it conversationally. Deliberately not done in Catalog instantiation — apply a position's duty catalog to a person #5: nothing needs it for reachability (the REST route works without it), and arming an agent to bulk-create duties for arbitrary users is a decision to take deliberately rather than as a side effect.

          Filing unassigned for triage. B is the cheapest thing that gives the onboarding flow a button, and it does not invalidate A.

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          Type

          No type

          Projects

          No projects

            Milestone

            No milestone

            Relationships

            None yet

            Development

            No branches or pull requests

            Issue actions

            , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
            Skip to content

            Object-less ("global") actions have no UI home in protocol 17 — the onboarding flow is API-only #27

            Description

            @os-warren

            Found while implementing catalog instantiation (#5). Reported rather than redesigned around, because which way this goes is a product call.

            What was measured

            duly_catalog_apply and duly_catalog_sync are global actions — neither operates on a record, so neither declares an objectName. In @objectstack/spec@17.2.0 that means they have no place to surface in the UI:

            • global_nav was removed from ACTION_LOCATIONS in spec 17 (#6888, ADR-0049 enforce-or-remove). The console's ⌘K palette composes its groups from nav items, objects, dashboards, pages, reports and record search — it reads no action metadata, so the location never rendered anything.
            • Every surviving location is object-bound: list_toolbar, list_item, record_header, record_more, record_related, record_section.

            The spec's own prescription for this case is locations: [] (headless), which is what both actions declare. They keep their param contract, capability gate and audit trail, and they are invoked over the platform action route:

            POST /api/v1/actions/global/duly_catalog_apply
            { "position_code": "plant_compliance_officer", "users": ["u1","u2","u3"] }
            

            ...or over MCP. There is no button.

            Why it is worth a decision

            #5 opens by calling this "the onboarding path, and the single biggest adoption risk in the product" — the thing that has to be easy or the rollout dies in week one. An admin who has just imported their catalog currently cannot click anything to apply it; they need an API client, or the MCP surface (#21).

            Options

            • A. Leave it headless. Honest to the platform, and day-one bulk onboarding over API/MCP is arguably the right shape for "26 duties × 40 people". Pairs naturally with 清单导入走平台标准 Import:提供样例 CSV,浏览器走通目录项与职责的导入并留档 #19 (spreadsheet import) and Document the MCP surface — ask the system what is late #21 (MCP surface).
            • B. Also attach an object-bound twin to duly_catalog_item with objectName: 'duly_catalog_item' and locations: ['list_toolbar'] — a real button on the Role catalog list view, which is exactly where an admin is standing when they want it. Costs a second declaration whose handler can be the same function.
            • C. A page (src/pages/) that collects the inputs and calls the action. Most control over the onboarding experience, most work.
            • D. ai: { exposed: true, requiresConfirmation: true, description: … } so the MCP/agent surface can drive it conversationally. Deliberately not done in Catalog instantiation — apply a position's duty catalog to a person #5: nothing needs it for reachability (the REST route works without it), and arming an agent to bulk-create duties for arbitrary users is a decision to take deliberately rather than as a side effect.

            Filing unassigned for triage. B is the cheapest thing that gives the onboarding flow a button, and it does not invalidate A.

            Metadata

            Metadata

            Assignees

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              Object-less ("global") actions have no UI home in protocol 17 — the onboarding flow is API-only #27

              Description

              @os-warren

              Found while implementing catalog instantiation (#5). Reported rather than redesigned around, because which way this goes is a product call.

              What was measured

              duly_catalog_apply and duly_catalog_sync are global actions — neither operates on a record, so neither declares an objectName. In @objectstack/spec@17.2.0 that means they have no place to surface in the UI:

              • global_nav was removed from ACTION_LOCATIONS in spec 17 (#6888, ADR-0049 enforce-or-remove). The console's ⌘K palette composes its groups from nav items, objects, dashboards, pages, reports and record search — it reads no action metadata, so the location never rendered anything.
              • Every surviving location is object-bound: list_toolbar, list_item, record_header, record_more, record_related, record_section.

              The spec's own prescription for this case is locations: [] (headless), which is what both actions declare. They keep their param contract, capability gate and audit trail, and they are invoked over the platform action route:

              POST /api/v1/actions/global/duly_catalog_apply
              { "position_code": "plant_compliance_officer", "users": ["u1","u2","u3"] }
              

              ...or over MCP. There is no button.

              Why it is worth a decision

              #5 opens by calling this "the onboarding path, and the single biggest adoption risk in the product" — the thing that has to be easy or the rollout dies in week one. An admin who has just imported their catalog currently cannot click anything to apply it; they need an API client, or the MCP surface (#21).

              Options

              • A. Leave it headless. Honest to the platform, and day-one bulk onboarding over API/MCP is arguably the right shape for "26 duties × 40 people". Pairs naturally with 清单导入走平台标准 Import:提供样例 CSV,浏览器走通目录项与职责的导入并留档 #19 (spreadsheet import) and Document the MCP surface — ask the system what is late #21 (MCP surface).
              • B. Also attach an object-bound twin to duly_catalog_item with objectName: 'duly_catalog_item' and locations: ['list_toolbar'] — a real button on the Role catalog list view, which is exactly where an admin is standing when they want it. Costs a second declaration whose handler can be the same function.
              • C. A page (src/pages/) that collects the inputs and calls the action. Most control over the onboarding experience, most work.
              • D. ai: { exposed: true, requiresConfirmation: true, description: … } so the MCP/agent surface can drive it conversationally. Deliberately not done in Catalog instantiation — apply a position's duty catalog to a person #5: nothing needs it for reachability (the REST route works without it), and arming an agent to bulk-create duties for arbitrary users is a decision to take deliberately rather than as a side effect.

              Filing unassigned for triage. B is the cheapest thing that gives the onboarding flow a button, and it does not invalidate A.

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              Type

              No type

              Projects

              No projects

                Milestone

                No milestone

                Relationships

                None yet

                Development

                No branches or pull requests

                Issue actions

                , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                Skip to content

                Object-less ("global") actions have no UI home in protocol 17 — the onboarding flow is API-only #27

                Description

                @os-warren

                Found while implementing catalog instantiation (#5). Reported rather than redesigned around, because which way this goes is a product call.

                What was measured

                duly_catalog_apply and duly_catalog_sync are global actions — neither operates on a record, so neither declares an objectName. In @objectstack/spec@17.2.0 that means they have no place to surface in the UI:

                • global_nav was removed from ACTION_LOCATIONS in spec 17 (#6888, ADR-0049 enforce-or-remove). The console's ⌘K palette composes its groups from nav items, objects, dashboards, pages, reports and record search — it reads no action metadata, so the location never rendered anything.
                • Every surviving location is object-bound: list_toolbar, list_item, record_header, record_more, record_related, record_section.

                The spec's own prescription for this case is locations: [] (headless), which is what both actions declare. They keep their param contract, capability gate and audit trail, and they are invoked over the platform action route:

                POST /api/v1/actions/global/duly_catalog_apply
                { "position_code": "plant_compliance_officer", "users": ["u1","u2","u3"] }
                

                ...or over MCP. There is no button.

                Why it is worth a decision

                #5 opens by calling this "the onboarding path, and the single biggest adoption risk in the product" — the thing that has to be easy or the rollout dies in week one. An admin who has just imported their catalog currently cannot click anything to apply it; they need an API client, or the MCP surface (#21).

                Options

                • A. Leave it headless. Honest to the platform, and day-one bulk onboarding over API/MCP is arguably the right shape for "26 duties × 40 people". Pairs naturally with 清单导入走平台标准 Import:提供样例 CSV,浏览器走通目录项与职责的导入并留档 #19 (spreadsheet import) and Document the MCP surface — ask the system what is late #21 (MCP surface).
                • B. Also attach an object-bound twin to duly_catalog_item with objectName: 'duly_catalog_item' and locations: ['list_toolbar'] — a real button on the Role catalog list view, which is exactly where an admin is standing when they want it. Costs a second declaration whose handler can be the same function.
                • C. A page (src/pages/) that collects the inputs and calls the action. Most control over the onboarding experience, most work.
                • D. ai: { exposed: true, requiresConfirmation: true, description: … } so the MCP/agent surface can drive it conversationally. Deliberately not done in Catalog instantiation — apply a position's duty catalog to a person #5: nothing needs it for reachability (the REST route works without it), and arming an agent to bulk-create duties for arbitrary users is a decision to take deliberately rather than as a side effect.

                Filing unassigned for triage. B is the cheapest thing that gives the onboarding flow a button, and it does not invalidate A.

                Metadata

                Metadata

                Assignees

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions