Filed unassigned and ungraded by the #12563 dev (services seat) while measuring the quoting convention for that card. ⛔ Not graded, not routed. Observation-class; severity not judged.
What was measured
#12563 folded the automation engine's two copies of the contested-flow phrase onto one renderer and settled its quoting on measurement. While measuring, a fourth site rendering the same kind of fact — which package shipped a body that a runtime row is now shadowing, under the same ADR-0005 overlay precedence — turned up in a different package, with the other spelling.
packages/objectql/src/registry.ts, in the [Registry] Collision warning:
`[Registry] Collision: ${type}/${baseName} is shipped by package ` +
`"${shadowed._packageId}" and a runtime-authored row with the same name has ` +
`just been registered from sys_metadata. The runtime row now shadows the ` +
`package value (ADR-0005 overlay precedence): ...`
Double quotes around the package id.
Why that reads as divergent rather than as a house style
Measured per package, non-test .ts under src, counting interpolations that are quoted identifiers in prose:
| package | single-quoted | double-quoted |
|---|
packages/objectql/src | 170 | 37 |
packages/services/service-automation/src | 203 | 3 |
packages/cli/src | 97 | 73 |
So this is not objectql following a local double-quote convention — objectql is 82% single-quoted, and this line is in the minority of its own package.
The cross-package angle is the reason it is worth recording at all rather than as generic style drift: an operator whose boot hits both warnings reads one story about one event in two spellings. After #12563 the automation side renders package 'crm'; this line renders package "crm" for the same package in the same situation.
Explicitly NOT claimed here
Why the #12563 dev did not just fix it
The bounded in-place exemption did not hold, on two of its conditions:
- Verification surface. Changing shipped log text in
packages/objectql pulls that package's suite in — a new gate/test surface that card had no reason to carry. - File surface and heat.
packages/objectql/src/registry.ts was outside that card's declared file surface, and it is one of the hotter files in the repo. That dev cleared its own lane fence for service-automation and packages/cli/src/utils/format.ts only; it did not clear this file and does not claim it is free.
Re-check
git grep -n "is shipped by package" origin/main -- packages/objectql/src
git grep -n "runtime-authored row" origin/main -- packages
⛔ Reverse-check any zero with a term known present in the same file, and never a substring of the term under test.
Refs
Generated by Claude Code
Filed unassigned and ungraded by the #12563 dev (services seat) while measuring the quoting convention for that card. ⛔ Not graded, not routed. Observation-class; severity not judged.
What was measured
#12563 folded the automation engine's two copies of the contested-flow phrase onto one renderer and settled its quoting on measurement. While measuring, a fourth site rendering the same kind of fact — which package shipped a body that a runtime row is now shadowing, under the same ADR-0005 overlay precedence — turned up in a different package, with the other spelling.
packages/objectql/src/registry.ts, in the[Registry] Collisionwarning:Double quotes around the package id.
Why that reads as divergent rather than as a house style
Measured per package, non-test
.tsundersrc, counting interpolations that are quoted identifiers in prose:packages/objectql/srcpackages/services/service-automation/srcpackages/cli/srcSo this is not objectql following a local double-quote convention — objectql is 82% single-quoted, and this line is in the minority of its own package.
The cross-package angle is the reason it is worth recording at all rather than as generic style drift: an operator whose boot hits both warnings reads one story about one event in two spellings. After #12563 the automation side renders
package 'crm'; this line renderspackage "crm"for the same package in the same situation.Explicitly NOT claimed here
Why the #12563 dev did not just fix it
The bounded in-place exemption did not hold, on two of its conditions:
packages/objectqlpulls that package's suite in — a new gate/test surface that card had no reason to carry.packages/objectql/src/registry.tswas outside that card's declared file surface, and it is one of the hotter files in the repo. That dev cleared its own lane fence forservice-automationandpackages/cli/src/utils/format.tsonly; it did not clear this file and does not claim it is free.Re-check
⛔ Reverse-check any zero with a term known present in the same file, and never a substring of the term under test.
Refs
Generated by Claude Code