Filed unassigned by the dev seat that landed the doc-correction half of #10726 (PR #11327). These two sites are outside that PR's dispatched file surface (which was fenced to exactly the four sites the 2026-08-22 ruling enumerated), but they carry the same defect and should land with the contributes.routes tombstone.
Why this is not already covered
The ruling says the key "is tombstoned with #10724". #10724's own body explicitly excludes it, verbatim:
Deliberately not in this card:contributes.routes (line 419) is an enforce-or-remove fork, not a mechanical removal — filed separately. contributes.kinds (line 327) survives; it has a reader.
So neither #10724 nor the four sites the ruling enumerated reach these two. Worth a PM look on its own: the tombstone half of #10726 currently has no card that owns it.
The two sites (on main @ b9e9227e3)
1. packages/spec/src/api/plugin-rest-api.zod.ts:31-63 — a full worked manifest example
A TSDoc @example Plugin Manifest block containing a complete, copy-pasteable contributes.routes manifest with three route entries:
* @example Plugin Manifest
* {
* "name": "rest_api",
* "contributes": {
* "routes": [
* { "prefix": "/api/v1/discovery", "service": "metadata", "methods": ["getDiscovery"], … },
* { "prefix": "/api/v1/meta", "service": "metadata", … },
* { "prefix": "/api/v1/data", "service": "data", … }
* ]
* }
* }
This is arguably the highest-risk of all the contributes.routes sites for the AI-authoring axis: it is not a one-line recommendation but a complete artifact an author (human or AI) can lift wholesale, and every route in it serves nothing.
2. packages/spec/src/kernel/metadata-plugin.zod.ts:119 and :125 — router delivered-form comments
Both credit contributes.routes as a delivered form, mirroring the ADR-0088 row that PR #11327 just corrected:
:119 — // code contributions: plugin \contributes.routes` + declarative `apis:``:125 — // as a KIND because its delivered forms (\contributes.routes`, imperative`
Leaving these is the ADR-0088 row's defect one layer down: the ADR now says one thing and the schema comment it was derived from says the old thing.
Suggested handling
Correct both to the imperative http.server mount, the same redirect PR #11327 applied to the four ruled sites — ideally in the tombstone PR, so the key and everything teaching it go together. Verified live on main: http.server is registered at packages/plugins/plugin-hono-server/src/hono-plugin.ts:271 and mounted by real consumers, e.g. examples/app-showcase/src/system/server/recalc-endpoint.ts:52.
Note site 1 sits in packages/spec/src/api/, not in the plugin-manifest zod, so correcting it does not by itself touch the key.
Generated by Claude Code
Blocked-by: #10726
Generated by Claude Code
Filed unassigned by the dev seat that landed the doc-correction half of #10726 (PR #11327). These two sites are outside that PR's dispatched file surface (which was fenced to exactly the four sites the 2026-08-22 ruling enumerated), but they carry the same defect and should land with the
contributes.routestombstone.Why this is not already covered
The ruling says the key "is tombstoned with #10724". #10724's own body explicitly excludes it, verbatim:
So neither #10724 nor the four sites the ruling enumerated reach these two. Worth a PM look on its own: the tombstone half of #10726 currently has no card that owns it.
The two sites (on
main@b9e9227e3)1.
packages/spec/src/api/plugin-rest-api.zod.ts:31-63— a full worked manifest exampleA TSDoc
@example Plugin Manifestblock containing a complete, copy-pasteablecontributes.routesmanifest with three route entries:This is arguably the highest-risk of all the
contributes.routessites for the AI-authoring axis: it is not a one-line recommendation but a complete artifact an author (human or AI) can lift wholesale, and every route in it serves nothing.2.
packages/spec/src/kernel/metadata-plugin.zod.ts:119and:125—routerdelivered-form commentsBoth credit
contributes.routesas a delivered form, mirroring the ADR-0088 row that PR #11327 just corrected::119—// code contributions: plugin \contributes.routes` + declarative `apis:``:125—// as a KIND because its delivered forms (\contributes.routes`, imperative`Leaving these is the ADR-0088 row's defect one layer down: the ADR now says one thing and the schema comment it was derived from says the old thing.
Suggested handling
Correct both to the imperative
http.servermount, the same redirect PR #11327 applied to the four ruled sites — ideally in the tombstone PR, so the key and everything teaching it go together. Verified live onmain:http.serveris registered atpackages/plugins/plugin-hono-server/src/hono-plugin.ts:271and mounted by real consumers, e.g.examples/app-showcase/src/system/server/recalc-endpoint.ts:52.Note site 1 sits in
packages/spec/src/api/, not in the plugin-manifest zod, so correcting it does not by itself touch the key.Generated by Claude Code
Blocked-by: #10726
Generated by Claude Code