finding: duly_task.source carries no index, yet it is the filter column of every governed analytics measure — duly_duty.source is indexed #47

Description

@os-warren

Noticed while implementing the analytics datasets (#9); filed rather than fixed because
src/objects/ was outside that card's file surface.

Observation

Every measure in all three datasets carries source IN ('catalog','assigned') — that is
the caliber rule, and it is deliberately on every measure with no exception list. So
duly_task.source is now a predicate on every analytics read in the product.

It is not indexed. duly_task.indexes (src/objects/task.object.ts):

{ name: 'duly_task_dispatch_identity', fields: ['duty', 'owner', 'period_key'], unique: 'organization' }
{ fields: ['owner', 'status'] }
{ fields: ['business_unit', 'due_date'] }
{ fields: ['due_date'] }
{ fields: ['last_update_at'] }
{ fields: ['assignment'] }

duly_dutydoes index its source ({ fields: ['source'] }), which is what makes
this look like an oversight rather than a decision: the two objects carry the same field,
for the same caliber reason, and only one of them indexes it.

Why it may still be the right shape

Worth stating so this is not treated as an automatic yes. source is a three-valued
select with a skewed distribution, so a standalone index on it is close to useless — a
scan of catalog rows is most of the table. The useful shapes are probably composite and
lead with something selective, e.g. ['business_unit', 'source'] or extending the
existing ['owner', 'status']. Which one depends on how #10's dashboard actually groups,
which does not exist yet.

Suggested handling

Leave until #10 lands and the real group-by patterns are visible, then pick a composite
index against measured queries rather than adding a standalone one now. Recording it so
the question is asked deliberately instead of being discovered as a slow board.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions

      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all
       blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
      }
      } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
      })();
      (function(){
      try {
      var __m = "github.com";
      var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '
      
      Skip to content

      finding: duly_task.source carries no index, yet it is the filter column of every governed analytics measure — duly_duty.source is indexed #47

      Description

      @os-warren

      Noticed while implementing the analytics datasets (#9); filed rather than fixed because
      src/objects/ was outside that card's file surface.

      Observation

      Every measure in all three datasets carries source IN ('catalog','assigned') — that is
      the caliber rule, and it is deliberately on every measure with no exception list. So
      duly_task.source is now a predicate on every analytics read in the product.

      It is not indexed. duly_task.indexes (src/objects/task.object.ts):

      { name: 'duly_task_dispatch_identity', fields: ['duty', 'owner', 'period_key'], unique: 'organization' }
      { fields: ['owner', 'status'] }
      { fields: ['business_unit', 'due_date'] }
      { fields: ['due_date'] }
      { fields: ['last_update_at'] }
      { fields: ['assignment'] }
      

      duly_dutydoes index its source ({ fields: ['source'] }), which is what makes
      this look like an oversight rather than a decision: the two objects carry the same field,
      for the same caliber reason, and only one of them indexes it.

      Why it may still be the right shape

      Worth stating so this is not treated as an automatic yes. source is a three-valued
      select with a skewed distribution, so a standalone index on it is close to useless — a
      scan of catalog rows is most of the table. The useful shapes are probably composite and
      lead with something selective, e.g. ['business_unit', 'source'] or extending the
      existing ['owner', 'status']. Which one depends on how #10's dashboard actually groups,
      which does not exist yet.

      Suggested handling

      Leave until #10 lands and the real group-by patterns are visible, then pick a composite
      index against measured queries rather than adding a standalone one now. Recording it so
      the question is asked deliberately instead of being discovered as a slow board.

      Metadata

      Metadata

      Assignees

      No one assigned

        Type

        No type

        Projects

        No projects

          Milestone

          No milestone

          Relationships

          None yet

          Development

          No branches or pull requests

          Issue actions

          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
          Skip to content

          finding: duly_task.source carries no index, yet it is the filter column of every governed analytics measure — duly_duty.source is indexed #47

          Description

          @os-warren

          Noticed while implementing the analytics datasets (#9); filed rather than fixed because
          src/objects/ was outside that card's file surface.

          Observation

          Every measure in all three datasets carries source IN ('catalog','assigned') — that is
          the caliber rule, and it is deliberately on every measure with no exception list. So
          duly_task.source is now a predicate on every analytics read in the product.

          It is not indexed. duly_task.indexes (src/objects/task.object.ts):

          { name: 'duly_task_dispatch_identity', fields: ['duty', 'owner', 'period_key'], unique: 'organization' }
          { fields: ['owner', 'status'] }
          { fields: ['business_unit', 'due_date'] }
          { fields: ['due_date'] }
          { fields: ['last_update_at'] }
          { fields: ['assignment'] }
          

          duly_dutydoes index its source ({ fields: ['source'] }), which is what makes
          this look like an oversight rather than a decision: the two objects carry the same field,
          for the same caliber reason, and only one of them indexes it.

          Why it may still be the right shape

          Worth stating so this is not treated as an automatic yes. source is a three-valued
          select with a skewed distribution, so a standalone index on it is close to useless — a
          scan of catalog rows is most of the table. The useful shapes are probably composite and
          lead with something selective, e.g. ['business_unit', 'source'] or extending the
          existing ['owner', 'status']. Which one depends on how #10's dashboard actually groups,
          which does not exist yet.

          Suggested handling

          Leave until #10 lands and the real group-by patterns are visible, then pick a composite
          index against measured queries rather than adding a standalone one now. Recording it so
          the question is asked deliberately instead of being discovered as a slow board.

          Metadata

          Metadata

          Assignees

          No one assigned

            Type

            No type

            Projects

            No projects

              Milestone

              No milestone

              Relationships

              None yet

              Development

              No branches or pull requests

              Issue actions

              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
              Skip to content

              finding: duly_task.source carries no index, yet it is the filter column of every governed analytics measure — duly_duty.source is indexed #47

              Description

              @os-warren

              Noticed while implementing the analytics datasets (#9); filed rather than fixed because
              src/objects/ was outside that card's file surface.

              Observation

              Every measure in all three datasets carries source IN ('catalog','assigned') — that is
              the caliber rule, and it is deliberately on every measure with no exception list. So
              duly_task.source is now a predicate on every analytics read in the product.

              It is not indexed. duly_task.indexes (src/objects/task.object.ts):

              { name: 'duly_task_dispatch_identity', fields: ['duty', 'owner', 'period_key'], unique: 'organization' }
              { fields: ['owner', 'status'] }
              { fields: ['business_unit', 'due_date'] }
              { fields: ['due_date'] }
              { fields: ['last_update_at'] }
              { fields: ['assignment'] }
              

              duly_dutydoes index its source ({ fields: ['source'] }), which is what makes
              this look like an oversight rather than a decision: the two objects carry the same field,
              for the same caliber reason, and only one of them indexes it.

              Why it may still be the right shape

              Worth stating so this is not treated as an automatic yes. source is a three-valued
              select with a skewed distribution, so a standalone index on it is close to useless — a
              scan of catalog rows is most of the table. The useful shapes are probably composite and
              lead with something selective, e.g. ['business_unit', 'source'] or extending the
              existing ['owner', 'status']. Which one depends on how #10's dashboard actually groups,
              which does not exist yet.

              Suggested handling

              Leave until #10 lands and the real group-by patterns are visible, then pick a composite
              index against measured queries rather than adding a standalone one now. Recording it so
              the question is asked deliberately instead of being discovered as a slow board.

              Metadata

              Metadata

              Assignees

              No one assigned

                Type

                No type

                Projects

                No projects

                  Milestone

                  No milestone

                  Relationships

                  None yet

                  Development

                  No branches or pull requests

                  Issue actions

                  , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "youtube.com"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '
                  Skip to content

                  finding: duly_task.source carries no index, yet it is the filter column of every governed analytics measure — duly_duty.source is indexed #47

                  Description

                  @os-warren

                  Noticed while implementing the analytics datasets (#9); filed rather than fixed because
                  src/objects/ was outside that card's file surface.

                  Observation

                  Every measure in all three datasets carries source IN ('catalog','assigned') — that is
                  the caliber rule, and it is deliberately on every measure with no exception list. So
                  duly_task.source is now a predicate on every analytics read in the product.

                  It is not indexed. duly_task.indexes (src/objects/task.object.ts):

                  { name: 'duly_task_dispatch_identity', fields: ['duty', 'owner', 'period_key'], unique: 'organization' }
                  { fields: ['owner', 'status'] }
                  { fields: ['business_unit', 'due_date'] }
                  { fields: ['due_date'] }
                  { fields: ['last_update_at'] }
                  { fields: ['assignment'] }
                  

                  duly_dutydoes index its source ({ fields: ['source'] }), which is what makes
                  this look like an oversight rather than a decision: the two objects carry the same field,
                  for the same caliber reason, and only one of them indexes it.

                  Why it may still be the right shape

                  Worth stating so this is not treated as an automatic yes. source is a three-valued
                  select with a skewed distribution, so a standalone index on it is close to useless — a
                  scan of catalog rows is most of the table. The useful shapes are probably composite and
                  lead with something selective, e.g. ['business_unit', 'source'] or extending the
                  existing ['owner', 'status']. Which one depends on how #10's dashboard actually groups,
                  which does not exist yet.

                  Suggested handling

                  Leave until #10 lands and the real group-by patterns are visible, then pick a composite
                  index against measured queries rather than adding a standalone one now. Recording it so
                  the question is asked deliberately instead of being discovered as a slow board.

                  Metadata

                  Metadata

                  Assignees

                  No one assigned

                    Type

                    No type

                    Projects

                    No projects

                      Milestone

                      No milestone

                      Relationships

                      None yet

                      Development

                      No branches or pull requests

                      Issue actions

                      , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                      Skip to content

                      finding: duly_task.source carries no index, yet it is the filter column of every governed analytics measure — duly_duty.source is indexed #47

                      Description

                      @os-warren

                      Noticed while implementing the analytics datasets (#9); filed rather than fixed because
                      src/objects/ was outside that card's file surface.

                      Observation

                      Every measure in all three datasets carries source IN ('catalog','assigned') — that is
                      the caliber rule, and it is deliberately on every measure with no exception list. So
                      duly_task.source is now a predicate on every analytics read in the product.

                      It is not indexed. duly_task.indexes (src/objects/task.object.ts):

                      { name: 'duly_task_dispatch_identity', fields: ['duty', 'owner', 'period_key'], unique: 'organization' }
                      { fields: ['owner', 'status'] }
                      { fields: ['business_unit', 'due_date'] }
                      { fields: ['due_date'] }
                      { fields: ['last_update_at'] }
                      { fields: ['assignment'] }
                      

                      duly_dutydoes index its source ({ fields: ['source'] }), which is what makes
                      this look like an oversight rather than a decision: the two objects carry the same field,
                      for the same caliber reason, and only one of them indexes it.

                      Why it may still be the right shape

                      Worth stating so this is not treated as an automatic yes. source is a three-valued
                      select with a skewed distribution, so a standalone index on it is close to useless — a
                      scan of catalog rows is most of the table. The useful shapes are probably composite and
                      lead with something selective, e.g. ['business_unit', 'source'] or extending the
                      existing ['owner', 'status']. Which one depends on how #10's dashboard actually groups,
                      which does not exist yet.

                      Suggested handling

                      Leave until #10 lands and the real group-by patterns are visible, then pick a composite
                      index against measured queries rather than adding a standalone one now. Recording it so
                      the question is asked deliberately instead of being discovered as a slow board.

                      Metadata

                      Metadata

                      Assignees

                      No one assigned

                        Type

                        No type

                        Projects

                        No projects

                          Milestone

                          No milestone

                          Relationships

                          None yet

                          Development

                          No branches or pull requests

                          Issue actions

                          , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); } })(); (function(){ try { var __m = "*"; var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '
                          Skip to content

                          finding: duly_task.source carries no index, yet it is the filter column of every governed analytics measure — duly_duty.source is indexed #47

                          Description

                          @os-warren

                          Noticed while implementing the analytics datasets (#9); filed rather than fixed because
                          src/objects/ was outside that card's file surface.

                          Observation

                          Every measure in all three datasets carries source IN ('catalog','assigned') — that is
                          the caliber rule, and it is deliberately on every measure with no exception list. So
                          duly_task.source is now a predicate on every analytics read in the product.

                          It is not indexed. duly_task.indexes (src/objects/task.object.ts):

                          { name: 'duly_task_dispatch_identity', fields: ['duty', 'owner', 'period_key'], unique: 'organization' }
                          { fields: ['owner', 'status'] }
                          { fields: ['business_unit', 'due_date'] }
                          { fields: ['due_date'] }
                          { fields: ['last_update_at'] }
                          { fields: ['assignment'] }
                          

                          duly_dutydoes index its source ({ fields: ['source'] }), which is what makes
                          this look like an oversight rather than a decision: the two objects carry the same field,
                          for the same caliber reason, and only one of them indexes it.

                          Why it may still be the right shape

                          Worth stating so this is not treated as an automatic yes. source is a three-valued
                          select with a skewed distribution, so a standalone index on it is close to useless — a
                          scan of catalog rows is most of the table. The useful shapes are probably composite and
                          lead with something selective, e.g. ['business_unit', 'source'] or extending the
                          existing ['owner', 'status']. Which one depends on how #10's dashboard actually groups,
                          which does not exist yet.

                          Suggested handling

                          Leave until #10 lands and the real group-by patterns are visible, then pick a composite
                          index against measured queries rather than adding a standalone one now. Recording it so
                          the question is asked deliberately instead of being discovered as a slow board.

                          Metadata

                          Metadata

                          Assignees

                          No one assigned

                            Type

                            No type

                            Projects

                            No projects

                              Milestone

                              No milestone

                              Relationships

                              None yet

                              Development

                              No branches or pull requests

                              Issue actions

                              , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode"); } } catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); } })(); })();
                              Skip to content

                              finding: duly_task.source carries no index, yet it is the filter column of every governed analytics measure — duly_duty.source is indexed #47

                              Description

                              @os-warren

                              Noticed while implementing the analytics datasets (#9); filed rather than fixed because
                              src/objects/ was outside that card's file surface.

                              Observation

                              Every measure in all three datasets carries source IN ('catalog','assigned') — that is
                              the caliber rule, and it is deliberately on every measure with no exception list. So
                              duly_task.source is now a predicate on every analytics read in the product.

                              It is not indexed. duly_task.indexes (src/objects/task.object.ts):

                              { name: 'duly_task_dispatch_identity', fields: ['duty', 'owner', 'period_key'], unique: 'organization' }
                              { fields: ['owner', 'status'] }
                              { fields: ['business_unit', 'due_date'] }
                              { fields: ['due_date'] }
                              { fields: ['last_update_at'] }
                              { fields: ['assignment'] }
                              

                              duly_dutydoes index its source ({ fields: ['source'] }), which is what makes
                              this look like an oversight rather than a decision: the two objects carry the same field,
                              for the same caliber reason, and only one of them indexes it.

                              Why it may still be the right shape

                              Worth stating so this is not treated as an automatic yes. source is a three-valued
                              select with a skewed distribution, so a standalone index on it is close to useless — a
                              scan of catalog rows is most of the table. The useful shapes are probably composite and
                              lead with something selective, e.g. ['business_unit', 'source'] or extending the
                              existing ['owner', 'status']. Which one depends on how #10's dashboard actually groups,
                              which does not exist yet.

                              Suggested handling

                              Leave until #10 lands and the real group-by patterns are visible, then pick a composite
                              index against measured queries rather than adding a standalone one now. Recording it so
                              the question is asked deliberately instead of being discovered as a slow board.

                              Metadata

                              Metadata

                              Assignees

                              No one assigned

                                Type

                                No type

                                Projects

                                No projects

                                  Milestone

                                  No milestone

                                  Relationships

                                  None yet

                                  Development

                                  No branches or pull requests

                                  Issue actions