Gate the catalog actions with requiredPermissionsduly_catalog_apply is currently ungated #30

Description

@os-warren

Sub-issue of #8, which is where the permission sets these need to name get created.

Found while implementing #5. Not fixed there: naming a capability that no permission set grants would either make the action uninvokable or leave a gate that grants nothing — and src/security/index.ts is #8's file surface, not #5's.

What is ungated

Both actions added in #5 declare no requiredPermissions:

  • duly_catalog_apply — creates a duly_duty for anysys_user id the caller passes, in bulk. A 26-item catalog against 40 people is 1,040 rows in one call.
  • duly_catalog_sync — rewrites cadence (frequency, due_anchor, due_offset_days, lead_days, grace_days) on every catalog-sourced duty in the org when position_code is omitted.

requiredPermissions is the real gate (ADR-0066 D4, enforced with a 403 on the platform action route and mirrored on the MCP bridge). visible/disabled are UI predicates and do not stop a request; neither action declares those either, and they would not help if it did.

Note this is not mitigated by object-level permissions: ctx.engine is the trusted facade — context-less and RLS/FLS-bypassing by design (#2849). The boundary for an action handler is the invoke-time capability gate, so with none declared there is nothing between a caller and a bulk write.

What to add

#8 already defines duly_admin as "catalog owners and rollout admins" — the right holder for both. Once that permission set exists:

// src/actions/catalog.actions.tsrequiredPermissions: ['<the duly_admin capability from #8>'],

on both CatalogApplyAction and CatalogSyncAction.

Worth considering as part of the same pass: whether duly_catalog_sync should require a narrower capability than apply. Applying a catalog to a new hire is routine onboarding; syncing org-wide rewrites authored cadence on duties people are already working to, and #5's PR notes it is deliberately reportable-after-the-fact for that reason.

Acceptance

  • both actions declare requiredPermissions naming a capability duly_admin actually grants
  • a test asserts the declaration (the same shape as the wiring assertions in test/catalog-instantiate.test.ts)

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
       blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
      }
      } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
      })();
      (function(){
      try {
      var __m = "github.com";
      var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
      
      Skip to content

      Gate the catalog actions with requiredPermissionsduly_catalog_apply is currently ungated #30

      Description

      @os-warren

      Sub-issue of #8, which is where the permission sets these need to name get created.

      Found while implementing #5. Not fixed there: naming a capability that no permission set grants would either make the action uninvokable or leave a gate that grants nothing — and src/security/index.ts is #8's file surface, not #5's.

      What is ungated

      Both actions added in #5 declare no requiredPermissions:

      • duly_catalog_apply — creates a duly_duty for anysys_user id the caller passes, in bulk. A 26-item catalog against 40 people is 1,040 rows in one call.
      • duly_catalog_sync — rewrites cadence (frequency, due_anchor, due_offset_days, lead_days, grace_days) on every catalog-sourced duty in the org when position_code is omitted.

      requiredPermissions is the real gate (ADR-0066 D4, enforced with a 403 on the platform action route and mirrored on the MCP bridge). visible/disabled are UI predicates and do not stop a request; neither action declares those either, and they would not help if it did.

      Note this is not mitigated by object-level permissions: ctx.engine is the trusted facade — context-less and RLS/FLS-bypassing by design (#2849). The boundary for an action handler is the invoke-time capability gate, so with none declared there is nothing between a caller and a bulk write.

      What to add

      #8 already defines duly_admin as "catalog owners and rollout admins" — the right holder for both. Once that permission set exists:

      // src/actions/catalog.actions.tsrequiredPermissions: ['<the duly_admin capability from #8>'],

      on both CatalogApplyAction and CatalogSyncAction.

      Worth considering as part of the same pass: whether duly_catalog_sync should require a narrower capability than apply. Applying a catalog to a new hire is routine onboarding; syncing org-wide rewrites authored cadence on duties people are already working to, and #5's PR notes it is deliberately reportable-after-the-fact for that reason.

      Acceptance

      • both actions declare requiredPermissions naming a capability duly_admin actually grants
      • a test asserts the declaration (the same shape as the wiring assertions in test/catalog-instantiate.test.ts)

      Activity

      Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
          Skip to content

          Gate the catalog actions with requiredPermissionsduly_catalog_apply is currently ungated #30

          Description

          @os-warren

          Sub-issue of #8, which is where the permission sets these need to name get created.

          Found while implementing #5. Not fixed there: naming a capability that no permission set grants would either make the action uninvokable or leave a gate that grants nothing — and src/security/index.ts is #8's file surface, not #5's.

          What is ungated

          Both actions added in #5 declare no requiredPermissions:

          • duly_catalog_apply — creates a duly_duty for anysys_user id the caller passes, in bulk. A 26-item catalog against 40 people is 1,040 rows in one call.
          • duly_catalog_sync — rewrites cadence (frequency, due_anchor, due_offset_days, lead_days, grace_days) on every catalog-sourced duty in the org when position_code is omitted.

          requiredPermissions is the real gate (ADR-0066 D4, enforced with a 403 on the platform action route and mirrored on the MCP bridge). visible/disabled are UI predicates and do not stop a request; neither action declares those either, and they would not help if it did.

          Note this is not mitigated by object-level permissions: ctx.engine is the trusted facade — context-less and RLS/FLS-bypassing by design (#2849). The boundary for an action handler is the invoke-time capability gate, so with none declared there is nothing between a caller and a bulk write.

          What to add

          #8 already defines duly_admin as "catalog owners and rollout admins" — the right holder for both. Once that permission set exists:

          // src/actions/catalog.actions.tsrequiredPermissions: ['<the duly_admin capability from #8>'],

          on both CatalogApplyAction and CatalogSyncAction.

          Worth considering as part of the same pass: whether duly_catalog_sync should require a narrower capability than apply. Applying a catalog to a new hire is routine onboarding; syncing org-wide rewrites authored cadence on duties people are already working to, and #5's PR notes it is deliberately reportable-after-the-fact for that reason.

          Acceptance

          • both actions declare requiredPermissions naming a capability duly_admin actually grants
          • a test asserts the declaration (the same shape as the wiring assertions in test/catalog-instantiate.test.ts)

          Activity

          Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              Gate the catalog actions with requiredPermissionsduly_catalog_apply is currently ungated #30

              Description

              @os-warren

              Sub-issue of #8, which is where the permission sets these need to name get created.

              Found while implementing #5. Not fixed there: naming a capability that no permission set grants would either make the action uninvokable or leave a gate that grants nothing — and src/security/index.ts is #8's file surface, not #5's.

              What is ungated

              Both actions added in #5 declare no requiredPermissions:

              • duly_catalog_apply — creates a duly_duty for anysys_user id the caller passes, in bulk. A 26-item catalog against 40 people is 1,040 rows in one call.
              • duly_catalog_sync — rewrites cadence (frequency, due_anchor, due_offset_days, lead_days, grace_days) on every catalog-sourced duty in the org when position_code is omitted.

              requiredPermissions is the real gate (ADR-0066 D4, enforced with a 403 on the platform action route and mirrored on the MCP bridge). visible/disabled are UI predicates and do not stop a request; neither action declares those either, and they would not help if it did.

              Note this is not mitigated by object-level permissions: ctx.engine is the trusted facade — context-less and RLS/FLS-bypassing by design (#2849). The boundary for an action handler is the invoke-time capability gate, so with none declared there is nothing between a caller and a bulk write.

              What to add

              #8 already defines duly_admin as "catalog owners and rollout admins" — the right holder for both. Once that permission set exists:

              // src/actions/catalog.actions.tsrequiredPermissions: ['<the duly_admin capability from #8>'],

              on both CatalogApplyAction and CatalogSyncAction.

              Worth considering as part of the same pass: whether duly_catalog_sync should require a narrower capability than apply. Applying a catalog to a new hire is routine onboarding; syncing org-wide rewrites authored cadence on duties people are already working to, and #5's PR notes it is deliberately reportable-after-the-fact for that reason.

              Acceptance

              • both actions declare requiredPermissions naming a capability duly_admin actually grants
              • a test asserts the declaration (the same shape as the wiring assertions in test/catalog-instantiate.test.ts)

              Activity

              Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions

                  , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
                  Skip to content

                  Gate the catalog actions with requiredPermissionsduly_catalog_apply is currently ungated #30

                  Description

                  @os-warren

                  Sub-issue of #8, which is where the permission sets these need to name get created.

                  Found while implementing #5. Not fixed there: naming a capability that no permission set grants would either make the action uninvokable or leave a gate that grants nothing — and src/security/index.ts is #8's file surface, not #5's.

                  What is ungated

                  Both actions added in #5 declare no requiredPermissions:

                  • duly_catalog_apply — creates a duly_duty for anysys_user id the caller passes, in bulk. A 26-item catalog against 40 people is 1,040 rows in one call.
                  • duly_catalog_sync — rewrites cadence (frequency, due_anchor, due_offset_days, lead_days, grace_days) on every catalog-sourced duty in the org when position_code is omitted.

                  requiredPermissions is the real gate (ADR-0066 D4, enforced with a 403 on the platform action route and mirrored on the MCP bridge). visible/disabled are UI predicates and do not stop a request; neither action declares those either, and they would not help if it did.

                  Note this is not mitigated by object-level permissions: ctx.engine is the trusted facade — context-less and RLS/FLS-bypassing by design (#2849). The boundary for an action handler is the invoke-time capability gate, so with none declared there is nothing between a caller and a bulk write.

                  What to add

                  #8 already defines duly_admin as "catalog owners and rollout admins" — the right holder for both. Once that permission set exists:

                  // src/actions/catalog.actions.tsrequiredPermissions: ['<the duly_admin capability from #8>'],

                  on both CatalogApplyAction and CatalogSyncAction.

                  Worth considering as part of the same pass: whether duly_catalog_sync should require a narrower capability than apply. Applying a catalog to a new hire is routine onboarding; syncing org-wide rewrites authored cadence on duties people are already working to, and #5's PR notes it is deliberately reportable-after-the-fact for that reason.

                  Acceptance

                  • both actions declare requiredPermissions naming a capability duly_admin actually grants
                  • a test asserts the declaration (the same shape as the wiring assertions in test/catalog-instantiate.test.ts)

                  Activity

                  Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                  Metadata

                  Metadata

                  Assignees

                  No one assigned

                    Type

                    No type

                    Projects

                    No projects

                      Milestone

                      No milestone

                      Relationships

                      None yet

                      Development

                      No branches or pull requests

                      Issue actions

                      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                      Skip to content

                      Gate the catalog actions with requiredPermissionsduly_catalog_apply is currently ungated #30

                      Description

                      @os-warren

                      Sub-issue of #8, which is where the permission sets these need to name get created.

                      Found while implementing #5. Not fixed there: naming a capability that no permission set grants would either make the action uninvokable or leave a gate that grants nothing — and src/security/index.ts is #8's file surface, not #5's.

                      What is ungated

                      Both actions added in #5 declare no requiredPermissions:

                      • duly_catalog_apply — creates a duly_duty for anysys_user id the caller passes, in bulk. A 26-item catalog against 40 people is 1,040 rows in one call.
                      • duly_catalog_sync — rewrites cadence (frequency, due_anchor, due_offset_days, lead_days, grace_days) on every catalog-sourced duty in the org when position_code is omitted.

                      requiredPermissions is the real gate (ADR-0066 D4, enforced with a 403 on the platform action route and mirrored on the MCP bridge). visible/disabled are UI predicates and do not stop a request; neither action declares those either, and they would not help if it did.

                      Note this is not mitigated by object-level permissions: ctx.engine is the trusted facade — context-less and RLS/FLS-bypassing by design (#2849). The boundary for an action handler is the invoke-time capability gate, so with none declared there is nothing between a caller and a bulk write.

                      What to add

                      #8 already defines duly_admin as "catalog owners and rollout admins" — the right holder for both. Once that permission set exists:

                      // src/actions/catalog.actions.tsrequiredPermissions: ['<the duly_admin capability from #8>'],

                      on both CatalogApplyAction and CatalogSyncAction.

                      Worth considering as part of the same pass: whether duly_catalog_sync should require a narrower capability than apply. Applying a catalog to a new hire is routine onboarding; syncing org-wide rewrites authored cadence on duties people are already working to, and #5's PR notes it is deliberately reportable-after-the-fact for that reason.

                      Acceptance

                      • both actions declare requiredPermissions naming a capability duly_admin actually grants
                      • a test asserts the declaration (the same shape as the wiring assertions in test/catalog-instantiate.test.ts)

                      Activity

                      Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                      Metadata

                      Metadata

                      Assignees

                      No one assigned

                        Type

                        No type

                        Projects

                        No projects

                          Milestone

                          No milestone

                          Relationships

                          None yet

                          Development

                          No branches or pull requests

                          Issue actions

                          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                          Skip to content

                          Gate the catalog actions with requiredPermissionsduly_catalog_apply is currently ungated #30

                          Description

                          @os-warren

                          Sub-issue of #8, which is where the permission sets these need to name get created.

                          Found while implementing #5. Not fixed there: naming a capability that no permission set grants would either make the action uninvokable or leave a gate that grants nothing — and src/security/index.ts is #8's file surface, not #5's.

                          What is ungated

                          Both actions added in #5 declare no requiredPermissions:

                          • duly_catalog_apply — creates a duly_duty for anysys_user id the caller passes, in bulk. A 26-item catalog against 40 people is 1,040 rows in one call.
                          • duly_catalog_sync — rewrites cadence (frequency, due_anchor, due_offset_days, lead_days, grace_days) on every catalog-sourced duty in the org when position_code is omitted.

                          requiredPermissions is the real gate (ADR-0066 D4, enforced with a 403 on the platform action route and mirrored on the MCP bridge). visible/disabled are UI predicates and do not stop a request; neither action declares those either, and they would not help if it did.

                          Note this is not mitigated by object-level permissions: ctx.engine is the trusted facade — context-less and RLS/FLS-bypassing by design (#2849). The boundary for an action handler is the invoke-time capability gate, so with none declared there is nothing between a caller and a bulk write.

                          What to add

                          #8 already defines duly_admin as "catalog owners and rollout admins" — the right holder for both. Once that permission set exists:

                          // src/actions/catalog.actions.tsrequiredPermissions: ['<the duly_admin capability from #8>'],

                          on both CatalogApplyAction and CatalogSyncAction.

                          Worth considering as part of the same pass: whether duly_catalog_sync should require a narrower capability than apply. Applying a catalog to a new hire is routine onboarding; syncing org-wide rewrites authored cadence on duties people are already working to, and #5's PR notes it is deliberately reportable-after-the-fact for that reason.

                          Acceptance

                          • both actions declare requiredPermissions naming a capability duly_admin actually grants
                          • a test asserts the declaration (the same shape as the wiring assertions in test/catalog-instantiate.test.ts)

                          Activity

                          Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                          Metadata

                          Metadata

                          Assignees

                          No one assigned

                            Type

                            No type

                            Projects

                            No projects

                              Milestone

                              No milestone

                              Relationships

                              None yet

                              Development

                              No branches or pull requests

                              Issue actions

                              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                              Skip to content

                              Gate the catalog actions with requiredPermissionsduly_catalog_apply is currently ungated #30

                              Description

                              @os-warren

                              Sub-issue of #8, which is where the permission sets these need to name get created.

                              Found while implementing #5. Not fixed there: naming a capability that no permission set grants would either make the action uninvokable or leave a gate that grants nothing — and src/security/index.ts is #8's file surface, not #5's.

                              What is ungated

                              Both actions added in #5 declare no requiredPermissions:

                              • duly_catalog_apply — creates a duly_duty for anysys_user id the caller passes, in bulk. A 26-item catalog against 40 people is 1,040 rows in one call.
                              • duly_catalog_sync — rewrites cadence (frequency, due_anchor, due_offset_days, lead_days, grace_days) on every catalog-sourced duty in the org when position_code is omitted.

                              requiredPermissions is the real gate (ADR-0066 D4, enforced with a 403 on the platform action route and mirrored on the MCP bridge). visible/disabled are UI predicates and do not stop a request; neither action declares those either, and they would not help if it did.

                              Note this is not mitigated by object-level permissions: ctx.engine is the trusted facade — context-less and RLS/FLS-bypassing by design (#2849). The boundary for an action handler is the invoke-time capability gate, so with none declared there is nothing between a caller and a bulk write.

                              What to add

                              #8 already defines duly_admin as "catalog owners and rollout admins" — the right holder for both. Once that permission set exists:

                              // src/actions/catalog.actions.tsrequiredPermissions: ['<the duly_admin capability from #8>'],

                              on both CatalogApplyAction and CatalogSyncAction.

                              Worth considering as part of the same pass: whether duly_catalog_sync should require a narrower capability than apply. Applying a catalog to a new hire is routine onboarding; syncing org-wide rewrites authored cadence on duties people are already working to, and #5's PR notes it is deliberately reportable-after-the-fact for that reason.

                              Acceptance

                              • both actions declare requiredPermissions naming a capability duly_admin actually grants
                              • a test asserts the declaration (the same shape as the wiring assertions in test/catalog-instantiate.test.ts)

                              Activity

                              Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

                              Metadata

                              Metadata

                              Assignees

                              No one assigned

                                Type

                                No type

                                Projects

                                No projects

                                  Milestone

                                  No milestone

                                  Relationships

                                  None yet

                                  Development

                                  No branches or pull requests

                                  Issue actions