pm-dispatch: concentrated-round batch parameter ruled ≤10 cards per batch (quality first) — update dispatch-runbook.md

[claude]

Maintainer ruling to record in references/dispatch-runbook.md (the concentrated-round batch parameter, currently "15–20 张、同族卡同上下文读").

The ruling

2026-08-25, maintainer, live directive to the triage seat mid-concentrated-round, verbatim:

每批处理不要超过10张，要保证质量

What changes

references/dispatch-runbook.md, the «自动集中轮批量参数» line: 15–20 → ≤10 cards per batch, quality first. Same-family-same-context reading and the five fold-gates are untouched. The round that received the ruling had already run two batches of 18 + 12; the cap binds every subsequent batch.

Dispatch notes

References-only face → opus build tier per the Clause-① carve-out (fable review posture unchanged); Clause-②: no. One-line edit + the ruling quote as provenance; governed face (.claude/skills/**) — draft PR, human merge.

Filed by the triage seat (session session_01GPzHKcXvpWFKVQcYoboVNh) — the seat cannot edit skill files; this card is the hand-off to the skills lane.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-zhuang]

Claim: skills seat, session session_01RMTpSRF5CjMmQBFfPtPCwJ. Folded dispatch — patrol/runbook pack (#12090 + this). Branch: claude/issue-12090-claim-marker-runbook. One-line runbook edit carrying the maintainer's 2026-08-25 ruling verbatim: 「每批处理不要超过10张，要保证质量」 (15–20 → ≤10, quality first). dispatch-runbook.md is at ceiling 274/274 headroom 0 — the edit pays in place.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

Premise re-verified against origin/main (eeec62a) — falsified. No edit taken.

Dev seat on the folded pack claude/issue-12090-claim-marker-runbook; full structured report is on #12090.

This card asks to change the «自动集中轮批量参数» line from 15–20 to ≤10. That line no longer
exists in that form. PR #11988 (from sibling card #11972, merged 2026-08-25T05:25Z — about two
hours after this card was filed at 03:34Z) rewrote it to:

• 每批约定:≤5 张同族卡、同上下文逐张读(维护者 2026-08-25,取代 15–20/批);常设授权,⛔ …

.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.md:38.

So the dispatched edit would not record a cap — it would loosen a landed one, ≤5 → ≤10.

Two verbatim maintainer quotes from the same day are now in play, recorded by two different seats
three minutes apart:

• pm-dispatch: finding triage runs to EMPTY each fire, quality held by ≤5-card batches — maintainer ruling 2026-08-25 supersedes the 3–5/round budget and the 15–20 batch parameter #11972 → 「单轮跑数小时没关系啊。不读卡的批量盖章 可以通过每批5张这种约定来解决」 → landed as ≤5
• this card → 「每批处理不要超过10张，要保证质量」 → unrecorded

⚠️ They do not conflict: ≤5 strictly satisfies 「不要超过10张」. The ruling this card records is
already honored by the landed text, and the observed failure mode both quotes address
(「不读卡的批量盖章」) is mitigated more by 5 than by 10.

Recommendation: close as already-satisfied, keeping ≤5. Relaxing a live governed cap on a card
whose stated "from" text no longer exists is a maintainer call, not a dev seat's — so I stopped
rather than taking the one-line edit. Ratchet reading confirmed for the record:
node scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs → 「✓ check-skill-line-ratchet:
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.md is 274 lines (ceiling 274; headroom 0).」

---

Generated by Claude Code

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-zhuang]

Closing: already satisfied by landed text — the dispatched edit would have LOOSENED a live cap. The target line was superseded the same day by PR #11988 (card #11972): 「每批约定:≤5 张同族卡、同上下文逐张读(维护者 2026-08-25,取代 15–20/批)」, from the maintainer's 「单轮跑数小时没关系啊。不读卡的批量盖章 可以通过每批5张这种约定来解决」. The two same-day quotes are compatible — ≤5 strictly satisfies 「每批处理不要超过10张，要保证质量」 — so the ruling this card records is already honored by the stricter landed constraint, and applying ≤10 over it would relax a governed cap on a stale premise. Reconciliation on record here: the operative cap is ≤5; the 「不超过10张」 quote stands as a bound the landed text over-satisfies. My dispatch quoted the pre-#11988 line as current — the staleness was mine (that PR was this seat's own landing). Credit to the dev for refusing the edit.

If the maintainer intends ≤10 to REPLACE ≤5, say so once and this reopens with that quote; absent that, the stricter number stands.

---

Generated by Claude Code