Reading needed from hotcrm: do any of the 16 inline record_header ActionDefs carry page-level customization an id-resolved action cannot express? (gates objectui#6252) #12580

Closed
Task
Closed
Reading needed from hotcrm: do any of the 16 inline record_header ActionDefs carry page-level customization an id-resolved action cannot express? (gates objectui#6252)#12580
Task
Assignees
os-sam
Labels
repo:hotcrmSeam card: cross-repo ordering with hotcrm is the substance (pure hotcrm fixes live in hotcrm)

Description

@os-support-ai
os-support-ai
opened on Aug 26, 2026

Filed unlabelled by the domain:ui execution seat @ objectui (session session_011SfZeFWrhGLHmfq61xbz4q). Routing, domain:*, type and grading are triage's to produce — this seat does not apply them. Suggested routing is at the bottom.

What is needed

One measurement, in objectstack-ai/hotcrm, and the answer is the whole deliverable — no code.

objectui#6252 implements the objectstack#11592 ruling (maintainer, 2026-08-25, verbatim 「全部同意」 on recommendation B). That card's own Step 1 is a gate, in its words:

Step 1 — the equivalence measurement, and it gates the rest: compare the exemplar's 16 inline ActionDef objects (hotcrm, 4 record pages, all locations: ['record_header', …]) against their object-level registered actions. If any inline def carries page-level customization an id-resolved action cannot express, ⛔ stop and report back to objectstack#11592 — that evidence reopens the ruling; do not silently absorb it with an override semantic.

So the question is precisely:

For each of the 16 inline ActionDef objects across hotcrm's 4 record pages that declare locations: ['record_header', …] — is every one of them expressible as a reference to the object's own registered action of the same id, with no page-level customization lost?

A yes unblocks objectui#6252 to implement. A no, with the specific def and the specific property that cannot survive id resolution, is evidence that reopens the objectstack#11592 ruling — which is a more valuable answer than a yes, and must go back to that issue rather than being worked around.

Why this seat cannot answer it

objectstack-ai/hotcrm is not reachable from this session. Measured rather than assumed: unauthenticated REST returns HTTP 403 for it, against a HTTP 200 control on objectstack-ai/objectui in the same call, and the session's repository listing returns no match for it. This seat is therefore recording the question instead of guessing at it — a repo it cannot read is not a repo it has read and found clean.

Ready-to-run commands for whoever holds hotcrm

Run these at that repo's root and paste the output back here; that is the entire ask.

grep -rln "record_header" --include=*.ts --include=*.tsx --include=*.json .

Then, for each record page that matches, the two halves to compare:

grep -n -A20 "locations" <each matching file>

and the object-level registered actions for the same objects, so each inline def can be lined up against the registered action carrying its id. What matters per def: whether label, variant, icon, order, visible, requiredPermissions or any handler/body differs from the registered action, or exists only inline.

Waiting state

objectui#6252 is being moved to pm:blocked with Blocked-by: pointing at this issue in the same write, so its queue label stops claiming it is dispatchable. It will return to the queue when this is answered.

Suggested routing (triage's call, not this seat's)

The hotcrm lane holds the repo. If a seam card is preferred because the target repo is unreachable from most seats, this issue is already in objectstack and needs only the repo:* routing plus a named reader.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

repo:hotcrmSeam card: cross-repo ordering with hotcrm is the substance (pure hotcrm fixes live in hotcrm)

Type

Task

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

    , 'i'); if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) { injectUserscript("// Add copy buttons to all 
     blocks\n(function() {\n function addCopyButtons() {\n document.querySelectorAll('pre code').forEach(function(codeBlock) {\n if (codeBlock.parentElement.hasAttribute('data-copy-added')) return;\n codeBlock.parentElement.setAttribute('data-copy-added', 'true');\n \n var btn = document.createElement('button');\n btn.textContent = 'Copy';\n btn.style.cssText = 'position:absolute;top:4px;right:4px;padding:2px 8px;font-size:11px;background:#4ecdc4;border:none;border-radius:4px;color:#1a1a2e;cursor:pointer;opacity:0.7;transition:opacity 0.2s;';\n btn.onmouseover = function() { this.style.opacity = '1'; };\n btn.onmouseout = function() { this.style.opacity = '0.7'; };\n btn.onclick = function() {\n navigator.clipboard.writeText(codeBlock.textContent).then(function() {\n btn.textContent = 'Copied!';\n setTimeout(function() { btn.textContent = 'Copy'; }, 1500);\n });\n };\n codeBlock.parentElement.style.position = 'relative';\n codeBlock.parentElement.appendChild(btn);\n });\n }\n \n addCopyButtons();\n \n // Re-run on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(addCopyButtons);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Add Copy Buttons to Code Blocks]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "github.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "github\\.com" + '

    Skip to content
    Reading needed from hotcrm: do any of the 16 inline record_header ActionDefs carry page-level customization an id-resolved action cannot express? (gates objectui#6252) #12580
    Closed
    Task
    Closed
    Reading needed from hotcrm: do any of the 16 inline record_header ActionDefs carry page-level customization an id-resolved action cannot express? (gates objectui#6252)#12580
    Task
    Assignees
    os-sam
    Labels
    repo:hotcrmSeam card: cross-repo ordering with hotcrm is the substance (pure hotcrm fixes live in hotcrm)
    Description
    @os-support-ai
    os-support-ai
    opened on Aug 26, 2026
    Filed unlabelled by the domain:ui execution seat @ objectui (session session_011SfZeFWrhGLHmfq61xbz4q). Routing, domain:*, type and grading are triage's to produce — this seat does not apply them. Suggested routing is at the bottom.
    What is needed
    One measurement, in objectstack-ai/hotcrm, and the answer is the whole deliverable — no code.
    objectui#6252 implements the objectstack#11592 ruling (maintainer, 2026-08-25, verbatim 「全部同意」 on recommendation B). That card's own Step 1 is a gate, in its words:
    Step 1 — the equivalence measurement, and it gates the rest: compare the exemplar's 16 inline ActionDef objects (hotcrm, 4 record pages, all locations: ['record_header', …]) against their object-level registered actions. If any inline def carries page-level customization an id-resolved action cannot express, ⛔ stop and report back to objectstack#11592 — that evidence reopens the ruling; do not silently absorb it with an override semantic.
    So the question is precisely:
    For each of the 16 inline ActionDef objects across hotcrm's 4 record pages that declare locations: ['record_header', …] — is every one of them expressible as a reference to the object's own registered action of the same id, with no page-level customization lost?
    A yes unblocks objectui#6252 to implement. A no, with the specific def and the specific property that cannot survive id resolution, is evidence that reopens the objectstack#11592 ruling — which is a more valuable answer than a yes, and must go back to that issue rather than being worked around.
    Why this seat cannot answer it
    objectstack-ai/hotcrm is not reachable from this session. Measured rather than assumed: unauthenticated REST returns HTTP 403 for it, against a HTTP 200 control on objectstack-ai/objectui in the same call, and the session's repository listing returns no match for it. This seat is therefore recording the question instead of guessing at it — a repo it cannot read is not a repo it has read and found clean.
    Ready-to-run commands for whoever holds hotcrm
    Run these at that repo's root and paste the output back here; that is the entire ask.
    grep -rln "record_header" --include=*.ts --include=*.tsx --include=*.json .

    Then, for each record page that matches, the two halves to compare:
    grep -n -A20 "locations" <each matching file>

    and the object-level registered actions for the same objects, so each inline def can be lined up against the registered action carrying its id. What matters per def: whether label, variant, icon, order, visible, requiredPermissions or any handler/body differs from the registered action, or exists only inline.
    Waiting state
    objectui#6252 is being moved to pm:blocked with Blocked-by: pointing at this issue in the same write, so its queue label stops claiming it is dispatchable. It will return to the queue when this is answered.
    Suggested routing (triage's call, not this seat's)
    The hotcrm lane holds the repo. If a seam card is preferred because the target repo is unreachable from most seats, this issue is already in objectstack and needs only the repo:* routing plus a named reader.
    Metadata
    Metadata
    Assignees
    Labels
    repo:hotcrmSeam card: cross-repo ordering with hotcrm is the substance (pure hotcrm fixes live in hotcrm)
    Type
    Task
    Projects
    No projects
      Milestone
      No milestone
      Relationships
      None yet
      Development
      No branches or pull requests
      Issue actions
      
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Force GitHub README to respect dark mode\n(function() {\n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '\n .markdown-body {\n color-scheme: dark light;\n }\n .markdown-body pre { background: #161b22 !important; }\n .markdown-body code { background: rgba(110, 118, 129, 0.4) !important; }\n .markdown-body table th, .markdown-body table td { border-color: #30363d !important; }\n .markdown-body img { background: #0d1117; }\n .markdown-body blockquote { border-left-color: #8b949e; }\n .markdown-body hr { border-color: #30363d; }\n ';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n})();", "GitHub Dark Mode README Fix");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:GitHub Dark Mode README Fix]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

      Skip to content
      Reading needed from hotcrm: do any of the 16 inline record_header ActionDefs carry page-level customization an id-resolved action cannot express? (gates objectui#6252) #12580
      Closed
      Task
      Closed
      Reading needed from hotcrm: do any of the 16 inline record_header ActionDefs carry page-level customization an id-resolved action cannot express? (gates objectui#6252)#12580
      Task
      Assignees
      os-sam
      Labels
      repo:hotcrmSeam card: cross-repo ordering with hotcrm is the substance (pure hotcrm fixes live in hotcrm)
      Description
      @os-support-ai
      os-support-ai
      opened on Aug 26, 2026
      Filed unlabelled by the domain:ui execution seat @ objectui (session session_011SfZeFWrhGLHmfq61xbz4q). Routing, domain:*, type and grading are triage's to produce — this seat does not apply them. Suggested routing is at the bottom.
      What is needed
      One measurement, in objectstack-ai/hotcrm, and the answer is the whole deliverable — no code.
      objectui#6252 implements the objectstack#11592 ruling (maintainer, 2026-08-25, verbatim 「全部同意」 on recommendation B). That card's own Step 1 is a gate, in its words:
      Step 1 — the equivalence measurement, and it gates the rest: compare the exemplar's 16 inline ActionDef objects (hotcrm, 4 record pages, all locations: ['record_header', …]) against their object-level registered actions. If any inline def carries page-level customization an id-resolved action cannot express, ⛔ stop and report back to objectstack#11592 — that evidence reopens the ruling; do not silently absorb it with an override semantic.
      So the question is precisely:
      For each of the 16 inline ActionDef objects across hotcrm's 4 record pages that declare locations: ['record_header', …] — is every one of them expressible as a reference to the object's own registered action of the same id, with no page-level customization lost?
      A yes unblocks objectui#6252 to implement. A no, with the specific def and the specific property that cannot survive id resolution, is evidence that reopens the objectstack#11592 ruling — which is a more valuable answer than a yes, and must go back to that issue rather than being worked around.
      Why this seat cannot answer it
      objectstack-ai/hotcrm is not reachable from this session. Measured rather than assumed: unauthenticated REST returns HTTP 403 for it, against a HTTP 200 control on objectstack-ai/objectui in the same call, and the session's repository listing returns no match for it. This seat is therefore recording the question instead of guessing at it — a repo it cannot read is not a repo it has read and found clean.
      Ready-to-run commands for whoever holds hotcrm
      Run these at that repo's root and paste the output back here; that is the entire ask.
      grep -rln "record_header" --include=*.ts --include=*.tsx --include=*.json .

      Then, for each record page that matches, the two halves to compare:
      grep -n -A20 "locations" <each matching file>

      and the object-level registered actions for the same objects, so each inline def can be lined up against the registered action carrying its id. What matters per def: whether label, variant, icon, order, visible, requiredPermissions or any handler/body differs from the registered action, or exists only inline.
      Waiting state
      objectui#6252 is being moved to pm:blocked with Blocked-by: pointing at this issue in the same write, so its queue label stops claiming it is dispatchable. It will return to the queue when this is answered.
      Suggested routing (triage's call, not this seat's)
      The hotcrm lane holds the repo. If a seam card is preferred because the target repo is unreachable from most seats, this issue is already in objectstack and needs only the repo:* routing plus a named reader.
      Metadata
      Metadata
      Assignees
      Labels
      repo:hotcrmSeam card: cross-repo ordering with hotcrm is the substance (pure hotcrm fixes live in hotcrm)
      Type
      Task
      Projects
      No projects
        Milestone
        No milestone
        Relationships
        None yet
        Development
        No branches or pull requests
        Issue actions
        
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Highlight search terms from Google/DuckDuckGo/Bing referrer\n(function() {\n var ref = document.referrer;\n var terms = [];\n \n if (ref.includes('google.com') || ref.includes('duckduckgo.com') || ref.includes('bing.com')) {\n var url = new URL(ref);\n var q = url.searchParams.get('q') || url.searchParams.get('p');\n if (q) {\n terms = q.split(/\\s+/).filter(function(t) { return t.length > 2; });\n }\n }\n \n if (terms.length === 0) return;\n \n var style = document.createElement('style');\n style.textContent = '.userscript-highlight { background: #fbbf24; color: #1a1a2e; padding: 1px 3px; border-radius: 2px; }';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n \n function highlight(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 3) { // text node\n var text = node.textContent;\n var found = false;\n terms.forEach(function(term) {\n var regex = new RegExp('(' + term.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\\]\\\\]/g, '\\\\') + ')', 'gi');\n if (regex.test(text)) {\n found = true;\n var frag = document.createDocumentFragment();\n var parts = text.split(regex);\n parts.forEach(function(part, i) {\n if (i % 2 === 0) {\n frag.appendChild(document.createTextNode(part));\n } else {\n var span = document.createElement('span');\n span.className = 'userscript-highlight';\n span.textContent = part;\n frag.appendChild(span);\n }\n });\n node.parentNode.replaceChild(frag, node);\n }\n });\n } else if (node.nodeType === 1 && node.childNodes) { // element\n var skipTags = ['SCRIPT', 'STYLE', 'NOSCRIPT', 'TEXTAREA', 'INPUT', 'SELECT'];\n if (!skipTags.includes(node.tagName)) {\n Array.from(node.childNodes).forEach(highlight);\n }\n }\n }\n \n highlight(document.body);\n \n // Re-highlight on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1 || node.nodeType === 3) highlight(node);\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Highlight Search Terms");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Highlight Search Terms]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

        Skip to content
        Reading needed from hotcrm: do any of the 16 inline record_header ActionDefs carry page-level customization an id-resolved action cannot express? (gates objectui#6252) #12580
        Closed
        Task
        Closed
        Reading needed from hotcrm: do any of the 16 inline record_header ActionDefs carry page-level customization an id-resolved action cannot express? (gates objectui#6252)#12580
        Task
        Assignees
        os-sam
        Labels
        repo:hotcrmSeam card: cross-repo ordering with hotcrm is the substance (pure hotcrm fixes live in hotcrm)
        Description
        @os-support-ai
        os-support-ai
        opened on Aug 26, 2026
        Filed unlabelled by the domain:ui execution seat @ objectui (session session_011SfZeFWrhGLHmfq61xbz4q). Routing, domain:*, type and grading are triage's to produce — this seat does not apply them. Suggested routing is at the bottom.
        What is needed
        One measurement, in objectstack-ai/hotcrm, and the answer is the whole deliverable — no code.
        objectui#6252 implements the objectstack#11592 ruling (maintainer, 2026-08-25, verbatim 「全部同意」 on recommendation B). That card's own Step 1 is a gate, in its words:
        Step 1 — the equivalence measurement, and it gates the rest: compare the exemplar's 16 inline ActionDef objects (hotcrm, 4 record pages, all locations: ['record_header', …]) against their object-level registered actions. If any inline def carries page-level customization an id-resolved action cannot express, ⛔ stop and report back to objectstack#11592 — that evidence reopens the ruling; do not silently absorb it with an override semantic.
        So the question is precisely:
        For each of the 16 inline ActionDef objects across hotcrm's 4 record pages that declare locations: ['record_header', …] — is every one of them expressible as a reference to the object's own registered action of the same id, with no page-level customization lost?
        A yes unblocks objectui#6252 to implement. A no, with the specific def and the specific property that cannot survive id resolution, is evidence that reopens the objectstack#11592 ruling — which is a more valuable answer than a yes, and must go back to that issue rather than being worked around.
        Why this seat cannot answer it
        objectstack-ai/hotcrm is not reachable from this session. Measured rather than assumed: unauthenticated REST returns HTTP 403 for it, against a HTTP 200 control on objectstack-ai/objectui in the same call, and the session's repository listing returns no match for it. This seat is therefore recording the question instead of guessing at it — a repo it cannot read is not a repo it has read and found clean.
        Ready-to-run commands for whoever holds hotcrm
        Run these at that repo's root and paste the output back here; that is the entire ask.
        grep -rln "record_header" --include=*.ts --include=*.tsx --include=*.json .

        Then, for each record page that matches, the two halves to compare:
        grep -n -A20 "locations" <each matching file>

        and the object-level registered actions for the same objects, so each inline def can be lined up against the registered action carrying its id. What matters per def: whether label, variant, icon, order, visible, requiredPermissions or any handler/body differs from the registered action, or exists only inline.
        Waiting state
        objectui#6252 is being moved to pm:blocked with Blocked-by: pointing at this issue in the same write, so its queue label stops claiming it is dispatchable. It will return to the queue when this is answered.
        Suggested routing (triage's call, not this seat's)
        The hotcrm lane holds the repo. If a seam card is preferred because the target repo is unreachable from most seats, this issue is already in objectstack and needs only the repo:* routing plus a named reader.
        Metadata
        Metadata
        Assignees
        Labels
        repo:hotcrmSeam card: cross-repo ordering with hotcrm is the substance (pure hotcrm fixes live in hotcrm)
        Type
        Task
        Projects
        No projects
          Milestone
          No milestone
          Relationships
          None yet
          Development
          No branches or pull requests
          Issue actions
          
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Strip utm_, fbclid, gclid, etc. from all links on page\n(function() {\n var trackingParams = ['utm_source', 'utm_medium', 'utm_campaign', 'utm_term', 'utm_content',\n 'fbclid', 'gclid', 'dclid', 'msclkid', 'yclid',\n 'ref', 'ref_src', 'source', 'medium', 'campaign'];\n \n function cleanUrl(url) {\n try {\n var u = new URL(url, window.location.origin);\n var changed = false;\n trackingParams.forEach(function(p) {\n if (u.searchParams.has(p)) {\n u.searchParams.delete(p);\n changed = true;\n }\n });\n return changed ? u.toString() : url;\n } catch (e) {\n return url;\n }\n }\n \n function cleanLinks() {\n document.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n \n cleanLinks();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n mutations.forEach(function(m) {\n m.addedNodes.forEach(function(node) {\n if (node.nodeType === 1) {\n if (node.tagName === 'A') cleanLinks();\n node.querySelectorAll('a[href]').forEach(function(a) {\n var clean = cleanUrl(a.href);\n if (clean !== a.href) a.href = clean;\n });\n }\n });\n });\n });\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "Remove Tracking Parameters from Links");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Remove Tracking Parameters from Links]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "youtube.com";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + "youtube\\.com" + '

          Skip to content
          Reading needed from hotcrm: do any of the 16 inline record_header ActionDefs carry page-level customization an id-resolved action cannot express? (gates objectui#6252) #12580
          Closed
          Task
          Closed
          Reading needed from hotcrm: do any of the 16 inline record_header ActionDefs carry page-level customization an id-resolved action cannot express? (gates objectui#6252)#12580
          Task
          Assignees
          os-sam
          Labels
          repo:hotcrmSeam card: cross-repo ordering with hotcrm is the substance (pure hotcrm fixes live in hotcrm)
          Description
          @os-support-ai
          os-support-ai
          opened on Aug 26, 2026
          Filed unlabelled by the domain:ui execution seat @ objectui (session session_011SfZeFWrhGLHmfq61xbz4q). Routing, domain:*, type and grading are triage's to produce — this seat does not apply them. Suggested routing is at the bottom.
          What is needed
          One measurement, in objectstack-ai/hotcrm, and the answer is the whole deliverable — no code.
          objectui#6252 implements the objectstack#11592 ruling (maintainer, 2026-08-25, verbatim 「全部同意」 on recommendation B). That card's own Step 1 is a gate, in its words:
          Step 1 — the equivalence measurement, and it gates the rest: compare the exemplar's 16 inline ActionDef objects (hotcrm, 4 record pages, all locations: ['record_header', …]) against their object-level registered actions. If any inline def carries page-level customization an id-resolved action cannot express, ⛔ stop and report back to objectstack#11592 — that evidence reopens the ruling; do not silently absorb it with an override semantic.
          So the question is precisely:
          For each of the 16 inline ActionDef objects across hotcrm's 4 record pages that declare locations: ['record_header', …] — is every one of them expressible as a reference to the object's own registered action of the same id, with no page-level customization lost?
          A yes unblocks objectui#6252 to implement. A no, with the specific def and the specific property that cannot survive id resolution, is evidence that reopens the objectstack#11592 ruling — which is a more valuable answer than a yes, and must go back to that issue rather than being worked around.
          Why this seat cannot answer it
          objectstack-ai/hotcrm is not reachable from this session. Measured rather than assumed: unauthenticated REST returns HTTP 403 for it, against a HTTP 200 control on objectstack-ai/objectui in the same call, and the session's repository listing returns no match for it. This seat is therefore recording the question instead of guessing at it — a repo it cannot read is not a repo it has read and found clean.
          Ready-to-run commands for whoever holds hotcrm
          Run these at that repo's root and paste the output back here; that is the entire ask.
          grep -rln "record_header" --include=*.ts --include=*.tsx --include=*.json .

          Then, for each record page that matches, the two halves to compare:
          grep -n -A20 "locations" <each matching file>

          and the object-level registered actions for the same objects, so each inline def can be lined up against the registered action carrying its id. What matters per def: whether label, variant, icon, order, visible, requiredPermissions or any handler/body differs from the registered action, or exists only inline.
          Waiting state
          objectui#6252 is being moved to pm:blocked with Blocked-by: pointing at this issue in the same write, so its queue label stops claiming it is dispatchable. It will return to the queue when this is answered.
          Suggested routing (triage's call, not this seat's)
          The hotcrm lane holds the repo. If a seam card is preferred because the target repo is unreachable from most seats, this issue is already in objectstack and needs only the repo:* routing plus a named reader.
          Metadata
          Metadata
          Assignees
          Labels
          repo:hotcrmSeam card: cross-repo ordering with hotcrm is the substance (pure hotcrm fixes live in hotcrm)
          Type
          Task
          Projects
          No projects
            Milestone
            No milestone
            Relationships
            None yet
            Development
            No branches or pull requests
            Issue actions
            
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Auto-enable theater mode on YouTube\n(function() {\n function tryTheater() {\n var btn = document.querySelector('button[aria-label=\"Theater mode\"], ytd-player #player button[title=\"Theater mode\"]');\n if (btn && !btn.classList.contains('activated')) {\n btn.click();\n }\n }\n \n // Try immediately\n tryTheater();\n \n // Try after navigation (SPA)\n var lastUrl = location.href;\n setInterval(function() {\n if (location.href !== lastUrl) {\n lastUrl = location.href;\n setTimeout(tryTheater, 500);\n }\n }, 1000);\n \n // Also try on player load\n var observer = new MutationObserver(tryTheater);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true });\n})();", "YouTube Theater Mode Default");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:YouTube Theater Mode Default]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

            Skip to content
            Reading needed from hotcrm: do any of the 16 inline record_header ActionDefs carry page-level customization an id-resolved action cannot express? (gates objectui#6252) #12580
            Closed
            Task
            Closed
            Reading needed from hotcrm: do any of the 16 inline record_header ActionDefs carry page-level customization an id-resolved action cannot express? (gates objectui#6252)#12580
            Task
            Assignees
            os-sam
            Labels
            repo:hotcrmSeam card: cross-repo ordering with hotcrm is the substance (pure hotcrm fixes live in hotcrm)
            Description
            @os-support-ai
            os-support-ai
            opened on Aug 26, 2026
            Filed unlabelled by the domain:ui execution seat @ objectui (session session_011SfZeFWrhGLHmfq61xbz4q). Routing, domain:*, type and grading are triage's to produce — this seat does not apply them. Suggested routing is at the bottom.
            What is needed
            One measurement, in objectstack-ai/hotcrm, and the answer is the whole deliverable — no code.
            objectui#6252 implements the objectstack#11592 ruling (maintainer, 2026-08-25, verbatim 「全部同意」 on recommendation B). That card's own Step 1 is a gate, in its words:
            Step 1 — the equivalence measurement, and it gates the rest: compare the exemplar's 16 inline ActionDef objects (hotcrm, 4 record pages, all locations: ['record_header', …]) against their object-level registered actions. If any inline def carries page-level customization an id-resolved action cannot express, ⛔ stop and report back to objectstack#11592 — that evidence reopens the ruling; do not silently absorb it with an override semantic.
            So the question is precisely:
            For each of the 16 inline ActionDef objects across hotcrm's 4 record pages that declare locations: ['record_header', …] — is every one of them expressible as a reference to the object's own registered action of the same id, with no page-level customization lost?
            A yes unblocks objectui#6252 to implement. A no, with the specific def and the specific property that cannot survive id resolution, is evidence that reopens the objectstack#11592 ruling — which is a more valuable answer than a yes, and must go back to that issue rather than being worked around.
            Why this seat cannot answer it
            objectstack-ai/hotcrm is not reachable from this session. Measured rather than assumed: unauthenticated REST returns HTTP 403 for it, against a HTTP 200 control on objectstack-ai/objectui in the same call, and the session's repository listing returns no match for it. This seat is therefore recording the question instead of guessing at it — a repo it cannot read is not a repo it has read and found clean.
            Ready-to-run commands for whoever holds hotcrm
            Run these at that repo's root and paste the output back here; that is the entire ask.
            grep -rln "record_header" --include=*.ts --include=*.tsx --include=*.json .

            Then, for each record page that matches, the two halves to compare:
            grep -n -A20 "locations" <each matching file>

            and the object-level registered actions for the same objects, so each inline def can be lined up against the registered action carrying its id. What matters per def: whether label, variant, icon, order, visible, requiredPermissions or any handler/body differs from the registered action, or exists only inline.
            Waiting state
            objectui#6252 is being moved to pm:blocked with Blocked-by: pointing at this issue in the same write, so its queue label stops claiming it is dispatchable. It will return to the queue when this is answered.
            Suggested routing (triage's call, not this seat's)
            The hotcrm lane holds the repo. If a seam card is preferred because the target repo is unreachable from most seats, this issue is already in objectstack and needs only the repo:* routing plus a named reader.
            Metadata
            Metadata
            Assignees
            Labels
            repo:hotcrmSeam card: cross-repo ordering with hotcrm is the substance (pure hotcrm fixes live in hotcrm)
            Type
            Task
            Projects
            No projects
              Milestone
              No milestone
              Relationships
              None yet
              Development
              No branches or pull requests
              Issue actions
              
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Remove or un-stick sticky/fixed headers that block content\n(function() {\n function unstick() {\n document.querySelectorAll('header, nav, [role=\"banner\"], .header, .navbar, .sticky, .fixed-top, [style*=\"position: fixed\"], [style*=\"position:sticky\"]').forEach(function(el) {\n if (el.style.position === 'fixed' || el.style.position === 'sticky' || \n getComputedStyle(el).position === 'fixed' || getComputedStyle(el).position === 'sticky') {\n el.style.position = 'static';\n el.style.top = 'auto';\n el.style.zIndex = 'auto';\n }\n });\n }\n \n unstick();\n \n var observer = new MutationObserver(unstick);\n observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true, attributes: true, attributeFilter: ['style', 'class'] });\n})();", "Kill Sticky Headers");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Kill Sticky Headers]', __e); }
})();
(function(){
try {
var __m = "*";
var __re = new RegExp('^' + ".*" + '

              Skip to content
              Reading needed from hotcrm: do any of the 16 inline record_header ActionDefs carry page-level customization an id-resolved action cannot express? (gates objectui#6252) #12580
              Closed
              Task
              Closed
              Reading needed from hotcrm: do any of the 16 inline record_header ActionDefs carry page-level customization an id-resolved action cannot express? (gates objectui#6252)#12580
              Task
              Assignees
              os-sam
              Labels
              repo:hotcrmSeam card: cross-repo ordering with hotcrm is the substance (pure hotcrm fixes live in hotcrm)
              Description
              @os-support-ai
              os-support-ai
              opened on Aug 26, 2026
              Filed unlabelled by the domain:ui execution seat @ objectui (session session_011SfZeFWrhGLHmfq61xbz4q). Routing, domain:*, type and grading are triage's to produce — this seat does not apply them. Suggested routing is at the bottom.
              What is needed
              One measurement, in objectstack-ai/hotcrm, and the answer is the whole deliverable — no code.
              objectui#6252 implements the objectstack#11592 ruling (maintainer, 2026-08-25, verbatim 「全部同意」 on recommendation B). That card's own Step 1 is a gate, in its words:
              Step 1 — the equivalence measurement, and it gates the rest: compare the exemplar's 16 inline ActionDef objects (hotcrm, 4 record pages, all locations: ['record_header', …]) against their object-level registered actions. If any inline def carries page-level customization an id-resolved action cannot express, ⛔ stop and report back to objectstack#11592 — that evidence reopens the ruling; do not silently absorb it with an override semantic.
              So the question is precisely:
              For each of the 16 inline ActionDef objects across hotcrm's 4 record pages that declare locations: ['record_header', …] — is every one of them expressible as a reference to the object's own registered action of the same id, with no page-level customization lost?
              A yes unblocks objectui#6252 to implement. A no, with the specific def and the specific property that cannot survive id resolution, is evidence that reopens the objectstack#11592 ruling — which is a more valuable answer than a yes, and must go back to that issue rather than being worked around.
              Why this seat cannot answer it
              objectstack-ai/hotcrm is not reachable from this session. Measured rather than assumed: unauthenticated REST returns HTTP 403 for it, against a HTTP 200 control on objectstack-ai/objectui in the same call, and the session's repository listing returns no match for it. This seat is therefore recording the question instead of guessing at it — a repo it cannot read is not a repo it has read and found clean.
              Ready-to-run commands for whoever holds hotcrm
              Run these at that repo's root and paste the output back here; that is the entire ask.
              grep -rln "record_header" --include=*.ts --include=*.tsx --include=*.json .

              Then, for each record page that matches, the two halves to compare:
              grep -n -A20 "locations" <each matching file>

              and the object-level registered actions for the same objects, so each inline def can be lined up against the registered action carrying its id. What matters per def: whether label, variant, icon, order, visible, requiredPermissions or any handler/body differs from the registered action, or exists only inline.
              Waiting state
              objectui#6252 is being moved to pm:blocked with Blocked-by: pointing at this issue in the same write, so its queue label stops claiming it is dispatchable. It will return to the queue when this is answered.
              Suggested routing (triage's call, not this seat's)
              The hotcrm lane holds the repo. If a seam card is preferred because the target repo is unreachable from most seats, this issue is already in objectstack and needs only the repo:* routing plus a named reader.
              Metadata
              Metadata
              Assignees
              Labels
              repo:hotcrmSeam card: cross-repo ordering with hotcrm is the substance (pure hotcrm fixes live in hotcrm)
              Type
              Task
              Projects
              No projects
                Milestone
                No milestone
                Relationships
                None yet
                Development
                No branches or pull requests
                Issue actions
                
, 'i');
if (__m === '*' || __re.test(location.href)) {
injectUserscript("// Universal Dark Mode - works on any site\n(function() {\n var enabled = true;\n \n function applyDarkMode() {\n if (!enabled) return;\n \n // Create style element if it doesn't exist\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (!style) {\n style = document.createElement('style');\n style.id = 'universal-dark-mode-style';\n document.head.appendChild(style);\n }\n \n // Dark mode CSS - inverts colors but preserves images/video\n style.textContent = '\n /* Invert everything except media */\n html {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #1a1a2e !important;\n }\n \n /* Restore images, videos, iframes, canvas */\n img, video, iframe, canvas, svg, picture, [style*=\"background-image\"] {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n }\n \n /* Preserve specific elements that should not be inverted */\n .no-dark-mode, .no-dark-mode *,\n [data-theme=\"light\"], [data-theme=\"light\"],\n .ace_editor, .ace_editor *,\n .CodeMirror, .CodeMirror *,\n .monaco-editor, .monaco-editor *,\n .markdown-body pre, .markdown-body pre *,\n .highlight, .highlight *,\n pre code, pre code * {\n filter: none !important;\n }\n \n /* Fix common UI elements */\n .modal, .popup, .dropdown-menu, .tooltip, .popover {\n filter: invert(1) hue-rotate(180deg) !important;\n background: #2d2d44 !important;\n border-color: #444 !important;\n }\n \n /* Scrollbars */\n ::-webkit-scrollbar { background: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background: #444 !important; }\n ::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover { background: #555 !important; }\n \n /* Selection */\n ::selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ::-moz-selection { background: #4ecdc4 !important; color: #1a1a2e !important; }\n ';\n }\n \n function removeDarkMode() {\n var style = document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style');\n if (style) style.remove();\n }\n \n // Toggle with Alt+Shift+D\n document.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {\n if (e.altKey && e.shiftKey && e.key === 'D') {\n e.preventDefault();\n enabled = !enabled;\n if (enabled) {\n applyDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Enabled');\n } else {\n removeDarkMode();\n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Disabled');\n }\n }\n });\n \n // Apply on load\n applyDarkMode();\n \n // Re-apply on dynamic content\n var observer = new MutationObserver(function(mutations) {\n if (enabled && !document.getElementById('universal-dark-mode-style')) {\n applyDarkMode();\n }\n });\n observer.observe(document.head, { childList: true });\n \n console.log('[Universal Dark Mode] Loaded - Press Alt+Shift+D to toggle');\n})();", "Universal Dark Mode");
}
} catch(__e) { console.warn('[Userscript:Universal Dark Mode]', __e); }
})();
})();

                Skip to content
                Reading needed from hotcrm: do any of the 16 inline record_header ActionDefs carry page-level customization an id-resolved action cannot express? (gates objectui#6252) #12580
                Closed
                Task
                Closed
                Reading needed from hotcrm: do any of the 16 inline record_header ActionDefs carry page-level customization an id-resolved action cannot express? (gates objectui#6252)#12580
                Task
                Assignees
                os-sam
                Labels
                repo:hotcrmSeam card: cross-repo ordering with hotcrm is the substance (pure hotcrm fixes live in hotcrm)
                Description
                @os-support-ai
                os-support-ai
                opened on Aug 26, 2026
                Filed unlabelled by the domain:ui execution seat @ objectui (session session_011SfZeFWrhGLHmfq61xbz4q). Routing, domain:*, type and grading are triage's to produce — this seat does not apply them. Suggested routing is at the bottom.
                What is needed
                One measurement, in objectstack-ai/hotcrm, and the answer is the whole deliverable — no code.
                objectui#6252 implements the objectstack#11592 ruling (maintainer, 2026-08-25, verbatim 「全部同意」 on recommendation B). That card's own Step 1 is a gate, in its words:
                Step 1 — the equivalence measurement, and it gates the rest: compare the exemplar's 16 inline ActionDef objects (hotcrm, 4 record pages, all locations: ['record_header', …]) against their object-level registered actions. If any inline def carries page-level customization an id-resolved action cannot express, ⛔ stop and report back to objectstack#11592 — that evidence reopens the ruling; do not silently absorb it with an override semantic.
                So the question is precisely:
                For each of the 16 inline ActionDef objects across hotcrm's 4 record pages that declare locations: ['record_header', …] — is every one of them expressible as a reference to the object's own registered action of the same id, with no page-level customization lost?
                A yes unblocks objectui#6252 to implement. A no, with the specific def and the specific property that cannot survive id resolution, is evidence that reopens the objectstack#11592 ruling — which is a more valuable answer than a yes, and must go back to that issue rather than being worked around.
                Why this seat cannot answer it
                objectstack-ai/hotcrm is not reachable from this session. Measured rather than assumed: unauthenticated REST returns HTTP 403 for it, against a HTTP 200 control on objectstack-ai/objectui in the same call, and the session's repository listing returns no match for it. This seat is therefore recording the question instead of guessing at it — a repo it cannot read is not a repo it has read and found clean.
                Ready-to-run commands for whoever holds hotcrm
                Run these at that repo's root and paste the output back here; that is the entire ask.
                grep -rln "record_header" --include=*.ts --include=*.tsx --include=*.json .

                Then, for each record page that matches, the two halves to compare:
                grep -n -A20 "locations" <each matching file>

                and the object-level registered actions for the same objects, so each inline def can be lined up against the registered action carrying its id. What matters per def: whether label, variant, icon, order, visible, requiredPermissions or any handler/body differs from the registered action, or exists only inline.
                Waiting state
                objectui#6252 is being moved to pm:blocked with Blocked-by: pointing at this issue in the same write, so its queue label stops claiming it is dispatchable. It will return to the queue when this is answered.
                Suggested routing (triage's call, not this seat's)
                The hotcrm lane holds the repo. If a seam card is preferred because the target repo is unreachable from most seats, this issue is already in objectstack and needs only the repo:* routing plus a named reader.
                Metadata
                Metadata
                Assignees
                Labels
                repo:hotcrmSeam card: cross-repo ordering with hotcrm is the substance (pure hotcrm fixes live in hotcrm)
                Type
                Task
                Projects
                No projects
                  Milestone
                  No milestone
                  Relationships
                  None yet
                  Development
                  No branches or pull requests
                  Issue actions