You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Continues the new-developer journey audit (#10264), which covered the README and the running product but could not reach the docs site. The site is served from this repo, so the audit is content/docs/**.
content/docs/references/** — 214 auto-generated pages (⚠️ AUTO-GENERATED — DO NOT EDIT, produced by packages/spec/scripts/build-docs.ts). A defect there is a generator bug; file it against the generator, do not hand-edit.
content/docs/releases/** — written centrally at release time. Never edit in a code PR.
Everything covered by card 2/2 (ui/, automation/, permissions/, ai/).
Already machine-covered — do not re-derive
These gates were run on origin/main before dispatch:
Gate
Result
check:doc-authoring
✓ 380 files clean, no bare metadata literals
check:docs-redirects
✓ 92 entries, all destinations resolve
check:doc-anchors
exists and runs in CI (needs node_modules locally)
So anchors, redirect integrity and metadata literals are the machine's job. Spend nothing on them. Your job is what no gate can see.
Method — cheap checks first, prose reasoning last
This ordering is the point of the card; inverting it burns budget for little yield.
Mechanically falsifiable claims first. Every identifier a doc names — a field type, a schema property, a method, a CLI flag, an option key — either exists in packages/spec / the implementing package or it does not. That is a grep, not a reading exercise. Sweep the identifiers out of the code fences and check them in bulk against source. Docs that name things which no longer exist are the highest-yield, cheapest defect class in this tree.
Runnable claims second. Commands and code samples a reader is invited to run. Run the cheap ones. Note that node_modules is absent in a fresh clone — if a documented first command requires an install the doc never mentions, that itself is a finding.
Audit-only. Do not open a PR and do not edit any doc. File one finding issue per distinct defect, unassigned, finding label only — no domain and no type label, those are the triage seat's product. Dedupe-search before each one. Back-link this issue.
If the hit rate is high, say so plainly in your report: whether the remaining 88 unaudited pages are worth a second round is a decision that rests on your measured rate, and an honest low rate is as useful as a high one.
Report as a comment here: pages audited, defects found by class (nonexistent identifier / broken command / pedagogical hole), findings filed with numbers, and your hit rate per page.
Continues the new-developer journey audit (#10264), which covered the README and the running product but could not reach the docs site. The site is served from this repo, so the audit is
content/docs/**.Scope — exactly these, nothing else
content/docs/index.mdx,content/docs/build-without-code.mdx,content/docs/getting-started/**,content/docs/concepts/**,content/docs/data-modeling/**(~33 pages).Explicitly out of scope, do not touch or audit:
content/docs/references/**— 214 auto-generated pages (⚠️ AUTO-GENERATED — DO NOT EDIT, produced bypackages/spec/scripts/build-docs.ts). A defect there is a generator bug; file it against the generator, do not hand-edit.content/docs/releases/**— written centrally at release time. Never edit in a code PR.ui/,automation/,permissions/,ai/).Already machine-covered — do not re-derive
These gates were run on
origin/mainbefore dispatch:check:doc-authoringcheck:docs-redirectscheck:doc-anchorsnode_moduleslocally)So anchors, redirect integrity and metadata literals are the machine's job. Spend nothing on them. Your job is what no gate can see.
Method — cheap checks first, prose reasoning last
This ordering is the point of the card; inverting it burns budget for little yield.
packages/spec/ the implementing package or it does not. That is agrep, not a reading exercise. Sweep the identifiers out of the code fences and check them in bulk against source. Docs that name things which no longer exist are the highest-yield, cheapest defect class in this tree.node_modulesis absent in a fresh clone — if a documented first command requires an install the doc never mentions, that itself is a finding.Deliverable
Audit-only. Do not open a PR and do not edit any doc. File one
findingissue per distinct defect, unassigned,findinglabel only — no domain and no type label, those are the triage seat's product. Dedupe-search before each one. Back-link this issue.If the hit rate is high, say so plainly in your report: whether the remaining 88 unaudited pages are worth a second round is a decision that rests on your measured rate, and an honest low rate is as useful as a high one.
Report as a comment here: pages audited, defects found by class (nonexistent identifier / broken command / pedagogical hole), findings filed with numbers, and your hit rate per page.